Does 'Rampage' have a chance at UFC 135?

By Sam Cupitt / Roar Guru

For many, Quinton “Rampage” Jackson is nothing but the next highlight to add to UFC Champion Jon Jones’s expanding show reel. It’s not exactly hard to see why public opinion is leaning that way.

Jones’ capturing of the light heavyweight title was as skilful as it was brutal, while ‘Rampage’ has almost faded into the background following his defeat to Rashad Evans early last year.

Jackson’s title shot is seen as more of a product of circumstance than actual merit, with fans more interested in seeing how Jones fares against former teammate, Evans instead.

But should we write Jackson off before he even steps into the cage with Jones? It wasn’t after all that long ago that Jackson ruled the whole division.

Maybe we should look back at what happened to Jackson after he lost the title and his road back to title contention to see if we really should write him off.

After losing his title to Forrest Griffin in 2008, Rampage immediately bounced back with a cathartic knockout win over Wanderlei Silva. That win looked like it was going to score him a title shot against Evans at UFC 96. Evans was not ready in time and he instead met Evans’ teammate, Keith Jardine who he would defeat by unanimous decision.

Immediately following that fight, Evans entered the cage and the two went nose-to-nose in the infamous “Don’t say that, Rashad” exchange.

The confrontation was meant to hype up the upcoming title fight but the rescheduling of the Frank Mir/Brock Lesnar heavyweight match-up meant that the fight had to get pushed forward.

Rampage was unable to recover from the Jardine fight in time and Evans went on to get demolished by Lyoto Machida at UFC 98.

In any other situation Rampage would have received a title shot against Machida, but the hype behind a potential Jackson/Evans bout was too great and the two were made opposing coaches on The Ultimate Fighter.

During filming, Rampage would sign on to play B.A. Baracus in the A-Team Movie, which resulted in the fight having to be pushed back. The decision angered UFC management and Rampage, feeling disrespected, briefly retired from the sport.

A year after his victory over Jardine, Rampage announced his return to the Octagon and met Evans at UFC 114. The time away seemed to affect him and he dropped a unanimous decision.

Since then he has picked up a disputable but impressive win over Lyoto Machida and a lacklustre but clinical decision win over Matt Hamill.

So since losing his title, Rampage has gone 4-1 with his only loss coming to Rashad Evans. A loss that came after a year long lay-off where he blew up in weight and had external pressures from his movie commitments and quarrels with UFC management.

Sure, these factors are by Rampage’s own doing but that doesn’t change the fact they were at play.

Looking at these fights its hard to argue that Rampage ever stopped being one of the world’s premiere light heavyweights.

So why then are we writing him off?

If you look at Jones’ past fights it’s clear that the main reason he wins fights is his superior wrestling. He completely ragdolled powerhouse wrestlers such as Matt Hamill, Vladimir Matyushenko and Ryan Bader.

So I guess if he did it to them he can do it Rampage?

I’m not completely convinced. Apart from being an excellent boxer, Rampage is a more than astute wrestler. More than astute doesn’t really cut it against Jones but Rampage’s defensive wrestling gave Evans fits in their fight and he also managed to stuff all of Hamill’s takedowns with ease (even if they were poorly set-up).

Jones probably has Rampage covered in that area but there’s still a chance and surely one big enough to not write Rampage off completely.

So if it’s not just that then it must be because the public think Jones has Rampage covered on the feet as well.

For all of Jones’ flashiness his striking fundamentals do appear to still need some work. They get covered up by his dominating ground game and spinning elbows and punches but they are there.

People seem to discredit Rampage’s win over Machida because they believe the decision should have gone the other way, but what people forget is how well Rampage did in stifling the riddle of Machida’s striking. Only Mauricio “Shogun” Rua was able to do it before him, and it shows how solid Rampage’s striking game is.

As flashy as Jones’ striking is, it’s not on Machida’s level. There’s a very good chance that if the fight stays on the feet for an extended period of time, Rampage will be able to make inroads on the untested chin of Jones.

With all that said, there is good reason behind Jones being the favourite for Sunday’s contest. This piece is in no way trying to instil Rampage as the favourite, but to say he is without a chance is just nutty.

The Crowd Says:

2011-09-24T04:55:14+00:00

S.T.

Guest


Even though Rampage has won his previous fights they haven't been won in traditional "Rampage" style(KO's) so you have to give Jones a slight chance to win this bout.I find it interesting that Jackson wants to be respected by his opponents but he talks a load of BS about whoever he faces in the UFC,he should have a teaspoon of cement and harden up Princess!!!

2011-09-22T06:53:12+00:00

Wylie

Guest


Some of the fighters who aren't good enough to challenge for titles like fighting standing up because they know that that is generally what most of the crowd want to see. If your fights are popular you are more likely to get invited back to fight again (and earn more money). Hence why a guy like Chris Leben had been in the UFC for so long.

2011-09-22T05:30:28+00:00

all7days

Roar Guru


The UFC rules are set up slightly differently to Pride and it actually favours BJJ and wrestling. Most fighters do use their hands a lot more because of how small the gloves are. It's easier to land a punch to the face than a kick and a landed punch always has the chance for a knockout. I would also like a bit more of a stratagy to the kicks. One problem is a lot of guys are scared to kick because they become vunerable to a takedown which yeilds points for the other fighter. One takedown and you can lose a round. The organisers have been smarter in the last few events and placed strikers on the cards. Just wait for GSP's next fight though, they'll likely be rolling around on the ground for 25 minutes.

2011-09-22T05:14:55+00:00

Sledgeandhammer

Guest


Just got foxtel so watching a bit more UFC of late, but not up on all the names. I wonder how much pressure these guys are under to fight in a particular style? In the past all fights used to go to the ground, even strikers would get into ground fights without scrambling too hard to get up. Now I see a lot of ground fighters spending the whole fight trading blows standing up. The commentators say stuff like "these guys have made a pact to have an old fashioned stand up war tonight". So to me it all seems a bit preconceived. I would love to see a stand up fighter actually use a smart strategy for a change too - too many ineffective high kicks and charges, why not stand back work the low kicks to front thigh, jab, tiip, do some damage in round 1 at least? If your opponent goes to ground, don't try to grapple, hit his feet/ ankles with low kicks... big bone on small bone.. anyway.

2011-09-22T03:58:57+00:00

Wylie

Guest


I dislike both Koscheck and Hughes so I kinda hope they just beat the crap out of each other for three rounds.

2011-09-22T01:55:10+00:00

matt mitrione

Guest


you wish. mitrione will slaughter kongo

AUTHOR

2011-09-22T01:46:50+00:00

Sam Cupitt

Roar Guru


Yeah I'm taking Koscheck to beat Hughes, even if i do despise him. I'll take Diaz over Gomi as well, as Gomi just looks confused lately. I'd like to see Hunt win but I have a feeling he might be taken down early and submitted (with a keylock). And I'll take Browne against Broughton but I don't care that much about that fight.

AUTHOR

2011-09-22T01:44:40+00:00

Sam Cupitt

Roar Guru


Rashad's got a decent chance but I think he might be a bit too small. Rampage is excellent defensively as well so if he can withstand Jones for a few rounds he'll wear him down. Jones is a big boy and he does tire.

2011-09-21T23:41:53+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Yeah there's Australasian interest with Mark Hunt and James Te Huna on the card - Hunt on the main card too, with a great quote from his interview with Sam, saying he could've been beaten by a wooden chair... http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/19/mark-hunt-and-james-te-huna-fly-the-australasian-flag-at-ufc-135/

2011-09-21T23:35:21+00:00

all7days

Roar Guru


Well I'm hoping my Fellow NZer Mark Hunt wins in a brainless slugfest. I hate Diaz, but he should win with his crazy BJJ. Isn't it Hughes fighting Koscheck? I'm backing Hughes to finish on a high.

2011-09-21T23:29:23+00:00

thesportsguy

Guest


any thoughts on the other fights on the card? i like koscheck to beat hughes (in possibly his last ufc fight) nate diaz to beat gomi, and im not to interested in the rest to be honest!

2011-09-21T23:23:43+00:00

all7days

Roar Guru


Rampage will be very lucky if he pulls out a win. Agree with KPM Evans is more likely based on how technical he is, and knowledge of Jones.

2011-09-21T23:21:18+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Good to see you're an MMA fan KPM. Jones just has those levers for arms and legs. Rampage will do it tough trying to punch him. You can't train with anyone like Jones... except maybe Kongo, and he's going to pummel Mitrione in 137 :-)

2011-09-21T23:05:01+00:00

kingplaymaker

Guest


oh hes a chance alright, just a small one. Jones is amazingly talented. he has height, length, power, poise and all round ability. i cannot see jackson getting close here, he has been underwhelming in his last couple fights IMO. i rate evans with the best chance of beating jones.

Read more at The Roar