AFL footballers' brains should be sacrosanct

By Andrew Sutherland / Roar Guru

After the infamous sickening collision between Jordan Lewis and Jarrod Harbrow at Etihad Stadium in 2010, a report stated: “Lewis was carried from the ground, and the alarmist in everyone thought he had suffered serious injury to his ribs, chest, neck or head.”

It was a sign of ignorance about head trauma that it was considered possible Lewis had been knocked unconscious by a blow to the ribs.

No, it was his frontal lobe, the seat of reasoning and personality, that took the blow from Harbrow’s flying hip; an impact so serious his brain chose to shut itself down.

Some clown – the sort of person who is opposed to the AFL’s new concussion management guidelines that prevent concussed players returning to the field – had this to say about it: “If a player is bumped while they are standing vertically and contact is made to the head it should be just play on even if that player is knocked out or injured, this is footy and contact is expected I don’t care if mums don’t like it.”

The brain is given short shrift by football matches and action movies. It is there to take hits for our entertainment.

When James Bond orders his martinis “shaken not stirred” he could be talking about his brain. With the regular head poundings he receives he shouldn’t have survived his first outing in Dr No with his faculties intact.

That brain of his with its so-called protective membrane would have sloshed around in its fluid and slapped up against the inside of his skull – there, ironically, to protect the precious organ from outside impacts.

It is not a good thing to have any part of your brain take a hiding to nothing.

Amazingly, spectators who have never taken a hit aren’t the only ones poo-pooing the idea of concussion management. The players themselves have proven to be the biggest hurdle to understanding and monitoring the effects of concussions.

Unbelievably, Lewis was allowed by doctors (who clearly have a conflict of interest between player and club welfare) to return to the ground. It was a courageous act – but stupid.

His teammate Campbell Brown while praising his courage also let it be known that the player code gave Lewis no option:

“So, you know, it was his turn and he did it, and that’s one of our team rules”.

Strengthening the neck and torso can reduce the effect of relayed shock to the brain from strong tackles which is why rugby league forwards are built like brick outhouses. Unfortunately they don’t have muscles on their head so when skulls hit, they stay hit.

Last week an anonymous NRL player wrote an article expressing the player code and in so doing showed an ignorance of long-term head injury:- “Rugby league is a masculine game, fiercely so. Weakness, or a sign of it, just isn’t an option. Get back in the line, shake it off. And is a footballer’s migraine going to be any worse than the other things that lie in your future: bung knees, shoulders and fingers that have been broken….? So you just keep going … consequences are something to think about when your footy career’s just a memory.”

Unless one of the consequences is loss of memory, of course.

Medicine has a long way to go when it comes to understanding the brain, let alone fixing or managing a damaged one. The owner of a brain knows when something is horribly wrong though. Mildly concussed footballers mention the ringing in the ears – a sure sign of the temporal lobe copping a good beating – from the side of the skull or from surrounding parts of the brain. The temporal lobe is also important for long term memory.

Then there is nausea, the body’s way of telling you of the existence of a foreign or toxic presence, and headache.

The more serious cases involve loss of balance, blurred vision, slurred speech, confusion and, of course, a loss of consciousness (the frontal lobe’s way of saying “Adios!”). These immediate symptoms of concussion are a result of the brain tissue being stretched causing blood vessels to burst leading to bruising on the brain. The location of the bleeding will determine the nature of temporary dysfunction.

If given time, the brain will heal itself from singular episodes. Repeated concussions, however, pose a different threat: permanent damage to brain tissue and functioning. The science is still weak but the link between repeated concussions and brain dysfunction is clear.

It’s highly likely that when Muhammad Ali allowed big men to tire themselves out by giving him glancing blows on the ropes, he was committing himself to a future with Parkinson’s disease. Multiple concussions are also on the causal list of some forms of dementia and epilepsy.

They are a definite cause of the progressive degenerative condition of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) whose symptoms include memory loss, aggression, confusion and depression. The disease has been found in numerous dead NFL players and is the basis of a current lawsuit by former players against the NFL, its clubs and the official helmet manufacturer.

Last year former Melbourne player Daniel Bell submitted a claim for compensation after brain scans confirmed a deterioration in his cognitive function. He believes a loss of memory and ability to concentrate are a result of multiple concussions sustained over his sixty-six game career.

In lower level competitions I imagine head contact injuries are more numerous because evasive skills are less likely. But even players capable of a side step may refrain from it because it’s considered unmasculine and disrespectful to opponents. Rather, plough on through.

It’s right that intentional and accidental contact to the head is illegal.

At present the players’ code of toughness stipulates that you must either run through someone, or put your head down, to have it run through by someone else.

And for the spectator who thinks a hip and shoulder to the temple is a good spectacle – if only I could put him in the centre square of Etihad Stadium and have Sam Mitchell put up that hospital pass again.

Most of us aren’t sure how we’re going to explain environmental damage to our children.

What’s Jonathan Brown going to say to his children down the track about his decision to keep playing?

Will he be capable of stringing words together, or even talking at all?

The Crowd Says:

2012-03-08T05:28:42+00:00

amazonfan

Guest


If a player deliberately takes head-first contact in an attempt to win a free kick, then I think he should be suspended. The players who deliberately make contact with other players' heads should be suspended for several matches at least. The AFL needs to make it clear that not only will they not tolerate players deliberately making contact with other players' heads, but they will also not tolerate players risking head contact in an effort to win free kicks. Courage is one thing, but stupidity is another, and if a player wants to be stupid and risk their long-term health, they can choose another sport. "Also remember, no one is making these guys play, and nor did they have to make AFL their living." Yes, but that doesn't mean the AFL shouldn't look after their health and try to reduce long-term health problems. These young men may choose to play football, but it doesn't mean they choose to risk brain damage. Plus, considering that we essentially pay their salaries, we have a moral responsibility (as represented by the AFL) to do what we can to reduce brain damage.

2012-03-08T03:00:03+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Its good to see the AFL stand fim on the sling tackle where one arm is pinned before the player is thrown to the ground. The potential for head and neck injuries are immense.

2012-03-08T02:46:37+00:00

brendan

Guest


Good on you for writing this article .Now more than ever we need the Afl to set the agenda regarding head injuries.I find it astonishing that it is not mandatory in junior football for head protection for all players and there developing brains.When i coached my son for a while all the kids wore helmets but they were seen as unnecessary.The only club that had a blanket approach to headgear were Ajax,the Jewish team,and many people thought they did this to cover there yamukas which obviously wasnt the reason.You touched upon some of the brain illnesses and whilst people accept frontal lobe damage from alcohol and substance abuse the ignorance of concussion and acquired brain disease is astonishing.

2012-03-08T02:13:18+00:00

Lucan


Great article.

AUTHOR

2012-03-08T00:56:27+00:00

Andrew Sutherland

Roar Guru


Learn to love your internal organs Cattery!

2012-03-07T23:22:20+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Not while I'm sipping on my morning coffee - thanks very much!

2012-03-07T23:19:42+00:00

Alison

Guest


This should be the photo for this article http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3550zu/

AUTHOR

2012-03-07T23:17:12+00:00

Andrew Sutherland

Roar Guru


Sorry Nate, not on twitter. Must get on to it!

2012-03-07T23:15:49+00:00


In summary, yes head high contact should be illegal, and is. Except, often the player launches himself head-first into an opponent in an attempt to win a free-kick, so the player himself is culpable for any injury. I completely agree that any player knocked out should be removed from the game - it shouldn't even be a question. There are risks inherent in any sport, and the physicality of AFL is part of the attraction of the 360 degree game. Also remember, no one is making these guys play, and nor did they have to make AFL their living.

2012-03-07T22:50:31+00:00

Alison

Guest


I agree. I think that if someone's been knocked unconcious and the footy Dr lets them back on the field that game, then the Dr is close to being negligent. Of course the Dr is employed by the club so is always going to be torn. It needs to be a regulation to take the "you're weak" stigma away from players who don't re-take the field. I think that if you've been unconcious you shouldn't play the following week either, as an absolute minimum.

2012-03-07T22:40:08+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


This is timely, because this debate has kicked off in the NRL the past week, and it will be a fierce one because of the machosism inherent in the game. The AFL has had to overcome similar obstacles over the past decade and is gradually making progress - you are culpable if you hit another player's head - full stop.

2012-03-07T22:37:17+00:00

Nate Hornblower

Guest


NRL Rugby League just gave Frank Pritchard a one week ban on a highlight reel hit against the Panthers. We all love the big hits but this kind of impact where you clearly make contact with the head needs to be outlawed. That said, if these sports want to ensure they do not lose the innate physicality that makes them great, they must have strident regulations for the off field medical consequences. The NFL has a rule that a concussion is automatically one week out. Dr's clearance is required to verify that there are no ongoing symptoms such as headaches, nausea etc. Rules like this and stronger need to be implemented by AFL, NRL, Rugby Union for us to move forward with quality player outcomes.

2012-03-07T22:29:37+00:00

Nate Hornblower

Guest


great article Andrew, I am glad you covered all the key football codes, the NFL evidence cannot be denied. r u on twitter? @kurtrudder

AUTHOR

2012-03-07T21:26:05+00:00

Andrew Sutherland

Roar Guru


Excellent summary MIB, Yes, the adored hits of RL. Strong legal tackles should be praised but there's not a lot of serious concern for the bloke seeing stars. As Phil Gould likes to say: "Get that into ya!".

2012-03-07T19:11:53+00:00

ManInBlack

Guest


the 'contact' sports are going to be 'wrestling' with this topic more and more into the near future. The AFL to their credit has been acting on advice from the medico's for some time now about protecting the head. The AFL has therefore shown a level of responsibility dictated by 'duty of care'. Good to see. RU is challenged by the dangers of the scrum; grid iron by the dangers of helmetted heroes using their armoured heads as battering rams; soccer has a question mark over the use of the head to propel the ball; RL is coming to grips with it's adored 'big hits'.

Read more at The Roar