Shades of '92-93 in Australia's loss to Proteas

By JohnB / Roar Rookie

It has been noted that the South Africans were the first visiting team since the 1992/3 West Indians to win a second successive series touring Australia.

However, there are some parallels between the two series which may dispel some of the gloom after the recent Perth loss.

The glaring similarity, to me, is that in both series Australia was on the verge of taking the number one position in the Test rankings (albeit unofficial in 1992/3) by winning in Adelaide, only to stumble there and collapse completely in the final test at Perth to lose the series.

Many will remember the Adelaide test in 1992/3 – low scoring first innings, but a lead to the Windies, Tim May’s phenomenal five for next to nothing in the second innings giving Australia a chance by limiting the target to 186, Justin Langer’s gutsy 50 on debut with all around him collapsing (7-74 at the lowest point).

Then some faint hope as first a young Shane Warne and then May offered some support, but then falling himself at 9-144.

That left May and Craig McDermott batting needing 42, against Curtley Ambrose at his peak, Courtney Walsh and Ian Bishop. Pretty much the definition of no chance.

I for one switched off the TV at that point and went off to do something else. Tim May after all had been playing well supporting Langer but was no batsman. Craig McDermott had always had ability but by this stage of his career had been pummelled so much by the West Indies he could generally be relied on for a couple of big swipes and not much more.

Consequently when an hour or so later I drifted back past the TV, and flicked it on as much to see what might be on as anything, I was stunned to see they were still batting and inching to the target.

At 9-184 Courtney Walsh bowled a bouncer to Craig McDermott, who had been getting in line and copping it all innings, and did so again this time, except that his gloves were somewhere in front of his face, the ball flicked something on the way to the keeper, the Windies appealed and the finger went up – for the Windies win by one run.

Nowadays maybe there’d be a DRS challenge and maybe it would have shown the ball hitting the helmet or the hand being off the bat (as with Michael Kasprowicz in somewhat similar circumstances a few years later) – but who knows. It’s clearly in the scorebook that he was out caught.

For the record McDermott ended with 18, and May 42 – his highest Test score, just as that 5-9 in the second innings was his best Test bowling result. Somewhat poignant for him to have still then been on the losing side.

That brought the series back to 1-1 – Australia had won in Melbourne on the back of Shane Warne taking a seven for, after having got very close before running out of time in Brisbane (the Windies were eight down and a long way off at stumps – not so different to the South Africans recently).

They then went to Sydney and (after a strong first innings) were flattened by Brian Lara’s 277 but were easily able to hold on for the draw.

Coming into Perth therefore all was square, even though Australia could have been two or even three up had only very little fallen their way.

Would Australia end up getting the reward for on balance having been on top to that point in the series, just as in the recently completed series? Afraid not.

We know what happened against South Africa in the last Test this year. Back then Curtley Ambrose also had some different ideas. Australia batted first and got to a respectable enough 2-85. Ambrose then delivered his famous 7-1 spell and Australia found itself 9-104 and staring at losing the game and series within the first half of the first day.

Miracles do happen, but not for Australia in Perth in 1993 or in 2012. Two series lost which so nearly looked like being won. The number one ranking tantalisingly close but snatched away – in 1993 it was probably as close as one absolute champion, Alan Border, ever got to it. In 2012 it was another’s (Ricky Ponting) last chance to regain it.

After 1993 the next tilt at the crown for the Australians was in 1995 in the West Indies – and on the back of the Waugh brothers kicking on from that 1992/3 series, David Boon and to a lesser extent Ian Healy providing some ongoing backbone, Mark Taylor and Michael Slater coming in, Shane Warne maturing into a great player and one Glenn McGrath adding a new element to an otherwise pretty prosaic seam attack.

The likes of McDermott, Merv Hughes and Bruce Reid had retired in 1992/3, so it was largely a new team that started Australia’s run towards becoming the best in the world.

Is there basis for optimism that something similar might happen this time? There are too many variables to try to predict whether winning the next two Ashes series could lift Australia to number one. Even if it did, it’s difficult to dispute that that would be a hollow result unless Australia also managed to beat South Africa.

To me though, the prospects for Australia to kick on in the next couple of years look bright, and there’s a potential parallel to the 1992/3 to 1995 transformation there.

You can see David Warner becoming a more consistently good player and filling the dominating opener role that was Michael Slater’s. Michael Clarke can’t be too much less of a batsman than Steve Waugh ever was.

Michael Hussey fills the old pro role that was David Boon’s – differently, and not as well in some respects – but arguably better in others.

Matthew Wade has it all in front of him to match Ian Healy but has the ability. The comparison falls down a bit with Nathan Lyon who, with all respect, will never be Shane Warne. On the other hand, if they could ever get onto the park, it’s fair to say the sky’s the limit with the Australian pace attack at the moment.

There really is material there to create a world beating side.

And all that leaves us to do is find Mark Taylor and Mark Waugh equivalents, and a sixth batsman or all-rounder! For now, persist with Cowan as a poor man’s Taylor, recall Khawaja and hope talent turns into production with Watson.

And anyone getting consistent runs in the next season and a half, or any wrist spinner taking wickets, form a line to the left, we’ll be right with you.

The Crowd Says:

2012-12-07T03:03:11+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Funny you mention that decision..... I was at a Curtley Ambrose and Courtney Walsh sportsmen dinner last Saturday night that very decision came up in conversation. Curtley and Courtney both swear blue that McDermott hit that one. Also they claim the non striker Tim May was also quoted as saying McDermott smashed it! I certainly wasn't going to argue the point with either of the West Indian greats!!!!!!!!!!

2012-12-07T02:53:52+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


other fave moments of this series, Waugh/Border centuries Melbourne, Warney 7/52 Melbourne, Simmons belting 100,Bishop terrifying 2nd innings Perth ( or was it first ). Always thought Deano hard done by. S R Waugh ave about 25 but they stuck with him. Arthurton got the biggest nick in christendom in Brissie half way through great ton. Don't think this team is on the eve of a great era or that the Africans will slide like the WI.

2012-12-06T04:47:10+00:00

JohnB

Guest


You're right, but that writing still wasn't that clear. Things can change pretty rapidly with only a couple of changes in personnel. At that point Ambrose, an all time great, was at his best, Walsh was getting better and better, Bishop was looking like the next great Windies paceman off the production line and either of the 2 Benjamins looked more than handy as the fourth paceman. As it turned out, Bishop's career was too affected by injuries, the Benjamins never kicked on and the production line faltered, leaving Ambrose and Walsh to carry the load. They were good enough to do so for years, but not to the extent the 4-pronged attacks had. Batting wise in 1992/3 Desi Haynes was still there, but coming to the end. Phil Simmons made some runs (notably in Perth) but Gordon Greenidge he wasn't and the long term lack of a strong opening pair hit the Windies from then on. Whether that was predictable at the time, hard to say. Richie Richardson was still there and I've always rated him very highly indeed. Certainly there was no Richards, Lloyd, Gomes, Logie or Dujon from the great teams of a few years earlier but Lara was obviously a superstar in the making, Jimmy Adams had been the number one rated batsman in the world not too long before that, Keith Arthurton played at least one very good innings that series and Carl Hooper wasn't the worst batsman going around and a better spin bowler than many who had played for them, so they actually looked ok there too. Again, as it turned out, they never found another Greenidge and Haynes, Adams rarely lived up to that early rating, Hooper rarely delivered on his ability, Arthurton and anyone else they tried were'nt up to it and Richardson and Lara couldn't do it by themselves. Maybe Junior Murray as the keeper in 1992/3 was the clue to the future. Very much a junior to the previous Murray who'd kept for them (Deryk) and not a patch on Jeff Dujon, and they wouldn't find even a decent keeper batsman for quite some time (Ridley Jacobs was probably the next one, in the late 90s).

2012-12-06T04:00:08+00:00

Malibu77

Guest


Adelaide 1992/93 was one of the low points of my life! So close and yet so far. Hard to believe that was 20 years ago! Win would have clinched the series. Instead Ambrose went whoosh in Perth and Windies won 2-1. Seem to recall a freakish stop by Haynes at short leg that would have gone for 2 and either levelled the scores or meant Aus win. But the writing was on the wall for the Windies and the series loss 3 years later in the Caribbean to Steve Waugh's team marked the end of their great dominance.

2012-12-06T02:30:48+00:00

Neuen

Roar Rookie


Rope-A-Dope/ Australia fired all their bullets in the second test.

2012-12-05T23:01:29+00:00

Sailosi

Guest


What I remember about that Adelaide test was the phenomenal work of Desmond Haynes at short leg and the guts of Justin Langer. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].

2012-12-05T21:39:05+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


Adelaide 92/93: DEEP IMMENSE PAIN. Much like AB pelting his stress-ball cherry into the floor of the changerooms at the ground, many projectiles were sent flying around my loungeroom that day. To my pet dog who copped the slipper: I'm sorry, boy. It was the fault of that crapola umpiring decision.

2012-12-05T20:20:43+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


Awesome memories of Waca in 92/93. All i seem to recall is Ambrose knocking us over (7 for 1 in one spell i remember) We were on the rise though, hard to see us in the same light these days though.

2012-12-05T18:15:25+00:00

Johnno

Guest


our batting line up was disjointed for Perth, and we lost the critical moments of the test, which is ho test cricket the formulae works, you win those crucial 50/50 momentum seizing moments, you win the test. The crucial part of the test for me was the last hour of day 1, for what's it's worth now. Aussies were tired , been fielding all day, we had to dig deep int he last hour against World class bowling. Losing 2 wickets at end of day knocked us around. If he were 1 down, the match would of been different, but it wasn't and going 2 down late in day 1 really knocked us around I think.

Read more at The Roar