A catch up with 2012 Super Rugby Final referee Steve Walsh

By The Roar / Editor

Steve Walsh has been refereeing since he was 16, and has again reached the pinnacle with his selection as the referee for the 2012 Super Rugby Final, his second such appointment after overseeing the Super 14 Final in 2007 between the Bulls and Sharks.

“It hasn’t really sunk in, but obviously I am pleased, you always want to be recognised for strong performances,” Walsh said.

“I suppose it is always nice that people appreciate the work you put out there.”

Walsh said that the trick to his improvement this year was similar to lessons he used in life.

“It is continuous work figuring out what your strengths and weaknesses are and working on those, and for me especially it has been like that for the last couple of years,” he said.

“Last year for me was disrupted with injury, but this season it has been more about me, not the teams or game, but more focusing on my mental preparation prior to each match. I deal with how I am feeling and what I am trying to achieve during the games.”

Walsh said of equal importance wasn’t just what happened on the field, but ensuring that he assessed his game post match.

“I do a review of my performance, work out what I did wrong and try and improve on my faults from a game-to-game basis,” he said,

“I think all of us (the referees) like to think we are our own toughest critics.”

Walsh is a popular referee with the players, with his approach in regard to dealing with 30 men on the park focused on man management, without becoming too heavy handed.

“The sort of things I am strong on is emotional control and empathy with players, and be self-aware, that is creating the space I need to work while officiating the game,” he said.

“(But) every referee needs to be in charge, because at the end of the day, we are responsible.”

“I think the art of refereeing is the art of managing men, just going out there and acting like a dictator won’t end up with a successful result for all. It is about getting men to do what you want them to do, but not coming down on them like a schoolteacher by being too strict demanding ‘this is the way it has to be’.”

Despite focusing on the approach, any referee is still going to be questioned, and Walsh felt that part of the process was giving a player the attention first, making sure that he only dismissed their view if he felt there was no valid point to be made.

“I think at the start you need to listen to players, and this is one of the things I am really trying to do, because you can then assess if they have validity in what they are trying to say,” Walsh said.

“If they don’t, you can move on from that, but if they have a point, then I listen and acknowledge, and then take a course of action.”

“I think I have the ability to put a line in the sand and tell them fairly if I disagree with them.”

With the Chiefs and Sharks working furiously behind the scenes with their match analysis, Walsh said at this stage of the campaign he didn’t need to examine the teams in too much detail.

“At the beginning of the year yes, and looking back at what has happened throughout the season, I’ve done a lot of video review of teams, myself, and other referees,” Walsh said.

“Now that the season is progressing, I have a firm picture of what I want to see, and what is not acceptable, and I am at the stage that I have control.”

“In this game I’m not worried about the teams, I know what is expected.”

“My gut feeling, having seen the teams, as well as refereeing the Sharks last week, is that both teams have good intent, and it makes it a lot easier as there isn’t negativity out there.”

Walsh, like most referees, believed that rugby’s key priorities centred around the tackle and ruck area, and the Super Rugby Final whistle blower said the key wasn’t only the contest, but ensuring quick ball for a good spectacle.

“The tackle area is always something that referees have a continuous work on with, as we want to create quick ball,” he said.

“Obviously physically dominant teams or players going forward are going to get that quick ball, giving them a better platform to work off, so the breakdown is one of our key areas.”
However Walsh said he had also put special focus into his management of scrums this season.

“I’m also aware that you need to have a good scrum night, because if the scrums don’t go well, often you don’t have a good game of rugby,” he said.

“Setting up the set phases and giving the teams a good platform where they can create quick ball is what we are all after.”

Walsh was quite clear with what was needed to operate a good scrum.

“The teams, and myself, need strong management at setup,” he said.

“There are the four calls (crouch, touch, pause, engage) followed by four actions by the team. My triggers are a) is the height right at setup (pre-engagement) b) head and shoulders above hips (post-engagement) and c) spines in line (post-engagement).”

While watching for this accuracy, Walsh also said he looked carefully for illegal tactics.

“Every referee puts a huge amount of focus and time on making sure the scrums are right, and ploys like deliberate or quick wheels, are pretty easy to spot due to the speed with which it happens,” he said.

“If a team is trying to fox you at the engage, it is important not to move on, and then reset and continue with my four call process. If they don’t change, then penalties need to apply.”

“Post engagement, I want to be clear about the pictures that are in front of me so I can accurately label what is acceptable and what is not.”

The Super Rugby Final would also be policed like any other match, with Walsh making it quite clear there would be no alteration to his game for such a big occasion.

“No change,” Walsh said.

“Player attitude will dictate the game. We all hope that I can set the game and we are away, and give the players your understanding of what is acceptable, so they can make the play. If player attitude isn’t right, then you need to be fair to the other team, but for the Super Rugby Final, I’m not concerned about this as the Chiefs and Sharks are positive teams.”

Walsh, like all within the rugby community, has a vision of how the game should be played, but also knows he has to do what was required.

“We would all love it to be an open, flowing, entertaining and enthralling match,” Walsh said.

“But I am also prepared to knuckle down if I need to, if it is a grind it is a grind, I can only work with what the teams put in front of me.”

– provided by SANZAR

The Crowd Says:

2012-08-04T04:44:24+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


Is great to see Steve Walsh overcoming the personal issues that saw him sacked in NZ and working his way back to the top.

2012-08-03T05:23:17+00:00

drop kick

Guest


Ive been told the tat is a shopping list

2012-08-03T04:50:33+00:00

wayne barnes

Guest


I think sharks be ok with walsh been ref ,i think he will do good job and not be a factor like joubert and kaplan allways are

2012-08-03T01:52:48+00:00

Colin

Guest


Walsh had issues with alcohol which saw him stood down as a ref in New Zealand. This is well publicised, see "Top whistler admits alcohol led to downfall" ( http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10569021 ) He moved to Australia and sorted himself out, and good on him for it too. As a Sharks supporter, I'm glad its not Kaplan or Joubert because they're too aware of the politics around the whole thing. Far prefer Walsh (though I didn't like him at all in the early parts of his career) because I think he is genuinely striving to be fair and good at what he does, while readily admitting he's not 'a know it all'.

2012-08-02T15:41:43+00:00

SandBox

Roar Guru


pretty sure it's: he who controls himself controls the game some on roar have mentioned he has had off field problems. Maybe he got the tat more for his personal life than his refereeing

2012-08-02T13:56:57+00:00

andy

Guest


anyone know what the tatoo says .... on the inside of his arm ?

2012-08-02T10:58:48+00:00

Sabe

Guest


totally agree Andrew C & can't believe I'm agreeing with a group of kiwi's in a hamilton pub ! Would have loved to see Joubert, he's efficient & fair where as Walsh gives you the feeling it's all about him & swayed all too easily by a home crowd. Good Luck to the Cheif's for 2012 only

2012-08-02T08:04:11+00:00

Andrew C (waikato)

Guest


Steve Walsh has deteriorated as a whistleblower this year (as a Super 15 ref) and definitely doesn't deserve the final - albeit as an Aussie these days. Too officious, doesn't play advantage well at all................... we (7 Kiwis) had a quick whip around of opinion tonight in a pub in Hamilton and had 100% agreement that Jonker (or even Joubert) is the best Super 15 ref this season (for chrissakes, please NO KAPLAN - but presumably this plonker is on the touch !!). Chiefs to win by a solitary point (that's enough !!)

2012-08-02T06:44:51+00:00

Jimmy

Guest


Walsh has improved out of sight especially in his more objective approach to the game.

2012-08-02T06:13:34+00:00

Royce Strauss

Guest


Don't have a problem with Walsh. Just don't be a whistle happy turd and spoil what should be a good game.

2012-08-02T05:17:17+00:00

SandBox

Roar Guru


good article, will have to send this to the commentary team at OSN mid east. They regularly mock Welsh and I have thought it was a biased NH criticism for some time. assistant ref seems a real misnomer. Would like to see consideration for the two ref league system. Yes it has it's problems, but the assistant refs aren't doing their job. Either get the ARs to step up, or introduce two refs. One for the O team and one for the D team. We wouldn't have the offside issues that many fans complain about. Two sets of eyes at the break down could be a good thing.

2012-08-02T03:34:22+00:00

Carnivean

Guest


“Player attitude will dictate the game." Exactly. Thankfully we have 2 teams that seem to play positively in all of their games.

2012-08-02T03:32:59+00:00

redsnut

Guest


That is all very well and good, but what about the touchies and their input to the match. Apparently they are there as "assistant referees", yet on the face of it, they don't seem to have much input.

Read more at The Roar