NSP drop another chance with ODI squad for India

By Muhammad Irfan / Roar Rookie

Within some of the greatest challenges lie the greatest opportunities. Beating the great Aussie teams of the past was a tough job for every team – whether at home or away – and English selectors took this challenge as an opportunity.

In 2005, English selectors took a brave decision by axing their best player, 36-year-old Graham Thorpe, and giving a chance to Kevin Pietersen.

The result? Pietersen was a big difference between the two sides at the end of the series.

Since the arrival of KP on the international scene, England has broken many hoodoos – they won back the Ashes after 18 years, won in Australia after 24 years, won in India after 28 year and won their first ever ICC trophy.

You need an impact player to change the fortunes of team.

On the other hand, Australia’s selectors are still playing on the back foot trying to save their skin.

The national selection panel (NSP) introduced Chris Rogers at the age of 35 and have now recalled Brad Hardin, who will be 36 in next month and played his last ODI in Feb 2013 against the West Indies, to the one day side.

There are five players who are in 30s in the ODI squad for the series against India. Since World Cup 2015 is just 16 month away, why are the NSP is still persisting with old hands?

Michael Clarke’s chronic back problem and Shaun Marsh’s hamstring injury provide an excellent chance to introduce young troops in India.

A couple who are very strong contenders for the Indian series are Joe Burns, who is already there for the Indian Champions League and will be used to the conditions, and Nic Maddinson, who is in a great form.

Australia’s selectors should learn from their English counterparts that you can never restore lost pride by investing in your past, you need be proactive in your approach.

Australia should have considered Peter Handscomb instead of veteran Brad Haddin for the Indian tour, as Greg Shipperd (Victorian coach) rates him the best player of spin in Australia after Michael Clarke.

And Australia is in dire need of such player in the national side for Ashes and away tours, particularly on the subcontinent.

Touring India is always tough for Aussies. They have not win a single Test match since 2004 and ODI since 2009 but it will be made even more difficult with Australia going with out of form players.

The NSP retained almost the same team for tour of India as they had in England, apart from couple of changes. I don’t know how the NSP justify the selection of Phil Hughes and Brad Haddin – what they have done to get in the side?

Hughes has played four ODIs and could not score 50 runs. He was vulnerable against spin and seam in India and in England also. There is a chance he will not be in the playing XI, so why he is going?

If Aussies continue to miss such opportunities to develop a team for the Ashes and World Cup, there will be a leadership crisis in the side after couple of years because both George Bailey and Michael Clarke are in their 30s.

Now is the right time to develop a future leader under the shadow of Bailey and Clarke.

Apart from Shane Watson, Clarke and Bailey, everyone is fighting for a place in the team. There will be another transition waiting after the fake transition of the Andrew Hilditch era.

If you lose a series with a young squad it will be learning curve but if you lose the series with a squad like this there will be drastic changes as the World Cup is just about the corner.

This squad also put a question mark on the importance of the Ryobi Cup in the eyes of NSP, as no one from champion side Queensland is in the squad.

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-26T00:25:22+00:00

Dan Ced

Guest


Hey this is exactly what I was going to write. Well done. Hughes needs Ryobi/Shield he has looked out of sorts and hasn't been scoring runs... in fact Warner was scoring more than him but got dropped. Odd. Maddinson has Aus A runs behind him recently but I'd still like to see Klinger or D Hussey in there for experience rather than Haddin who failed with the bat in the Ashes. ...and whilst I'm on a Redbacks bias blitz. Ludeman for keeper :)

AUTHOR

2013-09-23T05:26:16+00:00

Muhammad Irfan

Roar Rookie


Excellent Chance for Joe to show his class CLT20.He is very confident against Spin and Seem/swing.He uses his fit exceptionally well.

2013-09-21T12:23:45+00:00

Cricket113

Guest


What about Callum ferguson who was so succesful as a one day player before he injured his knee?? Michael klinger who has mountains of runs behind his name??? Are the selectors blind? It's amazing how these guys are not getting picked, yet the likes of Hughes continues to be picked & Maddinson, Silk, burns etc... Keep getting mentioned???? Has no one learnt anything from the Ashes series where Chris Rogers was probably the most successful batsman????

2013-09-21T11:46:40+00:00

ChrisUK

Guest


Really? Is that all? I had no idea. It's a bit hard to complain about a one day series there given that isn't it?

2013-09-21T11:11:31+00:00

gav

Guest


Australia have played 2 ODI's vs India in India since 2009, how is that considered a poor record

2013-09-21T11:10:07+00:00

Baggy_Green

Roar Pro


Rob....Handscomb is primarily a batsman ..who can also keep. And I think he has the makings of a very good (test) batsman

2013-09-21T07:47:18+00:00

Jammel

Guest


I would rest Watson and Clarke but take Haddin for some experience. I would have gone with a squad like this: Finch Maddinson Bailey(c) Voges DHussey Burns Haddin(v)(+) Maxwell Agar Doherty Johnson Faulkner Coulter-Nile McKay

2013-09-21T06:40:54+00:00

Jo M

Guest


Still think that Haddin is there to be the VC to Bailey because Clarke won't go.

2013-09-21T05:57:37+00:00

Swampy

Guest


Hughes has probably been selected as keeper...

2013-09-21T03:53:54+00:00

Plainsman

Guest


How can we pick a team when we have no form upon which to judge? Without an effective domestic competition it is impossible to develop our players let alone pick a winning team. I only despair for the future of our national summer game.

2013-09-21T02:53:44+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Yeah agree. Paine for me. Instead they go for haddin so just add another tired player for the ashes.

2013-09-21T02:37:13+00:00

Praveen

Guest


Agreed guys

2013-09-21T02:19:47+00:00

Rob Barrow

Guest


Agreed, i would have also lik to see either Paine or Hartley get a chance and i am not sure why Hughes is going and how many chances does he get

2013-09-21T01:11:29+00:00

abigail

Guest


It would have been a good opportunity for either Paine or Hartley to impress the National selectors. Wade's keeping has deteriorated to he point that he needs serious improvement before playing for Australia again. Not sure how many opportunities Hughes deserves, but with so few batsmen in the squad, he will probably get a game.

2013-09-21T00:39:53+00:00

Singapore Sling

Guest


"Outgoing" might be referring to his personality??? lol

2013-09-21T00:28:09+00:00

Rabbitz

Roar Guru


If you say it enough on the interwebs it must be true... :)

2013-09-20T23:06:35+00:00

Atawhai Drive

Guest


Intriguing caption on the picture. News to me that Inverarity was 'outgoing', or that his sacking was imminent.

2013-09-20T21:24:06+00:00

Robert

Guest


Handscomb?Please.He's not even rated Victoria's no.1 keeper(although most people outside Victoria,other than NSP,cant believe Wade is anywhere near the national side) -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2013-09-20T20:54:06+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Good article. Burns, Maddinson and Handscomb would have been worth it except the last two matches in India clash with the Sheffield Shield opener maybe the reason why they aren't.

Read more at The Roar