Civil war, corruption and delusion: Libya or the FIFA?

By JackBoard / Roar Rookie

Widespread corruption allegations, gross wealth and a deeply unpopular leader whose behaviour has provoked a fierce reaction from his own people – so called rebels on a mission to bring him down. A building wrath from the international community and a fraught electoral system.

No this isn’t Libya under the dictatorial regime of Colonel Gaddafi, it is FIFA under Sepp Blatter.

For every football lover, this should be a damning comparison.

Blatter, the self-appointed captain of the ship, has been reinstated unopposed as football governing body’s president and with it injected a fresh booster of venom into the veins of the sport.

For FIFA is a poisoned body, or as the man himself has described it, a “ship in troubled waters”.

Whichever way you want to put it, instead of setting it “back on course”, it is time for Blatter to walk the plank.

From the day he took over the role from João Havelange, Blatter has acted with an irrational, inflated sense of self and promoted the basest of cultures. His very first days were scandal-ridden and blighted by controversy. Not much has changed since.

The entire principle of leading FIFA should be about football, not politics, not personalities, and Blatter has proven not to be someone who follows that guideline.

Like Colonel Gaddafi – he continues to rule in state of delusion, somehow believing that despite widespread criticism and signs the organisation is broken, all is well.

“My people love me” is the catch cry of the North African dictator; Blatter would be wise not to make the same public assumption.

The “sweeping” changes he announced during his presidential inauguration were token measures designed to create an impression of a new openness and a departure from back-room dealings and dirty cash. All nations will now vote for future locations of World Cups – cynics and Marxists alike might call that “spreading the wealth”.

The 17 votes against Blatter in the election were a mild sting; bees brave enough to make the bear angry. British officials making a stand were courageous; the nature of the beast means they will likely fall steeply down through FIFA’s deep hierarchy.

Equally, the FFA’s silence over the issue typifies Australia’s unstable and timid role on the world football stage. It is difficult to imagine many other scenarios where we wouldn’t protest, or at least investigate, widespread claims of corruption.

Now, football has never been a pure pastime – just take a look at your average English High Street punter (not pretty). But, the months following the shock selection of Qatar as the 2022 World Cup hosts have been unprecedented in their dubiousness.

Qatar was always an odd choice to host one of the world’s largest events. An emirate state scorched by encroaching desert and a crippling summer. A nation with little football history, let alone success and laws that heavily restrict alcohol, ban homosexuality and do little to protect human rights.

Much of the required infrastructure (there are no stadiums, railways etc) will be performed by immigrant labourers, and Ramadan will fall around the months the World Cup is normally held.

Sure, these large sporting organisations have fallen in love with the idea of taking their respective games to new frontiers, but Blatter’s commentary about many of these issues epitomised his ignorance of significant issues central to the World Game.

What may have swung influence Qatar’s way is a result of massive investment worth hundreds of millions of dollars to develop lucrative oil and natural gas reserves in the country – from all accounts, that money has been dripped into the open pockets of FIFA executives.

Blatter continues to deny any complicity with the notion Qatar “bought” the World Cup, yet there is mounting evidence that corruption is endemic within FIFA – the place he has an all-seeing eye over, his baby. And, while the winds of change have blown through the Arab world, most of FIFA’s congress seems disturbingly content with their lavish status quo.

Of course, they are comfortable; a FIFA executive role is akin to a golden ticket to Willy Wonka’s factory, only for adults.

As the days pass and the scandals stack up, FIFA will continue to lose credibility and legitimacy, which is a situation that can only hurt the game’s development throughout the world. Unlike Libya, FIFA is too powerful to become a pariah – making the potential for collapse all the more dangerous.

The first step should be a simple one. No, it’s not a NATO-led strike force, but it involves the same type of fight.

Overhaul the leader and let the cleansing begin.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2011-06-03T02:41:20+00:00

JackBoard

Roar Rookie


I understand your point Oly - by no means do I intend to contrast the actions of the two mean - or the consequences of their leadership. The loss of human life versus sport can never be a justified argument. But, I wanted to point our how ridiculous each regime is, and the reasons Blatter must go

AUTHOR

2011-06-03T02:38:45+00:00

JackBoard

Roar Rookie


I think if you had an election based on a vote from the general public, the result would be far more damning for Blatter. Just because no-one in FIFA has the gumption to stand up to him, doesn't endorse his leadership - we should all be stakeholders in football and it's shame our representatives can't take a tough stand

2011-06-03T00:47:21+00:00

oly

Guest


Poor taste to compare Libya to FIFA I reckon. This is from yesterday's Football 365 media watch on similar comparsion in the Sun: "Nobody likes Gaddafi because he has has presided over a totalitarian regime for over 40 years, has made the formation of an opposition party illegal and punishable by death, frequently executes dissenters in public, been party to dozens of assassinations over the years and then there's Lockerbie. We could, of course, go on. Nobody likes Sepp Blatter because he's not keen on goalline technology and may or may not have been involved in some shady dealings in Zurich."

2011-06-02T23:47:14+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


Regime change is only truly effective when the constituents rise up, protest and demand a change of leadership. But, when given the chance to change leadership ... or, at least postpone the leadership vote, the constituents said "NO, we're happy with our current leader". And, with over 90% voting in his favour of his continuing Presidency of FIFA, I reckon Sepp Blatter must be one of the most strongly endorsed leaders of any organisation - business or Government.

Read more at The Roar