AFL set to create a second tier league

By Redb / Roar Guru

According to an article on the NT News website, the AFL is set to create a second tier league comprising teams from NSW, ACT, QLD and NT from 2012. This eastern seaboard league would be on the equivalent level of the VFL, SANFL and WAFL.

According to this article, the teams would include the reserve teams of the Sydney Swans, Brisbane Lions, Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney, with representative teams from the ACT and NT, plus four of the premier clubs in the Queensland AFL (QAFL).

Currently, the Brisbane Lions reserves and NT Thunder are already in the QAFL, along with clubs such as Southport, Morningside, Mt Gravatt, with a total of ten teams.

This would probably be viewed as an expansion and vote of confidence in the QAFL, with the retention of the six current teams and expanding to include teams from NSW/ACT.

I’d imagine the remaining four QAFL teams would form another tier under this league (second Division?)

A couple of weeks ago, a report in the Melbourne AGE suggested the AFL was looking at several options from 2012, which included an expansion of the VFL, which currently hosts the Gold Coast, to include the NSW/ACT teams or a proposed eastern-northern seaboard league like this one.

Currently, the Sydney Swans reserves play in the AFL ACT competition and it was thought GWS would do the same for its reserves after serving an apprenticeship in the TAC Cup and VFL following in the Gold Coast’s footsteps.

It’s great news for the NT Thunder, who only recently joined the QAFL, as it propels them one step closer to the elite competition.

The ACT, it appears, will get a team in its own right in this second tier league. Currently a combined NSW/ACT representative team plays in the Under 16 and 18 junior championships.

Of course, the remnants of the QAFL and ACT leagues will need to be managed carefully. There is no detail at this stage as to what their fate holds.

Although a second division of the QAFL exists, maybe this could be expanded to include an AFL Cairns team as a representative North QLD along with the recently introduced team from PNG that currently plays in the AFL Cairns competition.

At the time of writing there was no official word from the AFL as to the veracity of this report. However, it appears this structure, at the very least ,is being seriously considered at AFL House.

One thing is for sure: the two new AFL teams of GC and GWS are potentially creating significant shifts in the whole structure of the game in NSW, ACT, QLD and NT.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2010-10-14T04:11:43+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2010/10/14/interstate-series-on-cards/ Heres what you sandgropers and croweaters have been waiting for. A knockout second tier comp. League’s Championship Cup "Teams from the strong VFL, SANFL and WAFL as well as Tasmania, Queensland, ACT and Sydney league will qualify by finishing in their finals series from this year." Backed by Foxtel. Great stuff.

2010-03-28T23:10:25+00:00

Michael C

Roar Guru


Good to see. These PNG kids are the next wave......and that gives great hope of a reasonable PNG national side in years to come with several tiers of PNG talent having come through the system. Mal Michael as coach, James Gwilt as captain?? and perhaps a PNG national team vs the Australian Amateurs??

2010-03-28T23:08:31+00:00

Michael C

Roar Guru


Participation wise and re 'roll models' etc.......seemingly it's very important for gaining mileage with Govt to have womens participation....look at basketball, soccer. Also, at a local level - - if your club doesn't have juniors, women, handicapped, ethnic minorities....then you can't get funding from anywhere!!!!!

2010-03-24T05:44:11+00:00

bever fever

Guest


I think Cairns has the money, the Cazaly club up there makes plenty from what i understand, they run the Cairns basketball team and also sponsor the lions 100k each year ( I stand corrected). Their juniors are growing quickly and the ideal situation would be a structure that leads to a club representing the area.

AUTHOR

2010-03-23T21:37:27+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Bever, You have to wonder though if it might be better for Cairns and the PNG side to participate in the QAFL with potentially the 4 best sides moving up to the Eastern Aust AFL comp. Would still be a step in quality and allow for further development.

2010-03-23T06:12:39+00:00

bever fever

Guest


http://www.worldfootynews.com/article.php/20100323123631764 Interesting article about a PNG side playing a pre-season tournament in Cairns, Cairns is a pretty good standard league with plenty of good local talent with southerners and territorians also playing. Any expanded northern comp must IMO include Cairns, plenty of flights to Cairns. Winning 3 from 4 is pretty good but they did with another 20 very good players playing in Brisbane.

2010-03-22T12:51:04+00:00

bever fever

Guest


I did hear today on radio about the possibility of a womens national football league starting, with womens teams running out of the current AFL clubs. The AFL has apparently done a review on womans football and has raised this as a possibility. Don't want to sound negative but womans sport generally does not make money, but loses it. Although on the other hand making money is not the be all and end all, it should be self sustaining. Especially with the cost of flying huge teams, much bigger than cricket, volleyball and netball, it will be a big effort to be a success IMO.

AUTHOR

2010-03-21T21:54:44+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


'Northern league possibility' 21 March, 2009 http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/northern-league-possibility-20100320-qnbs.html "THE AFL is considering the merits of a northern states football league, in which the Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney reserves teams could compete, as early as next season. The league could also include the Brisbane Lions and Sydney reserves teams, Northern Territory Thunder, which transferred to the AFLQ last season, a representative team from Canberra's ACTAFL, four top clubs from the AFLQ and four Sydney-based clubs." Slight variation of the model reported by NT News with the addition of 4 Sydney Football League teams.

AUTHOR

2010-03-19T00:05:03+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Yeah it's pretty light on for details at this stage. I guess as a proposal it still has time given GWS wont be running around until 2012.

2010-03-18T23:57:45+00:00

Republican

Guest


I really don't know who would fund an ACT team. I would hope the ACT govt would come to the party to some extent, since they have been forking out for AFL visiting appearances as we all know. There has been consistent dialogue about upgrading infrastructure i.e Manuka Oval or the development of a proposed Footy Park in Woden. The Govt here have been upping the anti as far as Aust Footy in the Territory goes in recent years but as always this town, as wealthy as it is, still lacks corporate clout. I think most of what was available in that respect, went to bringing Giteau back to the Brumbies actually. The Assembly have alluded to a budget that will bring more footy here together with the mooted GWS collaboration, which seems to be less of likely with the passing weeks, so who knows how much $ has been earmarked footy here in reality. It all might just be pie in the sky on our part. Cheers

2010-03-18T22:17:50+00:00

Dogz R Barkn

Roar Guru


Good sensible posts from bever and redb. I can see where bever is coming from, existing financially strong clubs are better positioned to enter such a comp then some abstract concept like an ACT representative team (which would be very strong, and certainly around the level of your average VFL team). But redb is right, if you start talking about a 14+ strong comp - that might be a touch too expensive - unless you have a draw where the local QAFL, SFL and ACTAFL clubs are playing each other more often than they play the other clubs (thereby reducing the cost substantially, although the NT team would still be flying out every 2nd week, but that would have to happen regardless).

AUTHOR

2010-03-18T21:12:53+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Good questions Bever. There is no one solution that satifies all these ideas. This league IMO can't be all thing to all peope or solve all issues. The first requirement is to provide a league for the reserves of the 4 NSW/QLD AFL clubs. I think due to the growing status of the QAFL and the involvement of NT Thunder it is seen as geographcially a better base to provide a pathway and gives 4 distinct geographic second tier leagues with the VFL, SANFL and WAFL. it doesn't mean the ACT and SFL teams cant also compete but now you are looking at 14 or 16 teams - a bit unwieldy and costly. As there has been nothing official from the AFL I'd suggest this is still on the drawing board along with other proposals including an expanded VFL with the 4 reserves teams. I prefer the QAFL option from a strategic perspective.

AUTHOR

2010-03-18T21:05:01+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


No worries Republican. At least ACT footy will be represented beyond the current form in this proposed comp. As a rep team they will be very competitive and if the locals can support the team then that builds momentum for a tilt at the elite comp.

2010-03-18T10:12:22+00:00

Timmuh

Guest


No, the Tasmnaian government has spent money on Hawthorn. The AFL, and Hawthorn, have put virtually nothing into the deal. Its just an exercise in diverting voters attention away from the fact that Tasmania's health system is worse than NSW's and cronyism is rampant on a scale only Joh and the AWB could comprehend.

2010-03-18T08:59:02+00:00

bever fever

Guest


Years ago Ainslie were ready to pull the pin and join the SANFL, they had the money they were premiers every year, now they have the money but wisely they dont buy as many players but use local talent instead. A combined ACT team would be funded by whom ?, Ainslie, Belconnen, Easlake and Queanbeyan fund their own teams upwards of 500k a year, who is going to fund a ACT stand alone team, the ACTAFL have no clubhouse (read pokies)anymore to raise funds with, the money must come from the AFL, Government and sponsorship, individual clubs such as the ones mentioned are self funded. The sort of comp they are proposing must include the four AFL teams but their is no reason why the rest of the teams can be promoted or relegated. Will Southport who are contributing a lot of money to GC17 want to be part of this. These are the teams i would involve.. The four northern AFL teams The four ACT teams i mentioned 1 NT team 1 Cairns team which may include a quota of players from PNG. 2 or 3 Financially viable Sydney clubs 2 or 3 Viable QAFL clubs

2010-03-18T05:54:54+00:00

Republican

Guest


Redb. On the contrary, I reckon this is worth considering and i would love to see a second tier league get the nod. Perhaps I took your earlier question and reply out of context, so my apologies if I did. I do confess however, to having a vested interest in our regions future, which is perfectly natural and trust that there is room for the ACT in all of this, along with Tassie who really should be afforded something along these lines as well, even if it is courtesy of the SANFL or VFL. Cheers

AUTHOR

2010-03-18T05:44:45+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


re Tassie, they should be in the VFL if it was viable. But from a cost perspective to put them in a league dominated by 6 QLD based teams this would blow out costs even more.

AUTHOR

2010-03-18T05:41:19+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


No chip whatsoever Repub, I mean c'mon Sir James Hird ! :-) My favourite player of all time came from Ainslie. I just don't think you see the value of building a fourth strong 2nd tier league using the QAFL as the base. It makes more sense to me play all four NSW/QLD reserve teams in the same league yes or no? at the moment there is a fragmented comp with the Swans reserves in ACT comp and Lions in the QAFL which also has the developing NT Thunder. This proposal also puts a rep ACT team in the mix.

2010-03-18T05:18:26+00:00

Dogz R Barkn

Roar Guru


I was involved with the Wagga Tigers for a couple of years when we played in the ACTAFL, at a time when the Swans Reserves were absolutely demolishing every team. My memory is that their first premiership in the ACTAFL coincided with their senior premiership back in 2005, and you might recall that the Swans had an amazing run where they fielded the identical team for their last 12 games of the season, including the finals - pretty much unprecedented. With zero injuries for what's basically half the season, this meant that the Swans Reserves side we were playing against was a virtual AFL ready team - and not too many non-AFL clubs in Australia can compete against a team consisting of AFL ready players. You were basically up against an AFL standard midfield, and half-back line, so it was pretty hard getting your hands on the ball and keeping the ball for too long!! I don't know wha't happening these days, but if you have a season where the Swans go through a normal run of injuries, that brings the Swans reserves back to a level where the top ACTAFL clubs can compete.

2010-03-18T04:58:58+00:00

Republican

Guest


Redb Thats a bit harsh. I'm not sure what point exactly, you are trying to make here? The Swans enetered an elite line up that certainly did NOT qualify as reserves in respect of this region or indeed any other minor state. That is they did NOT reflect the true calibre of the demographic they professed to be representing. This was a veritable Swannies 1sts with choice players recruited from top tier Leagues predominately, which I expect meant that many of these players might well have hailed from Vic, SA and WA's leagues. I think you were hypothesising an analogy with QAFL and the Lions. I believe the outcome would be the same dependent on any stacking of the Lions reserves. What I am trying to convey to you is that the calibre of Qld state footy is no better than that of the ACT in respect of a second tier concept. I wonder if sometimes you are merely ignorant of the footy culture here in Canberra, or have a bit of a chip towards this region. I certainly would like to give you the benefit of the doubt in hoping it is NOT the latter. Cheers

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar