Sixers are pink-hot, but BBL's debut gets a cool reception

By mds1970 / Roar Guru

The new T20 Big Bash – Australian domestic cricket’s biggest gamble. Six state teams out, replaced with eight city-based franchises. New names, new colours, new team line-ups. Support for the new concept was far from unanimous in cricket circles; but the true test would be what unfolded when the new league started.

First up would be the Sydney Sixers, one of two Sydney-based teams, at home against the Brisbane Heat. The Sixers in pink, the Heat in teal.

Early signs weren’t particularly promising. Half an hour before the game, there looked to be only around 5000 people inside the ground. The crowd built up in the final minutes, though during the early overs it was already clear the attendance would be below expectations.

Brisbane won the toss and elected to bat, sending experienced international players Brendon McCullum and Matthew Hayden out to open the innings. Hayden retired from first-class cricket four years ago, but has played the T20 circuit in India since then and still looks match-fit.

Another old warrior opened the bowling for the Sixers, with Brett Lee charging in from the Paddington End. And he looked in form early, conceding only four runs from the opening over. In his second over, a bouncer struck Brendon McCullum in the head, forcing the New Zealander to retire for treatment.

James Hopes replaced McCullum, but after scoring 18 he departed, being the first player to be dismissed in the history of the new league; with Dwayne Bravo the first successful bowler. McCullum returned, but would score only one more run.

The Sixers brought Stuart MacGill into the attack. The old leg-spinner, returning to action having not played at any level for a few years, immediately hit the spot with the ball and tightened up the game. In his first over, he tempted McCullum into a lofted drive, but the shot went straight to Mitchell Starc at long on.

Hayden went on to score 29, and Daniel Christian top-scored with 32. But too many of the Heat batsmen gave their wickets away easily; and the scoreboard wasn’t ticking over quickly enough. Only 50 runs were scored from the first ten overs, and although the Heat increased the tempo in the second half of their innings, they never looked to have anywhere near enough.

The Heat finished their innings on 8 for 139, leaving the Sixers exactly seven per over to win.
Stuart MacGill kept his bowling tight, finishing with 2 for 21 from his four overs. Brett Lee was even more economical with 0 for 19 from his four.

And the entertainment rolled along. Player’s theme music was played for each new batsman, as well as for a boundary, fall of a wicket, or a bowling change. Cheer girls danced routines and formed human pyramids at the fall of the Heat wickets. During the innings break, the Sixers’ mascot dog ran around the outfield. As the teams emerged for the second half, a spectacular fireworks display lit up the sky.

The Heat made a big move for the first over of the Sixers’ innings, giving off-spinner Nathan Hauritz the new ball. And he kept the bowling tight, as it took a few overs for Sixers’ openers Brad Haddin and Michael Lumb to find their rhythm.

Haddin found his groove when Alistair McDermott bowled to him. McDermott, a late signing for the Heat, had no number on his shirt, but he had bad numbers on his bowling sheet after Haddin smashed two sixes and a four in an over.

Lumb was soon out, with Nick Maddinson taking his place at the crease. The runs flowed freely.

The crowd, although small, were getting into the spirit. Celebrities spotted in the crowd were interviewed, including Mel Doyle, Kristina Keneally and Adam Goodes. Tweets from the crowd were scrolling across the scoreboard. The Mexican wave, which in these days exists solely as an excuse to boo the members, went around the ground.

Big hits and wickets were appreciated and applauded. With this being the Sixers’ first game ever, there was little merchandise being worn by the crowd; but plenty of Australia and New South Wales Blues shirts were being worn.

With Haddin in form, hitting boundaries and sixes, the Sixers’ score was well ahead of the Duckworth-Lewis par score. Haddin and Maddinson put on 79 for the second wicket. Haddin, under fire after his get-out shot in the recent Test in Hobart, bounced back to form with a series of lobs over the infield and big hits, including one that hit the roof of the Members’ Stand, on his way to an innings of 76 off 59 balls.

Maddinson and Haddin both departed with the finish line in sight, but Steve Smith and Moises Henriques finished the game off, and the Sixers took out the first win in the history of the new competition by seven wickets.

So was the opening night for the new T20 Big Bash league a success? The cricket was entertaining enough, especially Haddin’s innings. It was good to see Matthew Hayden batting again, and Stuart MacGill still has some good bowling in him.

The crowd figure was never announced or posted on the scoreboard, but it looked about 12,000; a disappointing number, with the original expectation being about double that. The Sixers and the new Big Bash league still have work to do to build support, with this crowd well short of what the New South Wales state team attracted in last year’s T20 competition.

Overall I’d rate it a pass, but only just. There’s still more to be done to turn the team of players in pink drawn from far and wide into a team the locals of Sydney identify with. In this new league, there’s also a new cross-town rival. And it’s not until I’ve checked out the Thunder as well that I’ll know who my team will be in this brave new world of franchise T20 cricket.

The Crowd Says:

2012-12-12T07:29:51+00:00

Titus

Guest


Lol.......how's that trolling in an article from a year ago going for you Bob? Did you not think it was strange that TC was calling himself The Cattery again?

2012-12-12T07:21:53+00:00

Bob

Guest


yeh but the a-league is better

2011-12-18T10:33:06+00:00

lcnsw

Guest


Simple..pple are sick of cricket...its boring...too much of it and no personalities...i was an avid cricket fan many yrs ago...today cldnt tell you who is in aus team as for little bash its a boring mix of has beens...want to be's....will never be's...aussies are showing what they think with their feet....not interested!

2011-12-17T21:48:06+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


I don't understand this thinking. One of the attractions of the club format is that you build a team with whatever player you can find, wherever you can find them. Seeing an overseas players alongside our own players is a point of interest of the comp - that's precisely what differentiates it from the state vs state concept - which is an archaic one in the modern Australian sporting landscape.

2011-12-17T17:16:55+00:00

Philip Coller

Guest


The teams are franchises and just "made" up of anyone. How can you support a Sydney team when players come from Jaimaca, Hobart and worst of all Queensland. And given the nature of the game the teams will change from year to year under such a format.Too manufactured for my liking.

AUTHOR

2011-12-17T11:12:41+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


Only 23,000 at the MCG, even with Warnie's comeback. Have Cricket Australia killed the golden goose?

2011-12-17T08:50:09+00:00

Jack Russell

Roar Guru


342k is a massive result - it shows how many people are wanting to watch live sport on Friday nights outside the footy season. As a comparison, that's more than every game of a round of A-League combined most weeks.

2011-12-17T07:39:41+00:00

Dean

Guest


Ian if there are no loyal fans, then what is the expectation - who is going to attend the games? Is Cricket Australia expecting a new group of "theatre-goers" for each game? And, I've just noticed each team plays 7 games - presumably 3 or 4 games at home. Unless the players are being paid very little (are they?) then I cannot see any revenue model that would create a "shedload of money" for a professional sports club that plays 3-4 matches or a maximum of 5-6 games (for the team one that hosts the GF) each year. Am I missing something? Where is the "shedload of money" coming from - perhaps, the TV broadcast rights are huge?

2011-12-17T06:36:13+00:00

BigAl

Guest


The NFL, or should I say the telecasters, even experimented with placing a video camera in the quarterback's helmet ! . . . it was not a success.

2011-12-17T06:14:03+00:00

Mark

Guest


Agga78 What do you think sport is!?!?? It's always been entertainment for me. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

2011-12-17T05:27:32+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Ah, just found the answer, our very own Michael di Fabrizio has tweeted that the average audience was 342,000 with a reach of 858,000. 342k is an excellent number, that's right up there with the top NRL ratings.

2011-12-17T05:15:07+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


858k?? Isn't that a record for any Fox sports telecast? Or is that the amount of viewers who switched on at one point during the telecast? (as opposed to the peak audience) Very good number anyway.

2011-12-17T05:03:26+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Catters, Peter Young from CA just posted this on Twitter: "Last night's FoxSport KFC BBL telecast reached 858,000 viewers, a new record for domestic cricket. They think 2night will be bigger"

2011-12-17T04:44:03+00:00

Fake ex-AFL fan

Roar Rookie


Yeah, would be very surprised by 50K. Just haven't really noticed much buzz around this game, would guess around the 30K mark would be a half decent result.

2011-12-17T04:24:15+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


I wouldn't go as far as prescribing Test cricket as a 19th century game, but I understand what people are getting at. In this modern age, with busy lives and people having to work two jobs to make ends meet, etc, comparatively speaking, a lot of effort has to go into following test cricket than may once have been the case. That's not to deny that test cricket is still capable of producing enthralling contests and is a great display of individual effort, skill and concentration, but it might be harder to get pepole to dedicate themselves for five full days than may have been the case 40 years ago. It's true that Twenty20 may not be the solution, only time will tell, but cricket adminstrators would be foolish to ignore the enormous interest in the very shortened game, more importantly, to ignore the differing demands modern audiences have.

2011-12-17T04:17:33+00:00

Johnno

Guest


No he is not Ian he is just starting., spinners mature later like props in rugby union broth arts age like a fine wine. Warney at 42 does not even look old. Maybe we can say these bowlers are old. Think Eddie Hemmings, and John Embery, are old maybe yes, we will say there are old. But Greg Matthews we will call evergreen .

2011-12-17T04:17:22+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Yes, that's how I remember it happening as well.

2011-12-17T04:06:03+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Jock, At 40, Stuart Macgill is not old for a slow bowler. Just saying.

2011-12-17T04:05:14+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Dean, Judging from the attendances at State matches, there are almost no loyal fans of State cricket sides.

AUTHOR

2011-12-17T02:50:43+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


T20 wasn't taken all that seriously when it started. Players giving interviews while fielding, nicknames on their shirts. NSW even used Andrew Johns as a guest player. But it drew bigger crowds than they expected. Most domestic games only draw a couple of hundred, but when crowds started coming, the cricket administrators realised they were sitting on a potential gold mine.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar