Gold Coast expansion may be too much, too soon

By Adrian Musolino / Expert

Gold Coast Football Club has booked its place in the AFL for 2011, provisionally at least. It’s boom time for the Coast: A-League, AFL, NRL, NBL (or whatever it’ll be called) franchises and one of Australia’s most popular motorsport festivals. Everyone’s on board, but is it a road to nowhere?

A decade ago, none of these franchises existed and the Gold Coast had no representation in a national code.

Why now the mad rush to Coolangatta airport for the leading codes’ powers that be?

Sure the Gold Coast is booming, but can it sustain all these franchises, all still in their infancy, all in a region with a questionable sporting heritage, supporter base and franchise record?

The recent Queensland election was crucial to the next step in this sporting proliferation with Anna Bligh’s victory ensuring over $60 million into the redevelopment of an AFL stadium and crucial support for the GCFC.

Interesting footnote, too, that Gold Coast United (A-League) billionaire owner, Clive Palmer, was reported to be one of the biggest financial supporters of the rival Liberal National Party, while Gold Coast Titans (NRL) officials have already publicly derided the long term sustainability of the AFL franchise.

At the GCFC announcement, AFL boss Andrew Demetriou went out of his way to avoid comparisons with the struggles of the Sydney Swans and Brisbane Bears in establishing themselves and growing their supporter base in a non-AFL state.

But the difference is going to be the financial assistance from government and code, helped by having their own stadium, according to Demetriou.

This doesn’t answer, however, how it is going to generate a significant crowd in a city that is now so overpopulated by various codes and yet under-populated at present to support these franchises.

Despite all the talk of a booming region with its economic might and being a haven for migrants from the southern ‘cold’ states, the population of the Gold Coast is still approximately one eighth of Sydney’s, over three million shy of Melbourne’s, and about half of Adelaide’s.

It is Australia’s fastest growing area, but it still has a way to go.

According to the Gold Coast City Council, the population projected for 2021 will still only be 683,568.

What’s odd here too is that the biggest contributor to the region’s economy is tourism, believed to account for one in every four jobs: whether it’s the hotels, timeshare apartments, resorts, theme parks and so on. So primarily it’s a city that sees people coming and going regularly.

The competition, therefore, from non-sporting entities such as theme parks, beaches and nightclubs is a lot more intense than, say, in Adelaide.

It isn’t in a position population wise or economically to sustain these franchises at present, hence the over-reliance on government support and the philanthropic actions of billionaires.

Seeing its growth potential, the major codes have all rushed into the Gold Coast, following each other so as not to miss out on the possible dividends.

But this is all speculative.

What if the region’s growth stagnates? What if the tourism industry dries up? And, more importantly, what if football and the AFL can’t establish enough of a supporter base to detract fans from the rugby codes?

Remember, this is Queensland!

As these franchises fight over such a small area, expect to see a real battle between the codes for supremacy.

In the space of only a few years, the Gold Coast has become one of the most densely populated sporting capitals within Australia.

Whether it can sustain that remains to be seen.

The Crowd Says:

2009-04-02T08:12:37+00:00

Col the Bear

Guest


Will Gold Coast be called the "Dolphins"??

2009-04-02T03:18:54+00:00

Michael C

Guest


FMN - tend to agree. But, that may be the 'take it or leave it' scenario.

2009-04-02T03:16:32+00:00

Forgetmenot

Guest


MC, Tasmanians would not support a relocated team. Everyone there already has an AFL team. Would you support a current club if they relocated to your area?

2009-04-01T19:33:59+00:00

Michael C

Guest


Col the Bear - Tassie might be the 'home' of a future relocation, that'd seem the MOST likely scenario. And sooner rather than later if the stadium deals in Melbourne aren't all sorted out.

2009-04-01T19:09:52+00:00

Col the Bear

Guest


I see Tassie is on the agenda but not until after Western sydney..Does this mean 20 teams is on the money for thefuture of AFL (NT)?? Surely a better option would be to relocate an established team with the demographics of WS..why not Footscray Bulldogs give them a fresh start as South Melbourne did,then Tassie "Celts" could come in next as the 18th team, but in saying that I still have doubts whether another team in Sydney is even a viable option...

2009-04-01T13:02:56+00:00

Tifosi

Guest


An AFL team on the gold coast will do fine. The amount of "mexicans" that have moved north from victoria will ensure it will be successful.

2009-04-01T11:37:29+00:00

The Auteur

Guest


Has anyone read the blog on 442 about the GC football landscape?

2009-04-01T10:09:22+00:00

Forgetmenot

Guest


IMO the GC will not be able to keep all of these teams in profit for the next 15 years (but should be able to after that). If you were a betting man you would have to say the Gold Coast Football Club would be the most likely to be a failure. Followed by United and then the Titans. There are so many other variables though, that it is impossible to say stuff. Titans have a large fan base already (i see people all over Australia wearing their gear) ... and both GCFC, and GCU have a lot of money at their disposal. It will be very difficult to see how it pans out, but i feel that only 2 of the clubs will survive.

2009-04-01T04:32:40+00:00

el_capitan

Guest


IMO, The Coast has nothing to worry about with all the codes. As previously stated in this forum, Queensland is lucky compared to NSW and VIC, as there is normally a one team town. Plus all the major football codes in Brisbane, try not to play at the same time over the weekend, ie the Broncs will play Friday night, the Reds play on Saturday night and the Lions play on Sunday. The GC will employ a similar tatic, to ensure that there are no clashes, and provide the best entertainment for the coast. Football has no real problems, as it's played over summer. Its not Sydney or Melbourne where the codes are saturated, but people in Queensland, IMO, are far more tolerant and share season tickets for numerous teams (Reds, Broncs, Lions, Roar)

2009-04-01T04:21:20+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


GCU's first three home games will be against Queensland Roar, Melbourne Victory and Sydney FC. FFA are going in with the big guns. All these games will draw 20k min. Although, what the sun-bronzed locals will make of the MVFC away support will be pretty interesting. Talk about culture clash. At least they will be given a lesson on how to chant at football matches.

2009-04-01T02:50:19+00:00

Michael C

Guest


Redb - yeah, Clive is a twit.............but, a rich twit. Simmo - the notion of a unified state league is pretty important for Tassie especially should they desire to have a AFL team in future. It needs to succeed to illustrate a unified approach such that COULD support and sustain an AFL side into the future. And, ideally, provide the best managed/structure pathways for talent so as to ensure a decent number of Tassie players going into the future. Presently, Tassie are less represented on the AFL lists than NSW and certainly QLD; but, does come in ahead of the NT.......just..........and the NT are this year playing a combined side in the AFLQ - - so, they've taken action to improve benchmarking and access to talent pathways - especially in view of GC17 joining in the near future.

2009-04-01T02:44:34+00:00

Redb

Guest


I think Palmer is more of a help than hindrance to GC17. His money and effort to support the LNP in QLD really worked a treat. Keep it up Clive. :-) Redb

2009-04-01T02:35:35+00:00

Redb

Guest


"Demetriou, Premier David Bartlett and AFL Tasmania chairman Dominic Baker are due to announce Tasmania’s new state league in Launceston at midday (AEDT). AFL chief operating officer Gillon McLachlan last week told a Senate inquiry there are no plans to include a Tasmanian team in the competition." I would have thought it is pretty clear. Redb

2009-04-01T02:17:22+00:00

Simmo

Guest


If this is an April Fool's thing it's fooled both the AAP and the Age http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/afl-in-tasmania-for-major-announcement/2009/04/01/1238261615532.html or if they're both in on the joke it's a touch cruel --- AFL boss Andrew Demetriou is due in Tasmania on Wednesday for a major announcement less than 24 hours after the Gold Coast was granted the competition's 17th licence. Mystery surrounds the AFL's official response to the Tasmanian government's bid to have a Tasmania-based team in the competition. The AFL and the state government have so far refused to detail the AFL's response on Monday to the government's unsolicited bid for a team. However Sport Minister Michelle O'Byrne says the AFL wants more information so it can continue assessing the submission. Demetriou, Premier David Bartlett and AFL Tasmania chairman Dominic Baker are due to announce Tasmania's new state league in Launceston at midday (AEDT). AFL chief operating officer Gillon McLachlan last week told a Senate inquiry there are no plans to include a Tasmanian team in the competition. The AFL plans to expand its current 16-team competition to include clubs from the Gold Coast in 2011 and Western Sydney in 2012.

2009-04-01T01:58:22+00:00

Michael C

Guest


Clive Palmer having a pot at GC17 : http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/sport/afl/story/0,27046,25271764-5016169,00.html

2009-03-31T23:16:45+00:00

Michael C

Guest


Cpaa - now, check the apparant arrangements re the venue. The GC council will be allowing ownership to be signed over to the QLD govt. Now, remind us how much the AFL are directly investing in the project - - with zero sum ownership of the venue. This is not funding to increase the AFL asset base. It's capex funding that provides the state of QLD with an ongoing asset and for the AFL perspective hopefully a generous ongoing stadium 'deal' for the primary tennant club. ANd it's certainly not an opex funding scheme like what the Fed Govt props up the FFA with. The AFL don't OWN many stadia. Can you rattle off how many the AFL own?? btw - the Geelong example illustrates just how good a financial wicket can be nurtured from a 25K boutique venue with a decent 'deal'. Therefore, no concerns re the AFL high 30K general crowd averages. However, in recent years the overall crowds have hit record levels EVEN with matches at Carrara, Manuka and Darwin. Having Carrara matches regularly at a decent stadium will be no major issue for overall averages, and like the Brisbane Lions who pump most of any profits they generate back into local grass roots footy - this will be good for sports (footy/cricket) on the Gold Coast.

2009-03-31T23:04:23+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


Cpaa was anyone truly concerned about the 40 mill? It's the other $1 billion that we have to worry about!! Also, people should try and understand how the $60 mill has been assembled, who it's going to directly, who owns and runs the facility, who benefits, etc before jumping to conclusions.

2009-03-31T23:00:59+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


It also has to be remembered that the GC A-League club will play predominantly over the Summer, and only needs a crowd of about 10,000 in the early years to sustain it (with some top ups from Palmer of course!) I would think the AFL would be happy with getting crowds of 15,000 to 18,000 in the early years.

2009-03-31T23:00:24+00:00

Cpaaa

Guest


michael c you forgot to mention the Gold Coast Giants, another failed RL side. now, let me tell all you afl folk something.....congratulations. the Gold Coast Football Club. after all the talk ,media debate, asking the fans for a name, stingrays, sharks etc. the afl has chosen the most beautiful name it could for a club. as a football fan, i am jealous. i hate fancy americanized niknames in a clubs title, this should be decided by fans. on the other hand i dont want to hear anymore propaganda from afl folk that afl does not recieve any government funding. 60million of government support to one small city, funding for one sport/city in compared to 40million for a world cup bid that would involve the wholle nation/ world through sport and economics.

2009-03-31T22:47:32+00:00

Sensible Kurt

Guest


There's no doubt the GC is listed as a 'buy' in the minds of Australia's sporting administrators. Adrian makes an interesting point re. the fact that the region will still only have a population of 600K or so in 2021 - such is the hype about the growth rate of this region that I must admit I imagined it bigger than that already. I was listening to a radio interview with QLD Premier Anna Bligh yesterday and she made the interesting point (admittedly in characteristic pollie speak) that the GC is the place Australians come on holiday and that she expected plenty of AFL fans from Melbourne to make the trip up to watch their teams and then stay on for a break to enjoy the winter sun. Which was a pretty good point I thought and explains at least in part the enthusiasm of the govt to fund various sporting facilities and assist in the establishment of A-League, NRL, AFL teams etc. As for whether or not the region can support all these teams I must admit I was impressed by the sporting diversity on display on the GC during a recent visit. Of course being QLD league still rules the roost, but there were plenty of kids about in AFL jumpers kicking sherrins in the parks, which is more than you can say for Western Sydney. As for soccer I assume there are enough Brits around to provide the bedrock of support for an A-League team as is the case in Melbourne and Sydney. It will be definitely be interesting to see how it plays out over the next few years.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar