Australia's greatest ever ODI team

By sheek / Roar Guru

Back in late February 2007, ESPN selected its greatest Australian ODI team on the eve of the ICC World Cup in the Caribbean, which Australia subsequently won.

To refresh your memory, here is the best-ever team that was selected:

Adam Gilchrist (wk), Mark Waugh, Ricky Ponting (vc), Dean Jones, Steve Waugh (c), Michael Bevan, Andrew Symonds, Shane Warne, Brett Lee, Dennis Lillee, Glenn McGrath, Greg Chappell (12th man).

In the intervening almost six years, has anyone else put their name forward for inclusion among this team? Indeed, I nominate three players who are most worthy of selection in this XI – Michael Hussey, Shane Watson and Michael Clarke.

In my humble opinion Hussey and Watson are shoo-ins, while Clarke might have to wait his turn a little longer. So who would Hussey and Watson replace?

Hussey would replace no bigger a scalp than the nominated skipper above – Steve Waugh. Hussey’s batting average of 48.16 from 185 matches dwarfs Waugh’s of 32.91 from 325 matches.

Hussey also has an excellent superior strike rate of 87.18 to 75.91.

Keeping in mind that Hussey, like Waugh, is a tough-minded street fighter and also, like Waugh, a brilliant all-round fielder, his selection above Waugh is perfectly acceptable.

The captaincy thus passes to Ponting with either Gilchrist or Warne (my choice) as the new deputy. The fact that Waugh was a useful bowler is compensated by the next selection.

The other change I would make is Watson for Symonds. This is a tight decision but in the end the plusses outweigh the minuses. Symonds was a brutally powerful batter. His strike rate of 92.46 is second only to Gilchrist’s 96.95.

However, Watson currently at 88.28 is not a shrinking violet either when it comes to belting the white ball. Symonds was a brilliant fielder, arguably the best of many great fielders, but again, Watson doesn’t lose much by comparison.

Pertinently, Watson’s batting average of 41.48 is just higher than Symonds 39.75 but more importantly still, he is a much better bowler. It’s instructive to point out that Watson’s selection is predicated on him still bowling, which of course would happen in the ideal world of all-time selections.

Right now at this point in time, Watson has captured 155 wickets in 154 matches (one wicket per match) at an average of 28.83 and S/R of 36.01.

Both these figures dwarf Symonds’ bowling of 133 wickets from 198 matches at 37.26 and S/R of 44.62.

Clarke is pressing Jones hard. His batting average of 45.07 from 223 matches just shades Jones’ 44.62 from 164 matches. Clarke also has the better S/R of 78.41 to 72.57.

However, this is too close to call at the moment. We don’t know if Clarke has reached his highwater mark, or that he will get better. Meanwhile, Jones’ fielding in the covers helps keep him in the top side.

For the moment.

So a revamped Australian greatest ODI team now looks like this:

Adam Gilchrist (wk), Mark Waugh, Ricky Ponting (c), Dean Jones, Michael Hussey, Michael Bevan, Shane Watson, Shane Warne (vc), Brett Lee, Dennis Lillee, Glenn McGrath, Andrew Symonds (12th man).

This team bats down to Lee at no. 9 and has five frontline bowlers plus the extra options of M.Waugh and Bevan. It also possesses an outstanding array of all-round fielders.

Often, in order to appreciate the best XI, we need to see who made the second XI. So, pulling Symonds out as 12th man and injecting him into the second XI along with S.Waugh, Clarke, Chappell and others, how good is Australia’s second best-ever ODI team?

Geoff Marsh, Matt Hayden, Brad Haddin (wk), Greg Chappell, Michael Clarke (vc), Steve Waugh (c), Andrew Symonds, Simon O’Donnell, Brad Hogg, Jason Gillespie, Craig McDermott.

This team bats even deeper to Gillespie at no.10. It also possesses five frontline bowlers plus more than useful support from S.Waugh, Chappell and Clarke. Again, there is an array of outstanding fielders.

Two quick points here. Hayden has both a better average (43.81 to 39.35) and S/R (78.96 to 76.83) than Mark Waugh. However, it is not a straight swap of one batter for another. In Waugh’s defence is his much more brilliant fielding in almost any position and useful mix of pace and spin bowling.

Brad Hogg is clearly our next best ODI spinner after Warne. He has a very useful batting average of 20.06 from 123 matches and 156 wickets at 26.85 and a S/R of 35.67.

What do fellow Roarers think?

In my next instalment, I will look at who might have made an Australian all-time ODI team from 1877-1970.

The Crowd Says:

2020-07-30T13:28:43+00:00

sauron2000000

Roar Rookie


Guru Greg deserves to be there.

2015-09-21T13:18:26+00:00

padmanaban

Guest


Australia best odi team 1.mark waugh 2.gilly 3.ponting 4.hayden 5.bevan 6.steve waugh c 7.symonds 8.johnson 9.warne 10.lee 11.mcgrath... Australia test xi 1.hayden 2.langer 3.bradman 4.ponting 5.steve waugh 6.border 7.gilly 8.warne 9.johnson 10.lee 11.mcgrath

2013-01-30T21:00:18+00:00

Alan Ticke

Guest


On team selection. I saw Steve Waugh's effort in 1999 and also 2003. He turned a likely loss in crucial games in the lead up to a win with centuries. He is a must. It is a mistake to forget the potential of greats just prior to the modern era and how they could adapt if placed in the era ahead. Doug Walters would have been a brilliant one day/ 20x20 player and I'd have him ahead of Symonds. A fit Watson yes maybe then of course David Warner has been left out. Mark Waugh could not be picked ahead of Greg Chappell. Gary Gilmour is another who would have been brilliant in the modern game. Gilchrist, Jones, Ponting, Chappell G, Waugh S, Walters, Bevan, Warne, Lee, Lillee, McGrath, Watson 12th 4 specialist bowlers plus Walters, Chappell and Bevan. Jones would be brilliant opening with Gilchrist. I agree with the comments about swampy Marsh. He did not have the shot options and his game used to be to provide a rock and accelerate at the end. If he got out mid innings he was only going at about 65-70 per 100. Walters and Chappell were up there with the best fielders ever for Australia in any position on the field.

2013-01-30T11:16:55+00:00

Thommo

Guest


Couldn't leave the vintage pre-shoulder injury Jeff Thomson out of my top side. Sheer speed, the sand shoe crusher, a killer bouncer and the fear factor has him ahead of Brett Lee in my book. Would be interested to see the top team based on character as well, Merve Hughes, Max Walker, Dennis Lille, Dean Jones, Andrew Symonds and Warne are the first to come to mind.

2013-01-28T23:13:06+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Symonds should be in over Watson. Yes the stats point to Watson, but the stats cannot illustrate just how many runs Symonds saved with his fielding, or how many runouts he was instrumental in. Watson doesn't come close to Symonds on the park. But its a good try with this XI.

2013-01-28T23:10:13+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Mark Waugh could bowl too. Handy spin beats Hayden finger chewing at slip.

2013-01-28T23:09:25+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Mark Waugh played in a day when batters didn't have the match served to them on a platter. Hayden did.

2013-01-28T17:38:31+00:00

Dadiggle

Guest


And why was he a better ODI opener? Hayden had a better strike rate and average.

2013-01-28T10:02:17+00:00

Dadiggle

Guest


Actually the bookies was to thank for that one.

2013-01-27T23:06:28+00:00

Disco

Roar Guru


Because he was a better one-day opener.

2013-01-27T23:06:05+00:00

Disco

Roar Guru


Quite so. Martyn's interrupted career held him back somewhat.

2013-01-27T06:12:28+00:00

Dinny Navaratnam

Roar Guru


Clarke's a better fielder and bowler as well

2013-01-27T03:14:05+00:00

Brendon

Guest


Not sure how you could compare the fielding of Watson to the fielding of Symonds. Symonds, Ponting and Rhodes were the best fielders I've ever seen. I'd probably have Symonds in front of Watson because of that fact, catches win matches. I'd also have Matty Hayden in for Mark Waugh and Mike Hussey in for Bevan.

2013-01-26T23:00:47+00:00

JJ

Guest


How can Mark Waugh get in ahead of Mat Hayden?

2013-01-26T12:49:57+00:00

brian

Guest


I wonder why Nathan bracken was never considered He alongside Brett lee was our best pace partnership. He had the ability to swing the ball in and away from batsman, his slower ball was also as good as anyone's, if not the best. 174 wickets between 2001-2009 at 24 was his record and it was only a ruptured knee ligament that stoped him from taken 200-250..

2013-01-26T10:57:05+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Bruce Reid and Carl Rackemann were handy ODI bowler's too, .

AUTHOR

2013-01-26T10:24:54+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Disco, That's your opinion, but not supported by the stats (although stats aren't the be-all, end-all). Clarke - 221 matches, 45.47 average, 78.48 S/R. Martyn - 208 matches, 40.81 average, 77.42 S/R. So Clarke is ahead on both counts.....

2013-01-26T03:26:56+00:00

brian

Guest


I wonder why Nathan Bracken wasn't considered He alongside Brett lee was one of our best bowlers. He always hit the seam, swung the ball back into the right handers and his slower ball was as good as anyone's. It was a shame his career was cut short by a ruptured knee ligament but he was one of the best short form bowlers for australia

2013-01-26T02:23:29+00:00

Chui

Guest


A good point about the stats. Without knowing the figures, it seems like a good score in the eighties was around 240. Now a good score is 290. Hard comparing times without powerplays, etc.

2013-01-26T01:36:43+00:00

Disco

Roar Guru


Martyn was an awesome ODI player. Definitely better than Clarke.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar