How Foxsports can help re-energise the A-League
By Tony Tannous, 9 Dec 2010 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, FFA, football, Lionel Messi, World Cup football
It’s been a crazy old week or so in the world of the round ball. After the beauty of Barcelona’s dismantling of Real Madrid came the beast in Zurich, as contrasting a pair of football occasions as you are ever likely to witness. Lionel Messi at the Nou Camp, a total mess at the Blatterbox.
Soon came another unedifying effort from Kevin Muscat, followed by the usual defence from his friends in the football media, then the mandatory slap on the wrist from the governing body.
In truth, Muscat’s clenched fist was probably the last thing on Ben Buckley’s mind after the failed World Cup bid prompted renewed calls for his head.
Add the referring error that led to Muscat’s blow-up, the error by the same referee 10 minutes earlier not to award Carlos Hernandez a second yellow for encroaching on a free kick, the error by Muscat himself in missing the header that lead to Matt McKay’s injury time equaliser (the latter two points conveniently ignored in the post-match discussion), and there were bungles all over the place.
Xavier Doherty, Marcus North and the Ashes selectors had nothing on football.
Thank God Messi was around for us to keep the faith.
Meanwhile, those most faithful to the local game began to look forward, in the knowledge life will go on, but only after a spot of calibration.
Perhaps the best discussion on the state of the game featured on Tuesday night, on Foxsports’ Fox Sports FC, or ‘The Club’ as it’s also known.
Skilfully stirred by Simon Hill, it featured some cracking debate from Andy Harper and Mike Cockerill, two guys who have cared much for the local game, and for a very long time, well before the word ‘blog’ even existed.
It was passionate and proud, as the panel moved from the failed bid through to such topics as the future of the Fury, the apparent need for a knock-out FFA Cup, the botch-job that has been the West Sydney Rovers, the concept of a marquee pool, the best time to position the season, the need for Lowy’s funds, among a procession of other subjects.
The real pity was there wasn’t a wider audience to take in the discourse. Such moments of “where are we at” are ratings bonanza’s for rugby league’s Footy Show.
But for a couple of exceptions, and I’m reminded regularly about Fox’s obsession with ex-players by disgruntled readers, the Fox football team do an outstanding job in covering the local game.
Whether it’s through the sharp work of ball-by-ball commentators Brenton Speed or Hill, the analysis of Harper, Paul Trimboli and Mark Bosnich, or the quick wit of Adam Peacock, in the main they do a great job, with hours and hours of the round ball.
That’s not to mention the obvious cash injection Fox made ahead of the second A-League season, remembering they paid absolute peanuts for the first season.
But how many football fans know about the great coverage?
Devoted football fans, like this correspondent, do. But what about the casual observer?
In a way, the team at Fox share something in common with the A-League. They have a product worthy of a wider audience, but lack the means to sell that message.
Whether through lack of marketing or limited reach, both products are hidden.
It’s a vicious cycle. The lack of free-to-air coverage means the league gets no oxygen and limited opportunity to sell itself, while this lack of interest in the league leads to less knowledge of Fox’s work.
The outcome? Both become less relevant, and that, at least to this observer, appears to be what’s happening.
So how can Fox help make the A-League, and conversely itself, more relevant, you ask?
It was a subject, not surprisingly, left out of their great debate on Tuesday night, so I’m broaching it here.
My thoughts on this were shared in a recent article on The Roar when I wrote:
“But with the game buried on pay TV for at least a couple more years (Fox could help its own cause and that of the league by on-selling a game a week – Friday night – to OneHD, and the FFA could help by facilitating such a move, if it isn’t already) and the honeymoon with the mainstream press and broader community well and truly over, there is much rebuilding to be done. Foremost is the need get the mainstream media on side, manage the message in a proactive and honest way and get some of the goodwill back. But that will take plenty of know-how and attention to detail.”
So I was pleased, no end, to hear former A-League head Archie Fraser utter the same sentiments in an interview with The World Game earlier this week:
“The competition needs to be promoted properly and there needs to be a renegotiating of the TV rights deal with Fox which allows a free to air component. While the contract isn’t up until 2013, deals are renegotiated all the time and if the FFA thought it could land a World Cup and only ended up with one vote, surely it can go out and tweak a deal which has left the code hidden from a great majority of the public,” Fraser said.
“The promotion just hasn’t been there also. People don’t know the A-League is even on. It’s become almost invisible to anybody who doesn’t watch Fox Sports TV.”
To expand on my September statement, here’s a model I’ve been mulling over, especially since the Zurich single vote, which I believe would be a win for competition and a win for Fox, providing some much needed oxygen (no mention of gas or oil here!!!) for both.
Provided, of course, there is a free-to-air network out there, most likely One HD or SBS, willing to be part of the deal, it would feature a Friday Night Game of the Week, which would remain live on Fox and be slightly delayed on free-to-air.
A weekly free-to-air game, at say 8.30pm, featuring one of the better games from the round, would provide a great lead-in for the weekend, and part of the deal should be that the free-to-air network not only promotes the league, but Fox’s coverage of the rest of the weekend.
To save on production costs, the free-to-air channel could feature the Fox commentary, with their own panel, before and after the game, to give it a bit of independence.
The devoted fan would likely tune in to the live Fox coverage, while the casual fan gets a taste of the A-League on free-to-air and starts to engage with the competition.
Soon, he or she may well be enticed to sign a Fox subscription.
For the FFA, such a deal should be paramount. People need to know there’s a product, and that it’s good.
By promising Fox two or three live games a weekend from 2013 onwards, as part of a new split deal with a free-to-air network, the FFA could ask them to share at least one game a week with a free-to-air network over the next couple of years.
Otherwise, the FFA might have nothing to sell in 2013, and Foxsports, even if they get the A-League for peanuts at the time, might have very little to cover.
This is a crucial period and a key deal, and all involved must get it right.
In many ways, the well-being of the A-League depends on it.
Recommend this story.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Would a video referee work in football? (103)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Manchester City, ‘Uniting’ the sporting world (60)
- Bling when you’re winning
- Dual signings give Mariners A-League boost (12)
- Would a video referee work in football? (104)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (18)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Bling when you’re winning (1)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Explore:
- A-League, FFA, football, Lionel Messi, World Cup football



December 9th 2010 @ 6:04am
James said | December 9th 2010 @ 6:04am | Report comment
Tony, I love your work, but this piece takes it to another level by encapsulating everything that is wrong about the game at the moment. No promotion and no energy, and a limited future unless Double FA can arrange a free to air component.
I agree it’s even in Fox’s interest. But will everyone come to the party?
Thanks for another great article, the type we are unlikely to see on Fox, SBS, One or even from Cockerill, as they all have a vested interest.
December 9th 2010 @ 7:55pm
Tony Tannous said | December 9th 2010 @ 7:55pm | Report comment
But will everyone come to the party?
Cheers James, that’s the big queston. In my view, it’s in everyone’s interest if they want this baby to work.
December 9th 2010 @ 6:49am
agga78 said | December 9th 2010 @ 6:49am | Report comment
The A league needs to get onto FTA, one hd is the likely broadcaster, but I would hope for channel 10 myself, they don’t have much sport from Oct to March and the A league is a very good product to watch, Melb vs Brisbane last friday was an epic and the derby this weekend highlight the A league as a really entertaining league. The amount of quaity matches this season has unbelievable from Melb vs Fury, to the game of the year Heart vs Brisbane and many many more which have been as good as any sport in this country.
Tony I will pick you on your mainstream media comment, the mainstream media have never had any good will towards football, infact they have done eveything in their power to stop the game, even this season when we had the biggest crowd of the season for the Melbourne derby, channel 9 had the 3rd story of the news as trouble flares at derby, showing 1 person lighting a few flares and then didn’t show any of the match highlights in the sports section, even though 26k people turned up which showed there was great general interest in the match.
December 9th 2010 @ 6:58am
Football United said | December 9th 2010 @ 6:58am | Report comment
your right about channel 9, they are the scum of the media world. same thing happened after victory brisbane when it only covered the aftermath of the theoklitos controversy and refused to show any of the game.
December 9th 2010 @ 2:39pm
hobnobit said | December 9th 2010 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
Actually the mainstream media give more coverage to the a-league than it warrants. The age is a sponsor, news carries multiple stories everyday, yet crowds and ratings remain low. Media is a business, if there’s money to be made covering the a-league, then media will cover it. That there’s as much coverage as there is should please soccer people given the league’s unpopularity (nbl teams attract the same following as many of the a-league clubs yet receive inferior coverage)
December 9th 2010 @ 8:02pm
Tony Tannous said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:02pm | Report comment
Just on the mainstream bit agga, to my view they did get on board at the start of the A-League and that honeymoon went on for a good few years. There was much goodwill and the A-League thrived on the back of it.
It changed a bit, in my view, around the time News Ltd went to town on Tim Cahill mid last year…that was the day the honeymoon ended, and it was clear to me where it was coming from.
December 10th 2010 @ 6:51am
bruski said | December 10th 2010 @ 6:51am | Report comment
Agga, I would not go as far as saying OneHD has not got much on between Oct – March… The NFL and NBA is going great guns at the moment!
Good article, I enjoyed that.
December 9th 2010 @ 6:56am
JAJI said | December 9th 2010 @ 6:56am | Report comment
Tony I believe this is the reason Ben Buckley is staying around. He was hired by Lowy amongst other things to do the next TV deal. Remember he was the architect of the AFL deal back in 2005. A New and better TV deal does 2 things – firstly it gets the game back on Free to Air and secondly it injects more cash into the game which means more cash for clubs and a higher salary cap
This fact is not being brought up bu Craig Foster, Jess Fink, Ray Gatt and all the others. They wont answer one question – who within the football community at present has the ability to negotiate such a critical TV deal? Recall Sydney Rovers was all about old football getting involved – and its been a shambles from day one
December 9th 2010 @ 1:20pm
Raghu said | December 9th 2010 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
When football people were incharge of the NSL they negotiated the TV rights with 7 and look what happpened
December 9th 2010 @ 8:06pm
Tony Tannous said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:06pm | Report comment
JAJI, that thought, Buckley hanging around for the deal, did cross my mind while writing this. His role in the AFL deal was said to be one of the main reasons Lowy hired him.
December 9th 2010 @ 7:05am
Redb said | December 9th 2010 @ 7:05am | Report comment
Why would Foxtel agree to allowing one game on free to air? Makes no sense. The promotional benefit is outweighed by the whole purpose of having exclusive sporting content which is to drive subscriptions to Foxtel not allow ‘product’ leakages.
As for promotion, radio Ads frequent SEN in Melbourne, Ads’ in newspapers. In fact both newspapers carry reviews and previews, for example today there is a double page spread in the Herald Sun on last nights Heart v Jets game. People know its on.
2013 is the first real chance to change the Tv coverage, by then the alternate media platforms from Foxtel will be widely available and content hungry from Telstra to Apple TV, Fetch TV,etc. All heading down the path of ‘on demand’ sport/movies with viewer choice as the narrative.
I guess this means though that breaking out of exclusive media might be difficult unless the digital channels can pick up content. At least the dollars will come from new media platforms.
December 9th 2010 @ 9:25am
Andyroo said | December 9th 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
One game a week would work as pretty much a 2 hr advertisment for Foxsports RedB.
At best your local team is only on once a month… you want to see your team play next week against Adelaide you are going to need Fox Sports. It’s the teaser, the sample the bird on the door.
You could even show the games 12 hours after they were on Fox. The Friday night game shown at 10:00 am on a Saturday would remove about zero value from Fox, for One HD it would replace Nascar or some drag racing auction show and it would be virtually free and more relevant.
It wouldn’t be enough to spark a revolution but it would help a little bit…. do a lot of things that help a bit and we are on our way.
December 9th 2010 @ 1:18pm
Redb said | December 9th 2010 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
AndyRoo,
My point was I dont see Foxtel agreeing to this. Why would they leak their product offering?
Maybe the FFA should look at dual promotion of A Leagues games on FTA – they would IMO be interested in that. A TV advert that promotes up and coming A League fixtures on Foxtel,etc. That is a win for both.
For this to work it would have needed to be included in the original TV deal as seed games or teaser games offered on Free to air but then the main games are only on Foxtel.
At the end of the day I wouldnt be hoping for Foxtel to get the A League on free to air it is counter productive for them.
December 9th 2010 @ 7:12am
Midfielder said | December 9th 2010 @ 7:12am | Report comment
Wise words Tony hope somebody out there is listening
December 9th 2010 @ 7:17am
Adam said | December 9th 2010 @ 7:17am | Report comment
Thankyou Tony! A constructive solution to fixing some of the problems with the game. It’s so refreshing to hear someone actually put forward suggestions on how to fix the game instead of talentless hacks like Fink who just whinge all day without putting up any ideas. Well done!
December 9th 2010 @ 7:38am
Hooplah said | December 9th 2010 @ 7:38am | Report comment
Sensible, but it simply will not happen.
If anything there will be less football on FTA and more on Fox Sports.
One HD will be scrapped by Packer and Murdoch so you are forced to get Foxtel if you want sports and SBS only puts up games out of hours when you have to be truely committed fan to bother.
December 9th 2010 @ 8:12am
Lu said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:12am | Report comment
All the free to air lobbist just don’t realise that who will actually watch this one game a week?
Do you all forget that AFL do not get beamed into northern states live because no one there watches or cares? Do you all forget NRL is not beamed into southern states because no one watches or cares?
These are two of the biggest sports in the country. They are the most supported and most watch and yet the free to air channels, who paid bucketloads of money for them, make the economic decision to not broadcast them to the entire country because a rerun movie or whatever will actually have more viewers than the 2 biggest sports in the country in certain states..
To make it commercially viable for even SBS to show an A-league game, they have to get it for peanuts. Will the potential exposure make up for the lost revenue?
We need to remember that football is a distant 5th sport in Australia in terms of free to air TV broadcasting.. even bastekball is a better option for commercial television (there is can’t be commercial breaks in football).
FoxSports is doing the best job for football. The exposure it has on the channel, the money it is pumping into the league.
FFA and football supporters will have to tread very carefully when it comes to boardcasting rights.. by chasing this free to air mirage, we could bite the hand that feeds us..
December 9th 2010 @ 11:19am
RedOrDead said | December 9th 2010 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Lu I can’t agree with your comment. Yes AFL and NRL are the first and second biggest sports in this country respectively, but I wouldn’t say that the A-League is 5th. On the same token, where the AFL is not shown live in the northern states and the NRL not shown live in the Southern states, the A-League is shown live Nationally! This isn’t a matter of a Victorian sport expanding to northern states or NRL moving more and more south like the cane toads; the A-League, or let’s call it plainly “Football” is played all over Australia, by all states, by all nationalities, races and even sexes. This is exaclty why it’s called “The world game”.
Some exposure on FTA television would go a long way in re-energising football and as Andyroo commented earlier, if One HD gets a game already played LIVE on Fox Sports and plays it the next day, what’s wrong with that? Someone sitting on the couch with nothing better to watch will watch it because we are a football hungry nation. I don’t know about playing it at 10am on a Saturday morning, but if you play it at 5pm on Saturday evening on ONE or SBS and advertise a game on Fox Sports 1 coming up LIVE at 7pm would be great for the A-League AND Fox Sports! Do this again on the Sunday afternoon (play a game which was shown Live on Fox the day earlier) and you get two A-League games on FTA TV. At the same time Fox Sports would get a free plug in return for selling an already televised game to a free-to-air channel; it’s a win/win for all, but the biggest winner of all would undoubtedly be Australian Football.
December 9th 2010 @ 11:22am
TheMagnificent11 said | December 9th 2010 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Tony isn’t saying that Fox shouldn’t have coverage. He’s talking about Fox selling the rights to one game per week next season. So Fox shows the game live and gets compensated for the FTA delayed coverage. Win-win from Fox’s point of view (and 3rd win if it convinces more people to sign up for Fox).
He also said that Fox should have the majority of the rights in the next TV deal. So I don’t see how this is “biting the hand”. Fox still gets to be the home of football.
December 9th 2010 @ 8:14pm
Tony Tannous said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:14pm | Report comment
Spot on, Fox to be rewarded for their support and great work so far with a good portion of the new deal.
But the league also needs oxygen and exposure.
December 9th 2010 @ 8:44am
KP said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Its not good business sense for Fox to sell its biggest game to FTA – thats where it’ll make the most money with the most viewers, conversely its not great for the A-League to show its poorer games on FTA because it wont bring new people to the game.
Foxtel can only do so much – Woolies can park Old Spice at eye level and at a great price, but only old hardcore users will buy it, the A-League needs to market itself hard, like Old Spice recently has, and get more people onto its product!
December 9th 2010 @ 8:44am
Australian Football said | December 9th 2010 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Tony—–words of wisdom from you yet again. Absolutely correct, and I have no faith in Ben Buckley to deliver a favourable TV deal of any sort—he has shown to be a yes man, not a football warrior, or a competent negotiator. I think a man like Archie Frazer (who I once wrongly blamed for the ills of the A-League) has blown the whistle on the man BB who should now be shown the door… I would support Archie Fraser as the new CEO to negotiate a new tweaked FOX TV deal before it’s too late.. He is a Football man with courage to speak out and truly loves the game Football..