Ranking Australia's prospective Test batsmen (Part 2)

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Who are the young Australian batsmen who will compete to replace the likes of Chris Rogers, Michael Clarke and Shane Watson in the Test side over the next few years?

This is the follow up to part one, where I revealed the players I ranked from five to eight.

Today I have revealed the top four batsmen aged 25 or younger who are most likely to earn a baggy green and ranked them based on who has the best chance of making an impact in Tests in the next decade.

1. Jordan Silk (21 years old) – 834 first-class runs at an average of 38
Patience is an increasingly rare commodity among Test batsmen.

The frequency of batting collapses in recent years seems to have risen in line with the amount of T20 cricket batsmen are playing.

Too often those wielding the blade are not prepared to shackle their ego, respect a rampant attack, weather the storm and then gradually lift the pace of their innings.

They want instant gratification in the form of daring counterattacking strokes.

Not Jordan Silk.

The Tasmanian is a throwback to an age of cricket when batsmen were content to continue leaving or defending good balls until the bowler lost patience and strayed into their scoring zones.

Luckily for Silk, he has not just vast patience but a wide range of scoring avenues.

Both were on display in just his third Shield match – the final of the competition last March.

Opposed to an on-song Ryan Harris, Silk showcased invaluable circumspection, dead batting or shouldering arms to the Aussie Test quick over and over.

When Harris overpitched, Silk climbed into him and sent the ball skidding across the turf down the ground or through the covers.

Any width outside off was similarly exploited with deftly-placed cut shots.

Short balls, meanwhile, fed Silk’s pet pull shot.

The rookie blunted Queensland’s strong attack for almost four sessions, rarely ever losing his patience and being drawn into a false stroke.

The level of concentration, determination and technique required to compile such a hundred is in short supply among young cricketers.

Silk is tailor-made for Test cricket.

Striking four hundreds in your first seven Shield matches is indicative of a rare talent.

2. Nic Maddinson (22 years old) – 2281 first-class runs at 40
Maddinson is already in his third incarnation as a batsman.

His original persona with the blade was similar to Silk’s – a combative, careful opener who likes to bat for time.

In his debut Shield season in 2010/11, the New South Welshmen made 437 runs at 40 while maintaining a cautious strike rate of 45.

The following season he lifted his scoring rate slightly to a tick over 50.

Then last summer, Maddinson revealed a new, cavalier approach.

He began to take on the new ball in a ferocious style which has only ever been successfully executed with anything close to consistency by Indian legend Virender Sehwag.

This belligerent batsmanship reached its zenith on the Australia A tour of Europe last winter.

In his four first-class innings, Maddinson smashed 300 runs from just 223 balls.

The range of strokes he unleashed was impressive but it seemed unlikely he could ever translate such an aggressive approach to Test cricket.

Maddinson has since improved his balance between attack and defence.

His third phase as a first-class player suggests he may now be ready to don the baggy green should an opportunity arise.

3. Chris Lynn (23 years old) – 1687 first-class runs at 43
The Queenslander has had a series of setbacks during his infantile first-class career yet has come out the other end with an impressive average of 43.

Having endured those tough periods he looks set to realise the tremendous potential which made him the most promising teenage batsman in the country just four years ago.

Lynn was on the fast track to the Test side in 2011 when he was named in the Australia A squad to tour Zimbabwe after a scintillating start to his Shield career, which included a ton in just his second match.

Then he was left crestfallen when a finger injury forced him to withdraw from what would have been his first senior international tour.

By the end of the next Australian summer he had lost his place in the Bulls side after averaging just 20 in the Shield.

Things only got worse for Lynn in 2012-13 when he suffered an injury-plagued season which saw him restricted to just a few limited overs appearances.

His resounding return to first-class form this summer was prompted by a pair of sparkling efforts against the touring England side in October.

Lynn cracked 104 and 51 not out as he displayed the fine touch which had been evident in the Ryobi Cup.

His first-class figures this season – 570 runs at 71 – tell of a prodigious talent who is back in business.

His versatility as a batsman means he would be able to slot into the Test side at anywhere from first drop to number six.

4. Phil Hughes (25 years old) – 8381 runs at 46
As I’m typing his name, I can almost taste the backlash.

Hughes has a swarm of supporters, many of whom frequent The Roar.

They have lambasted me time after time for suggesting other young players should be given their first crack at Test cricket before Hughes gets his fifth go.

The reality is that predicting what lays ahead for Hughes is fraught with danger.

His ability to flay Shield attacks is unparalleled among players outside the Test line-up.

Yet when he dons the baggy green something goes amiss.

Is it a mental weakness which is exposed? Is it a technical glitch which gets exploited?

It seems likely it is a mixture of both.

For whatever reason, Hughes has not been able to replicate his blazing form at Shield level when he suits up for Australia.

Hughes is as strong as any player in Australia square of the wicket.

He is capable of punishing the slightest hint of width.

He has also displayed both an insatiable appetite for runs and tremendous consistency in the Shield.

It would be no surprise if Hughes does one day click at Test level and become the batsman he promised to be.

But, for the moment at least, he has had enough chances in the baggy green.

Australia must look beyond him to try to unearth the fresh batting talent which will be required to replace the likes of Rogers, Watson and Clarke in the coming years.

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-08T19:49:30+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Hughes has a lot of work to do beauty to address his spin phobia I agree. But he's got the years on his side. Marsh doesnt seem to have that luxury

2014-03-08T19:43:55+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Khawaja has come good in the last couple of matches Ronan. I still have a belief this is not the last we've seen of him. But he has been off the boil, except in the shorter form of the game, for almost 2 years now (still better than Shaun Marsh though). If he wants a permanent test spot, seems likely he needs to turn himself around during the 2014-2015 Shield comp because at present does seem to have fallen down the list of potentials. Maddinson has also had a lean season but he has age on his side. Other than the obvious in Hughes who's Shield form is dynamic. Lynn seems the next cab off the rank with some consistent scores this year. But you're right Ronan. He needs to make a few statements with a couple of three figure scores to make the selectors sit up and look.

2014-03-08T19:30:57+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


I think you're quite right there Baggy. In the U19s the two openers showed promise, but I was especially impressed by the later performances of young Doran, including his 99 not out in one match. I checked the ages of those playing for Oz and other teams and the majority were between eighteen and a half and mid to late 19 years. Young Doran had just turned 17 and looked like the youngest playing by far. Yet towards the end of the tournament after a shaky start, he seemed Australia's most consistent batsman and somewhat of a backbone for the team batting line up. Seems to be a very impressive young player and hopefully will be playing Shield late 2014. He looks potentially Australia's next super star batsman. Hope he develops as he seems to be..

2014-03-08T15:00:19+00:00

Baggy_Green

Roar Pro


Ron - no Handscomb and Kurtis Patterson ? Very good list though and i feel these players are gonna be seriously good once they make the test cut Think we need 2-3 more years probably for the guys you have listed to properly come through..and i hope that guys like Doolan,Marsh,Khawaja, Hughes may be will fill in for those 2-3 years, when these guys will join Warner and Smith. Some batters in the recent U-19 world cup are also gonna be really good.

2014-01-22T10:06:45+00:00

Hal V

Guest


The deluded scramble to discard proven and experienced batsmen for inclusion in the Australian team based upon the absurd theory that any individual is "not young enough" needs to be exposed for the nonsense that it really is. The most suitable and obvious replacement for George Bailey in the team to tour South Africa was and is Marcus North an aggressive and determined campaigner whose Sheffield Shield batting average this season is about 99. Selectors should always pick the best available players taking into account their recent and current form.

2014-01-20T17:05:27+00:00

Beauty of a geek brains of a bimbo(atgm)

Guest


Even my gf plays spin better than hughes and he has scored most of his runs on a dead adelaide wicket.

2014-01-20T13:47:16+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Even though a lesser FC batsman took his place in Marsh

2014-01-20T13:43:02+00:00

rockyshoals

Guest


Noting the inclusion of Marsh in the .SA tour. Bailey was gracious in his exclusion comment.

2014-01-20T13:42:48+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Beauty. I agree Marsh is an attractive batsman to watch. But technique means little, if you cant adapt and he doesnt seem able to, despite many years of experience. I mentioned before that its not technique that makes a top batsman, its adaptability. Hughes may be unorthodox but he scores runs. Bradman was another who was unorthodox. Yet a fellow called Sheehan, said to have had the most perfect of techniques, never made it. Smith is a perfect example of someone with an unorthodox and at times seemingly clumsy style, yet he adapts and is now well entrenched in the Oz side.

2014-01-20T13:19:08+00:00

Beauty of a geek brains of a bimbo(atgm)

Guest


No burns in the top 8 future prospects? lynn at 2 maddinson at 3 for me

2014-01-20T13:14:11+00:00

Beauty of a geek brains of a bimbo(atgm)

Guest


I agree that he has been average but hes technically good and orthodox unlike fan favourite hughes.

AUTHOR

2014-01-20T13:09:10+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


It would nor surprise me if he is the most successful of any of these blokes. There is definitely something about him that makes it seem like he will relish taking the next step. We'll get to see that soon when he makes his T20 debut for Australia.

2014-01-20T13:07:26+00:00

wife

Guest


wherez burns?isnt he the future?

2014-01-20T13:00:27+00:00

rockyshoals

Guest


Hughes.at 4 is fair enough. He might still become a good test player but he has already had failures at this level.

2014-01-20T12:54:04+00:00

raynasura

Guest


I would actually have Lynn as number 1. everything I have seen from him makes me think he is pretty special.

AUTHOR

2014-01-20T12:31:26+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I can't agree completely with that Clavers. If you go back and look at his innings towards the end of that Indian series he was just throwing the bat in frustration and a bit of luck ran his way.

2014-01-20T12:22:28+00:00

Clavers

Guest


Hughes struggled in the first couple of matches of the India series but he wasn't the only one, and he did improve by the end of it. And then he scored 81 not out in the First Test in England, against Swann. I think he is a better player for the experience. He averaged over 60 on the England tour, having scored very well at No 3 in the country matches.

2014-01-20T11:57:10+00:00

rockyshoals

Guest


Good to see Jordan Silk acknowledged for his current skills and achievements and his undeniable potential.

AUTHOR

2014-01-20T11:53:27+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


The difference is that Johnson is a former ICC player of the year. We all knew how good he could be it was just a mystery which Mitch would turn up. But Marsh has been consistently average across his whole career. He's never achieved anything close to what Mitch had, even before his latest Ashes-winning exploits.

AUTHOR

2014-01-20T11:50:53+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Khawaja had a very disappointing first half of the Shield season. He needs to finish it strongly or he'll fall off the radar. He turns 28 this year so he's not a young prospect anymore and with the likes of Silk, Lynn, Maddinson and Burns rising fast he could be overtaken if he's not careful. It's a pity because he has a huge amount of talent but has really been screwed around by the selectors - just 9 Tests across 3 separate stints in the side.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar