The All-Australian selectors get it right, mostly

By Michael DiFabrizio / Expert

St Kilda’s Lenny Hayes deserved to be in the 2010 All-Australian team. Other than that oversight, you have to say this year the selectors have done a pretty decent job at picking the AFL’s team of the year. There really wasn’t too much else to complain about.

Hayes, of course, was instrumental in St Kilda not falling apart after Nick Riewoldt’s injury, both in terms of his performance and his leadership. Beyond that, he’s easily one of the toughest midfielders in the competition (if not the toughest midfielder in the competition).

This year he’s averaged 6.6 tackles per game – a figure way ahead of every single player selected last night (Luke Hodge was the closest with 5.7).

He’s also averaged 27.5 disposals – a figure three of the midfielders selected didn’t reach (Chris Judd, Scott Pendlebury and Hodge).

He was even ranked sixth in the competition for clearances this season.

To be fair, though, there wasn’t another truly glaring omission. Maybe Shane Mumford could’ve ousted Mark Jamar for that second ruck spot (surely at least one Sydney player could’ve made it?) or maybe there wasn’t a need for a second ruck at all. Maybe Collingwood and Geelong, with ten team members, were over-represented.

On the whole, however, most of the players selected seemed worthy.

FB: James Frawley, Brian Lake, Corey Enright
HB: Brendon Goddard, Harry Taylor, Harry O’Brien

Lake and Goddard are the indisputables of the back six, both are very much worthy of selection and have had huge years. Enright and O’Brien, in playing big roles in two of this year’s genuine contenders, also can’t be faulted.

Frawley was a topic of debate in pre-announcement discussions, but finishing a close second in Melbourne’s best and fairest count is a decent effort for a 21 year-old key defender. Taylor has arguably benefitted from there being few other standout centre half backs, but in fairness to him his stats do suggest he was the pick of the bunch.

C: Leigh Montagna, Luke Hodge (c), Joel Selwood
R: Aaron Sandilands, Dane Swan, Gary Ablett (vc)

Anyone who can find fault with the Sandilands-Swan-Ablett line did not watch any football this season – all would’ve been automatic selections. Same with Hodge, with the only debate around him being whether to place him along the half back line or in the middle (with Goddard down back that debate ended pretty quickly).

Of the others, you could argue whether Montagna or Selwood should be swapped for one of the midfielders on the interchange – or Hayes, for that matter, but I digress – although both have at least had strong years in very strong teams.

HF: Alan Didak, Lance Franklin, Paul Chapman
FF: Barry Hall, Jack Riewoldt, Mark LeCras

Going for three talls is perhaps the most controversial aspect of this forward line, although Riewoldt and Hall both deserved their spots thanks to their Coleman Medal shootout late in the season.

LeCras was unlucky to miss out last year, and you get the sense playing for the wooden spooners wouldn’t have helped his case this year, but those 12 goals against Essendon probably sealed it for him. Chapman and Didak are by no means surprise selections in this team.

I/C: Mark Jamar, Chris Judd, Steve Johnson, Scott Pendlebury

This is where the “Insert player from my team” suggestions start flowing. Before all that begins, let it be said Johnson might’ve been a bit lucky despite racking up a decent goal tally. Jamar, Judd and Pendlebury, as mentioned earlier, might’ve been a bit lucky too.

Outside the team announcement, Liam Jurrah was given mark of the year and Buddy Franklin goal of the year.

Jurrah’s mark was a beauty and a deserving winner, although the mark of his chief rival Goddard wouldn’t have looked out of place as a winner either. As for Franklin’s goal, it was good (and kind of surprising) to see a great running goal get rewarded, although strong build-up play has been a feature in a few winners over the past couple of years.

By the end of last night, it was easy to get the feeling the selectors, and those in charge of mark and goal of the year, had made the right calls.

Just as long as you forget about Lenny Hayes.

The Crowd Says:

2010-09-16T22:15:06+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Nope. Being selected in the All Australian team is an honorary award. It is not intended to be anything else.

2010-09-16T21:51:06+00:00

Fez's are cool

Guest


This isn't that team. This is the imaginary team that would play imaginary oponents if they existed in international AFL. They get a tie and a jacket if selected. The team that plays Ireland will be different.

2010-09-15T11:26:08+00:00

michael

Guest


duffield, malcheski, deledio or gilbert instead of obrien pavlich instead of steve j/ jamar hayes instead of pendlebury/judd

2010-09-15T09:18:45+00:00

danny

Guest


When do the All Australians play All Ireland?

2010-09-15T02:48:18+00:00

andrew

Guest


Wow, I hadn't seen that. I know you are picked against others in your position, I think one of Frawley's best moments of the season was when (unanimous choice) Jack Reiwoldt was sulking in the dugout late in the third term, round 19 - with no goals and a handful of possessions to his name. Richmond were more than competitive in the middle that game, and had plenty more i50s, but every time the ball came in, it went back out, usually with JF's fingerprints on it.

AUTHOR

2010-09-15T02:31:59+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Andrew, good comment. He has had a great season. Just to give you an idea of how Frawley was valued in the lead-up to the announcement, only three of the Herald Sun's 13 experts had him in their team, and one of those was on the bench: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/all-our-experts-all-australian-teams/story-e6frf9jf-1225915857077

2010-09-15T02:24:33+00:00

James

Roar Rookie


Kick to kick, You first state that it's very Victoria centric???? You then claim Geelong have too many reps based on them not winning minor premiership. Then you think Sydney should get a rep because they finished top 8??? 1 kick away from top 4??????? Well the Kangaroos were 1 kick away from top 8 (should have beaten Essendon {debatable!!}) so Brent Harvey should have been selected?? Based on your reasoning on why Sydney deserve a rep just points out why there are more vic players. 6 out of 8 team in finals 8. You can't have it both ways! Geelong had more reps than Collingwood because they have the star power. Collingwood have played an extremely consistent 'team' brand of footy and that is why they finished 1st. I'm a North supporter and must admit I was a little dissapointed that they came up empty but understand that it's based on opinion and they were picking the team as a team and NOT the best 22 players. I think every supporter could muster up a reason why some of their players could/should have been selected. Brady Rawlings - one of the best taggers but still amassed the 5th highest possesions in the league. Andrew Swallow - Lead the league in tackles and uses the ball well. Fits a definite role in a team. Brent Harvey - Speedy, breaks the lines and inspires the team. However I can completely see why they missed out. Hayes probably should be in their though as a better version of Swallow.

2010-09-15T01:10:53+00:00

andrew

Guest


didn't see much public debate on Frawley, but if I had I would have put my 2c worth in. I think he showed as much this season as Lake, or Enright. His consistent efforts all season, in a team that was up and down, were sensational. To top it off, the jobs that he did on Jonathon Brown and then on Jack Reiwoldt at the tail end of the season were absolute proof that he is the real deal. Pencil him in for next year.

2010-09-14T14:06:48+00:00

jimbo

Roar Guru


You get a nice suit and striped tie from the AFL.

2010-09-14T10:22:50+00:00

andy g

Guest


brad green deserves mention among the seriously unlucky. especially when johnson was pretty ordinart this season -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

2010-09-14T09:40:47+00:00

Fez's are cool

Guest


When is their next game?

2010-09-14T09:39:08+00:00

Chris

Guest


Holds about as much interest as international rules for mine.

2010-09-14T03:53:22+00:00

Mark

Guest


No question Hayes should be there. I would personally have moved Hodge to the backline at the expense of Enright to make room in the centre. Failing that, drop Judd or Pendlebury, and move Selwood to the bench.

2010-09-14T03:30:36+00:00

kick to kick

Guest


Very Victoria centric team. Only two players LeCras and Sandilands who play outside Vic. It wasn't a standout year for interstate teams but one has to suspect selectors have a bias . 6 Geelong reps in a team that wasnt even the minor premier is too much. Swans, who were 5th and one kick away from a top four finish were the only team in the final 8 without a representative. Malceski for instance was a more decisive player than Taylor.

AUTHOR

2010-09-14T01:47:03+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


No arguments here that Johnson was a bit lucky. Was fifth in goal kicking behind four players that did make the team, but you've got to draw the line somewhere.

AUTHOR

2010-09-14T01:43:02+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Care to elaborate on that one, Wiko?

2010-09-13T23:21:04+00:00

Justin

Roar Pro


Hayes would be in my team everyday, the bloke is a dead set GUN!

2010-09-13T22:32:31+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Lenny Hayes over Pendlebury any day of the week. Also beleive that Steve Johnson got there on reputation alone!

2010-09-13T20:02:58+00:00

Wiko11

Guest


Abblett? -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

Read more at The Roar