Arbib, Lowy know their mushrooms

By Dugald Massey / Roar Guru

A week into the post-Smith Review era and the immune system is struggling. First came the guffaws – I mean, I can build you a cathedral in seven months if you want – and now I’ve had to take sick leave because I can’t stop chanting ‘what a waste of money’, which is not on in a call centre flogging fitness equipment.

The bemused responses to Smith reminded me of the old one about the diarrheal circus elephant, the cork, the monkey, the champagne bottle and the banana. Yes, we’re up to our necks in it but we can still laugh; the look on Brendan Schwab’s face as he was trying to push the cork back in was priceless.

I say that with respect. We’re talking about your perception, not mine. If it looks like Schwab has banged one past his own keeper from deep inside his own half, that’s only because wizened observers have surmised that it was Schwab’s representations to Mark Arbib that prompted the inquiry.

Fortunately Schwab is a bit sharper than some of his, um, supporters in the social media who have argued that if players have to cop a pay cut then so must FFA, as if on that fine point the debate has been snookered and they walk off with the High Dudgeon trophy.

I like moral equivalences but, you know, FFA has been retrenching staff hard and fast for a year. I think moral ambivalence has its place too.

Warwick Smith’s theatre skills might be excellent, I don’t know, but methinks the football family’s last surgeon, Mr Crawford, had a better grasp of the patient’s situation, and I don’t think Crawford would have tried to get at the brain through the kneecap.

Frank, founder of the Lowy Institute, would, you’d think, be able to distinguish public and private from his elbow, be aware that taxpayers’ money cannot be disappearing into an outfit that’s disbursing money under who knows what criteria to private businesses who’ve been granted entry into a closed shop under who knows what criteria, and that an unbridled enthusiasm to keep A-League clubs alive any old which way won’t cut it with the auditors when they get back from Greece.

Smith’s 48-page message might have been better communicated with an irritated grunt, some finger waving and the chequebook disappearing into the sports minister’s pocket: “C’mon Frank, we’ll cop no more of this pretending that you don’t know the rules.”

Some spotted in the Smith report an anti-football bias, which is what they get for having it tattooed on their one good cornea.

Seriously, had the government really wanted to give the game grief, like Charlie Manson said, there’d be no one of us left. [Written and authorised by former Australian Soccer Federation officials; spoken by J. Assange, no fixed address.] The government isn’t trying to recover any money and there are no question marks over it continuing to fund football, which is more slack than they’ll cut you down at Centrelink if you misread the small print.

Lowy’s how-high-sir response tells us that Mr Smith has taught him something very valuable these past weeks; that he’s a more enlightened man now and that we can all relax again; what’s done is done, he stands corrected and all is forgiven.

It’s a new dawn and a whole new paradigm where paradoxically nothing has changed. Reset the clock, Mr Lowy’s time starts over.

I don’t know about Blatter having no obvious successors.

No, all is sweet between Arbib and Lowy because we can tell. Normally when you’ve stuffed up you don’t get a nod and a wink and a leg up from the authorities so you can unscrew the light bulb and plunge the joint into darkness and shut down debate.

How that transpired might have been a good dirty-pool football story had our venerable football media not overlooked it completely, which is understandable when it had in-depth stories to file about the micron-deep superficiality of the Beckham phenomena, although some did take time out to Twhine on Twitter that they didn’t even know Lowy was up for re-election.

For the record, the last time it was four years ago and the next time will be eight years after that, which if my calendar reads right is going to be four years from now. It beats me why they do it in four-year cycles, can’t fathom it, but you can set your iWatch to it, if not a football journalist’s diary.

Anyway, Lowy fronted FFA’s AGM last week seeking re-appointment and a la Carnac the Magnificent spoke eloquently about the challenges facing football which, looking back, almost sounded like a direct response to Smith’s concerns – which they couldn’t have been since those were still inside a sealed envelope inside a locked safe under an armed guard at the government printers.

Talk about Burke, Wills, Coopers Creek, College Street and tragic timing. On the Monday Lowy was re-appointed unopposed – and unchallenged – for another four years.

On the Thursday morning, not 72 hours after Lowy’s cakewalk, after seven months of finger-twiddling, Smith’s report was unloaded on the public and unleashed in turn a torrent of furious and ultimately futile discussion, as if mushrooms have any reason to be arguing about the best way forward.

Lowy, of course, is better known for running his own race than his acute hearing. The time to talk about agendas, by my reckoning anyway, was probably before he was re-appointed – not when he’s got another three years, 51 weeks and five days up his sleeve to chase his own instincts.

The day after his re-appointment Lowy was back to spruiking riddles about 2022.

The damage in that is in the questions it begs. Is that the best he’s got? Does Lowy see no hope for the A-League until Australia hosts a World Cup? But for waving his arms in the air and making noises about big bangs and giants awakening, has he any other ideas? And this is bloke is in the driver’s seat. Crikey.

It might not have been a pretty exercise, allowing a consequential argument about where football now stands, about who is best-equipped to lead it and what their priorities ought to be.

It might have – no, would have – turned into a bunfight and the winner might have been Lowy or it may not have been – it may have been one of the old-guard gorillas in his midst – but at least the eventual victor would have headed out with some riding instructions from, well, someone.

I could be wrong, of course; usually am. Maybe it’s everyone else who has lost the plot?

Maybe Frank Lowy is desperate to attend to the details of the A-League and get on with rebuilding the burnt bridges that are all over the local football landscape but FFA’s directors said no Frank, you’ve been re-appointed on the condition that you get up tomorrow and mumble about Australia still being a chance for 2022 and then break the grassroots’ hearts by hosing down anticipation of an FFA Cup cos there ain’t no money and probably won’t be until we host this aforesaid World Cup – and don’t forget to remind them that you are still unequivocally the best man for this job.

Some are saying – me to myself – that Lowy is a quick-fixer who ran out of ideas circa 2005 and still thinks that hosting a World Cup is the A-League’s get-out; either that or plunging what’s left of football’s dough on a long-odds yapper in the last at Wentworth Park. It might come off.

Myself, I’d have thought it was time for someone more consultative and with less historical baggage and more of a yearning for electoral legitimacy than Lowy to take the helm – someone who can permit themselves to recognise that the solutions to the A-League won’t be found among big bashers and WWE tragics but in addressing why so few of the 1.7 million football participants the Smith Review quotes have bought into the national league.

Frank’s probably right of course or he wouldn’t be loaded. This is about working smarter, not harder. You don’t get off the couch to fix the floorboards and the holes in the walls when you’ve got a ticket in the lottery and you’ll be moving into a penthouse. Bring on 2022.

Credit where it’s due though; Lowy taking Australia into Asia so we can compete with North Korea has been a winner.

The Crowd Says:

2011-12-11T11:22:39+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


Answer the simple question then, - When the government hands out money to upgrade an AFL facility, why does government money go directly to the AFL club which doesn't own the ground or any of the infrastructure? http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-clubs-financial-premiership-stakes/story-e6frf9jf-1225815392261 "HANDOUTS prop up the Tigers, who would have made an $84,000 loss if it were not for $1.675 million in government money towards the redevelopment of Punt Rd oval."

2011-12-10T22:53:09+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


I don't understand - these assets are community assets, as Wookie states above - they are used by other community groups, the AFL clubs chip in a fair chunk - so the taxpayers are getting more bang for their buck, plus you end up with infrastructure that will last 30 years. That's a different proposition to providing annual grants to a sports body to meet annual operating costs. If Government doesn't attach strings, the inevitable result is that that money will be pi$$ed up a wall with nothing to show for it at the end of it. In many respects, soccer would be better off having that $32 million set aside and spent on infrastructure for the benefit of the game - rather than the salaries of office staff, and bailing out clubs, as is happening now.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T14:25:15+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


My one good eye detects a very, very perceptive man who reads much between the lines. Whether it is actually there, well that is a whole other question. You're right though. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean no one is out to get you.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T14:12:18+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


I'm on the record as saying Brendan Schwab is one of the few around with an overview of how the game works who hasn't got a debt to some part of clubland or the other. To lift its game in the short-term, FFA probably needs to stop its chairman making it up as he goes along and get him on message for the next four years leading up to the Asia Cup. For the long term, to save FFA being taken over by some of the absolute wallies who are waiting in the wings for Lowy to leave, the states' electoral structure probably needs to be more like the RACV/RACQ's or whatever they call the various automobile clubs across the states. Using cars clubs as an example, how would those organisations go if car owners were denied the vote because it was too hard to poll them all and the governors were just made accountable to, say, petrol station or car wash proprietors? After all, if car owners didn't wholeheartedly agree with the proprietors' politics and pricing policies, they wouldn't go there would they? That's the, um, common sense principles football's voting structures are based on. 'Clubs' have successfully argued that their aims are the same as their players, coaches and supporters so it's logical for clubs to decide who the decision makers ought be and have the whiphand over them. I'd say that's fundamentally misrepresenting the nature of the relationship between players and coaches and clubs, and that it would be a glaringly obvious misrepresentation to anyone who has the faintest idea about how football clubs actually work.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T13:32:03+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


If it's an important point, at least make it with due care. "Page not found" or articles about AFL clubs putting their hands out to the AFL don't shed a lot of light on the funding debate.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T13:23:11+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


Lowy and the FFA have done a lot to improve the game since they took over.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T13:17:45+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


Well, some wizened heads around the grassroots are saying the football federations have lost their way since the career sports administrators moved in on football and carved the games various activities up into 'business units'. As we've seen, the cost of that can be, say, juniors shelling out many thousands of dollars for the privilege of representing their state or not playing at all and being replaced by a less talented player with more money. That might offend the sensibilities of football people who tend to see development as meaning the most talented players being selected rather than the best players from the kinds of families with the financial capacity to help 'expand the industry' but it makes perfect sense to someone whose continued employment involves achieving certain revenue goals before June 30. But who am I to accuse the sportsbiz industry of putting job creation for other sportsbiz professionals ahead of a particular sports own goals? That would be nothing more than a wild unsubstantiated allegation, which is why I'm not making it.

2011-12-10T13:14:21+00:00

The_Wookie

Roar Guru


which also includes the 6 million in funding to setup facilities for australias paralypmpic teams. Not to mention that the bulk of the money for the facility will come from Essendon and its members. That leaves 6 million from the state government if they can get it. The AFL will supply funds as well. And heres the key - the AFL supplies funding as well for most projects that the government supplies funding with. Take Carlton for example - money spent at Visy Park for development of the facilities there has benefited 4 different codes of football in the last 2 years. Including the Melbourne Storm. Its the HQ of the Melbourne Rebels, and been the home of the Carlton football and Cricket clubs for more than a hundred years. Hell even the LA Galaxy were there recently. There has never been a 50 million rescue plan or funding for Carlton. State and Federal funding is supplied to AFL clubs under the provision that its used for community purposes. That is its available to local groups to used. Im not clear on all the arrangements here. North at Arden St, the Western Bulldogs and others are supplied funding with this in mind. Finally, facilities investment is generally in stadiums that arent owned by the clubs at all. Kardinia Park is oned by the City of Geelong. Blacktown is owned by the local council, Metricon is a QLD government facility etc etc. Its all local and state government owned stuff.

2011-12-10T13:04:29+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Most would agree with you that it's time for Lowy to let the 2022 WC go, although you will read some support on a few forums for the notion that Lowy should conntinue pursuing some sort of miracle outcome.

AUTHOR

2011-12-10T12:56:06+00:00

Dugald Massey

Roar Guru


The North Korea reference wasn't really about football. As for Lowy getting Oz out of Oceania into Asia, it's a huge feather in his cap. I just wish he'd capitalise on that by getting over his WC fixation and making sure Asia 2015 is a tournament for the ages like the Asia Cup was this year. It really doesn't help that cause, his obsessing over 2022 as if that was the making or breaking of Oz football.

2011-12-10T12:39:16+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


Exactly and that's why its wrong!

2011-12-10T12:36:34+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


$17M from the Tasmanian government to play AFL games in Hobart http://www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2011/06/27/3254529.htm

2011-12-10T12:32:42+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


And here's the federal government giving the AFL AusAid money to expand AFL into South Africa. http://forums.rugbyleagueplanet.com/topic/3416048/1/ Doesn't that warrant a government investigation?

2011-12-10T12:29:41+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Once again, none of that money goes to the AFL nor is any of that infrastructure owned by the AFL.

2011-12-10T12:12:07+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


And here's another $10m from Simon Crean - mad AFL supporter - and the federal govt to upgrade the lights at Skilled Stadium for the cats.

2011-12-10T11:59:33+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


Here's another 12 million from the federal and Vic govt just for Essendon moving their training ground for heaven's sake. http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/essendon-aim-to-raise-15-million-from-supporters-to-help-fund-the-afl-clubs-momentous-shift-from-windy-hil/story-e6frf3e3-1226054284006

2011-12-10T11:37:38+00:00

ItsCalledFootball

Roar Guru


And Football isn't an Australian sport? Over 2 million Australians play football every year. AFL are rolling in money and they still get hundreds of millions in govt money and no one gives a stuff. FFA try and get a few million just to keep the game going and we have a Spanish inquisition and yet another government enquiry.

2011-12-10T06:47:49+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


It's Called Football the second and third links didn't work at all, which is a pity as I was curious as to what this $50 million rescue package for Carlton was. I looked at a few of the other links. I'm not sure if you appreciate this but in each of those examples none of the assets are actually owned by the AFL or the clubs. If you sent the Government auditor into the AFL to inspect their books and check on how government grants are being spent, that auditor would have a hard time of it because there ain't any government money sitting there to inspect. In your bitterness, you have thrown in the amount of money that Channel 7 has paid for the AFL TV rights, which is sort of a separate issue again, doesn't really have anything to do with taxpayer money. If one private body wants to purchase the rights owned by another private body, its a commercial matter between those two parties. As you have said yourself, the Commonwealth has provided the FFA with $8 million per annum as a grant for the last 4 years. This is money that is quite separate to that already going to the AIS to support coaching staff for national teams, and is also quite separate to capital investment that goes to building sporting infrastructure, like the grounds at which A-League clubs currently play. That's $8 million going to the FFA as an operating grant, to cover operating expenses, and the equivalent of about 60% of the grant was used to keep clubs afloat last financial year. Now many will think that's taxpayer money well spent, I'm not here to argue that point one way or the other, but I will say that it seems reasonable that the Government would want to be assured that its money is being used well before committing further Government money - that's quite normal in the area of public administration. Money used to renovate facilities that are already publicly owned and which are used by a variety of stakeholders are a separate issue again. Any audit that occurs in that case will not be of the stakeholders and tenants, but of the Government bodies themselves who are making the capital investment, oversighting constrcution, working through tenders, managing projects, etc.

2011-12-10T05:13:38+00:00

AL

Guest


But you see, ITS Called Football, those amounts of money are not a waste. Because those sports are fair dinkim aussie sports. And with that countless reasons are given as to why it is different when Football receives a grant. The simple fact is it was not good for the eggball coes for football to receive the injection that a world cup would have given aussie football. Our own Socceroos are strategicaly dragged down with every oportunity. In most cases for no real valid reasons, mostly media manufactured. The boys give their heart and soul for the nation.

2011-12-10T01:34:58+00:00

PeterK

Guest


I have begun reading the Smith Report for myself, because I'm not convinced that it actually says that we should not have an FFA Cup. Yes, it does talk of being much more careful with money (and especially with balancing the books), but why should an FFA Cup cost the Earth? I think sponsorship for it wouldn't be too hard to find, but even so, there would be many many clubs wanting to enter, and quite willing to pay a "nominal" fee to enter. With a large number of entries, those fees could really add up to a big financial help -- and I think all expect that the initial rounds of the FFA Cup would: a. be regional -- dramatically reducing travel-costs, and b. not involve A-League clubs (till later rounds). This post is about the Smith Report and Frank Lowy's reappointment, and so is about the past and the future. Yes, let's not expand for a while (though surely plans can begin to be put into place), but let's seriously investigate the institution of an FFA Cup!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar