Do doped world records encourage athletes to cheat?

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

At the peak of her career, Cathy Freeman was knowingly encouraged to take drugs by the ‘gurus’ who administer the international body that runs track and field.

A big call you say? Well, sadly, it’s not.

There is no suggestion here that Freeman doped. That’s not the story. It is the story behind the encouragement by officials that must be closely examined.

When Freeman officially retired from her sport in 2003 she bowed out with a glittering array of achievements. She won Olympic gold and silver medals, two World titles and four Commonwealth Games gold medals.

There was just one thing that was missing from her CV and it was the piece in the jigsaw that would have defined her as the fastest over 400m in the history of the sport – the world record.

And this is where the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) comes into play.

How you ask? Well let’s journey back to Bruce Stadium, as it was then, in Canberra on 6 October 1985. The last day of a three-day World Cup meet.

At the time Freeman was just a starry-eyed 12-year-old who would have had no interest, you would imagine, on what unfolded that day in our national capital.

A swag of big name stars were in town, participating in the World Cup, including a young Ben Johnson, who won gold in the men’s 100m.

But the biggest news to come out of the meet was the performance by a 28-year-old East German by the name of Marita Koch.

Five years earlier in Moscow she won gold in the 400m but was denied her chance to defend her title in Los Angeles in 1984 due to the Eastern Bloc boycott.

However, on this day in 1985 she shattered the 400m world record – her time a staggering 47.60 seconds, slicing an incredible 0.39 off the existing mark.

And what is more amazing, that record still stands today, over 27 years hence.

Well, maybe it is not so amazing given the fact that Koch posted her time as a result of being plied throughout her career with performance enhancing drugs.

With the fall of the Berlin Wall in late-1989, journalists from around the world were for the first time permitted to access the files of the East German sporting federations.

And what they found, as we have known for a long time, was the irrefutable evidence of a systematic state-sanctioned doping regime.

And among the hundreds of names there for the world to see was one Marita Koch.

Her entire daily drug protocol was there in black and white.

Like so many that preceded and followed her, Koch to this day flatly denies having ever used banned substances, which is a staggering fact.

Staggering because long time anti-doping campaigner, Werner Frank discovered a hand-written letter from Koch in which she complained that one of her main rivals, Bärbel Wöckel was receiving a higher dosage of drugs than herself because she had a relative who worked for the company that produced them.

Fairly damning evidence you would think and the IAAF has had over 25 years to consider what they should do about it. After all that time, what have they decided to do? Nothing.

Since Koch sizzled around the track in Canberra, the closest anyone has got to the benchmark is Marie-José Pérec’s 48.25 en route to claiming gold at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics – that is a whopping 0.65 seconds outside Koch’s tainted time and that is the best anyone has done in 27-plus years since.

Freeman’s gold medal winning time of 49.13 in the 2000 games remained 1.53 seconds outside of Koch’s record.

The question needs to be asked just why Koch’s world record still stands.

Some have questioned over time whether Pérec was clean, but that is all it is – supposition.

Florence Griffith-Joyner’s mind bending 10.49 100m world record in 1987 and 200m world mark of 21.34 at the Seoul Games, both which still stand, have also been highly questioned but again there is no proof.

With Koch, it is a fact – she cheated, knowingly.

So why does she still sit ‘proudly’ in the record books?

The IAAF and the IOC will state that it sits too far outside the eight-year statute of limitations clause with regard to the expunging of performances and times.

Really? Then why has cycling’s world governing body, the UCI, seen fit to strip Lance Armstrong of his Tour de France titles that date way back to 1999?

No issue with the eight-year clause as laid down by sports ultimate drug watchdog, the Montreal-based World Anti-Doping Agency.

Armstrong has been proven to be a cheat and so too has Koch.

By leaving her 400m world record as the single lap benchmark for women, the authorities are openly encouraging young athletes to dope if they wish to be the fastest of all-time.

I would have thought that is actually against the whole ethos of sport.

Unfortunately, the Amex card carrying, five-star hotel and first-class flight brigade who make the ultimate decisions reckon it’s all kosher.

And speaking of grand pooh-bahs who live a life of luxury as a result of their role in sports administration, what about our own Kevan Gosper, the AOC and IOC (former vice-president) board member?

Just before the 1992 Barcelona Olympics I interviewed Gosper for ABC Grandstand and asked him why Ben Johnson, having admitted in 1989 at the Dubin Inquiry into drugs in sport in Canda that he had doped ever since 1981, was still in possession of his two bronze medals (100m and 4 x 100m) from the LA Games of 1984.

He said it was the first time the matter had been raised with him and he would look into it and get back to me.

Sixteen years later, a few months before the 2008 Olympics I again interviewed Gosper for ABC Grandstand and asked about various issues relating to the Beijing Games.

As an aside, I again inquired of him about the Johnson medal issue surrounding the LA Games.

His response was to tell me that it was the first time it had ever been raised with him!

Very strange I thought, and when I twigged his memory his response was an equally strange, “What do you expect me to say?”

But – I was again reassured when he told me on air that this time he would look into it – and be rest assured he would furnish me with a response to my question.

I left the ABC in mid-2011 and guess what; I am still yet to hear from Kevan.

Mind you, in fairness I did only first raise the issue 20 years ago and to expect an answer so quickly is a little presumptuous on my part.

But Kevan, if you do happen to read this and have been able to find an answer to my query, feel free to post a comment below like all good Roarers do.

The Crowd Says:

2013-01-14T08:31:51+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Thanks for the response, Glenn :) Well, Johnson was caught red-handed the day after he ran that time. Koch wasn't, so there's one difference. You might also throw in pressure from the Americans and Carl Lewis' star power, if you wanted to be mischievous ;) I think most athletes (and fans) look at certain world records, acknowledge that they were set by probable dopers, and put them out of their minds. The incentives to be the best come in the form of Olympic and world championship medals, national championships and records, prizemoney, sponsorship, glory, personal fulfilment, ego... and on it goes. Do I think Koch's record should be erased? Yes. It's dodgy as. Do I think the fact that it hasn't been erased is encouraging athletes to dope? I don't. A few old world records is not a major factor in the decision to cheat, in my opinion. Athletes who dope will do so because they want to win and think they can get away with it. Winning an Olympic gold medal is, unfortunately, enough incentive to dope for many athletes. If the IAAF was negligent in enforcing its own doping rules, that's undoubtedly a problem. An athlete is more likely to dope if s/he thinks s/he can get away with it in the here and now. There might be an argument here about a lack of enforcement creating an atmosphere where doping flourished. Cycling has/had the same problem. But when you say "Freeman was encouraged to dope", that sounds like some officials took her aside in a back office somewhere and secretly told her that she had a free pass to cheat. That would be a huge story. Unfortunately, "Sports officials should have done more to prevent doping" is an important story, but it's not exactly a revelation. I think the presence of a few dodgy world records is a bit of a sideshow to the real issue of whether sports bodies could/should have done more in the past, and what they're doing today. I enjoyed the read, but I think the headline and lead par are a bit overblown.

2013-01-14T07:44:30+00:00

Chui

Guest


Couple those images with that of the Chinese swimmers with the massive v shape. I think they are joint winners.

2013-01-14T07:41:51+00:00

Chui

Guest


Yes, highly recommended. Even if half of it's true, you can't look at the Olympics the same way. Especially Samaranch.

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T06:12:43+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


You'll get know argument from me Greg. I have watched the vision numerous times on You Tube and to say the least, her run easy was amazing! Nice to hear from you by the way!

2013-01-14T06:09:24+00:00

greg prichard

Guest


Glenn, I covered the 1985 World Cup as part of the News Limited team, and every time I read the name Marita Koch it reminds me of that race. The sight of her thundering down the straight to win by a huge margin, with massive veins pumping all the way, makes her the alltime poster "girl" for performance-enhancing drug use, in my eyes. It was one of the most outrageous things you will ever see in sport. I'd rather not say it, but I have to: I swear that woman had balls.

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T06:00:13+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Tell me VerbosityAbridged, what message is being communicated to an elite 400m runner who is tageting a world record that the authorities know is 'synthetic'? On the one hand the powers that be always trumpet how they want clean sport and then set atheltes a target that can't be reached it would appear without drugs. If you aren't able to get to it and you know that the person who set it doped, what may you consider doing? And lastly, would you remove Koch's undeniably drug-induced record ifrom the books or just leave it there? I

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T05:49:41+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


What's dodgy about the headline. What is the current record, which has been condoned for the past 23 years since the Berlin Wall fell, tell us if you need to break it? That you almost certainly need to dope. If that is not encouraging an athlete to cheat in order to achieve the ultimate mark in their chosen event I don't what is.

2013-01-14T05:32:47+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I'd put FloJo strongly in the Marion Jones category you have there - no doubt I'm afraid

2013-01-14T05:07:36+00:00

VerbosityAbridged

Roar Rookie


People are dumb. Without a dodgy headline, none of you would read the article. That's just called Media manipulation. It's how it works, folks.

2013-01-14T04:58:11+00:00

Dadiggle

Guest


Funny if you look at the medals at the Olympics for the woman 100 not a single American has won gold since the Balco scandal. Jones - Juiced Up Gail Devers - Juiced up Florence Griffith-Joyner - very suspicious

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T04:56:26+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Dadiggle, unfortunately we can think all we like - and believe me I do - but in the end is supposition. Without hard evidence we have to take athletes at their word.

2013-01-14T04:24:19+00:00

Dadiggle

Guest


Why did Perec go to Germany and trained with Koch? Then didn't turn up for the Sydney Olympics? Superstition my ass

2013-01-14T04:20:25+00:00

tommy

Guest


Great article Glen & I understand your argument about linking administrators negligence in not erasing a World Record to encouraging Cathy Freemen to dope but I think it is a long bow as Tim mentioned above. Encouraging someone to dope means pointing someone in the direction of a dodgy doctor or telling them that everyone else is doing it & that you should also. I would call not erasing a doped result as grossly negligent on behalf of the administartors but I disagree with your assessment that this means that they encouraged Cathy to dope.

2013-01-14T03:57:10+00:00

jameswm

Guest


She had an enlarged heart and other signs of sustained doping. Don't really think there's any doubt there, but it'd be nice if they could prove it so the records could be wiped.

2013-01-14T03:27:02+00:00

richard

Guest


Anyone read- Lords of the Rings ?

2013-01-14T02:55:27+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Classic.

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T02:31:57+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Tim, the evidence is sitting in the record books. If Freeman wanted to hold the hold the world and the authorities know the record they trumpet as the benchmark is totally and irrefutably bogus, by extension they are encouraging an athlete to cheat by leaving the record there. Why did they remove Ben Johnson's WR of 9.79 from the record books at Seoul. He was a known cheat,that's why. They also went a step further by erasing his previous WR of 9.83 from the 1987 Workd Championships in Rome. Surely one of the prime reasons to remove a tainted world record is to try and set goals for aspiring athletes to achieve through simply their own hard work and dedication. If you allow these falsified records to stand you are encouraging young men and women to be unethical in their goals to attain greatness in their sport. Absolutely no good is done by saying to an athlete here is the time that will set you apart as the fastest if all-time - this is what you need to break. Oh, and by the way, we know it is totally illegitimate but do your best anyway. Administrators are abrogating their responsibility to the fans and the athletes by continuing to foster what is, in sporting terms, a blatant untruth.

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T02:22:18+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


James, An autopsy was carried out on Flo-Jo and the findings could not ascertain whether she had been a user of performance enhancing drugs. She reportedly died of an epileptic seizure in her sleep, aged 38.

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T02:15:04+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Surely, if they wanted to deter doping Ferdinand, wouldn't erasing a totally bogus time be a good place to start? Can you give me one good reason why Koch's record should still be recognised? And by leaving it there, what message are you sending to aspiring young athletes who want to be seen as the 'best'"?

AUTHOR

2013-01-14T02:11:37+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Ferdinand, if Cathy Fremman wanted to be the record holder in the women's 400m she needed to break a time that is irrefutably known to be drug-induced, something admitted in writing, but not verbally, by Marita Koch. By allowing a totally falsified record to be the benchmark to break is reprehensible. Put simply, by the administrators allowing a completely bogus record to stand they are saying to Freeman that if you want to beat it you may have to do what Koch did - CHEAT. The relevant authorities are KNOWINGLY encouraging athletes to cheat should they wish to hold he 400m workd record by being totally happy to let them pursue a fake and 'artificial' time. As I wrote, while we can hypothesise all we like about Flo-Jo et al who are in the record rid books, with Koch we know it is a 'synthetic' record so rather than let it hang out there like a dangled carrot to young runners today and in the future, administrators should do the ethical thing and expunge it from the books.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar