What is South Africa's best ever Test XI?

By Two Slips and a Gully / Roar Rookie

Our podcast’s quest to find the best Test Xis for each nation has moved to look at the Proteas of South Africa.

The third oldest Test nation, South Africa’s Test history goes all the way back to 1889 when it hosted English Xis though it wasn’t until 1906 when it formed the International Cricket Conference with Australia and England that it officially became a fully-fledged Test Cricket nation.

Initially South Africa struggled to match the class of Australia and England, however once they achieved Test status in 1906 they responded with not only their first Test victory after 17 years but a resounding 4-1 series victory at home against England.

In stark contrast to what we know of South Africa today, a country known for producing some very fine fast bowlers, players like Allan Donald, Dale Steyn, Makhaya N’tini and a host of others, the early South African side utilized arguably the best spin attack the world has produced.

Their spin attack were the first to truly weaponise the ‘googly’.

Led by Reggie Schwarz, the spin quartet would take South African cricket to new heights a lead to the rise of the first generation of South African allrounders including Aubrey Faulkner, regarded by some as the finest pre 1st World War allrounder.

South African cricket would continue to compete and by the late 1960’s they were challenging to be the best nation in the world. Rounding out the decade with consecutive series victories against Australia, including a 4-0 drubbing in 1969.

It was there however that South Africa’s rise to dominance would be halted and with it the careers of many that seemed destined to sit among the Pantheon of cricket’s legends.

The South African government’s apartheid policies had left their sporting sides in an untenable position with many global sporting bodies banning the nation from participating and the ICC was no different.

South Africa would go from being on the door step to greatness to not being seen again for 22 long years and a generation of their best and brightest lost.

They would return to Test cricket in 1992 and from that point on South Africa has continued to be one of the world’s leading Test nations, reaching the number one ranking a number of times during the late 2000s and early 2010s.

Even with their absence South Africa has enjoyed a vibrant, successful Test career, they have won 174 of their 452 tests with 124 draws.

They have produced a number of amazing cricketers, a long, distinguished line of fast bowlers along with a number of elegant batsman who can score runs with the best of them.

Their history is littered with fantastic all-rounders so if nothing else we can be sure that South Africa can produce prolifically talented players.

Finding the best team from such a rich history was never going to be an easy task, especially with some of the greats of the game having their careers pulled out from under them.

So here is our attempt at finding the best South African Test XI;

Barry Richards (Tests: 4, Average: 72.57, HS: 140)
(First Class: 339, Average: 54.74, HS: 356)
Universally considered to be one of South Africa’s finest talents he was one of the players whose career fell victim to the international ban.

Richards made his debut in the 4-0 drubbing of Australia. While he would play no more Tests he did go on to have a monumental First Class career scoring over 28,000 runs and played in the World Series cricket.

He famously took apart a Western Australian attack featuring Australian Test players Dennis Lillee and Graham McKenzie to the tune of 325 runs in a single day. A ferocious stroke player he scored 9 of his 80 first class hundreds before the players had taken lunch.

Graeme Smith © (Tests: 117, Average: 48.25, HS: 277)
Not only an imperious opening batsman, at 22 years old he was the youngest South African captain and one of the most successful captains of all time leading South Africa to the heights it enjoyed in the late 2000s through to the mid 2010s winning 58 of the 109 games he captained.

A tall, almost mighty cricketer would give everything for his side. Few can forget him coming out to face a rampant Mitchell Johnson with a broken hand to try and save the game for his country. An incredible batting talent in his own right, Smith has been a part of all of South Africa’s 300 run opening partnerships

 

Jacques Kallis (Tests: 166, Average: 55.37, HS: 224)
(Wickets: 292, Average: 32.65)
Right up there in the echelons of Sir Garfield Sobers, Jacques Kallis is one of the finest cricketers to have ever lived. So far, he is the only South African to crack the 10,000 Test runs barrier. He is the only player to do the 10,000 run and 250 wicket double in Tests and ODIs.

Often beleaguered for an apparent inability to take the game away from bowlers, what he lacks in flair he makes up for in droves in grit and determination to protect his wicket and grind bowlers down. He has the 2nd most Test hundreds with 45 and holds the record for most Test Man of the Match awards with 23.

Graeme Pollock (Tests: 23, Average: 60.97, HS: 274)
(First Class: 262, Average: 54.67)
The 2nd of our players with limited Test experience that was selected on ‘what could have been.’ With an impressive first class career and an average of 65 in the 16 ‘rebel’ Tests he played during South Africa’s absence there is enough to suggest that he would have been one of the very best.

A tall, strong man with a heavy bat and a fantastic cover drive Pollock would go on to set records in his very short career. He was the youngest South African centurion and his 274 against the Australian’s in 1969 was South Africa’s highest test score until 1999.

His career average of 60.97 is the third highest out of players that have finished their careers.

South African batsman Graeme Pollock. (Photo by Central Press/Getty Images)

AB DeVilliers (Tests: 114, Average: 50.66, HS: 278*)
One of the most talented, adaptable batsmen that has ever played. DeVilliers seemingly has all aspects of the batting spectrum covered.

Has a 162 of 66 balls in ODI cricket but also has the ability to seamlessly switch gears and can bat for 220 balls for 33 to try and save a game. A technique that allows him to access all parts of the ground and complimented his batting with being one of the finest fielders and even had a successful stint as the wicket keeper.

His faultless 91 out of a total of 206 against Australia with Mitchell Johnson at his destructive best in 2014 will forever be one of the more underrated innings from a batsman.

Quinton de Kock (wk) (Tests: 54, Average: 38.82, HS: 141*)
Probably our most controversial selection, de Kock makes the side due to his ability to bat in the top 6 and allow us to pick two allrounders later on in the order.

Though his selection isn’t completely without merit. Already a very good batsman his keeping is still very good, if he played as many games as Boucher he would comfortably have more dismissals than Boucher. He broke the record for fastest keeper to 150 and 200 dismissals taking just 47 games to reach the 200 mark.

Retiring from Test cricket at the age of 29 he joins a long list of South African cricketers that never fully realised their potential.

(Photo by Christiaan Kotze / AFP via Getty Images)

Mike Proctor (Tests:7, Average: 25.11, HS: 48, Wickets 41, Average 15.02)
(First Class: 401, Average: 36.01, HS: 254, Wickets: 1417, Average 19.53)
Our 3rd cricketer to make the list despite missing his career due to the international ban. All of his 7 matches were against Australia who were considered the best in the world at that point. He has played World Series Cricket and has a staggering First Class career.

His exploits over a 13-year career for Gloucestershire had many jokingly rename the county to ‘Proctershire.’ He had an unusual chest on bowling action that could generate unplayable levels of in swing, his batting was built off of a sound defence and strong strokeplay. His 48 first class hundred and 109 fifties indicate he would have fitted in right away into the test arena.

Shaun Pollock (Tests: 108, Average 32.31, HS: 111, Wickets: 421, Average: 23.11)
Another in what seems to be a factory production line of talented allrounders to come out of South Africa. Borderline South African cricket royalty with his father, Peter and uncle Graeme also being members of the Proteas.

Statistically one of the finest fast bowlers of all time and is one of only six players to score more than 3000 runs and take 300 wickets. When he retired he was South Africa’s leading wicket taker before Dale Steyn took the record in 2018.

South Africa’s Shaun Pollock (Arif Ali/AFP/Getty Images)

Dale Steyn (Tests: 93, Wickets: 439, Average: 22.95)
The finest bowler of his generation and very much in the discussion for making an All Time World XI as one of the quicks. Had all the skills to be an elite fast bowler, could swing the ball, seam the ball, a fantastic bouncer and the ability to always find an extra gear when he needed too.

His brilliance can be shown be the fact he has the most wickets by any foreign pace bowler in the subcontinent with 92 at an average of 24, his best figures of 7/51 were in Nagpur and his strike rate of 37 in India is best for any fast bowler that has taken 20 plus wickets.

He dominated the number 1 bowler rankings spot for much of his career, his reign at the top is almost a year longer than Muralitharan who holds the 2nd longest stint at the top.

Hugh Tayfield (Tests: 37, Wickets:170, Average: 25.91)
Unlike the earlier pioneers of South African spin bowling, Tayfield was an off spinner and one of the finest ever produced taking over 4.5 wickets per game. Debuting in 1949, he was the fastest South African to 100 wickets until 2008 when Dale Steyn broke the mark.

He became the mainstay in the side during the 1952/52 tour of Australia where he was instrumental in their first victory over Australia in 42 years. He was also taking an immense 864 first class wickets at 21.

Allan Donald (Tests: 72, Wickets: 330, Average: 22.25)
Dubbed ‘White Lightning’ Donald played their first test after the ban and went on to become the main strike weapon of the side partnering with Shaun Pollock with the new ball. His career strike rate is 47 and his mastery with the ball gave South Africa some much needed punch in their quest to reach the top after readmittance.

His record stacks up with the very best of all time. Of all the bowlers to have taken more wickets than him only three have done so with a better average, McGrath, Ambrose and Marshall.

12th Man
Hashim Amla (Tests: 124, Average 46.64, HS: 311*)
One of South Africa’s most prolific batsman, just shy of 10,000 test match runs to his name and current holder of the highest individual test score by a South African.

Not an instant success after an underwhelming start he refashioned his technique and returned armed with his signature flick of the pads and sublime drive through the covers and become one of the cornerstones of the highly successful South African side of the late 2000s.

Honourable Mentions
Makhaya Ntini, Dudley Nourse, Aubrey Faulkner, Mark Boucher, Vernon Philander

South Africa is a nation with a long history in cricket and not all of it is good. But one thing for certain is that there is no shortage of talent and now that horrible political policies have been swept away and the entire country is now welcome to represent their country it has opened the door for so many more to become fantastic cricketers and I’m sure if we did this list again in 20 years there would be many incredible players to add to this list.

Rightly or wrongly they carry around the ‘chokers’ label after failing on the biggest stage of the World Cup, but it is a credit to them that they have put themselves into a position where the ultimate success is not only within reach but often expected. It is clear that a selection of South Africa’s best would put any team on notice.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2023-01-25T01:10:22+00:00

Nigel

Guest


Trung and other, you know more about Aussie cricketers than you do about South Africans. Lindsay was better than Gilchrist. Trevor Goddard (unlike Kallis) made the side both as an opening new ball fast bowler and as an opening batsman. We don’t need AB to be wk when we have Dennis Lindsay. You also underestimate Proctors batting ability. He was a genuine all rounder. Look up his first class record. He is certainly a worthy batsman anywhere from 6. Nourse is worthy of inclusion but then you have to leave out Ab de Villiers. There is room for both. In my mind it’s 50/50. They are both equally good. De Kock doesn’t belong in the side and AB is not the wk either. Unfortunately there is no place for Faulkner but he makes the second team. If the team was going to India then certainly include him and drop a fast bowler to reserve - a difficult choice to be made just before the match. Otherwise include Faulkner as the reserve 12 to Australia.

2023-01-25T00:37:34+00:00

Nigel

Guest


Proctor is the first choice bowler. The other fast bowlers should be Pollock, Steyn, Trevor Goddard (all rounder). That’s the 4 best fast bowlers. Donald was unreliable new bowler and couldn’t bat. Amla is a number 3 batsman. If you include Kallis then you have to leave out Amla. He makes the second team along with Donald. De Cock is not included in either first or second team. Lindsay and Waite are South Africa’s best wk. Lindsay was the best ever in the world. He took 24 wickets and scored over 600 runs at an average of 86 in a series against a world beating Australia side. The best Gilchrist has done is 26 wkts and over 300 runs at an average of 68. No other Wk comes anywhere close.

2023-01-25T00:22:45+00:00

Nigel

Guest


Trevor Goddard is a better cricketer than Alan Donald. Goddard was a tall fast bowler who opened South Africa’s bowling. His Test bowling average was 26 and FC was 21 compared to Donald’s 22 and 22. Too often Donald could not be used as the new ball opening bowler.?Goddard’s test average reflects the much stronger teams he played against compared to Donald. Similarly Goddards Test batting average was 34 and FC was 40 compared to Donald’s 10 and 12. Goddard is chosen. It’s no contest. Donald makes the 2nd team which is also a very good side.

2023-01-14T13:49:28+00:00

Nigel

Guest


South Africa’s greatest cricketers listed in two teams: 1 Barry Richards 2 Graeme Smith 3 Jacques Kallis 4 Graeme Pollock 5 AB de Villiers 6 Denis Lindsay wk 7 Trevor Goddard 8 Mike Proctor 9 Shaun Pollock 10 Dale Steyn 11 Hugh Tayfield Second team 1 jimmy Cook 2 Eddie Barlow 3 Hashim Amla 4 Dudley Nourse 5 Lee Irvine 6 Colin Bland 7 Clive Rice 8 Aubrey Faulkner 9 John Waite wk 10 Vince van der Byl 11 Alan Donald

2022-12-24T13:25:04+00:00

Nigel

Guest


Okay, put AB de Villiers at 3 and Kallis at 5. AB has a higher strike rate than Kallis and will be a better number 3. We have to leave out Dudley Nourse. So the batting line up will then be Richards, Smith, de Villiers, G Pollock, Kallis, Lindsay, Rice, Proctor, S Pollock, Steyn, Tayfield with Donald as reserve.

2022-12-24T12:29:25+00:00

Nigel

Guest


Another option would be Eddie Barlow instead of Jacques Kallis. Graeme Smith and Barry Richards are a strong opening partnership. The first wicket to fall will be Smith on 50 with Richards not out on 100 before lunch with score at 150 for 1. Richards was an attacking batsman and so was Graeme Pollock at number 4. The sooner they come together in an attacking partnership the better for South Africa. What we need at 3 is a batsman who can make a quick fire 50 or 100 and who will not slow down the strike rate. I don’t think that Kallis is the right man for this team. Yes he will occupy the crease and the run rate will slow. Better to put Eddie Barlow at 3 who will keep the run rate going until he is out. Then Richards and Pollock come together for a 200 run partnership. Kallis doesn’t fit with the balance of the best ever South African team.

2022-12-18T00:20:18+00:00

Nigel

Guest


The amended team: Barry Richards* Graeme Smith Jacques Kallis Graeme Pollock* Dudley Nourse Denis Lindsay wk* Mike Proctor* Shaun Pollock Dale Steyn Hugh Tayfield Alan Donald (?) * included in best world team Bowling opened by Proctor and Steyn First change Pollock and Donald (?) Note that Lindsays test batting average at number 7 is above 61 and at 6 and 7 his average is over 50. He was also used as opening batsman but without success. As wk there is no one close to Lindsay. As batsman wk he is superior to Gilchrist. Nourse is a better batsman than AB. Lindsay is far better batsman wk than AB.

2022-12-14T23:53:06+00:00

Nigel

Guest


The wicket keeper has to be Dennis Lindsay. Also D Nourse instead of AB de Villiers. Doubtful about Alan Donald. His running between the wickets was woeful and his bowling was often off target. There are better bowlers such as Vince van der Byl and some of the earlier bowlers. Or Clive Rice as an all rounder. Yes I would leave out Donald due to his unreliability. Fast but unreliable- couldn’t be used as opener on too many occasions.

AUTHOR

2022-08-18T12:39:56+00:00

Two Slips and a Gully

Roar Rookie


Goes against Black Lives Matter… that’ll do me. Enough hyper sensationalising already. So to do an accurate Test XI to reflect population balance I needed to pick 9 Afrikaans players and one white South African? I think instead I’m just going to go with who I think we’re the better cricketers.. My article doesn’t endorse apartheid, it fact refers to it as horrible policies. But the point is not supposed to be a scathing review of the inner workings of historic South Africa. This is merely a representation of who are the outstanding cricketers that have represented their country. It’s not political and have no desire for it to be turned into a political lightning rod. If you believe that South African sport history should start in 1992 you are more than welcome to write your own article reflecting your views.

2022-08-16T11:31:24+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


Another issue that people overlook is that there was SJN or social justice hearings into the state of cricket in South Africa. By acknowledging the past players, it basically goes against BLM as all these players benefitted from a previous regime. There is a 90:10 population difference between majority and minority, yet sporting teams like the one you’ve picked don’t reflect the population!

2022-08-08T18:37:36+00:00

Rusty

Roar Guru


:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

2022-07-28T09:05:01+00:00

Mike

Guest


“Trying” was auto-corrected from “Trung”.

2022-07-28T09:03:44+00:00

Mike

Guest


Trying - Your comments on Faulkner are well considered mate. He is a great option as he enables a team (like the Clive Lloyd Windies) to have a fearsome foursome while also keeping a great attacking, Test standard spin option. I think I’m correct in saying Faulkner was one of the first great exponents of the googly. For me the team selected is completely unbalanced with 5 fast bowlers and a spinner. Either Tayfield will get underbowled or a fast bowler will hardly be used - frustration will happen in the ranks. Also, de Kock and Proctor are not a good enough batting 7 & 8 if this team were thinking of taking on an all time Aussie or Windies team. For me, Dudley Nourse has to come in to add batting depth - a true great who carried his team with an impressive 53 average. I’d bat him at 5 and drop AB a spot to no.6 as he’d take the gloves and the freedom to bat in a more “Gilchrist” manner. AB’s batting stats while keeping are very, very solid. I’d bring Faulkner in for either Proctor or Shaun Pollock. Personally, I’d favour Proctor - an incredible talent. So my team: Richards Smith Kallis G.Pollock Nourse ABdV Faulkner Proctor Steyn Tayfield Donald This bats Proctor as genuine, world class 8, rather than a 7. The team has a world class off and leg spinner. It has 4 fast bowlers, with Kallis in his favoured 4th fast bowler role rather than a rarely used 5th fast bowler. The batting is strengthened significantly. I feel this is a team that would match up much better against other all-time teams. No offence to de Kock, but he wouldn’t get close to being in other all-time line ups. He actually wouldn’t make the combined African team ((Flower!).

2022-07-27T12:09:36+00:00

Trung

Guest


I think Aubrey Faulkner has to make it Most other great allrounders are either exceptional in one discipline and help out in other discipline (aka bowling allrounders Hadlee, Batting allrounder Sobers or Kallis). Or they are great allrounders due to synthesis of their batting/bowling skill without being exceptional in one discipline (the likes of Botham, Stokes, Flintoff where they are world class for their complete package rather than their individual batting or bowling) Faulkner seems like the only allrounder in world cricket that fulfills the mythical criteria of being good enough to make the side as a specialist batsman and specialist bowler with an test batting average above 40 and bowling average below 30 (40 with bat/26 with ball). Also his wrist spinning will give balance to the South African attack. The closest too him of being genuine allrounders are Keith Miller and Imran Khan who average 37 which would make a fine specialist batsman in decent test side but probably wouldn't make the team in a dominant test side purely due to their batting

2022-07-23T10:19:29+00:00

ken gargett

Guest


yes, i see your correction.

2022-07-23T10:18:48+00:00

ken gargett

Guest


apologies. if i had read further, i would have seen this.

2022-07-23T10:18:09+00:00

ken gargett

Guest


if you do not include graeme pollock then you are not serious. the guy is in more than legitimate contention for an all time world 11. for me, the first picked in this team.

2022-07-23T03:45:34+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


It shoes that in 25 odd years of democracy, still 2 percent of the population are in 80 percent of the agenda. Nothing has changed. The masses can’t aspire to be cricketers. The same goes for rugby.

AUTHOR

2022-07-22T13:02:17+00:00

Two Slips and a Gully

Roar Rookie


How does it fail to acknowledge modern South Africa? The majority of the players are from post 1992. And of the players picked pre the ICC ban none of them were known for holding any racist views. In fact they all played for the World XI and shared dressing rooms with coloured players. This article was in no way politically driven. It’s purely based on the talent of the men that have represented South Africa

2022-07-22T10:34:58+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Him or Herschelle!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar