Oh no! Waratahs kick the Reds out of jail

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

You live by the kick and you die by the kick. That is the story of the Waratahs’ astonishing and unnecessary loss to the Reds at the ANZ Stadium on Saturday night.

This is the situation. The Waratahs, leading 21 – 18, have the ball in the Reds half with about a minute of time remaining. The reserve halfback, Brendan McKibbin, gets a call from his winger to chip-kick through to a huge space down his side of the field.

Let’s stop the tape here. The Waratahs only have to hold on to the ball to win the match. Even if they score from a kick-and-chase play, they don’t get a fourth-try bonus point as, up until now, only two tries, both of them by the Waratahs, have been scored in the match.

The obvious play, the only smart play, is for the halfback to bring a forward in on a short run and force another ruck. Or take the ball up himself and force a ruck. And keep on forcing rucks until the siren sounds and the ball can be booted into touch.

Asked after the match, Michael Foley said about the chip kick: ‘The benefit of hindsight is a great thing but if we’d had our time again we’d probably do something different.’

Probably? Now roll the tape. The Reds scramble a defensive ruck forced by the chip kick and Ben Taupuai breaks away from inside his own 22 to about the 10m mark in Reds territory. The ball is moved through a couple of Reds player to Dom Shipperley on the far wing. Look now at the Waratahs defenders. They are standing passively watching this passing.

Rob Horne carefully positions himself some metres in from the touch presumably to leave the trap of an outside gap and the touchline for Shipperley to try and take.

Instead, Shipperley bursts inside Horne, who makes a lazy and ineffectual attempt at a tackle. And then the flying Reds winger streaks away down the unguarded touchline. It takes the Waratahs several moments to realise that there is no cover. In Rex Mossop’s famous phrase, “Shut the door, the horse has bolted.”

Tom Carter, a ponderous runner, tries to come across on the angle to make a saving tackle. But the effort is like a draught horse chasing a thoroughbred.

Now wind back the tape to an event marking the launching of the Super Rugby season. Foley is defending the kicking tactics he wants the Waratahs to employ. The tactics are not negative, he insists. The kicking will be to put pressure on the opposition and force a turnover. In this sense, the kicking is a positive form of play.

The Bible says, ‘as ye sow, so shall ye reap.’ Readers of The Roar will know that I have railed against the chip kick for years. It is a cop-out play that denotes a lack of rugby intelligence and skill. The play invariably gives the ball back to the opposing side.

It is a high-risk play that should only be used in the direst of circumstances. Even then, it probably shouldn’t.

So McKibbin will not be blamed for this play. It is an integral part of the Waratahs’ match strategy and tactics.

The blame, and it is a heavy blame, goes first and foremost to Foley. The chip kick play has been the bane of the Waratahs for years. Coming in as the new head coach, he should have issued instructions to the players that the play must never be used. He clearly did not do this. He actually reinforced the importance of the chip kick in the Waratah game plan for 2012.

Well, a match that should have been won and won easily against the old foe and reigning Super Rugby champions was lost. This loss could have a big bearing on whether the Reds or the Waratahs win the all-important Australian conference and with it at least one home game in the finals.

Both sides, though, showed enough to suggest that they should be finals contenders.

Despite a lot of over-refereeing, the opening rounds of Super Rugby 2012 provided some excellent games. All except the Stormers-Hurricanes match were still in play until the final whistle. Only the Brumbies-Force match was poor quality.

The Crusaders and the Blues are the bookies’ favourites to win the Super Rugby title, and both teams played very well in their match at Auckland to start the season. In the end, a slightly porky Piri Weepu missed a field goal attempt from close range, with the irresistible Irael Dagg getting his fingertips to the ball to divert its trajectory.

My main concern in the Brumbies-Force match was the poor play of both backlines. Even their alignment was all wrong. Rod Kafer, for instance, pointed out how deep Matt Toomua stood. It is impossible to get a backline running from this quarter-back position. Why is the Brumbies back coach Stephen Larkham, a great exponent of the flat backline, allowing this?

As for the Western Force, the time has come for David Pocock to re-think his game. He is touted here in Australia as the best openside flanker in the world. To me, this is nonsense.

He seems to have built himself up as Phil Waugh did into a muscle-bound slowcoach. He pilfers the occasional ball. But he has no impact with his running game, he does nothing in the lineouts, and he rarely makes telling covering tackles.

One other observation about this game is that both these sides seemed to play as if by numbers. Hopefully with the first match out of the way they will relax a bit and be more enterprising in their play.

Neither the Chiefs nor the Highlanders looked to be in the same class as the Crusaders and Blues. The bookies have them as eighth and ninth placed sides. The Chiefs, like the Hurricanes, do not seem to have solid set pieces in the scrums and lineouts. The backs in both sides are very good but games are won (or should be won in the case of the Waratahs) by teams with dominant packs.

All the South African sides had their moments. In some respects, though, the Sharks were lucky against the Hurricanes in that a video refereeing decision not to award the Hurricanes a try was the turning point of the match. A converted try, which was scored right by the posts, would have given the Hurricanes an unlikely lead of 30 – 29 with minutes left to play.

In my opinion, a try was clearly scored and I can’t see why it was not awarded. SANZAR has said that it will explain and discuss refereeing decisions. I would like to read a detailed review of why the video referee adjudicated the way he did, and more importantly whether the SANZAR authorities agree with the explanation.

The bookies have the Lions, Brumbies, Cheetahs and Western Force as their last four teams in that declining order. Some teams have to be on the bottom of the table. But in the case of the Cheetahs and the Lions, both looked stronger than the Brumbies and Western Force.

It is always exciting to see a youngster burst on to the scene already capable of turning matches in the favour of his side. So look out for Johan Goosen, the number 10 for the Cheetahs. This kid drop-kicked a goal from halfway, kicked a penalty from 10 metres inside his own half, took high balls on the burst and sizzled through gaps…

Even though he was on a losing team (with the Lions getting up by kicking nine penalties!), he was the player of the round as far as I am concerned.

Gallery images supplied by NSW Waratahs.

The Crowd Says:

2012-02-29T13:26:20+00:00

TD

Guest


Ioane outside JOC? The only time Ioane would see the ball is when there is absolutely nothing on for JOC. As for Tapaui, he is too slow.

2012-02-29T01:31:49+00:00

nunga

Guest


I think that any 9 really is only able to play as well as his forwards allow him. Therefor Pretorius was allowed more opportunities than Genia. Gregan's pass was slow but it did allow Larkam to stand with some width. There is a difference. I think you will find that the other teams will start to target Pretorius's cumbersome pass. Even if it's just pressuring the first receiver. I would also love to know what Berrick and Daniel think off the record.

2012-02-28T17:21:55+00:00

Spooony

Guest


Rolling maul? There were no mauls int the Reds Tah's game

2012-02-28T04:13:11+00:00

Sage

Guest


Agreed Atawhai. What a muppet pushing Digby in the head and gloating about the Reds losing to then be showed up so spectacularly.

2012-02-28T03:07:04+00:00

Bruce Rankin

Guest


Spiro - Very good starter article for the season..... agree in spades.... it was plain dumb tactics to kick away possession in the last minute of the game.... My view is that there are two places for the chip kick - judicially used: principal one is on attack in the opposition 22, when a spatially aware No 10 (especially Dan Carter) senses the opposition rushing up in defence and a deftly placed chip kick quite often yields a try. The second is when a winger is flying down the sideline, is hemmed in by one or more opposition players, knows he’ll get tackled over the sideline, can see supporting players inside, but unable to pass because of opposition blocking between, so a chip kick infield can pick up his inside supports. (Here the chip kick better than an overhand pass – or passing to the opposition! The latter sadly seen too often.) Cory Jane (Hurricanes) is superb in ensuring he keeps the ball in play and doesn’t get tackled into touch.... why he’s one of the best wingers around, in my book anyway. The one good thing for the Waratahs is that they showed themselves to be highly competitive against last years Super champions - despite being without 5 key players and the loss of Kurtley Beale.

2012-02-28T01:13:30+00:00

MikeG

Roar Rookie


Depends what you think are the key attributes an openside has. For mine, the openside has to be tough in the contact (get low to ground & able to pilfer at any time), be supremely fit, have excelent vision (and be able to predict what's next)...But also he/she has to be a link between the backs and forwards. So, pretty easy then!!! I think it's without doubt the best position on the field and (prior to becomming old and unfit), enjoyed playing there immensely. Given all this, I agree with you on your top 3, but surely Brussow isn't far away?? he is outstanding

2012-02-28T00:18:37+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Pocock, McCaw and Warburton are the top 3. Don't suppose you happened to watch the quarter final aganst South Africa last year? Best game I've ever seen from a 7. Never seen one player win us a game like that.

2012-02-27T23:58:56+00:00

harryonthecoast

Guest


Well said, Spiro. at last someone has woken up to Pocock. You did not mention the number of penalties he gives away (like the one against the Abs in front of the posts at the WC last year. And the other "notable" rugby scribes keep referring to him as "arguably the best No. 7 in the world"!

2012-02-27T23:38:36+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Carter is not one of the fastest. Foley, Pretorius, Horne, Mitchell, Turner, AAC, Kingston, even barnes, would all be faster. Agreed guys I'd like to see Foley at 10 with BB beside him. I can handle Foley at 15 to let him adapt, the way we've learnt in retrospect we should have done with Kurtley. In fact I'd move AAC into centre or wing. I wasn't hugely impressed with BKH, though Kingston was good. I think BFoley has to start at 10 or 15 - the Tahs need him. And get rid of Mumm. How long till Timani's back from Japan, or Vicks is fit?

2012-02-27T22:01:31+00:00

johnny-boy

Guest


I don't disagree entirely Jiggles and it might be better to stick with JOC at 13. The extra room he would get he would have a field day and Ioane outside JOC would be something to see ( I resisted a Mexism there :))

2012-02-27T14:30:22+00:00

Jiggles

Roar Guru


Not really sure who can fill this void. ideally I'd like to have JOC at 12 this year, and partner him up with a more direct workman 13. the big negatives for AAC and McCabe is they don't know how to pass the ball. McCabe is a winger/fullback anyway and shouldn't have been put in the centres to start with. Horne has the worst defence positionally speaking, and is apparently rather skillful, although I have never seen it. Faainga can distribute and can defend, however he has been found out once or twice at test level at 13. He probably has the least potential out of all those mentioned above. Ioane should be left on the wing where all he has to think about is being a runner. its better that way. JB mentions Tapaui, but he was woeful at 13, and I would rather he stay at 12 and develop. Australia over the last 10 years has gone down the path of trying to develop every backline player 12 - 15 into a utility. I think this is wrong. we need 2 or 3 guys who are specialists 12 and 13. and thats all they play. Not wing come fullbacks come 12 come 13. anyway its all redundant unless our pack is sorted out quickly. I think the best short term solution is to discard the Force backrowers, not including Pocock, of national duties. not even in the squad. We have enough "potential test" 6&8's plus 7's in Robbinson, Gill & Hooper to not warrant Browne, McCallman or Hodgson. Higganbotham, Palu, Samo, Vaea, Schatz, Mowan, Saffy, and Douglas as a 6 are better options than those 3.

2012-02-27T12:46:26+00:00

charles

Guest


Certainly not now he's retired. But that was a magic drop goal!

2012-02-27T12:42:17+00:00

charles

Guest


LOL

2012-02-27T11:36:30+00:00

Red Kev

Roar Guru


Yeah I would like to see Tapuai developed into a guy who can play both 12 and 13. The times last year.he was outside centre he looked confused.

2012-02-27T10:49:19+00:00

johnny-boy

Guest


WNM - it could be that Tapaui will be it in an intelligent McKenzie coached world with JOC at 12 or vv.

2012-02-27T09:06:01+00:00

MikeG

Roar Rookie


Yeah I'd like to see that too, Justin...indeed one of the rugby journo's predicted by seasons end that would be the combo

2012-02-27T08:23:24+00:00

Yikes

Guest


You, Sir, are a champion.

2012-02-27T07:25:04+00:00

Short-Blind

Guest


Thanks Jez - the little bro looks a prospect as well - point is mumm is not the deal

2012-02-27T07:24:06+00:00

Short-Blind

Guest


Topo Rodriguez I'm guessing - I think Link played with him so he should make the call.

2012-02-27T06:22:48+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Yeah, that Carter...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar