Slammin' Sam Cane shows just how good the Kiwis' super sevens are

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Erik Howard winced as he felt the familiar spasms in his lower back on the physio’s table. The worse they were, the better he had played. It was a ready-made barometer of performance, although he knew the pain would not leave him in his life after football.

Back in the late 1980s and early ’90s, Howard was the starting nose tackle on two Super Bowl-winning teams at the NFL’s New York Giants. At 6’4″ and tipping the scales at 122 kgs, the position was a natural fit.

Howard was one of the unsung heroes who created holes for the likes of All-Pro linebacker Lawrence Taylor to surf through and steal the glory with a highlight-reel tackle or quarterback sack behind the line of scrimmage.

He turned up for every day of hard, physical labour without complaint. He was ready to get down and dirty on every single play. Howard was blue collar to the bone:

“For me, the whole game is right in front of me. The Nose Triangle we call it. I see both guards and the centre and nothing else. That’s where I sit, six inches from leather and bad breath…

“Sometimes I try to get a good blow and start breathing really hard and puke on the centre’s hand as he goes to snap the ball. I did that in college once. That really discouraged the guy.”

Sam Cane would probably sympathise with Howard, because he shares the same attitude to the game he loves. He shows up every day, he does his work, he eats the pain while creating opportunities for others to shine.

He has also suffered a serious spinal injury because of the way he plays. Where Howard experiences lumbar symptoms to this day because of the repeated batterings he took in the middle of the line, Cane’s problems were higher up – he broke his neck on October 2018 in the All Blacks’ 32-20 win over the Springboks in Pretoria.

After a heavy collision with South African loose forward Francois Louw, he was left lying prone on the ground, motionless. He had sustained a small fracture in the vertebrae on the lower right side of his neck. By a stroke of sheer good fortune, he could still feel his fingers and toes, and had avoided serious nerve damage.

Only seven months later, Cane was back on the field playing for the Chiefs after what he laughingly called his “wee sabbatical”. Beneath the surface, he knew how close he had come to the fate of Blues halfback David Gibson, who underwent the same surgery and was never able to play again.

At the same time, during his enforced absence he was forced to watch his principal rival for the New Zealand openside jersey, the outrageously talented Ardie Savea, become the outstanding number 7 in Super Rugby 2019:

“Three or four years ago I probably would have looked at it like ‘oh man, that sucks’. But Ardie’s been impressive to watch, and for me now it’s what a challenge to come back, and I will have to lift and play better than I ever have done before.”

Ardie Savea. (Dianne Manson/Getty Images)

There is a good chance that Cane may not have to worry. Since he has returned to the Chiefs’ starting line-up, it has been alongside the side’s other primary openside flanker, Lachlan Boshier, rather than in replacement of him.

The Chiefs have gone from strength to strength since Cane came back, against the Reds in Round 15, to form a potent back-row partnership with Boshier and number 8 Peter Sowakula. They have won three straight games to gallop into the playoffs, including a barnstorming comeback to beat a full-strength Crusaders in Suva, and a 59-8 thrashing of the hapless Rebels in Melbourne in the final game of the regular season.

They have only conceded an average of 16 points per game in that run as the defence has hardened, and the back-row combination raises the tantalising prospect of Cane forming a similar alliance with Savea at the World Cup.

It is Cane’s blue-collar attitude, and his willingness to work significantly in the background rather than the foreground, which would make such a combination tick over.

Cane is a throwback to the old idea of ‘the fetcher’. Nowhere does this attitude show up more than in his defensive work, both in the tackle and at the ruck after someone else has made the initial hit.

According to my stats, Cane makes more offensive tackles (just over 50%) than any other number 7 in international rugby – tackles that not only stop the ball-carrier in their tracks, but make them think twice about taking the ball up again.

Here are a couple of big stops at first phase set-piece from the games against the Rebels and Crusaders. The first is on Rebels centre Billy Meakes from a lineout:

The second stop is on Crusaders number 12 Ryan Crotty from a scrum:

In both cases, the offensive pattern has been stopped at the source and will need a major rebuild over several phases in order to regain momentum.

Defensive teams are able to feed off Cane’s offensive tackles to turn the ball over. In the following example, Crusaders rookie openside flanker Billy Harmon is cut in half by a Cane exocet, and Boshier is on hand to win the turnover at a tackle situation which has been delivered on the Chiefs’ terms. It is a great example of two 7s working together in tandem!

Events like these are imprinted on a player’s memory. Harmon dropped the ball in front of Cane the next time he was confronted by his opposite number. He knew what was waiting.

The little details at the start of a play can have major repercussions further down the line. Cane made two super stops at the first phase against Melbourne, which had an exponential ripple effect on the two following phases.

In the 12th minute, he put big number 8 Isi Naisarani on the deck from lineout:

Cane finishes quite literally on top of Naisarani in the collision, and that causes a big problem with the placement of the ball. The Chiefs use the precious time bought to fill up on the defensive line:

There are no fewer than nine defenders massed to the openside on the second phase when Will Genia goes to pick the ball. The final outcome can be viewed on the highlight reel – Quade Cooper ends up taking an option where the risk factor outweighs the reward:

Cooper kicks into a densely populated backfield, and ex-Rebel Jack Debreczeni launches a counter down the middle of the field. The move, which was created by the Cane hit on Naisarani, is appropriately finished by the same player.

The play was essentially duplicated in the 21st minute:

This time it is another of the Rebels’ big runners (Reece Hodge) who is stopped in his tracks by Cane. The first cleanout player (Naisarani) notably has to take one step back after the collision, rather than propelling forward through the tackle site.

The result is an organised defence on the next phase:

The Rebels are looking for Quade to get a second touch off Tom English (a play they had already run on one previous occasion) but the Chiefs have all of the bases covered.

The final outcome can be viewed at 1:13 on the highlight reel, with Scott Stevenson blocking Cooper’s kick to the corner and picking the ball up to run away and score. But the try would not have been possible without Cane’s initial stop on Hodge.

Another classic tell of the top-class 7 is the number of double involvements in the same sequence of play:

Cane is worked off the ball by the Crusaders’ cleanout but comes back for a successful second shot via a counter-ruck on Richie Mo’unga.

Even this effort however, was overshadowed by a spectacular game-winning double jackal – on two consecutive phases, with the match still in the balance near the Chiefs’ goal-line:

There is a definite suggestion that Cane has adapted his on-ball technique since his injury. Instead of hanging on grimly and absorbing the punishment on his neck and shoulders as David Pocock has done so often in the past, Cane looks to scoop the ball out in shorter time, before the cleanout vultures descend.

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Summary
The high-class blue-collar operators in collision sports, like Erik Howard and Sam Cane, often pass unheralded – but the coaches know their worth.

They are selfless in their attitude. Howard occupied two or even three blockers at a time and opened up lanes for his linebackers to pour through to the runner or the quarterback. Cane makes offensive tackles which either create turnovers directly, or indirectly over the next couple of phases.

What he does leads to tries, but he is happy staying out of the limelight.

Both Cane and Howard paid for their approach with serious injuries, but they are the players no team can afford to do without – at least not if they hope to succeed consistently.

The long-term injuries to Cane and David Pocock have rightly raised the welfare issue of the jackalling-cleanout equation in the professional game. Maybe we will see more pilferers adopting the Cane ‘scoop’ in future times to lessen the time spent in hard contact.

The injuries to those two stars have also had the effect of highlighting the need for more than one player with a number 7 skill-set on the field to share the load at the defensive breakdown.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

For Pocock, it is Michael Hooper in the Wallabies. For Sam Cane, it is Lachlan Boshier since his return from injury with the Chiefs. It could easily be Ardie Savea with the All Blacks at the World Cup in Japan.

You cannot have enough people willing to sit next to “the smell of leather and bad breath” on a rugby field, even in the sanitised era we inhabit today.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-22T12:15:17+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


I agree both are excellent rugby players. We clearly disagree on their relative importance and merits within the current set up. But I think that is OK NB.

2019-06-22T11:54:16+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Semi in Argentina rather than Canberra unfortunately! But still, I am extremely proud of the team and am ecstatic with the season as a whole. Has been a nice season as a Brumbies fan. Laurie Fisher has done a great job with the defence and breakdown work, and Rory Arnold had a match like a flyhalf while also being a one man mail wrecking ball.

AUTHOR

2019-06-22T10:52:44+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I haven't read a lot of his work so cannot comment Fionn, but I certainly don't like the look of back-line he has picked in the article!

AUTHOR

2019-06-22T10:51:48+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The "cyclopia" or "myopia" was strictly given in relation to "omnipotence" CB - don't make too much of it! What I am pointing out is that B/R selection is relative to the strength of personnel available in each position. If you had say, up-to-date versions of Tim Gavin and Toutai Kefu at 8, and Willie O or Rocky Elsom available at 6, I doubt the Pooper would even come into consideration. But you don't players of that quality right now in those positions, so it does. But the straight choice between Hooper and Pocock at 7 is far closer than you seem to think anyway. Any country in the world would be glad to have it, because both are top drawer players :)

2019-06-22T09:06:02+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


I wonder about the integrity of the panel Fionn. For all the posturing, “give Michael what he wants” still seems to be the ultimate message. Guess we’ll see.

2019-06-22T08:57:13+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Yeah it certainly isn’t a fantasy if Pocock comes back strongly. Hooper could easily find himself on the bench if the other selectors have their way I think.

2019-06-22T08:49:59+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


I generally agree regarding Cully, Fionn. But the point was really that the Wallabies dual openside backrow alignment is absolutely in question at all levels. And O’Connor is the bigger indicator than Cully in this example. A Hooper-less Wallabies starting side can’t reasonably be called a “fantasy” if it has been confirmed as a key discussion point at test selection level.

2019-06-22T07:43:44+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


I find Cully's analysis, generally, to be of highly questionable quality.

2019-06-22T07:41:21+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


I'd be interested in seeing it, Nick, although defensive line outs are better at the international level.

2019-06-22T07:39:56+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


I provide the link only to illustrate that the point that in fact there is significant, demonstrable, widespread doubt that the Wallabies twin openside policy works, and that this policy is in fact, absolutely in question – not just by me or a plethora of other fans and sports media commentators, but right up to Wallabies selector level. Your assertion to the opposite is simply incorrect. You are free to call any and all of us myopic for disagreeing with your personal opinion as you choose. Though, I’m unsure why spirited discussion should necessarily degenerate to name calling. I respect your views and the efforts you make to justify them. I just disagree with this view. I rate Michael Hooper as a rugby player. I just don’t rate him within the categories in which the Wallabies are being outplayed within the forward pack. You are free to continue providing international backrow alignment examples with different player combinations from different player talent pools if you wish. And I may not necessarily disagree with those alignments based upon each’s unique strengths, weaknesses and player requirements. But again, these bear scant relation to Australia’s incumbent pain points over several failed seasons. Where we really diverge is that you clearly feel the Wallabies should accomodate a “point of difference” player at all costs. I simply think the cost is too high. I’m far from alone.

AUTHOR

2019-06-22T06:51:29+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think you’d you need Rory Arnold there Fionn, because he’s a lineout banker with his reach/height. When you look at it, the arrangement you suggest is not so different from the Brumbies own version on their winning run to the playoffs – Arnold, Carter, Valetini/McCaffrey, Samu and Cusack – so worth a try! If you want to go down the orthodox route, then Luke Jones or McCaffrey at 6, Naisarani at 8 and one of Pocock or Hooper at 7 – though I have my doubts about that selection ????

AUTHOR

2019-06-22T06:45:57+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks for the link! As to the substance of Paul Cully's article, I don't think it shows much awareness of changes in the game. There has been considerable interchange between 10, 12 and 15 for many years now, and back row is a place where experimentation has occurred more than anywhere. When Stuart Lancaster took over the England job back in 2012, we found there were no genuine open-sides playing Premiership rugby. We had two excellent 6's in Tom Wood and Chris Robshaw, and two good ball-carrying 8's in Ben Morgan and Billy Vunipola. So extra mobility and breakdown work was found in the second row, with players like Courtney Lawes, Joe Launchbury and Geoff Parling - all of whom had played in the B/R in their careers. It looked odd but it worked in practice. So you pick according to the material at your disposal (just as WG did with Wales' profusion of terrific 7's in the 6N), and right now for WBs that is two outstanding open-side flankers, both well ahead of any other B/R currently playing their trade in Australia. My feeling is that your dislike of Michael Hooper is at the root of this argument. You always mask it with praise for him as an athlete, but that cannot disguise your poor rating of MH as a 'pure 7'. Maybe Michael O'Connor shares that belief, I don't know, and that accounts for his statement? But all of my experience leads me to rate MH far more highly than you do. The inability to find a way to accommodate such a point-of-difference player in a starting line-up is exactly that IMO - monoptic vision, whatever the source :D

2019-06-21T22:43:37+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Nick, it sounds like Pocock will be back for the rugby championship. Would Pooper + McCaffrey offer enough in the line out it our locks are 4. Arnold, 5. Rodda or Simmons?

2019-06-21T22:03:01+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


Nick, my platform is that the incumbent dual openside alignment within this Wallabies team is an unnecessary and fatal compromise. I haven’t ever said I disagree with a multiple openside alignment philosophically or for other personnel/teams. My references are always specific to the topic of Wallabies forward selections. If you hadn’t elicited this previously, we can at least have that clarity moving forward. I absolutely acknowledge that Michael Cheika’s glued on selection brings certain benefits (Hooper is an incredibly talented player as I’m sure you have seen me frequently comment). But simply, the composite skill set of the Wallabies forward pack is indelibly compromised when the Wallabies best openside flanker, and player, is shifted to 8 at the expense of another backrow player, to accommodate Hooper’s carte blanche inclusion. Neither Hooper or Pocock possesses the capabilities required to fulfil these fundamental forward-centric team requirements and what benefits are gained by the Wallabies dual openside selection are clearly overhauled by the well noted, exhaustively discussed and widely acknowledged losses. The traditional versus unorthodox narrative is a distraction. My argument is simply one of balance. If holding this opinion is cyclopic, then there must be a monoptic epidemic sweeping the country, that has afflicted a huge amount of fans, commentators and at least one of the Australian selectors https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/michael-o-connor-s-crazy-wallabies-idea-just-might-work-20190222-p50zkw.html Watch Australian optometry fees halve.

AUTHOR

2019-06-21T15:11:08+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


You said that two open-sides doesn't work - you didn't specify particular countries. (And to the best of my knowledge, I've never heard you acknowledge any of the successes achieved by that set-up)! As far as Australia goes, it's a compromise any way you slice it - and picking people who satisfy the orthodox criteria at 6, 7 and 8 exemplifies it just as well as any awkwardness caused by the selection of two outstanding open-sides in the same B/R... The fantasy is one born of Cyclopia, rather than Omnipotence! But look, the reality is you are likely to get your wish. I don't think Pocock will play in the warm-ups, so you probably will get a more traditional arrangement at 6, 7 and 8 - just with Hooper at 7 :)

2019-06-21T14:13:48+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


I didn’t say Wales’ selections policy is flawed. I said Australia’s is. There’s no philosophical archetype that needs to be satisfied. It’s not a matter of traditional versus modern. There’s no blanket statement seeking to encompass every forward alignment, in every country, across every era with whatever personnel ever assembled. I have no issue with balance in whatever form it takes. Simply, accommodating two opensides within this Wallabies side, within the broader context of the key requirements of this team, with the personnel at Australia’s disposal, fatally compromises key capabilities of this rugby side. If it’s a fantasy, it’s a widely discussed one on these pages, mainstream media and the Australia selection panel amongst others. Omnipotent though I may appear, I didn’t start this conversation.

AUTHOR

2019-06-21T13:41:48+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


You’d better tell Warren Gatland that the twin open-side policy doesn’t work! Most of Wales’ long winning run (including a Grand Slam) has featured a B/R with two, and sometimes three open-sides. But hey, whatever silly fantasy floats your boat!

AUTHOR

2019-06-21T13:36:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The constant attempt to label selections as orthodox or otherwise is unhelpful. What is really unhelpful is the inability to look beyond a rigid typecasting of the skills necessary for 6, 7 and 8 - to the point where average SR players are elevated to Test match readiness, and Michael Hooper is relegated behind them because he doesn't fit the type. “The twin open-side policy undoubtedly works”. No. No it doesn’t. At this point we'll go our separate ways, since you refuse to acknowledge any evidence which contradicts you own point of view. Try telling this tomfoolery to Warren Gatland, who has used two, and sometimes three open-sides on Wales' long winning run. It's Dark Age thinking, no more, no less.

2019-06-21T12:12:04+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


Nick, as you know, I didn’t say Isi was a complete player. Simply, that he possesses a tapestry of skills more in keeping with what this Wallabies backrow has required for several failed seasons. The constant attempt to label selections as orthodox or otherwise is unhelpful. And completely beside the point. The question is simply about attempting to find a better balance of skills from the available stocks than has been woefully deployed by this appalling test coach. “The twin open-side policy undoubtedly works”. No. No it doesn’t. And there is significant doubt from a wide range of commentators from high to no profile, including importantly, the Wallabies selectors. Pocock may be out. But if he isn’t – and he’s fit – as Australia’s best player, it’ll be interesting to see who misses out.

AUTHOR

2019-06-21T11:24:34+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks Fin - I've bookmarked the final against France tomorrow!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar