FIFA have the whole world in their hands

By Doug Conway / Roar Guru

Australia must convince thirteen men it deserves to host the World Cup. If that sounds easy, think again. Those men are among the 24 members of FIFA’s executive committee, and the whole world wants a piece of them.

Australia, like all other bidding nations, must get onside a simple majority in the final ballot – that is to say thirteen votes.

But there is nothing simple about it.

As Prime Minister Kevin Rudd acknowledges, the politics of running the world’s most popular game can make the back-room machinations of the Labor Party look like child’s play.

That’s why Football Federation Australia chairman Frank Lowy calls it “one of the biggest challenges in sport”.

Those 24 men represent football’s six geographical zones.

They are dominated by Europe, with eight delegates, followed by Africa and Asia with four each, South America (Comnebol) and Central and North America (Concacaf) with three each and Oceania with one. FIFA President Sepp Blatter makes up the two dozen.

Sometimes they vote as individuals, sometimes en bloc.

Deals are done behind the scenes and the sands can be ever-shifting.

Negotiations might very well continue until the eve of the executive committee’s eventual vote in December next year.

Both the 2018 and the 2022 World Cup are up for grabs.

No continent can stage two consecutive World Cups, so either one is the prize.

There is little doubt that Australia has the capacity and drive to pull it off.

The 2000 Olympics, 2003 Rugby World Cup and 2006 Commonwealth Games are proof of that.

But in order to snare the World Cup, the Australian round-ball game will have to triumph over odds greater than those it has beaten in its greatest challenges of the Frank Lowy revolution – qualifying for consecutive World Cup finals in Germany in 2006 and South Africa next year, winning a berth in Asia and launching a successful domestic A-League competition.

There are eight rival bids for the 2018 World Cup.

Four are from Europe – England and Russia as well as joint bids from Holland/Belgium and Portugal/Spain.

Two are from North America – the US and Mexico, and two from Asia – Japan and Indonesia.

The same nine countries have thrown their hats in the ring for 2022, along with two others, South Korea and Qatar, making 11 candidates in all for that event.

England, a cradle of the game and home of one of the world’s richest leagues, will likely start a firm favourite for the 2018 championship.

Europe is the powerhouse of world football, hosting every second World Cup since the tournament started in 1930.

By 2018 Europe will have waited three cycles and England will have waited over half a century since its first and only crack in 1966.

FIFA President Sepp Blatter indicated at the world body’s congress in Sydney last year that it was Europe’s turn.

But Australia argues that Europe is a mature market and FIFA should ditch the status quo and go for “turbo-charged growth” in Asia.

If Australia misses out on 2018, however, it had better hope Europe wins.

Because if Europe doesn’t, it is scarcely conceivable the continent would miss out for a fourth time in a row in 2022, meaning Australia would go home empty-handed.

Opponents could argue Australia remains a comparative football backwater despite successes in Germany in 2006, where it reached the last 16, and in qualifying for a successive World Cup next year.

Critics maintain Australia is too remote geographically and too expensive for a couple of million world fans to travel to.

They would almost certainly argue that Australia’s time zone, 10 hours ahead of Europe, would be an impediment to maximising revenue from sponsorship and prime-time TV rights.

But Asia lays claims as a burgeoning economic power which is home to two-thirds of the world’s population.

There is little doubt that Asia’s claims as a host would be enhanced if Asian delegates got behind one of their candidates and backed it all the way.

Australia would seem to have solid prospects of being that candidate.

Its claims both on and off the field appear stronger than either Qatar or Indonesia and it is only seven years since Japan and South Korea jointly hosted Asia’s first World Cup.

Australia is the Asian confederation’s brash newcomer, but Mr Lowy maintains any regional jealousies have long been overcome and Australia is now among friends in Asian football.

Conversely, Europe’s cause could be made almost impregnable if the competing Euro nations back one candidate, but many consider that unlikely.

“I think you’ll have European countries voting against each other,” said Socceroo skipper Lucas Neill, “which I think could work to our advantage.”

Australia’s bid enjoys the support of both sides of politics.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has already committed $45 million to the bid for what he called “the greatest event on earth”.

And Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull vowed at last weekend’s official bid launch at parliament house that the coalition would line up with Labor “side by side, joined at the hip, as dual strikers, to bring the greatest show on earth to the greatest place on earth”.

Australia should be able to overcome domestic political problems in meeting FIFA’s requirements for 12 venues, two with an 80,000-plus capacity and the rest of around 45,000.

Already fitting the bill are the MCG and Etihad Stadium in Melbourne, the SFS and the Olympic stadium in Sydney plus Brisbane’s Suncorp.

Perth and Adelaide must get their acts together.

Newcastle and Canberra both have venues that are considered readily capable of an upgrade.

Townsville and the Gold Coast are being talked of as potential sites; so are Tasmania and the Northern Territory.

The idea is for an “all of Australia” bid, though football’s sudden emergence down under might stretch some friendships at home.

The World Cup takes place in June and July, during the break between European seasons.

That is smack bang in the middle of the AFL and rugby league competitions, which have had first call on many of the big venues that would be required for the World Cup.

This presents a whole new set of timing difficulties than those faced by the Sydney 2000 Olympics, held late in the footy seasons in September, and Melbourne’s 2006 Commonwealth Games, held in March.

The AFL and the NRL may not be happy about making way while soccer eats into their turf.

But FFA CEO Ben Buckley says soccer is working closely with the other codes to minimise the disruption and “they are very supportive in principle”.

The 24 men calling the World Cup shots for FIFA:
President:
Sepp Blatter
Europe:
Dr Michel De Hooghe (Belgium)
Marios Lefkaritis (Cyprus)
Geoff Thompson (England)
Michel Platini (France)
Franz Beckenbauer (Germany)
Vitaly Mutko (Russia)
Angel Maria Villar Llona (Spain)
Senes Erzik (Turkey)
Africa:
Issa Hayatou (Cameroon)
Jacques Anouma (Ivory Coast)
Dr Amos Adamu (Nigeria)
Hani Aboo Rida (Egypt)
Asia:
Junji Ogura (Japan)
Dr Mong Joon Chung (South Korea)
Mohamed Bin Hammam (Qatar)
Worawi Makudi (Thailand)
Central and North America:
Rafael Salguero (Guatemala)
Jack Warner (Trinidad and Tobago)
Chuck Blazer (USA)
South America:
Julio Grondona (Aregentina)
Ricardo Terra Teixeira (Brazil)
Dr Nicolas Leoz (Paraguay)
Oceania:
Reynald Temarii (Tahiti)

The Crowd Says:

2009-06-16T08:26:31+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Hi Doug, How are things? For the first time we are on the same page. Today I've presented 10 tennis trivia, divorcing cricket for once! What else to do when both Australia and India are out of World T20? Cheers, Kersi

2009-06-16T07:05:11+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


For Christ's sake, can we cut out the blasphemy!!

2009-06-16T06:48:48+00:00

GeneralAshnak

Roar Pro


Many do see him as a saviour, I personally, as a Christian, have no issue with using Jesus to mark someone who is a visionary and hopes to enact a betterment to society. Of course I also call Kennedy Jesus, so even a Christian can be a hypocrite :P

2009-06-16T05:50:39+00:00

Acer

Guest


Black Jesus......:-( I can see the PC police already :-)

2009-06-16T05:33:52+00:00

GeneralAshnak

Roar Pro


England and the US really do seem to shape up as the main competition, England for 2018 & USA for 2022 (or vice versa).

2009-06-16T05:25:48+00:00

Captain Random

Guest


Acer - I hadn't even considered the prospect of going up against Black Jesus. Hopefully he's got much more important things to concern himself with (please please oh pretty please). Having said that, if Frank Lowy took on Obama and won, wouldn't that be one hell of a story? The Republican Party would probably try to recruit him.

2009-06-16T04:38:29+00:00

whiskeymac

Guest


States had it in 1994. thats quite recent. although it didnt stop them snaring two olympics fairly close together... Spain had it in 82... i think england has a good case having hosted it only once (compared to others) back in 66.

2009-06-16T04:25:50+00:00

Acer

Guest


Captain I certainly have to agree the US will be the biggest threat. Now if Obama gets behind their bid you could almost certainly count Australia out :-(

2009-06-16T04:21:35+00:00

Captain Random

Guest


I think the Japanese and Korean bids are hurt by the fact that they've hosted the WC this decade. Indonesia's bid suffers ... because it's Indonesia, and Qatar are being pretty optimistic too (not that there's anything wrong with that). Our main competition is the US (bugger), have I forgotten anyone else?

2009-06-16T04:17:36+00:00

Ytraboy

Guest


Oceania I think would throw support behind Australia soley because of the economic spinoffs that having a tournament downunder could create. If we were talking soley a football sense Oceania owes nothing to Australia who dumped them at the first possible oppurtunity. In some ways we are lucky its not a NZ representitive we went out of our way to screw them in the 03 rugby world cup and then we voted against them hosting the 2011 world cup instead voting for Japan. As has been already mentioned Japan are also bidding to host the Football world cup so we can't really expect them to return the favour and as has been mentioned in other threads some of the West Asian countries tried or are trying to get Australia expelled from the Asian conference (is there any truth in this?) so why would Asia vote for Australia . I think in all seriousness Africa could easily be swayed to vote for Australia and South America would be tough but still attainable. Maybe we could play the politics card and square off the countries we are friendlier with oppossed to those who don't like us so much. Not PC but hey nothing is these days

2009-06-16T04:17:21+00:00

Captain Random

Guest


whiskey - So true. At least we won't be competing against European bids (as one WC will go to Europe and the other to ... somewhere else).

2009-06-16T04:12:01+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


Whiskey I would agree that the FIFA executive is even more daunting than the Olympics scenario from 1993.

2009-06-16T04:08:54+00:00

whiskeymac

Guest


good point Captain Random, even though the enormity of the task, and level of competiton, is arguably larger still.

2009-06-16T04:02:06+00:00

Captain Random

Guest


For sure it's going to be diffcult. But that's what everyone said in 1993 when Sydney was up against Beijing for the Olympics.

2009-06-16T03:52:46+00:00

GeneralAshnak

Roar Pro


This is going to be a massive task. The chance of us getting 13 votes is highly unlikely, especially whilst there are so many runners for the two bids. Our best hope lies with Asia, Oceania and South America getting behind us, along with convincing Africa to support our bid through any means possible. Realistically speaking if Asia continues to be a broken bid then we are sunk before we start. Asia needs to support us from the get go, which means that the counter bids from Asia need to acknowledge that ours is the best hope of securing the World Cup for Asia and pulling out of the running. I am not entirely confident of this happening.

2009-06-16T03:52:12+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


Towser we all know that Sepp has never been one to go out of his way to support us beyond whispering sweet nothings (while doing back room deals that make us look decidedly silly)

2009-06-16T03:40:47+00:00

Towser

Guest


I've looked at the delegates names & tried to decipher from hidden codes within those names whether there are secret Australianisms such as Chips Rafferty, Sydney Opera House, Underbelly,flies up the nostrils,men from snowy river,take your pick. So far only "bring a plate"& "wheres the sunscreen". Any others I missed? The key in reality is Sepp. Supposing he has the casting vote. Never was any good at guessing which colour a chameleon would change to next.

2009-06-16T03:14:15+00:00

Pippinu

Roar Guru


It also goes without saying that most of the delegates are as corrupt as all hell and voting will occur more along the lines of what they can personally get out of it (of course, this neither advantages or disadvantages Australia, it's just one of a long list of factors to consider).

2009-06-16T02:47:36+00:00

Tom

Guest


The first step is making sure we can lock in three or four votes so we're not one of the first nations eliminated. You would assume Temarii would be naturally in our camp. Hopefully we can woo Makudi away from voting for dead horse Indonesia. From there it gets really tough. All three other Asian reps are from countries submitting bids. North America and Europe have their own bids. South America would favour Mexico or Spain/Portugal. Africa would probably favour Europe. Frankly, we're going to have to lavish favours Sydney Olympics style on the African delegates.

Read more at The Roar