Numbers one and nine to decide State of Origin Game 3

By Jack Fleming / Roar Rookie

As both states begin their ten-day State of Origin journey for the last time in 2013, they look back with mixed emotions.

But given the position the battle finds itself at – one-all and heading to a decider in a week and a half’s time – it would be interesting to note who would prefer this more.

I have no doubt heading into this series Queensland would have been more confident than the Blues of wrapping up the series before a decider was necessary.

I assume, even though they would never publicly state this, that NSW would have accepted a 1-all scenario if offered it before the series started so that it would all come down to this final game.

That is simply because this Queensland side is the best ever of either state in any era in terms of size, speed, strength and most importantly execution, and if playing at their potential are near-impossible to match.

Their forwards are solid, and even though not spectacular, are made to look stronger and set that vital and necessary platform through the sheer brilliance of Cameron Smith.

Their backs speak for themselves, with numerous future immortals in there, and the others are all class.

The Blues on the other hand are an interesting team based on their results. Their outside backs are slowly catching up to Queensland’s in terms of class, with the Morris brothers, Hayne, Dugan, Jennings and other’s starting to finally match-up in that area.

NSW also, in most expert opinions, have the advantage in the forwards, especially in the back-row.

Considering it is no secret that forwards are the key to controlling field position, and hence the momentum of the game, it is somewhat interesting that they are staring down eight straight series losses.

This leaves three areas where they must be trailing Queensland, the halves, the hooker and the fullback.

Firstly, on the halves, Maloney and Pearce have done admirably this series to get it to this point.

All four halves from both states have been criticised this series for their kicking games, but it is no coincidence that they have all occurred after their forwards had been dominated in the game (Queensland in game one, NSW in game two).

For this reason I think we are starting to see a new trend in terms of importance of positions, with the two important positions of the modern era now being the hooker and fullback.

It is no coincidence that NSW have become more competitive with both a very good hooker (Farah) and fullback (Hayne/Stewart/Dugan) in the past two years to match Smith and Billy Slater.

These two positions have now risen to become the two most important positions in the modern game.

The fullback’s rise began in the early 2000s, where we began to see all fullbacks in the game becoming increasingly better at fielding kicks and maximising return metres to start their teams set off in a better position, a trend perfected by Slater.

The likes of Hayne and Stewart are again just now starting to catch up, evident in the last two Origin series.

This is why the fullback is such an important position in today’s game, because they provide the field position that puts constant pressure on the opposition, a luxury in Origin that was granted to Queensland in their first five years of Origin dominance.

This fact had inadvertently led to the rise of the role of the hooker.

In a way, this was also the problem that began to set Smith apart from his counter-parts from other clubs to make him arguably the best hooker the game has ever seen and the best player in the competition today, in my opinion.

Smith is a fantastic organiser, an astute operator from all reports, but most importantly the best general-play kicker in the modern game.

Now I’m sure statistics will not back me up in this, but I’m not talking about meters gained or try-assists from kicks.

I’m talking about momentum changes that are subconsciously behind the reasons expert’s such as Matthew Johns are calling him “the best big-match player in the game”.

He doesn’t just lead from the front in terms of tackles and passes.

His real effect in the game is where, in an era of outstanding fullbacks that all hunt to catch the ball on the full with momentum, he is able to dart on the fifth tackle from dummy-half and stab a kick from his own 40m line into the in-goal of the opposition, turning the opposition fullback around and shifting momentum back for Queensland or Melbourne.

It is no surprise then either that New South Wales resurgence has come off the back of the second-best player in the competition at that particular art, Robbie Farah, being included into the side in 2012.

In 2009, when Farah first played, he was still learning the tricks to the trade of dummy-half general-play kicking and it showed, as he wasn’t able to match the diligent Smith as he went about his typical flawless showcase in that area.

When New South Wales dropped Farah from the team in 2009, although not knowing at the time, they did both themselves and him a favour, by allowing him time to master the art.

He went back to his club, the Wests Tigers, and began to kick more, partly because his partner in crime, Benji Marshall, was inconsistent and Robert Lui was just starting first-grade.

But also because that is who he is, somebody who leads by his actions, and that was his team. He has now come back into the side and matched Smith, maybe not to the same level, but he is certainly taking it to him in that regard.

He won the Blues’ player of the series last year, and like the ever-consistent Smith is for Queensland, has been one of New South Wales’ best in 2013.

It is interesting to note that both Smith and Farah’s effectiveness in their general-field kicking has seen others, such as Jake Friend (Roosters) and Matt Ballin (Sea Eagles), begin to incorporate the art into their games in recent times.

Queensland now know this, they know with Farah and Hayne catching up they now depend on more of an impact from their forwards in the game.

That is why Ashley Harrison was dropped, because as fine a player as he is, Queensland needed to adapt to the new change implemented by the for-once successfully proactive New South Wales.

Just as the fullback and the hooker began to dominate the game in the 2000s, so is the role of the mobile forward in today’s game.

In the past, no matter how they were going (although admittedly it was rare for the Queenslandforward’s not to aim up) they could always rely on Smith’s kicking and Slater’s kick-returns to drag and direct them back into the game and regather the momentum.

With Ennis and Gidley at the wheel for New South Wales, no disrespect as they are again fine players.

But they were predictable and didn’t have the number of strings to their bow as their Queensland counterparts to change the momentum of the game back to New South Wales.

This is why between 2006-2011, New South Wales unknowingly were contributing to there own demise.

Queensland, however, now are changing with the times, adapting with New South Wales into this new age of mobile forwards that are today’s trend, being proactive in their reaction to the change in times in an effort to avoid a repeat of NSW’s earlier blunder all those years ago.

However for the time being at least, until sides further understand and execute effectively the new trend of mobile forwards, the hooker and fullback will continue to control the momentum of the game.

It was evident in Game 1 where we saw a dominated maroon’s pack, leaving their halves helpless and vulnerable, and their outside backs ineffective.

Again, in Game 2 we saw the exact same inflicted on the other side, New South Wales.

Experts, including the Queensland coach Mal Meninga, have put this down to desire, the desire of both states for the game.

Others have put it down to execution. Both are right. In game one, Farah and Hayne desired and executed better then there counterparts, controlled field position and led the charge.

Before Game 2 both states supporters were worried, New South Wales that Queensland would not only show desire this time round but also execute like everybody knows they can, and Queensland supporter’s feared that the side again wouldn’t execute.

This time Queensland’s desire was there, but also their execution, led by an instrumental Smith, and a flawless Slater.

The likes of Andrew Fifita, Matt Gillett and Sam Burgess are the future into gaining that ever important field position and momentum in the game of rugby league, but for now it’s over to you; the fullback and the hooker.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-15T02:15:46+00:00

iambunney

Guest


+ 1 As a Qld'er, I'm very happy with the selection of Maloney over Carney... And what's the go with the "combination" excuse?? Carney has still played a lot more games beside Pearce than Maloney has!

2013-07-15T02:14:00+00:00

iambunney

Guest


Timmy, I would suggest the stats you are referring to are misleading. Is it really the job of a hooker to set up tries and line breaks? Where have you mentioned dummy half running? This is one of Cam Smith's greatest attributes - when he runs, he makes ground, and puts the opposition defence on the back foot, and invariably then gets a quick play the ball which then helps that progression continue by having the defence on the back foot, by not giving them time to get back the 10, stop and move forward to limit the advance of the next play. Robbie Farah is clearly the 2nd best hooker in the game, and had a great series last year, esp. Games 1 & 2 (knocked out in game 3). I did not see game 1 this year as I was OS, but in game 2, Farah was virtually invisible. I too was surprised Smith got MOTM - I thought Thaiday, Parker, Thurston and Scott all had better games, but he clearly outpointed Farah. He ain't the Australian Captain for nothing. He is GOOD!

2013-07-13T09:41:29+00:00

Jay C

Guest


You do understand how strike rates work right?

2013-07-13T09:39:30+00:00

Jay C

Guest


I'm sorry, he played them out of a test jumper in 2007? Wow, that must have really stung bad when he was then dropped forever.

2013-07-13T09:37:56+00:00

Jay C

Guest


Carney showed last night why he was the right choice last year and would have been the right choice this year.

2013-07-13T09:36:27+00:00

Jay C

Guest


oh Tim, how feeble your footballing knowledge. Anyone who has played the game can see straight away that the man is very, very astute. Now I know as the NSW supporter you clearly are, you like big dumb bargey front rowers as your teams 'heroes' and 'leaders'. But Cameron smith would be the first picked on every team he plays in. I would be surprised if many coaches going around understood the game better than him. He is not the flashy Jarryd Hayne/Benji Marshall type who glide accross the field possesing footwork and grace. He is the hard working thinker who dictates the terms in almost every game he plays. You are looking at him the wrong way. Stop waiting for him to perform the way Benji used to and start appreciating what he brings to a football team.

2013-07-11T23:20:30+00:00

Jack Daniels

Roar Pro


And also remember the grandfinal where the Storm lost 40-0 against Manly? Guess who wasn't playing... And the reason the Storm lost 5 straight without Slater is because all their plays and the way they structure their attacking game is based around the big 3, so when they lose one its like taking a cog out of a clockwork watch. It can't work

2013-07-11T23:17:19+00:00

Jack Daniels

Roar Pro


You look at him as a collection of stats. A good dummy half is more than that. You dont get stats for calling out the right set play at the right time, you don't get stats for leading by example and firing the team up. These are things Smith does. He also makes about 40 tackles per game and his dummy half runs are always when the markers are out of position and always gains over 10 meters. Also he hardly ever makes errors

2013-07-11T04:16:32+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


I'm a blue too and I agree. Smith and Slater are both legends. Smith is the most valuable player in the game IMO. Not the best in the sense of the most skilful (Slater, Thurston take your pick) but the player that will make a team better because of his leadership as well as his brilliant skills as a hooker. Nobody else even comes close. First man picked in any team, every time.

2013-07-11T04:15:18+00:00

brett the manly fan

Guest


:) :) ;) :)

2013-07-11T04:13:04+00:00

Tom

Guest


Billy slater in the top 5 players of all time? That's interesting to say the least...

2013-07-11T04:07:17+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


Tim, since you like stats I would be interested in your view on why the Storm win rate drops from 73% to 40 % when Smith doesn't play? Or why the Storm got flogged to nil when he was suspended for the grand final? From a non-stats perspective, when Gordon Tallis said that when Smith had his debut for QLD he went over to him for a chat and to give him a pep talk and some confidence, he said "I went to talk to him and build his confidence and by the end of the chat it was him giving me confidence!".

2013-07-10T23:53:40+00:00

Renegade

Guest


Jack, Actually you did mention Dugan in the article but fair enough, point taken. I still don't believe Farah or the 3 fullbacks are close to Slater and Smith....these 2 guys are going to go down as one of the greatest ever in their position, can't say the same for the the NSW quartet.

2013-07-10T23:42:48+00:00

Djcooper

Guest


So you have regurgitated some stats rattled off by Benny Elias from a few weeks ago and we are all suppose to agree that Farrah is not only better than smith but smith is also overrated!? If you are basing your argument purely on stats than it obviously illustrates your lack of knowledge about rugby league. Do you really think that Farrah outplayed smith in game 2? Smith's ability to keep QLD on the front foot by his superior kicking game and his ability to get his forwards over the advantage line (do you know what that is?) was instrumental in QLD getting the field position to mount attacking raids. Please don't come on this site and relay second hand stats because you don't like a particular player.

2013-07-10T23:04:45+00:00

BoganDugan

Guest


Dugan plays for himself and is not good at setting up his outside men. His positional play is average at best.

2013-07-10T18:56:33+00:00

Marooned

Guest


Some interesting food for thought Tim. I'll admit it' was hard to digest with my "maroon" colored glasses. But after viewing the stats they certainly back your arguments however stats aren't everything because Smith also provides other attributes which can't be measured like his leadership skills and calming influence under pressure. These are also invaluable in Origin and we saw NSW panic in game 2 with Farrah and the halves not sticking to script when the pressure came on. In saying that its always good to see evidence based arguments than some of the baseless dribble on here.

2013-07-10T15:41:24+00:00

Samuel

Guest


Seriously impressive article. Very well constructed and your knowledge of the game is unbelievable. You should be writing for one of the newspapers, you'd put them all to shame with your knowledge and great insights. Keep them coming please, ill look forward to your next piece

2013-07-10T13:10:41+00:00

Yellow Ranger

Guest


U have not seen enough dugan defence because he is never there to allow an audience to witness it. Dugan is similar to Greg Inglis. If both were the same size as Slater, they would be struggling to make a first grade team.

2013-07-10T12:54:03+00:00

turbodewd

Roar Guru


Im a huge Slater fan, but he has definitely peaked, he looks one notch slower and less dangerous. Dugan is a deadlier runner. Im not sure about Dugan's FB defense, i havent seen enuff of it to judge it.

AUTHOR

2013-07-10T12:50:57+00:00

Jack Fleming

Roar Rookie


Generally Farah isn't far off Smith, but with Dugan I agree with you. Hayne and Stewart though definetly do deserve to be, and this article wasn't referring to Dugan in any way.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar