How Foxsports can help re-energise the A-League

By Tony Tannous / Expert

It’s been a crazy old week or so in the world of the round ball. After the beauty of Barcelona’s dismantling of Real Madrid came the beast in Zurich, as contrasting a pair of football occasions as you are ever likely to witness. Lionel Messi at the Nou Camp, a total mess at the Blatterbox.

Soon came another unedifying effort from Kevin Muscat, followed by the usual defence from his friends in the football media, then the mandatory slap on the wrist from the governing body.

In truth, Muscat’s clenched fist was probably the last thing on Ben Buckley’s mind after the failed World Cup bid prompted renewed calls for his head.

Add the referring error that led to Muscat’s blow-up, the error by the same referee 10 minutes earlier not to award Carlos Hernandez a second yellow for encroaching on a free kick, the error by Muscat himself in missing the header that lead to Matt McKay’s injury time equaliser (the latter two points conveniently ignored in the post-match discussion), and there were bungles all over the place.

Xavier Doherty, Marcus North and the Ashes selectors had nothing on football.

Thank God Messi was around for us to keep the faith.

Meanwhile, those most faithful to the local game began to look forward, in the knowledge life will go on, but only after a spot of calibration.

Perhaps the best discussion on the state of the game featured on Tuesday night, on Foxsports’ Fox Sports FC, or ‘The Club’ as it’s also known.

Skilfully stirred by Simon Hill, it featured some cracking debate from Andy Harper and Mike Cockerill, two guys who have cared much for the local game, and for a very long time, well before the word ‘blog’ even existed.

It was passionate and proud, as the panel moved from the failed bid through to such topics as the future of the Fury, the apparent need for a knock-out FFA Cup, the botch-job that has been the West Sydney Rovers, the concept of a marquee pool, the best time to position the season, the need for Lowy’s funds, among a procession of other subjects.

The real pity was there wasn’t a wider audience to take in the discourse. Such moments of “where are we at” are ratings bonanza’s for rugby league’s Footy Show.

But for a couple of exceptions, and I’m reminded regularly about Fox’s obsession with ex-players by disgruntled readers, the Fox football team do an outstanding job in covering the local game.

Whether it’s through the sharp work of ball-by-ball commentators Brenton Speed or Hill, the analysis of Harper, Paul Trimboli and Mark Bosnich, or the quick wit of Adam Peacock, in the main they do a great job, with hours and hours of the round ball.

That’s not to mention the obvious cash injection Fox made ahead of the second A-League season, remembering they paid absolute peanuts for the first season.

But how many football fans know about the great coverage?

Devoted football fans, like this correspondent, do. But what about the casual observer?

In a way, the team at Fox share something in common with the A-League. They have a product worthy of a wider audience, but lack the means to sell that message.

Whether through lack of marketing or limited reach, both products are hidden.

It’s a vicious cycle. The lack of free-to-air coverage means the league gets no oxygen and limited opportunity to sell itself, while this lack of interest in the league leads to less knowledge of Fox’s work.

The outcome? Both become less relevant, and that, at least to this observer, appears to be what’s happening.

So how can Fox help make the A-League, and conversely itself, more relevant, you ask?

It was a subject, not surprisingly, left out of their great debate on Tuesday night, so I’m broaching it here.

My thoughts on this were shared in a recent article on The Roar when I wrote:

“But with the game buried on pay TV for at least a couple more years (Fox could help its own cause and that of the league by on-selling a game a week – Friday night – to OneHD, and the FFA could help by facilitating such a move, if it isn’t already) and the honeymoon with the mainstream press and broader community well and truly over, there is much rebuilding to be done. Foremost is the need get the mainstream media on side, manage the message in a proactive and honest way and get some of the goodwill back. But that will take plenty of know-how and attention to detail.”

So I was pleased, no end, to hear former A-League head Archie Fraser utter the same sentiments in an interview with The World Game earlier this week:

“The competition needs to be promoted properly and there needs to be a renegotiating of the TV rights deal with Fox which allows a free to air component. While the contract isn’t up until 2013, deals are renegotiated all the time and if the FFA thought it could land a World Cup and only ended up with one vote, surely it can go out and tweak a deal which has left the code hidden from a great majority of the public,” Fraser said.

“The promotion just hasn’t been there also. People don’t know the A-League is even on. It’s become almost invisible to anybody who doesn’t watch Fox Sports TV.”

To expand on my September statement, here’s a model I’ve been mulling over, especially since the Zurich single vote, which I believe would be a win for competition and a win for Fox, providing some much needed oxygen (no mention of gas or oil here!!!) for both.

Provided, of course, there is a free-to-air network out there, most likely One HD or SBS, willing to be part of the deal, it would feature a Friday Night Game of the Week, which would remain live on Fox and be slightly delayed on free-to-air.

A weekly free-to-air game, at say 8.30pm, featuring one of the better games from the round, would provide a great lead-in for the weekend, and part of the deal should be that the free-to-air network not only promotes the league, but Fox’s coverage of the rest of the weekend.

To save on production costs, the free-to-air channel could feature the Fox commentary, with their own panel, before and after the game, to give it a bit of independence.

The devoted fan would likely tune in to the live Fox coverage, while the casual fan gets a taste of the A-League on free-to-air and starts to engage with the competition.

Soon, he or she may well be enticed to sign a Fox subscription.

For the FFA, such a deal should be paramount. People need to know there’s a product, and that it’s good.

By promising Fox two or three live games a weekend from 2013 onwards, as part of a new split deal with a free-to-air network, the FFA could ask them to share at least one game a week with a free-to-air network over the next couple of years.

Otherwise, the FFA might have nothing to sell in 2013, and Foxsports, even if they get the A-League for peanuts at the time, might have very little to cover.

This is a crucial period and a key deal, and all involved must get it right.

In many ways, the well-being of the A-League depends on it.

The Crowd Says:

2010-12-10T00:37:37+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


For me Fox broadcasting one match FTA is a no brainer as it advertises their product...

2010-12-09T21:58:28+00:00

Cpaaa

Guest


haha thanks lads, slip of the tongue

2010-12-09T21:30:08+00:00

James

Guest


Tony, from the tone of Cockerill's story today, I'd say you're onto an absolute winner here. He's on the Fox payroll, and for the first time has mentioned free to air. In fact, it's the first time I can recall anyone at Fox mentioning free to air. Seems Fox and the Double FA have listened.

2010-12-09T20:51:44+00:00

bruski

Roar Pro


Agga, I would not go as far as saying OneHD has not got much on between Oct - March... The NFL and NBA is going great guns at the moment! Good article, I enjoyed that.

2010-12-09T11:48:24+00:00

RobD

Guest


Yep, completely agree there are solutions on both points. But I think there are lessons to be learnt from the NRL experience: 1. I know many in the NRL are looking at moving from flexible to set scheduling as a way to increase memberships. E.g. If you know you work every Sat night and at the start of the season you see all of your games are scheduled for Sundays you know you can get value for money on you membership. We would have to be careful not to adversely affect membership numbers by going the other way. Also, match day crowds have shown preference for different times in different cities. I think Adelaide gets it's biggest crowds on Fri nights but Sydney gets them Sunday arvos. Moving fixtures around based on form might boost the TV numbers but could definitely affect the crowd numbers. 2. Yes, here I'd like to think so too. But you only have to look at One's treatment of the Bundesliga and Serie A replays to know that it's not necessarily the case. (Though I do note the non-occurrence of ads in their live telecasts.)

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:55:07+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


What a Joke; Wheelhouse gets two weeks, Muscat nada

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:44:31+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


With all the talk about the need to have Football men running Football (one bloke says it, they all say it), I've heard nobody mention any names. If it came to that, two I've long felt have the potential are; Kimon Taliadoros Brendan Schwab FNSW might prove a good stepping stone. If he can master it, bigger things might open up. Btw, whoever wrote that article forgot about his time at Marconi, and I seem to remember him at the Power as well

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:31:37+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Great comment Rob. To take up your two points; 1. The FFA could also come up with a flexible schedule, and decide the Friday night game of the week closer to that day, as league does, ensuring form teams feature. 2. I would like to think even commercial free-to-air networks, these days, have learnt this is just not the done thing.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:26:10+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Excellent comment Stevo, needs to be spot on.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:23:54+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Twenty20 Cricket, through the Big-Bash, made some great ground last season Brett. Football, caught up with the bid, dropped the ball and missed a big chance. Time to catch up.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:18:55+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


I was beginning to think Jeremy Brockie wasn't injured, just busy :-)

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:14:17+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Spot on, Fox to be rewarded for their support and great work so far with a good portion of the new deal. But the league also needs oxygen and exposure.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:06:13+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


JAJI, that thought, Buckley hanging around for the deal, did cross my mind while writing this. His role in the AFL deal was said to be one of the main reasons Lowy hired him.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T10:02:12+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Just on the mainstream bit agga, to my view they did get on board at the start of the A-League and that honeymoon went on for a good few years. There was much goodwill and the A-League thrived on the back of it. It changed a bit, in my view, around the time News Ltd went to town on Tim Cahill mid last year...that was the day the honeymoon ended, and it was clear to me where it was coming from.

AUTHOR

2010-12-09T09:55:13+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


But will everyone come to the party? Cheers James, that's the big queston. In my view, it's in everyone's interest if they want this baby to work.

2010-12-09T08:45:32+00:00

James

Guest


I can assure you that Tony's column always has the attention of some very heavy hitters, so I'd encourage you all to share your views. They all tune in here.

2010-12-09T08:09:18+00:00

Betty B

Guest


spot on Tony - you should email your article to Simon and co

2010-12-09T06:52:21+00:00

RobD

Guest


Hehe.. think you mean Jenny Brockie :-)

2010-12-09T06:49:14+00:00

RobD

Guest


Tony, love the idea. What you're suggesting is basically the same as the way the NRL worked in Sydney up until a few years ago. I think it has merit. A few considerations though: 1. The reason it worked for NIne with the NRL was because they had complete control over the schedule so they could make sure that they pick games with either the most popular Sydney teams (St George, Parra, Easts etc) or teams that were in good form. This ensured that they could keep their ratings high. The A-League on the other hand has a full schedule that is set in stone at the start of the season and largely 1 team per city so it would be much more difficult for the free-to-air broadcaster to ensure a good quality/high rating game for the Friday night slot. 2. Showing a rugby league game on delay, while somewhat frustrating, can be tolerated because of the natural breaks afforded by tries, penalties etc. My fear would be that providing a delayed football game would prove too tempting to a free-to-air broadcaster to put ad breaks in the middle of the game. If we can address these two issues I think you're on a winner.

2010-12-09T04:39:51+00:00

hobnobit

Guest


Actually the mainstream media give more coverage to the a-league than it warrants. The age is a sponsor, news carries multiple stories everyday, yet crowds and ratings remain low. Media is a business, if there's money to be made covering the a-league, then media will cover it. That there's as much coverage as there is should please soccer people given the league's unpopularity (nbl teams attract the same following as many of the a-league clubs yet receive inferior coverage)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar