We've been robbed by Jabulani and altitude

By Dejan Kalinic / Roar Guru

The World Cup football, the Jabulani, combined with the South African altitude has robbed fans of goals and the much-loved dead ball special, although it appears the players are finally adapting.

The free kick count sits at four after 52 games.

A couple of the free kicks were scored in the same game, while one of the other two was a cross which avoided a group of players to sneak into the far corner.

It barely counts.

It came from Nigerian Kalu Uche against Greece, as his long diagonal ball hit the corner of the net. The others were from Asian countries.

First, Park Chu-Young hit a flat curling set piece into the corner of the net against Nigeria.

The other two came from Japan, who taught the football world how to hit set pieces in altitude with the Jabulani through stars Keisuke Honda and Yasuhito Endo.

Common opinion was to hit low flat free kicks with your laces. But it appears to be otherwise, despite what Mark Bresciano might tell you.

Honda and Endo didn’t hit theirs with too much force.

One of the reasons for this, possibly, is that the ball flies faster and further in altitude because of the different forces.

The reason keepers are complaining is because of the lessening reaction time they have in altitude because of the pace.

More pace means the ball moves less in altitude than at sea level.

With the free kick count at four, the goal count sits at 116 – at an average of 2.23 per game, before the Netherlands – Slovakia clash.

But the players appear to be adapting to the ball and the conditions.

More shots are hitting the target and there has been plenty of long range shooting that has caused trouble for the keepers in recent games.

Many of the goals have been from goalkeeper error.

Yet, my belief is that the goalkeepers have been their own worst enemies, rather than springing all the blame on the Jabulani.

Mental preparation has been off, with more time dedicated to criticizing the ball rather than saving it, and when it has been saved, or parried, it has been into the path of the striker, or into the net – as Robert Green will tell you.

The real problem with the Jabulani occurs in general play.

Most teams are struggling to control possession because of what some have described as a service station football.

Assuming they are right, as many of you will know, the ball would be difficult on the first touch.

We are also seeing more long shots because teams don’t feel confident in trying to regain possession in the middle of the park.

It would also explain the float (no, I refuse to call it movement) we have seen from some set pieces.

Honda and Endo have shown the world how it’s done, so let’s hope we see more of it in the remaining games. And it’s a good chance we will because we’ve been robbed of some favourite spectacles thus far.

The Crowd Says:

2010-06-30T03:05:02+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


I reckon we - in Aus - have been robbed by time zones. I like watching the WC, but I'm not enough of a fan to get up at midnight or 4am to watch a match. And I don't have the luxury of sleeping in the following morning.

2010-06-29T00:58:35+00:00

Lee

Guest


Have played rugby in SA at altitude -but not being a kicker can't comment. However, the kicker in our team who was prety modest in the distance department did reckon he was getting a good 10-15m extra. Otherwise, you just get tired very quickly I found.

2010-06-29T00:49:07+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


This is a good compilation from 1986. Seems like yesterday.

2010-06-29T00:13:37+00:00

MVDave

Guest


Ahhh Art...you mean like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3UfakTu9Cc Josimar for Brazil vs Nth Ireland

2010-06-28T23:56:49+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


FIFA should have gone back to the future and used the ball from the 1986 World Cup when it was last held at altitude. The adidas Azteca. There were some cracking goals scored that tournament. The Jabulani will go down in history as the Leyland P76 of footballs.

AUTHOR

2010-06-28T23:51:58+00:00

Dejan Kalinic

Roar Guru


Valid point on the ball Lee. Have you ever been in high altitude or played sport in it, be it football or otherwise? I'd love to hear from someone who has, to tell us the effects. I think the combination of the ball and the altitude has led to some very defensive teams getting solid results. Is that a bad thing? ... But we've barely seen free kicks go close or otherwise, and that's a shame.

AUTHOR

2010-06-28T23:49:14+00:00

Dejan Kalinic

Roar Guru


Thanks Andy, glad you read the piece..

2010-06-28T23:19:24+00:00

Lee

Guest


The ball as been shown to be towards the upper end of the FIFA sanctioned weight range for footballs. What other option is there though for the ball? If they took another already used ball design from the EPL, teams whose players didn't play in teh EPL would complain, and so on. As to the altitude, what next? Complaining about the wind or high temperatures? These are professional athletes, part of any sport is who adjusts to the conditions the best, otherwise, we would be playing all sport in indoor, climate/atmosphere controlled, spectator-less rooms, in order to remove all external/uncontrollable variables.

2010-06-28T22:42:49+00:00

Luke W

Guest


I think the ball itself has little to do with it, but altitude certainly does. But it's nothing that teams couldn't adapt to, so no one has the right to complain in my opinion.

2010-06-28T22:34:03+00:00

AndyRoo

Roar Guru


I don't think Dejan is saying it effected the Socceroos. We give a way a lot of fouls and don't have a top drawer free kick taker so it probably would have helped us. But it's hurt the tournament.

2010-06-28T21:58:51+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Nice article Dejan ;)

2010-06-28T20:53:53+00:00

Apelu Tielu

Guest


Dejan, everyone plays with the same ball and the Socceroo plays its opponents at the same grounds. Your comments are just too shallow, mate.

Read more at The Roar