Australia's all-rounder options for the Ashes

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia is expected to select at least one all-rounder as a backup for Shane Watson in its next Ashes squad.

Following on from my recent pieces on Australia’s pace and batting options for the series, I have assessed their all-rounder choices.

I have given each player an “Ashes rating” based on how likely it is they will be picked in the squad.

James Faulkner
23 years old, first-class record: 1379 runs at 30 and 138 wickets at 23. Ashes rating: 9/10

Faulkner’s debut in the final Ashes Test was impressive, even if much of his success came in situations more akin to limited overs cricket as Australia tried to force a result in the weather-affected match.

The left arm quick snared 6-98 as he displayed the variety of deliveries – slower balls, cutters and subtle swing – which have made him such an effective Shield bowler for Tasmania.

He also cracked 45 runs in quick time as Australia cantered towards declarations in both innings.

In the wake of the series, Aussie coach Darren Lehmann indicated Faulkner was viewed as a backup all-rounder covering for Shane Watson rather than as a frontline paceman.

To this point, his canny bowling has been his strong suit at first-class level, although he has played many pugnacious innings for Tasmania at important stages of Shield games.

Glenn Maxwell
23, first-class record: 1221 runs at 39 and 35 wickets at 35. Ashes rating: 5/10

The Victorian’s hopes of making the Ashes squad may rest on the form of frontline spinners Fawad Ahmed and Ashton Agar.

Should both Ahmed and Agar flounder in the lead up to the Ashes, the selectors may well decide to pick just one spinner, Nathan Lyon.

If so, that could persuade them to include Maxwell in the squad as a second spin option should one of the tracks appear spin-friendly or more likely as a solo spinner at the WACA to complement an all-pace attack.

Maxwell showed in his two Tests in India that, while admittedly a loose bowler, he has a knack for taking wickets.

He collected seven wickets at 28 but failed to discharge his primary duties with the bat.

Maxwell showcased his aggressive batsmanship against South Africa A last month, caning 155 not out from 186 balls, albeit on a very flat track.

Moises Henriques
26, first-class record: 2150 runs at 32 and 86 wickets at 28. Ashes rating: 4/10

The New South Welshmen made a brilliant entry to Test cricket in February, scoring 68 and 81 not out amid a faltering Aussie batting line-up.

However, that dream debut was quickly erased as he was dumped after scoring just seven runs in his next four innings.

As opposed to Faulkner, Henriques is more of a batting all-rounder. He is a reliable operator with the ball but lacks penetration.

Henriques’ challenge is to overcome his reputation as a “bits and pieces” player – one incapable of gaining selection on the strength of their batting or bowling alone.

He went some way towards building a case for inclusion in the Ashes squad with solid displays on the recent Australia A tours of Europe and Africa.

Henriques scored 249 runs at 42 and snared six wickets at 23.

Runs will be his currency early in the upcoming Shield season.

Andrew McDonald
32, first-class record: 4573 runs at 40 and 201 wickets at 29. Ashes rating: 3/10

If not for a horrid run of injuries, McDonald would very likely have worn the baggy green in the past two years, adding to his four Tests from 2009.

The Victorian’s form with the blade has been supreme when he has managed to make it onto the field in recent years, scoring 1031 runs at 54 over the past three Shield seasons.

He is renowned as an ultra-reliable seam bowler who is notoriously difficult to score off, as he showed in his brief Test career taking nine wickets at 33 while conceding just 2.45 runs per over.

Realistically, his only chance of making the squad is if Faulkner gets injured.

Luke Butterworth
29, first-class record: 2319 runs at 27 and 205 wickets at 24. Ashes rating: 1/10

Perennially overlooked by the Australian selectors, the Tasmanian is very unlikely to make the Ashes squad unless all of the above players get injured.

His lack of pace – he operates in the mid-120kmh range – appears to have held him back from playing Test cricket as a frontline bowler.

A languid stroke maker, Butterworth has the capacity for making runs under pressure but a career average of 27 suggests he has not fully exploited his considerable talent with the blade.

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-23T10:32:35+00:00

A Punter

Guest


You are probably correct about support for injury prone bowlers, Ronan. But the big question is: why are there so many injuries in the first place? I have been following cricket for around 40 years and I have never seen so many injuries to bowlers (not even close) in any national team. I posed the question to the regulars on this site and no one could put forward any instance with this level of injuries. So instead of asking the obvious questions, CA persist with band aid solutions around the problem and their constant spin and denial. So CA and it's high performance manager needs to answer the question above.

2013-09-22T12:47:52+00:00

ChrisUK

Guest


Cruellest thing about that was that his father Jeff also had his England career cut short by injury. For it to happen to father and son is just not fair.

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T12:25:52+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


You're all over this story colvin...keep us posted

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T12:24:45+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


The selectors are clearly are worried about the fragility of their key quicks, as am I.

2013-09-22T11:08:58+00:00

ChrisUK

Guest


Er. I want both Liz and Lara too. Same time or separately - I don't mind!

2013-09-22T11:02:47+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Clarke's experience turned out to be a minor bingle. I'm warned this could be a major hurley burley

2013-09-22T10:04:40+00:00

colvin

Guest


Ronan, It's getting worse by the hour. Just as Warney flies into London to have crisis talks with Liz, Liz flies out to New York and she's not wearing her engagement ring. And the reason given for the breakup is that Liz dumped Warney because he wouldn't set a wedding date. She's too smart for Warney. It's clear she's playing games with his mind in order to get her way. The very mind we need focused on Australian cricket. He mustn't fall into that trap. And Shane and Liz have a GBP6 million house in England that they need to discuss. Oh, I can see this has the potential of turning all bad. What can we do? We need Warney as he's going to save Australian cricket. He's already put forward his plan but it's gathering dust on an office shelf. He needs his mind on cricket. Michael Clarke has experience in these matters. Can Michael call him and give him some much needed advice. She may be an agent of English cricket.

2013-09-22T08:55:45+00:00

A Punter

Guest


Good point Zatoo. the allrounder has too be good enough to hold his spot as a bowler or batsman. not someone who averages 25 with the bat and 60 with the ball.

2013-09-22T08:51:11+00:00

A Punter

Guest


I am more curious as to why there needs to be an all rounder at all. They need to pick 6 batsmen and a keeper and 4 bowlers.

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T05:22:39+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Jammel I'd swap Bailey for Voges and Paine for Wade.

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T05:18:34+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Cheers

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T05:11:44+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Agreed.

AUTHOR

2013-09-22T05:09:37+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Warney would want both Liz and Lara

2013-09-22T02:03:29+00:00

colvin

Guest


Oh no, Shane Warne has flown to London to have crisis talks with Liz Hurley. Australia needs Warney to keep a clear head and focus on his business plan to save Australian cricket. What can we do? Liz is too much hard work for Shane. Too much stress. This is a national crisis. We need a good Aussie woman to step up and take care of Shane. Is Lara Bingle available?

2013-09-22T00:49:14+00:00

Peter

Roar Rookie


We need a 5th bowling option. When we have McGrath and Warne MkII then we can pick our 6 best bats, but until then we need someone like Watson, McDonald or Faulkner.

2013-09-21T14:58:08+00:00

James

Guest


i dont know about solid bowling ranks. skillful absolutely but solid implies a bodily strength which most dont seem to have, they all break down about as much as they are well.

2013-09-21T07:56:00+00:00

Jammel

Guest


I still don't think we need to go looking for all rounders. Even if Watson is injured. The only focus should be finding the right top six batsmen! - admittedly, a hard task now! With six batsmen scoring runs - and Haddin or Wade - and then Lyon and three quality quicks I think we'd be in with a good chance. I just think looking for an all rounder like Henriques or Maxwell or McDonald will only further weaken the batting and any gain in bowling would be outweighed by the loss in terms of runs..... I personally - at this stage - like the look of the following XI: Rogers Warner Watson Clarke Voges Smith Wade Siddle Harris Pattinson/Bird Lyon

2013-09-21T07:49:00+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Good call Frank.

2013-09-21T07:18:34+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


My pleasure. Read "Miller's Luck".

2013-09-21T03:48:20+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I would have classed Miller as a batting all rounder. His first class average was a tick under 50 and 3 wickets per Test is not an out and out front line bowler's return.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar