The ‘GOAT debate’ – the title of greatest of all time in tennis – could not have been scripted any better.
As the big three – Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic – now remain on a three way grand slam deadlock of 20 majors, history awaits, but for only one of these men.
Djokovic, as per local media sources, had had his visa re-instated by the Federal Court of Australia, regarding his medical exemption to enter Australia, and play the Australian Open.
For those unaware of just how juicy this grand slam race has become- let’s take into account some interesting coincidences.
1. A once in a lifetime global virus likely extended Roger Federer’s reign account the top of the men’s grand slam count. In January 2020, Novak had won his 17th grand slam title.
Two years and eight majors later, Djokovic had accumulated just three majors in two years, despite winning five majors from June 2018- January 2020
2. The irony of Bill Gates – a champion of vaccines – having a budding friendship with Roger Federer and his charitable work in raising money for Africa, and the fact that the only thing that was standing in the way of Novak Djokovic’s ascension to the top of the all time major grand slam count, was a vaccine.
This irony is just too funny.
3. Disqualification from the 2020 US Open likely delayed Novak’s bid to overtake Federer.
4. A global pandemic limiting the number of weeks at number one Novak could accumulate. Due to the tennis tour remaining frozen from March-July 2020, Novak lost almost four months of time he could have spent holding on the the number one spot, another metric in determining the greatest male tennis player of all time.
5. Resurgence of Roger Federer in 2017-2018: Federer seemed to be out of answers for Novak by the end of 2016. Injured and out of form, Federer had not added to the 17 majors he earned back in July 2012.
At that point, Novak had only five majors to Federer’s 17. However over the next four years, Novak improved that to 12 majors, only five behind Roger Federer.
However, 2017 had other plans, and Novak failed to win another major for almost two years, while Federer added an additional three majors in that time to reach 20 majors.
6. Nadal renaissance in 2017
Nadal was completely out of form in 2015-2016, which was strange given he was world number one at some point in early 2014.
However after a miracle run in Australia, Nadal turned back the clock like it was 2007, and made the final at the Australian Open. He then won the 2017 French Open, his first major win since the 2014 French Open, full three years prior.
Nadal won two majors in 2017, one major in 2018, two majors in 2019, and one major in 2020. This capped off six majors in the space of three years.
7. The hurdles Novak had to overcome to close the gap: Novak Djokovic won the 2020 Australian Open despite calls for it to be cancelled due to dangerous levels of bushfire smoke and affecting visibility.
Thankfully it cleared miraculously. In 2021, due to a delta coronavirus surge in Melbourne, the Australian Open was very nearly cancelled, and was played with no fans for the entire second week.
As well, after quarantining in a hotel room for two weeks, Novak developed a 2.5 mm abdominal tear and managed to win the Australian Open despite such an extreme injury concern.
Lastly, in 2022, despite being banned from playing in the Australian Open due to a vaccine mandate, Novak successfully entered the Australian Open draw despite having to spend a weekend in a refugee facility.
If that isn’t a strong case for craziest major race in history, I truly don’t know what is.
KenW
Roar Rookie
Leaving aside the Novak issue itself, the idea that this is some good show of justice is hugely skewed. It requires ignoring that there are other occupants in that hotel that have been there for a decade - they didn't get a federal court hearing the same day they landed. And when they do eventually get an audience I bet the judge doesn't start off asking if the facilities were up to their standards before proceeding to fawn over their efforts to get here. This was standard 'one rule for the rich' style treatment.
Redcap
Roar Guru
What a strange article.
Ad-O
Guest
Good to know that some people have basic human rights and there's a judge, even in the People's Republic of Australia, willing to uphold them. Now if they could get around to extending those rights to actual Australians we might be getting somewhere...
Brainstrust
Roar Rookie
There were people who volunteered to be the lab rats. Someone else took the hit for you effectively. Given the political angle of a lot of antivaxers, in the nazi german era not only did they test vaccines on prisoners but they also gave them the deadly disease the vaccine was supposed to prevent. To make it even worse they also had an unvaccinated control group who they also infected. In one case the vaccine worked and the control group had all the fatalities.
Nicko
Guest
There are approximately 100,000 people living in Australia of Serbian descent Many of these, including myself, do not support Novak's anti vax stance. Nor do we see him as a demi-god. Nor did we participate in the peaceful demonstrations (up until last night unfortunately). Based on the facts available Judge Kelly's ruling was correct however i can greatly appreciate how difficult this decision is for many Australian's who have either lost jobs and businesses due to Covid restrictions and/or haven't been able to see their loved one's. Personally i couldn't care less about Tennis rather am looking forward to the start of the SA NPL soccer season watching my beloved White City FC Beograd back in the big league and having some mighty fine Chevaps and Rakija.