‘Controlled by the British government’: Abramovich sanctions cloud Chelsea future

By News / Wire

European football champions Chelsea are now effectively controlled by the British government after sanctions were imposed against the club’s Russian owner Roman Abramovich.

Abramovich, who had been under scrutiny following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, had announced he was selling the Premier League club last week.

That process is now on hold, leaving the west London club, ranked by Forbes as the seventh most valuable in world football at $US3.2 billion ($A4.3 billion), in a state of limbo, operating under a special government licence.

“The licence is a safety net to protect the sport, the Premier League, the wider football pyramid down to the grassroots game, loyal fans and other clubs,” the UK government said on Thursday.

“It will deprive Mr Abramovich of benefiting from his ownership of the club and mean he cannot circumvent UK sanctions.” 

The Russian bought the club in 2003 for a reported £140 million ($A250 million) and his investment resulted in the most successful era in their history.

(Photo by Clive Mason/Getty Images)

Abramovich had funded Chelsea via £1.5 billion ($A2.7 billion) in total loans through Fordstam Limited, the entity through which he owns the club.

Yet now there is a huge question mark over the club’s future. Chelsea said they would seek changes to the licence they are now operating under.

“(We) intend to engage in discussions with the UK Government regarding the scope of the licence. This will include seeking permission for the licence to be amended in order to allow the Club to operate as normal as possible,” the club said in a statement.

A number of potential new owners had emerged in the past week, including several American sports executives, but there is now a block on any sale.

A spokesperson for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that block could be lifted in the future if another licence is agreed to.

“We would have to grant a further licence. I think it is fair to say the government is open to the sale of the club, but … currently, it would require another licence and that would require a further conversation with the Treasury (finance ministry),” he told reporters.

“The principle has been to mitigate the impact on fans … these measures are designed to punish those close to (Russian President Vladimir) Putin.”

A source close to Chelsea said on Wednesday that the expectation within the club was that a deal would be done “sooner rather than later”.

(Photo by Francois Nel/Getty Images)

Chelsea, who are third in the Premier League and in the last 16 of the Champions League, will be able to play their games and pay their players while broadcasters will be permitted to show their matches on television.

Only fans who have already purchased tickets or who have season tickets will be allowed to attend matches, the government said, while no new merchandising sales will be permitted.

The club will not be able to enter into transfer deals for new players or receive money for selling existing players – effectively a transfer ban.

But the club will be able to continue paying the wages of all employees, including their playing and coaching staff.
British government Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries said the moves were aimed at “depriving Abramovich of benefiting from his ownership of the club”.

“I know this brings some uncertainty, but the Government will work with the league and clubs to keep football being played while ensuring sanctions hit those intended,” Dorries said in a statement.

“Football clubs are cultural assets and the bedrock of our communities. We’re committed to protecting them.”

The Crowd Says:

2022-03-13T00:06:33+00:00

stu

Guest


My suggestion is that no 'wealth level' exists with sanctions as in impacts the entire economic system. The people allow government power, even dictatorships if their needs are met. It is therefore in the lap of the people to dispose of government when their needs are not met. And yes, dictotarship are over thrown in time.

2022-03-12T23:50:17+00:00

Jack

Guest


100% agree. Punishing a State does hurt the individual anyway so why does the individual need to be punished further in separate sanctions specifically against someone owning a sports team? Where is the wealth level set?

2022-03-12T08:05:24+00:00

stu

Guest


Jack....how can a State Governemt be punished without it causing an effect on the population?

2022-03-12T00:35:59+00:00

Jack

Guest


If being involved in a war that is 100% wrong rules you out of owning a Football club then didnt the USA, UK and allies attack Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction that didnt actually exist? I must have missed all the sanctions imposed because of USAs lies back then and the years of war that followed because of those lies. Russia is way out of line here but the Russian people dont deserve to be punished. The Govt does. Should YOU be blamed for Scomo or Albos decisions? The world is becoming a very strange place.

2022-03-12T00:07:06+00:00

Mark

Guest


Yep. It’s pretty laughable that autocratic regimes that use sport to build their legitimacy are the first to complain that the two shouldn’t mix when others threaten to use sport against them. Similar to Chelsea fans who were happy to ride the bubble of dirty Russian money to the top of Europe, but now the bubble is bursting want to be sheltered from the fall.

2022-03-11T23:37:10+00:00

stu

Guest


I hope any issues relating to football or any sport does not hold higher angst than the bigger geo-political picture we currently face here and now.

2022-03-11T22:54:58+00:00

Tigertown

Guest


Although we don’t want to admit it, sport & politics will always go hand-in-hand together, on all levels of government. Will this decision affect Sydney FC? Watch this space.

2022-03-10T21:38:03+00:00

Buddy

Roar Rookie


The uk government’s response isn’t much different to their covid response and that turned out well! Boris the clown and his circus friends strike again.

Read more at The Roar