Is Haddin the man of the series ahead of Johnson?

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

As bizarre as it sounds, Mitchell Johnson might win four man-of-the-match awards and still not be man of the series.

Johnson has walked away with the prize in three of the four Tests so far, and already has his first of what could be another bag of wickets here in Sydney. He currently has 32 for the series. But in terms of players who’ve consistently had an impact, Johnson has an equal in Australian wicketkeeper Brad Haddin.

The numbers are one thing: with 465 runs, he’s the second-highest scorer from either side, and his 66.42 is the best average.

He’s also nine runs from the all-time series aggregate for a ‘keeper batting outside the top six. But that still doesn’t convey how influential he has been.

Without Haddin, Australia would not have regained the Ashes.

Time after time, his counterattacking batting has rescued Australia’s stuttering top order, especially in the first innings of matches. Haddin’s lowest score across those five first innings is 55. Overall he’s had seven innings, and crossed 50 in six.

While Australia’s top six have made eight centuries between them, only three have been in the first innings. Those batsmen have rarely clicked at the same time. Every match has seen the side in a vulnerable position.

In Brisbane, Haddin came to the crease with Australia at 100/5. He found a partner in Mitchell Johnson, and took the score to 295 by the time he was last man out for 94.

In Adelaide, Australia’s best start of 257/5 could still have ended up in the low 300s, but Haddin scored 118 and it ended up at 570.

At the WACA in Perth, 143/5 became 385, with Haddin’s 55 moving the score on to 267/6 by the time he was dismissed. Steve Smith carried the total further by scoring a hundred.

Melbourne’s 112/5 prompted a top-scoring 65 from Haddin, including a 40-run partnership for the last wicket before Haddin was out with the score improved to 204. It was enough to get Australia to a win.

Then here in the fifth Test in Sydney, Australia’s worst start of 97/5 became 325 by half an hour before stumps, with Haddin’s 75 having improved the position to 6/228 by the time he was out. As in Perth, Smith carried the final total further with the tail.

Haddin also scored a quick second-innings 53 from 55 balls to set up the declaration in Brisbane. His only low score – 5 – came similarly slogging for declaration runs after Shane Watson’s brutal hundred set the tone in the second innings in Perth.

This means the number of runs added with Haddin at the crease stand at 195, 101, 272, 124, 9, 92, and 128. Add to that some fine work behind the stumps for 18 dismissals, and Haddin’s case for man of the series begins to grow.

It’s not what he’s done, but the style in which he’s done it. His runs have not only come quickly, fluently, and at crucial times. England’s positions of dominance have been turned around in quick time, their momentum robbed, their enthusiasm sapped.

Dismiss him cheaply in any of those first innings and Australia would have been looking at some meagre totals against a far more vibrant England team.

Johnson would have been bowling in very different situations, and the whole direction of the series might have gone differently.

As far as records for a wicketkeeper in a single series go, Haddin is eight runs from equalling Adam Gilchrist’s 473, the highest aggregate by a ‘keeper batting outside the top six.

Gilchrist of course scored his in three Tests against South Africa, on the back of what was then the world’s fastest double century.

19 runs and Haddin would level West Indies ‘keeper Gerry Alexander’s tally from the 1960/61 series against Australia.

Alexander scored most of his runs from number seven and eight, but did move up to six for his final innings of 73.

Only three other wicketkeepers have scored more in a series, all from the top order. Budhi Kunderan scored 525 for India as an opener against England in 1963/64.

Andy Flower produced innings of 183*, 70, 55 and 232, totalling 540 across two awesome Tests against India in November 2000, and averaging 270.

South African Dennis Lindsay remains top of the pile: 606 runs at 86.57 across seven innings in 1966/67. Lindsay’s sequence went 69, 182, 5, 81, 137, 131 and 1. Australia’s bowlers must have been relieved at that last innings.

For Haddin to be in that sort of company underlines what he has achieved this series, at the age of 36, having come back from a career written off by many of us, myself very much included. The performance is astounding from a man I’ve often criticised for his cavalier approach.

All too often, it seemed Haddin would play a strange shot at a strange time and throw his wicket away. This series, something has clicked.

There is of course a great deal of hypocrisy in cricket coverage. The lofted on drive for six is a fabulous shot as long as it clears the fence, and a reckless one if it falls a metre short.

This series Haddin’s aggression has come off. He has had his share of luck, never more so than being dropped twice on his way to a hundred in Adelaide.

He has driven over and wide of slip fieldsmen more often than I can count, cut over gully, hooked over and past men in the deep.

But a run like this isn’t down to blind luck. Whether England don’t know how to bowl at him, whether Haddin has made some technical developments of his own, or whether this is just the series where everything has clicked into place, he has undoubtedly produced the greatest batting performance of his career.

For years, Haddin has lived in Adam Gilchrist’s shadow. At last, he has stepped from it. As far as this series goes, he’s made himself every bit as valuable.

He deserves every plaudit, and those of us who said he couldn’t do it should gladly admit that we were wrong.

Geoff Lemon is a writer and radio broadcaster. He joined The Roar as an expert columnist in 2010, writes the satirical blog Heathen Scripture, and tweets from @GeoffLemonSport. This article was first published by Wisden India, in a new-founded Ashes partnership.

The Crowd Says:

2014-01-25T10:44:04+00:00

trotsky

Guest


Yes, Haddin should have been man of the series. Without his heroics of rescuing the hopeless top order time and again, MJ would not have had a target to bowl at, and would have had been bowling to a confident English side.

AUTHOR

2014-01-06T03:16:12+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Not sure they belong to Mitch, given Australia were cooked at Brisbane before Haddin's 94 got them to a decent spot, and they were on for a modest total by Adelaide standards before his century took them to a massive 500+ score. Johnson's bowling happened in the context of those turnarounds.

AUTHOR

2014-01-06T03:14:53+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Great summary of all the relevant points there Jason - thanks for that.

2014-01-05T09:17:44+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


+1

2014-01-05T02:31:27+00:00

Adam

Guest


Haddin the man who prevented Australia losing any tests, Johnson the impetus to win the tests.

2014-01-04T17:33:19+00:00

Rejuvenated atgm

Guest


both of them deserve the award and tbh i dont think anyone in this english team deserves it.

2014-01-04T17:17:12+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Haddin couldn't exactly bat on his own though could he?

2014-01-04T14:34:40+00:00

johnb747b

Guest


Johnson has done superbly well, for sure. But he has had the bowler's advantage of respite time, most balls not requiring his attention in the field (thought he has done brilliantly when called upon). Haddin has had to concentrate on every single ball, including those from Johnson. Give thought to the concentration required of a keeper. All that bending for starters. The lot of a keeper is not an easy one. Haddin's batting has been exemplary. In my view he shades Johnson for Man of the Series.

2014-01-04T12:55:38+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


Johnners.

2014-01-04T11:52:34+00:00

tomjas

Guest


Johnson and it's not even close These Ashes were arguably won after the first test and almost definitely after the second Those matches belong to Mitch and when you add in his contributions in the remainder of the series, the difference is huge

2014-01-04T11:44:21+00:00

Oracle

Guest


Spot on. What accentuates Haddin's efforts are the absolute lack of, from his opposite number. Haddin has been great,but it has to be Mitchell Johnson

2014-01-04T10:06:52+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I disagree with you that Haddin saved those matches. I see that as setting up a win.

2014-01-04T08:55:29+00:00

Jason Lyons

Guest


Johnson has been intimidating, his pace has consistently been 5kph+ above all other bowlers, and is a worthy player of the series. After 9 completed English innings, 15 of his 34 wickets have been top order dismissals (Harris & Lyon 11, Siddle 9, Watson 4, Smith 1), so a good chunk of that intimidation has been the short-pitched at the body attack v the English tail. Discussions about Haddin's contributions have largely focused on his batting, but foremost has been his excellent keeping. He's also a key part of Australia's team leadership, and credited by Lyon as a big part of the spinner's success this series. For a keeper to have the highest average across a lengthy series, on such a volume of runs, is extraordinary. That he achieved this with Australia in trouble in all but one match is all the more meritorious. On performance alone, Haddin is my pick as player of the series, but that X factor - the physical and mental force of Johnson - will earn him the nod.

2014-01-04T08:30:24+00:00

Daniel Hackett

Roar Rookie


Johnson, but then Haddin and then daylight.

2014-01-04T08:03:03+00:00

chivasdude

Guest


I will also copy my post from last night here. Beating England has been a team effort and it would be fitting to consider a joint MOS award. For mine, Haddin made his runs when his team needed them most. His 1st innings average of 80 odd...enough said. But Mitch has also been a match/series winner. I don't think he would mind sharing the award. "Agree that Haddin and Johnson should be joint Men of the Series. While Mitch has been outstanding, every bowler needs runs to bowl to. Haddin ensured that EVERY time he went out to bat he left behind a competitive Aussie total. Let’s face it, almost all of his runs came in the 1st innings. Every time he went out to bat in the 1st innings we were in trouble. He delivered every time, not just by scoring runs, but also his aggressive counterattacking style put England on the back foot, demoralized them and they have not recovered this series. And his keeping has been outstanding. A joint award would be fitting."

2014-01-04T07:34:12+00:00

TheTruth

Guest


Cannot agree with that one. Aus only posted a reasonable total (over 300) twice in England but have done it 5 times this series. Our bowlers performed quite admirably in Eng but were let down by our batsmen

2014-01-04T06:34:34+00:00

Jammel

Guest


Johnson shades it for me. But he has got a lot of tail Enders out.... Haddin's been superb. What a last few months for him! Then it's Warner Harris Lyon and Clarke.

2014-01-04T05:20:29+00:00

Straight Ball

Guest


Exactly ak, 'no way'. This is just another example of the gross prejudice that bowlers face in cricket. Johnson the Saviour is so clearly the outstanding player of the series that only prejudiced eyes could look for a batting wicket-keeper to not give him the glory he deserves. Remember also, Johnson the Saviour has crucified the hopes of the Opposition with his batting as well! Include his fielding; remember the run-out in the last test! He has produced one of the most outstanding Test performances in history.

2014-01-04T04:18:42+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Geoff, I didn't think of this before, but various batsmen pulled Australia out of trouble in England as well. As has been documented by other people during this series, the significant difference between the Ashes in England & the Ashes in Australia has been Johnson. Specifically his pace. Johnson didn't play in England. He has certainly been seen in Australia!

2014-01-04T02:37:17+00:00

mark

Guest


From memory it's the opposition captain who decides, and in a way rightly so. The opposition would have the most idea about who has caused them most concern. Andy Flower, being a fellow wicket keeper, and batsman, would likely hold what Haddin has done in very high regard, equal to what Mitch has done. For what it's worth, i think it should be shared jointly, as without either one of them I believe the result could be very different. Mitch because he's caused huge collapses, and Haddin because without him Aust wouldn't have the runs on the board to have Johnson steaming in so confidently.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar