Are we all addicts of cricket statistics?

By Rick Eyre / Roar Rookie

When it comes to stats and trivia about cricket, I’ve been hooked since I was a teenager. It’s easy to get seduced by the numbers and the mathematical comparisons, but I figure it’s okay, so long as the sport itself remains more important.

I draw a line, however, when statistical “milestones” become playthings of the media industry, a raison d’etre of the sports desk at the 24/7 news outlet, the honeytrap for mindless SMS fodder.

The presentation of obscure and contrived stats for media self-gratification and/or profit – this surely justifies the definition of Stats Pornography.

It’s from that untapped frontier of cricket capitalism, India, that the most outrageous examples of Stats Porn are spewing forth.

We’ve seen, in recent weeks, the aggregation of Test, ODI and Twenty20 records to create the revelation that Sachin Tendulkar has scored 30,000 runs in international cricket.

But somehow overlooking, for example, the 28 runs he scored for India in the 1998 Commonwealth Games.

The media were all over this unprecedented, and possibly forever unique, 30000 milestone.

A happy postscript having already turned his 20th anniversary in the international game, without doubt a great effort of endurance, into pages and pages of newspaper copy and hours and hours of television analysis.

Then came India’s innings victory over Sri Lanka at Kanpur last week. It brought up that magic milestone for India – their 100th Test win. Ever. Since 1932.

Excited?

In the same week, Ricky Ponting won his 40th Test as Australian captain. The next victory will bring him level with his predecessor Steve Waugh. Yes, that’s 81 wins between the two of them. Add wins under the captaincy of Mark Taylor and Adam Gilchrist, and we have 111 Australian Test victories just since the retirement of Allan Border. In 1994.

One hundred wins for all time? Did you SMS your congratulations?

Moving forward to this Thursday, and an incredibly brutal knock by Virender Sehwag. Even he couldn’t accelerate enough in the final overs of the day to overhaul Don Bradman’s world Test record of 309 runs in a day.

But at 284 not out overnight, the speculation mounted.

Could he beat the first-class world record of 501 not out, or merely Lara’s Test world record of 400 not out?

But first, there was an interim milestone… at 300, he would become the first batsman in history (surpassing Bradman and Lara) to score his third Test match triple century.

But no. Sehwag caught and bowled Muralitharan 293. Sehwag Heartbreak, the headlines screamed. Sehwag Misses World Record By Seven Runs.

Oh, the horror, the agony, the shame. The lack of anything to celebrate … but wait. There is redemption.

The IBNLive website has come to the rescue by setting up the following thread on their message board, and prominently displaying it on their home page:
Sehwag becomes 3rd fastest Indian to score 6,000. Congratulate him.

What do I say?

“Congratulations Sehwag on your fast-ish milestone.”
“Viru, you’re still my Number Three.”
“Yo, Viru. I’m really happy for you, and imma let you finish, but Sunny had one of the fastest 6000s of all time!”

Call him. Go onnn, call him nowwwwww.

The Crowd Says:

2010-01-27T02:39:45+00:00

Michael C

Roar Guru


Let alone, that as per discussion on radio yesterday - - how come a 'triple century' only counts as '1' in the 100s column on a players career stats? Brian Lara has a 400 as well as a 375, those 7 centuries only count as 2. Hardly fair. The other contrived stat for allowing 'hat tricks' broken across innings, i.e. Merv Hughes vs West Indies. Not only broken over overs, but, from 1st innings to 2nd innings. Now - - since when was a batsman awarded a 'century' for scoring 65 in the first innings and passing 35 in the second? But - reality is, at some point - it's ALL contrived. Just, some stats are contrived for the benefit of coaches - other stats are contrived for the benefit of commentators. I don't think the coaches will focus on 30,000 career runs or 100th test win.

2010-01-27T02:00:17+00:00

Les

Guest


I had never considered the business side of the whole SMS thing - very interesting. Do you think sports betting also drives the media's obsession with sports stats? I wonder if I can bet on how many meters any given AFL player will run during game time over a season... or other useless facts.

2009-12-12T07:04:53+00:00

Hazey the Bear

Roar Rookie


When that happens they'll probably start keeping records of individual player's average heartrate as well as the total team heart rates as well..."And with that dropped chance, Australia's Gatorade GatorTracker total just ticked over 2100!"

AUTHOR

2009-12-12T00:41:15+00:00

Rick Eyre

Roar Rookie


I'm waiting for the day that channel 9 straps a Gatorade GatorTracker to every player on the field and we see career stats on the number of kilometres they have jogged in the outfield...

2009-12-12T00:24:52+00:00

drewster

Roar Pro


Interesting piece Rick! I didn't realise there were so many near achievements or trivial milestones you could congratulate people for. Still some lucky bugger is making a fortune out of SMS messages. I wonder what trivial information or near thing they will think of next to impart on the public next and then ask them to text a congratulation for (all for a small fee of course!). Ahh the wonders of modern technology!

Read more at The Roar