When is the right time to retire?

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

Australia’s cricketing dominance has officially come to an end after the team’s unexpected loss in the Ashes series at the Oval last weekend. But the writing had been on the wall long before their sudden drop in the ICC Test rankings after their series defeat.

It was a steady decline to say the least.

With all cricket fans around the world being familiar with the Aussies’ renowned blend of skill and good cricket brains to boot during their peak, all experts – and they include armchair critics – will probably concur on the subject as to why this demise was always in the offing.

The general conclusion among all and sundry around this demise, will be that the exodus from the Test arena of its top players and leading lights over the past few seasons has given impetus to the current state of affairs: an Ashes loss and a fourth place on the ICC Test rankings.

Of course, we as cricket fans are not privy to much of the information as to why players decide to retire. But the question has to be posed: Did the Australian players ride off into the sunset, so to speak, of their own accord, or was it a case of them being nudged into retirement?

We all are aware that the Aussies in general don’t attach much sentiment (with a few exceptions) when things are not going well with their cricketers on the field of play. That’s the opinion most of us who admire Aussie cricket hold anyway.

If you don’t perform, then well, there are others standing in line who are good enough to take your place. It pretty much was and still is the philosophy.

In my opinion, it’s not a bad approach at all. But then again it can’t be said that players like Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath, Hayden, to name but a few, were not at the top of their game when they called it quits.

So maybe it’s age that gets in the way of performance – the reflexes are no good anymore, being away from the family on tour gets a bit too much and so on. Thing is, we as fans don’t know the reasons actually – because the information isn’t really shared with us.

But then again, there are many players like the Husseys and the Bichels, who debuted almost or into their thirties. Now the question may be: Where are we going to with this argument?

For me anyhow, it was difficult to accept the fact that Steve Waugh had bowed out, so too Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath, MacGill, Haydos, Martyn, Langer, the former postman (can’t get to his name – now there was a canny left-arm tweaker, if there ever was one) when they did.

Or, was it simply a case of it being difficult to accept that these great players would not be seen gracing our cricket pitches anymore.

So what are exactly the events leading up to any player’s decision to quit the game?

Is it a decision made over time, OR is it a case of nudge nudge wink wink it’s time you packed up your kit and your coffin and think about life after cricket mate.

I think the Aussie public at large can be very hard on their players. Look what happened when talisman Haydos wasn’t batting well; the knives were out for him, quite clearly from sections of the cricket fraternity.

“Mr Cricket”, despite the slump in batting form, has managed to keep his spot until his century in a losing cause in the fifth Test.

Also, it’s a case of how the players get on (or not) with cricket’s hierarchy.

It’s a known fact that Warne did not get on with John Buchanan, he despised some of the training methods (“a coach is something that takes you to the park”, he is quoted as saying) and together with the leg-spinning feats, came an outspoken character.

Did he have to retire at the time he did, or was he just tired by it all.

The clashes, the unrelenting pressure of not getting the captaincy? Haydos felt the pressure too – and thank goodness when he did finally feel the urge to call it quits as the knives closed in on him, he was given the send-off he deserved.

The question is the timing of the retirements. There’s just a feeling that the retirements of all these recent greats have come like a flood.

There are now similar murmurings around Brett Lee. How long before he too calls it quits in the face of outside pressure. Yep, injuries have affected his form, but he is a better player than the injuries allow him to be. So I would say and it’s only my opinion, that Australia’s frenzied cricket fraternity (that includes, officials, players, fans, the media etc) should pipe-down their inclination to “push” players into retirement.

It should be a systematic process that allows youth and experience to blend in the same team, before the reins are finally handed over to the future.

There may be points of difference I know to my argument, but there is in my opinion a subtleness to how (certain) players are bowing out of Australian cricket.

If better handled Australia would certainly not be ensconced at number four on the ICC Test rankings today.

The Crowd Says:

2009-09-03T06:09:02+00:00

Dave

Guest


Mark Waugh was in top form in 2001 in England. He than had a bad home season and was gone by the start of the next season.

2009-09-02T12:52:53+00:00

whiteline

Guest


FOF You question regarding why the selectors didn't consider or I suppose act on giving Gilchrist a break for Haddin could well have been siad of the scenario with Healy and Gilchrist 12 years earlier. Although personally, I would have let haddin fade away into the distance and picked someone younger who could catch.

2009-08-31T13:16:44+00:00

Freud of Football

Roar Guru


Here is the lineup in which Gilchrist debuted in: M Slater G Blewett J Langer M Waugh S Waugh R Ponting A Gilchrist S Warne D Fleming G McGrath S Muller Of that team only two players were not regulars (not including Gilchrist). He was surrounded by talented, established players with plenty of Test Match experience compared to Brad Haddin's debut: P Jacques S Katich R Ponting M Hussey B Hodge M Johnson A Symonds B Haddin B Lee S Clark S MacGill Of that squad, only Katich, Ponting, Hussey and Johnson have since played with any consistency. Phil Jacques seems to have been forgotten, Brad Hodge has always been on the fringes, Andrew Symonds fell apart, Brett Lee would have been helpful with his experience but is too frequently injured, MacGill never played the amount of tests he deserved too and Stuart Clark has managed only 24 Tests as a 33 year old. The difference is this time, Australia have had to throw a bunch of relatively non-experienced players together as they didn't afford the opportunities to others over the years.

2009-08-31T10:08:52+00:00

Dave

Guest


Gilchrist was 28 when he played his first test which is comparable to Haddin's 30

2009-08-31T10:04:07+00:00

Freud of Football

Roar Guru


I think the issue here isn't when the players retire, that is always going to happen and like injuries, not something you should have in the back of your mind, it's the guys coming in to replace them that Australia needs to concentrate more on. Gilchrist played 96 Tests before retiring, yet Haddin, the man earmarked to replace him debuts pushing 30. Surely there would have been some series in Gilchrist's career that the selectors could have said, "we need to look to the future, we need Brad Haddin to get some Test Match experience"? When you lose; Shane Warne - 145 Tests Glenn McGrath - 124 Tests Justin Langer - 105 Tests Mathew Hayden - 103 Tests Adam Gilchrist - 96 Tests Damien Martyn - 67 Tests The opening partnership - gone, your two strike bowlers (including your spinner) - gone and 2 out of the middle order also depart, it's always going to be tough but the team wasn't equipped with adequate replacements. The 5 bowlers used during the Ashes have a total of 77 career tests between them. It was relatively obvious when the exodus was going to occur so why didn't was see these key players playing a little more infrequently to give experience to the up-and-comers? They should have all had at least 25 caps before the Ashes but only Stuart Clark (33 years old) fits that bill. As we have seen, Australia has gone into decline, this won't last too long as they still have quality players, they just need the experience and that will take time but the planning and implementation of the plan should have started earlier.

2009-08-31T08:28:26+00:00

Dave

Guest


Be like mark Waugh say you'll play till the selectors drop you

2009-08-31T04:18:58+00:00

AndyRoo

Roar Guru


Probably wont be an issue much longer. If most players can make more money playing IPL and whatever other 20/20 tournamnets start up, if players are lingering into their mid to late 30's in Test Cricket it will be because they want to play and not for the dough.

2009-08-31T03:45:23+00:00

sheek

Guest


For the player, he ought to retire when he wakes one morning & realises he doesn't want to train anymore, because the enthusiasm's gone. Firstly, the enthusiasm deserts the player, quickly followed by his desire, followed by his form. However, in the professional world, some players will push against the reality for as long as they can. Exhibit one - George Gregan. He had no intention of retiring until he was pushed. He knew there weren't any real alternatives to his position, or the selectors didn't have the guts to push him. So he thought, "I'll ride this out as long as I can". And he did..... Exhibit two - Mark Waugh extended his career by several years, playing a prominent innings every so often, just often enough to trick the selectors into thinking he still 'had it'. Matt Hayden attempted the same to get to England in 2009, but it didn't work for him.

2009-08-30T22:07:14+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Mac, Brad Hogg is the former postman who escaped your memory.. And you've picked a really tough subject here. The only people who could possibly know if the guys you mentioned jumped or were pushed, are the guys doing the jumping, or the selectors doing the pushing. I personally think most went of their own accord, though Hayden may have seen the writing on the wall and decided to jump before he was pushed...

Read more at The Roar