Wilkshire axing opens up new versatility for Socceroos

By Sam Clark / Roar Rookie

There was little public outcry last week when Ange Postecoglou axed two high-profile Socceroos in Luke Wilkshire and Brett Holman.

The latter has become a shadow of the player that was – arguably – our most important contributor for a two-year period.

A transfer to Aston Villa that cost him game time was followed by a move to the United Arab Emirates, a geographical location Postecoglou has made perfectly clear he has little respect for.

The former, though still playing for the powerful Dinamo Moscow, has seen age slowly creep into his game.

Aimless long balls, the occasional mistimed and overly aggressive tackle and dwindling pace have seen Wilkshire surrender what was an almost automatic starting spot in the Socceroos XI.


While I both respect and thank these two players for their contribution, I see little need for either to re-enter the Socceroos frame.

In regards to Wilkshire’s omission, in particular, it leads to some exciting versatility opening within the back four.

There are currently five options that could potentially fill Wilkshire’s spot at right-back; Rhys Williams, Ivan Franjic, Chris Herd, Ryan McGowan and (hesitantly) James Holland.

Where Postecoglou needs to differ from his predecessors is in his ability to be malleable with his back four.

Australia doesn’t possess a set of four players that have the requisite quality to demand selection for every variety of opposition they will face; a fact Holger Osieck never came to a full understanding of and possibly what ultimately cost him his position.

Postecoglou needs to look at the opposing team’s strikers and weigh up which of his options will best suit his needs.


For this reason, players like Rhys Williams become an invaluable tool.

Capable of playing not only on the right, but also in the heart of defence and as a screening midfielder, Williams provides exactly the kind of versatility Postecoglou will require.

For example, against the shorter, but technically adept attacks the Socceroos face in Asia, Postecoglou could play the mobile combination of Williams and Mile Jedinak/McGowan in the heart of defence with a player such as Franjic on the right.

However, for taller or stronger defences, Williams could easily be switched out to the right for a taller or more traditional central defensive pairing (perhaps the too-long overlooked Alex Wilkinson could feature here), that would minimise the aerial and set piece threat.



Herd and Holland also show a similar versatility to Williams – but both have serious issues at the moment.

Holland, though playing regularly in the Champions League, hasn’t managed to convert his club form to much of note in the national jersey in his native position of an anchoring midfielder.

In addition to this, his short-lived foray into the right back position left no one convinced he could adequately pick up the role on more than an emergency basis.

Herd, similar to Holman, has been frozen out of the Villa squad by Paul Lambert and though injuries haven’t helped his cause, he needs to seek game time soon if he is to figure in calculations for Brazil. 



Franjic has shown a versatility within the A-League and when given the responsibility by Mike Mulvey, has acquitted himself to the task of playing with aplomb.

The question mark here is whether his A-League form can convert to the leviathan task of competing in a World Cup.

Still, for me, Franjic is only second to Williams in calculations for the role.

Many will remember Neymar flaying Ryan McGowan time and time again at the Maracana and shudder, but he needs to be given another chance; Neymar routinely outwits the best in the world and this would have been invaluable experience for McGowan, who can also play centrally. 



All in all, my preference for the right back position would be one of Williams/Franjic, depending on the opposition.

Postecoglou has the tactical acumen and creativity to make sure that his back four is more of a fluid proposition than it was under Verbeek/Osieck, but with only three opportunities to test his hunches before the World Cup he may not have time to get the balance exactly right.

Fingers crossed.

The Crowd Says:

2013-11-13T08:38:46+00:00

Michael Bovell

Roar Rookie


Wilkshire's aimless long-balls and harmless crosses from nearer the half-way line than the goal-line were really hurting us and completely out of sync with Ange's playing style. He has to completely change his game or he'll probably never play for Australia again. I expect Franjic to fill in at RB just because he already knows the Ange style. Working tirelessly up and down the flank to allow the wingers to cut inside is what it's all about and I'm just not sure Williams or McGowan have the tank for it. Holman at his best fits perfectly with Ange's dynamic pressing style, but he just hasn't shown it of late and has been passed by the likes of Vidosic, Leckie, Kruse and Troisi. Neill is there because he's experienced and can pass a ball (something Ognenovski could not do hence he's cut) but if Lucas can't conform to the high-tempo pressing and fit within the team framework he'll be next out the door... the rest of the 2006 class should be safe and allow us a proper balance between youthful energy and wise old heads.

2013-11-13T07:29:11+00:00

Mantis

Roar Guru


everyone beat me to the punch. He played at other clubs aside from Villa...

2013-11-12T12:47:30+00:00

Justin Thighm

Roar Guru


As the golden generation sinks into the west, there will be more days like these. In Ange we trust, if not for the sake of the future worth of Australian football.

2013-11-12T12:32:40+00:00

Dylan Arvela

Roar Guru


he was a top player in the Dutch league you ignorant twit

AUTHOR

2013-11-12T07:37:23+00:00

Sam Clark

Roar Rookie


Agree, Evan. Holman is totally a 'touch' or 'form' player - as soon as he started warming the bench at Villa, he reverted to the Holman that was roundly derided before that run at Alkmaar (save a nice finish vs Oman). And he never seemed to come back.

2013-11-12T07:13:55+00:00

Evan Askew

Guest


From 2009 to 2012 with AZ Alkmaar he was imense. 110 games and 27 goals in all competitions which included 27 appearances and 5 goals in European competition. Admiitedly all the goals were scored in the UEFA Cup/ Europa League but that is still a good acheivement. I reckon if he has stayed at AZ he would still be an integral part of the national team but alas he fell for the mirage that is the EPL and was a victim of oour culture which holds this overated league up as some kind of footballing mecca.

2013-11-12T05:43:53+00:00

bribieboy

Guest


I agree with Sam Clark, What he says about Neill is correct he just does not have it these days and is getting slower. Yes he was good but would he have blamed the new boys for not having any passion 3 or 4 years ago. I don't think so. Ange had the perfect opportunity to give Neill a miss as surely he has been watching him play. You would have to think he will get game time next week so he must have one foot on the plane to Brazil

2013-11-12T05:39:58+00:00

fadida

Guest


Neill has been chosen because he has led his nation with distinction for many years. He is experienced and influential. AP is doing the "right" thing by giving respect to Neill. Once he has had a look at him I'd expect him to be phased out. I'm sure Neill expects this too. Wilkshire has been a great servant but offers nothing now his key attributes have faded

2013-11-12T04:28:21+00:00

vinnie

Guest


what impact has he made in Europe? his highlights real wouldnt last 15 seconds

AUTHOR

2013-11-12T02:51:00+00:00

Sam Clark

Roar Rookie


I have to agree with Steve. Neill's pace and agility have completely deserted him, to the point where he is struggling to get minutes off the bench for a J-League club that is mired in the lower echelons of the table. This coupled with an on-field petulance - for example, arguing with the touchline referee against France that led to a goal being conceded - and a marked shift into a series of strange delusions in the media, paint a picture of a player that is well past their best. Neill was once a vital cog in our defense, if not THE vital cog (remember there was some talk that he may make the best XI from the '06 WC), but now he has to save whatever grace he has left and exit the stage. In regards to his distribution, I would argue that any other player listed in my article would be capable of distributing with at least as much proficiency as Neill himself.

2013-11-12T02:07:08+00:00

Steve

Guest


And im assuming then that he is the only Australian CB that can distribute a ball? The main job of the CB is to defend and Im afraid he is pretty well crap at that nowadays. How long are we going to have to watch opposition forwards and midfielders breeze past him and shoot on goal. Its and embarrassment that people think he is still the best CB we can come up with.

2013-11-12T00:33:52+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


Because he can distribute the ball from the back. We have something of a dearth in that department.

2013-11-12T00:28:42+00:00

Steve

Guest


Im still struggling to understand why Lucas Neill wasn't axed along with Holman and Wilkshire. He is clearly one of the issues with our defence.

2013-11-11T23:54:31+00:00

The Bear

Guest


This is probably the biggest change to occur in the squad and formation since 2005. AP will be delighted to introduce his system by the mere simple tweak of the RB position. Excellent article and observations (tho Holland is surplus to requirements). -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2013-11-11T21:25:45+00:00

Mantis

Roar Guru


Disappointing that Holman decided to go to the middle east. He had plenty of good years left, and could have made an impact in any number of leagues in Europe.

Read more at The Roar