No tanking? Phew, what a relief!

By Ben Pobjie / Expert

Well, that’s alright then! I’ve been so worried lately. I haven’t been able to sleep, or eat, or leave the house, as I gnawed my fingernails down to the bone and fretted my life away.

All because I feared that the wonderful game of Australian Rules football had been tarnished by that foulest of sins: tanking.

I was developing quite a complex, and my tissue-box shoes were starting to wear out.

But now, o blessed release from care! Thanks be to Andrew Demetriou, who has ended my days of ceaseless paranoia and despair.

What a jolt of joy it is to discover, from the lips of the great man himself, that in fact there is no evidence that tanking exists in the AFL.

I gotta tell you, guys, that is a LOAD OFF! My mind feels light as a feather, as if a heavy burden has been swept from the shoulders of my brain by a mighty broom of integrity.

No tanking! None in the AFL! There’s just no reason to suspect it. There is simply no smoke from which to infer the existence of a fire.

Mr Demetriou has taken a long impartial look at the facts and discovered that all such allegations are utterly baseless.

We bow in awe at his wisdom and fairness.

Now, some might say that the very fact that, after investigating a club suspected of tanking, the AFL has chosen to suspend two of the individuals involved and fine that club $500,000 would in itself be evidence that tanking exists, in that if tanking didn’t exist, it would be sort of weird to punish people for doing it.

A bit like the fact that the police keep arresting robbers is evidence that robbery exists.

But that’s a very simplistic view of things, isn’t it? Let’s take the more sophisticated, Demetriou-esque view and realise that those penalties are not punishments for tanking, but rather gentle reminders to Dean Bailey, Chris Connolly, and the Melbourne Football Club, to be a bit nicer.

Don’t spread nasty rumours. D

on’t go about making people think there’s something wrong.

Obviously, nobody ever tanks, but it’s also important to make sure nobody ever thinks about tanking, so we need harsh penalties for anyone who causes such thoughts to exist.

I’m sure they’ve learned their lesson and can move forward happier and better-adjusted, just like Andrew himself.

Of course, some might say that the fact that one of the players who played for the club during the time when tanking was alleged to have occurred publicly stated that tanking definitely occurred, is also evidence that tanking exists, in that somebody saying something happened, or in legal terms, “eyewitness testimony”, is often considered at least some kind of evidence that the thing happened.

Again, unsophisticated thinking. So Brock McLean said that Melbourne tanked. What would he know? The coaching staff probably just told him that they were tanking, afraid that if they told him they were actually planning to win, his notoriously big mouth would cause him to blurt confidential game plans all over the media.

Classic tactical genius from the football department: there’s always one player at every club who you lie to: it’s called PSYCHOLOGY, yeah? So let’s hear none of that.

And naturally, some are almost certain to say that when you explicitly provide a tangible reward for the team which performs worst over the season, thus for all intents and purposes handing out prizes for losing, it’s absolutely inevitable that teams will lose on purpose.

Some will say that is evidence that tanking exists. Some will say the bizarre positional moves made by Melbourne on match days are evidence.

Some will say the weird and inexplicable plunge in the number of interchanges made by Melbourne during games after that point in the 2009 season when they couldn’t afford to gain winning form is evidence.

Some will say that, quite apart from Melbourne’s performances, the strangely consistent losing record that teams tend to have when placed in a position to gain a priority pick, is evidence.

And some might say that the fact that everyone knows that tanking exists and clubs do it pretty much every year and you’d have to be some kind of head-trauma-suffering imbecile, or a sociopathic liar, to deny this blatantly obvious reality, is evidence that tanking exists.

But look, just try not to think about it.

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-23T01:28:12+00:00

Lroy

Guest


Ha ha, thats good... AD would fit in nicely amongst our federal politicians... Whenever he and Wayne Swan get in front of a microphone, pump out their chests and start mumbling I think Im listening to some guy speaking Pekinese....

2013-02-22T22:29:14+00:00

vocans

Guest


We need some system to keep the comp even - any suggestions?

2013-02-22T12:17:42+00:00

nmj1654

Roar Rookie


The fact the Dees haven't won a premiership since 1964 shouldn't be used as a disclaimer for anything to do with tanking. The Doggies haven't won since '54 and the Saints since '66 and neither tanked or are tanking.

2013-02-22T08:50:59+00:00

Bill

Guest


Whats this "tanking" rubbish, its match fixing. If you deliberately do something to not win a match you are guilty of match fixing, end of story.

2013-02-22T05:37:30+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Kev, Won't happen. Both Bailey & Connolly agreed to their suspensions and would have signed waivers.

2013-02-22T05:34:24+00:00

Kev

Guest


Demetriou and co don't just have their collective heads buried in the sand when it comes to tanking. they've got their heads, shoulders and everything buried deeply and firmly within it. It could get uglier and more embarrassing for the AFL because I read a report that Adelaide are considering appealing Bailey's suspension since they ruled that there is no such thing as tanking.

2013-02-22T04:35:06+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


lol good article. The denial by AD and the presser the other day are an embarassment. Time for change.

2013-02-22T03:25:21+00:00

Mendip

Guest


As has been said elsewhere, this is the best possible result given that tanking is impossible to prove eg exhibition tennis games of 3 seats where top flight competitors used to let themselves win one set each and then play for real the game in the third set to make it interesting for the crowd. Or someone who gives up in a set when they are behing 1-5 to concentrate on the next set (if there is one) eg Tomic at US Open. But you missed the story of the day - people actually bet on NAB Cup games when teams are notoriously undermanned - who knew??? http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/attention-turns-to-2003-betting-plunge-20130221-2eupy.html Hardly match fixing - more inside info but whos crazy enough to bet on a NAB Cup game in humid cairns in march....

2013-02-22T01:43:00+00:00

The Duffster

Roar Rookie


Entrustung the AFL with investigating the tanking allegation is EXACTLY the same as entrusting the UCI to investigate doping in cycling. These organisations are incentivised to keep scandals to a minimum and we just can't trust their impartiality.

2013-02-22T00:23:30+00:00

Andrew Demetriou

Guest


Ive got some spare cash, What sort of deal can u do me for the Opera House and Harbour Deal if i take both ?

2013-02-21T22:17:30+00:00

Happy Hooker

Guest


Its OK. Sure, the coaches may have played players out of position to ensure the team did not play to their potential, but the players on the ground were still trying, so their was no tanking. If anyone believes Andrew, please get in touch. I have a couple of iconic Sydney structures they may be interested in.

2013-02-21T21:49:01+00:00

checkside

Guest


It was going to happen. A draft system that rewards poor performance for possible future gain. It was system that was begging for a club that has not won a flag since 1964 and that all who were involved in the tanking at the Melbourne Football Club knew it. A couple of scapegoats have been punished and the club has been recieved a hefty fine that the Melbourne supporters will pay over a few more agonising years. The AFL are still in denial - tanking does not exist and it never happened anyway. Andrew, I suggest you should consider politics, in Canberra - a few vacancies coming up in the end of the season.

2013-02-21T20:17:22+00:00

Arthur fonzarelli.

Guest


The AFL should sentence themselves to a thousand uppercuts and 6 months of Continous Justin bieber for developing a draft system that actually allows clubs to even consider tanking .

Read more at The Roar