Siddle rejects rotation as selectors fiddle

By David Lord / Expert

Tireless Australian paceman Peter Siddle has made it crystal clear he wants no part of the projected rotation system.

Who can blame him? No cricketer worth his salt would be a willing party to being “rested”, when he’s raring to go.

There are three mighty valid reasons for taking the Siddle line.

Firstly, if you are an automatic selection, as Siddle has become, you’d want to keep the momentum. If the “rested” player is expected to play Sheffield Shield, what’s the point of dropping him in the first place?

Secondly, you never give a mug an even break in case he takes six-for and keeps you out in the cold.

And thirdly, what about the Test match fee of $10,000 down the gurgler, all because five wise men think you should be rested for your own mental and physical good.

Bollocks to that idea, In fact, bollocks to the entire concept of rotation, and to most of the flawed Argus Review from whence it came.

Cricket at any level is all about harmony within a team. The baggy greens are proving that under the new regime of skipper Michael Clarke and coach Mickey Arthur and as a result they have thumped world number two side India in all three Tests – twice inside four days, and once inside three.

But have a disgruntled victim of rotation in the group and it will always have a damaging effect. Watch the performance level drop alarmingly, it’s human nature. One unhappy member can submarine an entire side on his pat.

The selectors face a problem of another kind for the fourth Test against India in Adelaide starting Tuesday. The 12-man squad from the WACA has been retained, but one of the successful four-man pace attack must make way for offie Nathan Lyon, who carried the drinks in Perth.

Who goes from Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus, Ryan Harris, or Mitchell Starc?

Not easy, and it will get harder once Shane Watson, Pat Cummins, and James Pattinson are back from injury.

That won’t be rotation, just the mathematical impossibility of trying to fit 15 into 12.

The next assignment after the series against India and the limited-overs games will be three back-to-back Tests against the Windies at Bridgetown, Port of Spain, and Guyana in April.

Three Tests in as many weeks will fall into the projected rotation bracket, the concept won’t go away. But leave it to the players, let them know if they are honest with the selectors they won’t be penalised.

Don’t make it mandatory to affect individual morale, team harmony, and the personal wallet.

The Crowd Says:

2012-01-22T10:42:48+00:00

oracle

Guest


With Siddle it obviously isn't about the money. He is a competitor, and on form if he wants to play, he should play, and bat at #7 ahead of the tailender/keeper that has been selected again Harris, Starc, and Hilfy should all be batting above Haddin on form.

2012-01-21T11:18:27+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


David, the ACA ensured that rested players still get the match fee if they would otherwise have been selected. Siddle won't be out of pocket if he doesn't play in Adelaide...

2012-01-21T10:43:50+00:00

sheek

Guest


G'day David, Is "rotation" the new euphemism for "dropped"? Commonsense needs to be adopted regarding the rotation of players, especially pacemen. In Siddle's case, it's not like he's been in the test team for 3 years u & 27 tests unbroken. He's just returning from injury layoffs, & what he needs right now, is plenty of cricket. I do think in the future it would be a good idea to have 12 players in a test team, of which only 11 would bat, as is the case now. However, the 12th player would be a specialist non-batting bowler (McGrath anyone), while some of the specialist batsmen would take turns acting as the off-field 12th man (the fielding team would also be 11 players, as now).

2012-01-21T05:51:07+00:00

Superd


If I was Siddle it would be the inane one-day comp that I would be hoping to be "left out" of.

2012-01-21T00:02:29+00:00

Swampy

Guest


I can get 14 into 12 easily - drop hussey and Ponting! -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

Read more at The Roar