Aussie Rugby California Dreamin'

By JottingsOnRugby.com / Roar Pro

The ‘First Wallabies’ rugby tour of Britain in 1908/09 is a familiar yarn, but that of 1912’s ‘Kangaroo Waratahs’?

A century ago the second Australian team to cross the equator left our shores, off to aid the cause of rugby in the USA.

Rugby had been enjoying a rapid rise in support on the west coast of the USA – a situation brought about by an ongoing national controversy over the number of players killed or injured playing American college football (USA President Theodore Roosevelt had implored college football administrators to “change the game or forsake it”), combined with the timely presence and influence of rugby-inclined officials in key positions within California’s universities.

In a further fortunate coincidence the New Zealand Rugby Union had arranged for their triumphant 1905 All Blacks party to return home from the UK in the early part of 1906 via Canada and California.

Staff from the University of California (‘Cal’) negotiated with the All Blacks management to showcase the rugby game via matches at the Recreation Ground (San Francisco) and the University of California (Berkeley).

In the hope of providing some semblance of competition for the New Zealanders, a British Columbia team travelled down from the neighbouring Canadian province. Though the All Blacks won both matches easily (43-6 and 65-6), the sweeping ball-passing and running rugby illustrated a marked point of difference from gridiron (still yet to legalise the forward pass play).

The decision was made by Cal and Stanford to change over to rugby, beginning with their famous annual ‘Big Game’ in October 1906. Following that lead, rugby swept through California’s high schools and universities.

A combined Californian team established annual visits to and from British Columbia, and rugby soon spread into Nevada. The Big Game lost none of its lustre or appeal under rugby rules, continuing to draw attendances well beyond 20,000 with the usual college fervour, songs and colour.

In February 1909 the Wallabies visited California on their way home from the UK. The Aussies weren’t in the All Blacks’ class, and the Americans were fast improving in their adopted code, but the Wallabies still won all three games (27-0 versus Cal, 13-3 versus Stanford; 17-0 versus All-California).

The following year Cal, Stanford and University of Nevada combined to send a representative team on a 14-game tour of NSW and New Zealand. During their visit the Americans played Sydney University three times, but were unable to defeat the home side. The visitors though did lower the colours of country rep XVs at West Maitland (bt Hunter 10-6) and Orange (bt Central West 11-9).

In early 1912 the fledgling Californian Rugby Union optimistically issued an invitation to the NSWRU, hoping that they could arrange for an “Australasian” team (combining NSW, Queensland and NZ) to tour the USA’s west coast cities. The NZRU opted against participating.

Despite the expense, and that the Californians were not affiliated to the English RFU (or IRB), the NSWRU determined to proceed with the visit. Partly this was to amplify that players under the NSWRU had wider international scope than the professional game, but also as the NSWRL had the year before come close to accepting speculative offers from USA syndicates to send a 30-man rugby league squad to the USA Pacific coast cities to hold exhibition matches.

The Californians themselves had been playing rugby with teams reduced to 14 players.

Captained by Ward Prentice, a stalwart inside back from the Western Suburbs club who had first played for NSW on their 1907 visit to Perth, the 23-man Australian team (five Queenslanders including vice-captain Tom Richards) were presented with sky blue jerseys adorned with a waratah above the word “Australia”.

The team’s manager, Dr Otto Bohrsmann, was one of the more outspoken voices within the NSWRU in the early 1910s, with his favoured target rugby league.

He dryly argued that “the cleavage had acted on rugby like a spring cleaning, and the game had emerged cleaner and better in every respect on rugby,” adding on another occasion that “The union had no room for piebalds or skewbalds. Members must play the game as the rules and constitution provided.”

Upon arriving in San Francisco, in his dockside interviews Bohrsmann began raising doubts about the use of paid coaches in California rugby, and that in Sydney and elsewhere in the rugby world such a practice was seen as professionalism.

The American newspapers quickly began to talk up the box-office appeal of the Australian rugby team “as probably one of the best rugby teams in the world” who were “here to exemplify rugby” and how it should be played to spectacular effect.

The Los Angeles Times headlined the tourists as the ‘Kangaroo Waratahs’, the San Francisco Call nicknamed them the ‘Southern Cross Stars’ and emblazoned “Rah! Rah! Waratah!” in a page-wide banner lead.

The Aussies won 11 of their 13 matches, including a 12-8 victory over the USA in a Test match – it was a fortunate escape given the home side led 8-0 with just ten minutes remaining.

With much of the tour itinerary involving matches against universities and colleges, the players spent a lot of their time as guests on campuses and billeted overnight stays at fraternity houses. Suffice to say, as Tom Richards’ biographer Greg Growden put it in Gold, Mud ‘n’ Guts, all “revelled in the wild student life” and it seemed to effect the on-field results (the two defeats were at the Universities – 13-12 to Stanford and 6-5 to California).

Though the Australians were a well-received team, attendances at their matches didn’t exceed 10,000. Yet, the Aussies were among a throng of 25,000 fans at the annual Stanford-California Big Game clash played under rugby laws. Outside of the UK, and in Sydney before the split with league, nowhere else in the world could boast of a larger attendance at a rugby game.

While it appeared that rugby was making good progress, Richards and his team mates were questioning the style of rugby game that the Americans were evolving. The local players and referees well understood the laws as they were written, but were blissfully unaware of the wider “spirit” and understanding that binds the game, making rugby what it is.

The Americans would break the scrum up the moment the ball had passed from the hooker, were seemingly incapable of passing the ball beyond flinging it away when in the midst of a tackle, and had no concept of how to defend against a posse of ball-passing three-quarters racing down the field at them.

Yet the Australians had difficulties beating these teams. At scrum time the two sets of backs in rugby traditionally stood deep, on the prospect that their pack might win possession of the ball, but the Americans stood flat in a line across the field up with the packs, were happy to lose the scrum, and swept forward to knock their opposite to the ground before, during and after the arrival of the ball.

The undoubted star of the 1912 tour was Dan Carroll, scoring 19 tries in 13 matches (including the three games in British Columbia). Carroll decided to stay in the USA and study for an engineering degree, and ultimately made the country his home.

Carroll played an integral role in the American rugby teams that won gold medals at the Olympic Games in 1920 (player-coach) and 1924 (coach). It completed a unique treble for Carroll, a member of the Wallabies team that won the Olympic gold medal in 1908.

The players in these USA rugby teams were college gridiron footballers. Though there was some legacy from the rugby boom before WWI that arguably contributed to their success, the last rugby Big Game was 1917.

The support for rugby had declined – partly out of influence from the east coast football colleges, a desire to play the same national game as the rest of the country at ‘football’, and that American football was itself reforming as a game in terms of player safety.

Had rugby been established for a longer period in California the story may have been different. However, with no rugby tradition and culture to draw upon, there was little fight left in rugby in California to stop the tide of the gridiron revival.

The Wallabies next played the USA at Anaheim in Los Angeles in early 1976 on the way home from their UK tour. Australia won 24-12. The first USA rugby team to visit Australia came in 1983 – playing a seven-match tour, the Eagles defeated WA, SA, Victoria and NSW Country, but lost to the Queensland Reds (14-10), Waratahs (19-13) and the Wallabies (49-3).

Since then rugby in the USA has begun to build a solid foundation, and may yet figure in the code’s first rank of national teams.

The Crowd Says:

2012-05-31T21:13:07+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


another great article jottings. rugby taking off in places such as Russia and America may but probably wont happen. the usual rugby global expansion supporterson this site have some unrealistic expectations on the rise of rugby but good luck to you

2012-05-31T20:54:42+00:00

chris

Guest


It wouldn't be fair if America ever got into Rugby Union big style as they are a monster of a country and would kill the sport. Remember being into Boxing in England in the 1980's and just because we speak the same language you think the pro Boxing world started and ended in the U.S.A. esp in the press where all the lighter weights were from Mexico/Thailand/Japan/Puerto Rico. Now it be more fair if California was a country in it's self like the rest of the states ala Europe.

2012-04-09T12:32:08+00:00

crip

Roar Pro


Yeah I only know about it because my old man played for ACT against them. Apparently they were a quality side with some kiwi players and a couple of their players went on to the NFL. Cheers for that.

AUTHOR

2012-04-09T08:47:40+00:00

JottingsOnRugby.com

Roar Pro


@ crip - wow!, that's so obscure - nearly disappeared entirely from history - the Uni of Cal rugby team visited here in 1965 & 1971. Sydney Uni bt them 17-8 on the 1971 visit. Wallabies' Max Howell enrolled at Cal in 1950, & he played for the 'Golden Bears'. Of course 'Golden Bears' is not reserved solely for Cal's rugby team, but all athletic sports.

2012-04-09T00:23:25+00:00

crip

Roar Pro


Hey Sean, what about some information on the California University (Golden Bears) Rugby Union team that toured Australia and New Zealand in the 60's and 70's? Also, to all those Roarers obsessed with Rugby in the US, you're only showing your ignorance to how great American football is.

2012-04-05T10:01:47+00:00

p.Tah

Guest


Rugby doesn't need to compete with the NFL etc. the huge number of athletes who don't make the big time have another pathway to play professional sport. Athletes aren't their issue. referees and coaches are. They need more.

AUTHOR

2012-04-05T02:52:40+00:00

JottingsOnRugby.com

Roar Pro


@ Micky. Yes, I have seen Tony Collins mentioned that to be the case. It was as I understand it a decision was taken by the CRFU to write to the RFL seeking assistance/affiliation, but it was virtually days before WW2 was declared in Europe. Some clubs & schools in Canada around 'The Maritimes' did switch from RU to RL in c.1945, but both soon after were overtaken by CFL.

2012-04-05T02:45:40+00:00

King of the Gorgonites

Roar Guru


cheers

AUTHOR

2012-04-05T02:33:33+00:00

JottingsOnRugby.com

Roar Pro


I agree. My only point was, as the 1920s example, you only need to put together one competitive team, not find hundreds of thousands of players - though I accept the former is often a result of the depth of the latter, increasingly the Pacific Island, Argentina & some European nations are showing that what matters is getting players into the pro/semi-pro comps in the major rugby nations, and forming your national team primarily from those experienced players. It is of course for USA rugby to decide the best path for its objectives and goals.

2012-04-04T22:30:00+00:00

kovana

Guest


The 2015 RWC has already confirmed it will stick to the same 5 teams per pool format with 20 teams. HOWEVER.. The 2019 event MUST have 24 teams.. 6 pools of 4 teams... With the top 2 from each pool PLUS the next best 4 teams based on points qualifying for the top 16 elimination finals.... That way, maybe Japan has a chance to make it to the Elimination rounds, to help keep interest up IMO.

2012-04-04T22:16:27+00:00

Mille Miglia

Guest


Jottings & Johnno - last year attendance at college football - where 97% of the pros come from - topped 50 million in the States. Rugby will never surplant American football in America for all kinds of reasons. Size of teams for one. History for another. The game has been played, in something akin to its present form, for the last 130 years. You'd need a supercomputer to calculate the number of public and private high schools in America that have a football team. Not to mention Pop Warner kids ball. They won't be switching to rugby, no more than US basketball players would switch to netball. The US, where I've lived for years, is mired in habit when it comes to sports. With the NFL, the NBA, (basketball is huge in college and high school) NHL and Major League baseball, there's no way rugby could ever achieve parity even.

2012-04-04T20:16:02+00:00

Micky

Guest


Sean, some rugby league fan post on here last year that California rugby was on the verge of switching to rugby league at some stage before the second world war. Was this the case or is it just another myth?

2012-04-04T12:25:16+00:00

p.Tah

Guest


Thanks again Sean.

2012-04-04T08:10:39+00:00

sheek

Guest


Sean, Great informative reading as usual.

2012-04-04T05:55:52+00:00

Onor

Guest


yes. I agree. 24 teams. The IRB has 4 years to pump 100 odd million into 4 countries.. There best bet is countries with plenty of eyes to see the games on T.V. I think the investment will pay off.. but which 4 teams do you pump money into? I also think the sooner they can get a world series up and running every two years the better. Imagine a sold out yankee stadium for the world series final.. (call me a dreamer)

AUTHOR

2012-04-04T05:13:28+00:00

JottingsOnRugby.com

Roar Pro


Can still buy The Rugby Rebellion http://jottingsonrugby.com/books/

AUTHOR

2012-04-04T04:34:55+00:00

JottingsOnRugby.com

Roar Pro


Thanks Mille. It's interesting re the scale of NFL + College football & whether that impacts on other codes development/success. Admittedly it was long ago, and not a competitive tournament of teams, but the USA wins at the Olympic rugby in 1920s were achieved on a very small player base (arguably in fact without any at all!). In Australia it is not as if rugby has first dibs on 'footballers', and despite the combined scale of AFL + NRL, the Wallabies have won 2 World Cups. Is trite to say, and no doubt depth ultimately produces the best long term results, but in the end the USA need to merely (is that the right word! ha!) produce a team of 15 players for success, not a pool of tens or hundreds of thousands. I think we will see (or are seeing) a rise in the competitiveness of Pacific island nations, simply as they form their team from their nationals playing in pro or semi-pro comps across the globe. 7s will be even more of this case.

2012-04-04T04:24:58+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Millie i agree and disagree. RUgby is getting bigger in Asia,Africa, SOuth america and europe where the big leagues are, and the wages are going up all the time, and the USA kids growing up will see they can make big bucks playing the sport of rugby in europe. And as kid it is more about love than money, and many will stay with rugby coz they know they can still make big bucks, rather than play a sport they have no interest in. And this global outlook that rugby offers that gridiron does as well, means gridiron long term will lose more and more fans, which means then a drop in tv ratings $$$, and crowds, and participation in the USA. This global rugby plan is just the start of the rugby reveloution, and sevens olympics coming up. More people in the world would rather play rugby union than gridiron, only USA/Canada a gridiron strong hold. Mexico will never be a gridiron powerhouse nor will germany. Long term rugby union has gridiron covered numbers wise, tv viewers numbers wise, long term i mean. This rugby revolution is young and just the beginning. ALready the rugby union world cup is the 3rd largest sports event and most watched sports event after the Olympics, and soccer world cup. Suoer bowl is 1 match and watched by millions of a fe billion yes but 1 match, and as digital streams come more in vogue a smote people get the net rugby just has all bases covered over gridiron long term in the USA, it may take 20 years or 50 years but i think rugby will win the code war over gridiron in the USA . In 2012 rugby is the facets growing sport no 1 phenomenal some of there growth. USA now host world sevens series legs the las vegas sevens which was huge NBC has tv rights deal to show world cup matches all of them.

2012-04-04T04:10:59+00:00

Mille Miglia

Guest


Excellent research Jottings. US rugby is something that's been discussed often in the past on this forum. While talented American players can earn big bucks in the NFL and the CFL, or even in Europe or Japan, there's little chance of the US becoming a power. Life U, a chiropractic college in Marietta, GA,, often fields the top team. The Eagles have three June tests coming up, one against Canada in Ontario, one against Georgia in Colorado and one against Italy in Texas. They'll lose all three, alas. American football, on the other hand, gets bigger and bigger, the players get more banged up every season in spite of those pads and helmets, the owners make a fortune, and the networks and the ad agencies make an even bigger one. Even in BC rugby doesn't draw the crowds - maybe 4,000 at Thunderbird in Vancouver when Canada plays the Eagles. 8,000 tops in Toronto.

2012-04-04T04:10:48+00:00

King of the Gorgonites

Roar Guru


Cheers. Look forward to getting into sometime before the Lions tour. Do you have any books outs? if not, any plans to?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar