Aussie tennis is A-OK

By Stephen Shortis / Roar Guru

Many Australians will be disappointed with the lack of any silverware achieved by the many Australians competing in the 2020 Australian Open, but a drill-down on the results suggests the nation should be proud of the results achieved by our representatives and the manner in which they performed.

Missing our highest ranked male singles performer Alex de Minaur, we were left with five direct entries into the men’s singles draw with our main hope considered to be Nick Kyrgios, seeded 23 and ranked second in Australia’s men’s singles rankings.

Kyrgios played a good, consistent and disciplined tournament, accounting for former Australian Open and Wimbledon quarter-finalist Gilles Simon in the third round before succumbing to number one seed, Spaniard Rafael Nadal in the fourth round.

Kyrgios – also a former quarter-finalist in Australia and at Wimbledon – managed to win one set and force Nadal to tie-breakers in the final two sets, and more importantly, played with a determination that has sometimes been lacking in his previous endeavours.

(Photo by Daniel Pockett/Getty Images)

Another player whose AO form is cause for celebration is number three on the Aussie list, John Millman. Millman beat a slightly higher ranked player in Round 1 before accounting for the 31st seed, young Polish player Hubert Hurkacz in straight sets in Round 2.

This resulted in a third-round encounter with the great Roger Federer, the third seed for the tournament and possibly the best player of all time. Although not at his best, Federer presents a formidable opponent, and Millman held the upper hand in their match and should have run out the winner except for the unbelievable run of six points that Federer produced to win the fifth set tie-break.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Part of Federer’s success these days is the aura that he presents to opponents who appear to have the upper hand against him. Despite any previous successes against him, the thought of beating the great man still causes opponents to play cautiously when in a winning position and this was the failing of both Millman and Federer’s quarter-finalist opponent, American Tennys Sandgren.

Although Millman has made the third round at both the Australian Open and Wimbledon before, his result in 2020 was his best ever.

Number four Aussie Jordan Thompson had an impressive first-round win against an opponent ranked ten places higher before falling to tournament 12th seed in a tough five-setter, losing the last tie-break set to Fabio Fognini, who boasts four fourth-round grand slam performances plus one French quarter-final.

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Twenty-year-old Alexei Popyrin – considered by some fans to be among our best chances – appeared to have the measure of Frenchman Jo-Wilfried Tsonga before the former AO semi-finalist retired, down two sets to one in the first round. In Round 2, Popyrin accounted for a slightly higher ranked opponent before bowing out in straight sets to the player considered the fourth best in the world at that time, Daniil Medvedev.

Given his age and his performances so far, his future inside the top 100 appears assured and his progress will be watched with interest.

John Duckworth was the only other Aussie who qualified for main draw entry. His opponent – nearly 40 places higher ranked than Duckworth – was too strong on the day, but he still had opportunities to win during his tough five-setter.

A number of other Aussies were granted wildcards into the men’s singles event with mixed success, and Max Purcell came up through the qualifiers, which I will cover in future articles.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-02-04T11:06:45+00:00

Stephen Shortis

Roar Guru


I agree. Tennis is such a game of centimetres and luck that you cannot expect number 1 to play like number one all the time. We have been spoiled by an amazing period of men's tennis dominated by three players, but even these three have had to share the spoils, sometimes even with other players. It is a big ask for a player to maintain top form and fitness even for weeks when every match gets harder.

2020-02-04T03:58:21+00:00

Winston

Guest


I'm not sure if I understand. World number 1 of course is supposed to be the best player in the world at the time. You could say it means consistency, of course it does, but that's part of the equation. What's the point of being number 1 if number 1 doesn't mean... number 1?

2020-02-04T03:05:41+00:00

Rob

Guest


Bit harsh on Barty. Whilst she is ranked number 1 in the world I'm not sure many would argue that she is clearly the best in the world. Women's tennis has been very unpredictable for quite a while now and for her to reach the semi final is still a great achievement.

2020-02-03T00:07:08+00:00

Winston

Guest


If the measuring stick is how well did the Aussie perform based on their ranking, then yes you're right. However, Australia is a proud tennis nation, so anything less than taking the cup is going to be a disappointment. This is especially the case with Barty. If you're world number 1, it means you're supposed to be the best player in the world, meaning you're supposed to beat EVERYONE. I'm pretty sure nobody will remember 2020 as a successful AO for Australia.

Read more at The Roar