Calm down about James Muirhead

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

For more than seven years, Australian cricket has been sick. Many ill-advised selections have been made amidst the dizzying effects of WSS (Warne Separation Syndrome).

The O’Connell Cricketing Dictionary defines WSS as such: “The clamour to prematurely unearth a match-winning wrist spinner as a means of quelling bouts of yearning for a fallen legend.”

Cameron White, Beau Casson, Bryce McGain and Fawad Ahmed have all been vaulted into Australian sides without justification as a result of WSS.

White, Casson and McGain collectively played just six Tests, snaring eight wickets at 78.

Their failures were no surprise to the majority of cricket followers.

White was never a frontline spinner and after bizarrely being asked to fill such a role in the Test side, and flopping, he turned away from bowling almost altogether at State level.

Casson was a specialist slow bowler with a better pedigree but also was rushed into a baggy green based on nothing more than the fact he wasn’t a finger spinner.

Merely three years later, at the age of 28, Casson had retired from all cricket following a wild descent which took him from the Test side to the Sheffield Shield to Darwin grade cricket.

Then along came McGain, the most confounding selection of all, a blinding example of WSS at work.

Prompted by a theory that South Africans were puzzled by leg spin, McGain was offered a Test debut in Cape Town just days before his 37th birthday.

In one of the most comical performances in recent Test history, McGain was treated like an eighth grade bowler en route to figures of 0-149 from 18 overs.

The shock and pain attached to the McGain incident seemed to cure Australian cricket of WSS, in a manner akin to scaring someone free of the hiccups.

Some residual effects remained such as the insistence that dependable finger spinners not simply play their role within a successful Test attack but rather break free and take ten-fors.

However, for a while, the symptoms largely evaporated.

Then came a Pakistani refugee who prompted a startling outbreak of WSS which tore through the cricketing community.

This time its effects were not limited to sporting circles but infected the very halls of Federal Government.

Soon, laws were being amended as the syndrome tightened its grip.

That refugee, Fawad Ahmed, then earned an ODI cap after being described by Australian chairman of selectors John Inverarity as a “consistent wicket-taker on the (recent) Australia A tour of Zimbabwe and South Africa.”

A consistent wicket-taker? Hmm…Ahmed had returned 2-274 for in the 50-over matches on that tour of Africa.

He had a soft ODI debut against Scotland before getting a proper test in two matches against what was still a second-string England ODI side.

Ahmed promptly returned 2-106 in those games, conceding 7.6 runs per over, and was soon flung back into obscurity.

Six months on from that failed experiment, the 32-year-old cannot even get a game for Victoria.

The reason? The emergence of the latest leg spinning golden boy, James Muirhead.

The cherubic 20-year-old Victorian was a complete unknown just two months ago.

Then, after taking 1-41 combined over three Big Bash League matches, he was shovelled into the national T20 side to play England.

Muirhead impressed in those three matches with his composure and hard-spun deliveries.

This alone was enough to spark another epidemic of WWS.

Suddenly, he was being suggested as a possible contender for the Test side, with some excitable cricket followers claiming he would soon have incumbent Test spinner Nathan Lyon nervously peering over his shoulder.

Muirhead was already being earmarked for next year’s Ashes series according to a report by Fairfax cricket correspondent Chloe Saltau.

The air was quickly let out of that balloon last week when Muirhead returned to Victoria and was taken apart in the Sheffield Shield match against NSW, returning 0-61 from seven overs.

NSW youngsters Kurtis Patterson and Scott Henry are reasonable batsmen.

But neither is close to the standard of an international cricketer.

Yet they carted Muirhead all over the SCG.

The young tweaker’s struggles were so pronounced that, despite being picked as a frontline bowler, his skipper Matthew Wade risked him only for seven overs in New South Wales’ lengthy innings spanning 121 overs.

His teammate White, an occasional leg spinner these days, had no such trouble, sending down eight economical overs which conceded just 20 runs.

If Muirhead is being comprehensively outbowled by a part-time wrist spinner, it is fair to assume his development is in its infancy.

Leg spin is the most complex art in cricket.

I am intimately aware of this.

I myself toiled away in grade cricket as a teenage leg spinner before being devoured by its eccentricities and later taking up the less complicated method of delivering the ball off a long run.

Leg spin has become even more devilishly difficult in this era of shortened boundaries and ballistic bats.

Moreso than any other skill within cricket it takes astounding levels of repetition in practice coupled with natural talent to result in anything approaching consistent performances at first-class level.

Granted, Shane Warne was only 22-years-old when he played his first Test.

But Warne is the very definition of a freak.

He is one of the five greatest Test cricketers in history.

It is madness to use Warne as the benchmark for future wrist spinners.

Ideally, a leg break bowler should have played 40 to 50 first-class games, at a minimum, before being lobbed into the caustic pits of Test cricket.

Maybe, just maybe, we should allow Muirhead to become a solid Shield player before we start forecasting Test appearances.

But, then again, such rationality is not possible when WWS takes over.

The Crowd Says:

2014-02-19T10:41:15+00:00

One-eyed Jack

Guest


'unpredictable, innovative, bullish' OR 'a team that has MJ at the peak of his powers'. The answer lies somewhere between those two, weighted toward MJ the destroyer.

2014-02-18T19:13:21+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Ronan, as you will have noted in most of my entries I take a very pragmatic perspective on issues. Doesnt mean I'm always right by any stretch, but I deal with facts firstly and feelings later..Comes with my former employment ie dont allow your feelings to distort the facts before you. Feelings may tell you if you sense a problem but the problem maybe your perception. Facts rarely lie over the long term. Therefore I deal with outcomes, not style or impressions. That's why I so strongly support Hughes. He scores the runs and just needs to believe in himself at test level. Same with O'Keefe. To me its irrelevant how he gets the wickets and scores the runs. If he does it,and does it consistently, then thats all that really matters. The rest is just window dressing.

2014-02-18T18:50:55+00:00

IndianCricketFan

Guest


Well but you can't use the same adjectives for New Zealand. They are a good side and an unpredictable lot but they got hammered by Bangadesh at their home! I think India needs to give the captaincy to Virat! Arrogant as hell but aggressive he is and will bring new innovative ideas on the pitch.

2014-02-18T18:39:13+00:00

Armchair expert

Guest


Probably the most damning stat for O'Keefe is his 1st class Australia A record, averaging 20 with the ball and 50 with the bat, compared to Lyon's 34 with the ball and 16 with the bat, which is supposed to be the next step to test selection.

2014-02-18T17:41:29+00:00

Armchair expert

Guest


Most of Miller's success at test level, including test cricketer of the year in 2001, was as an off spinner, he was dropped with a test record a lot better than Lyon's.

AUTHOR

2014-02-18T14:53:38+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Great post Giovanni, it is a pity that Fawad never got to have the career he could have had. Unfortunately at 32 he looks like he's going to be overrun at Victoria in the next few seasons by the likes of Muirhead and Jon Holland, both of whom are favourites of the national selectors.

AUTHOR

2014-02-18T14:36:16+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha cheers mate although it wasn't meant to be a jab rather an attempt to carry on with the spin pun theme you started (drift, deliver...hint, hint ;) )

AUTHOR

2014-02-18T14:31:42+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I am not convinced that O'Keefe would have great success at Test level bowling the way he does now. Whenever I've watched him he hasn't bowled with enough flight and looked like the kind of guy who would get milked by canny batsmen at Test level. But that doesn't mean he couldn't adapt his game well to Tests like Lyon has. We may never know.

2014-02-18T12:44:51+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Yeah fair point mate, and I suppose we may never know. He certainly does have a terrific first class average, but for whatever reason, 2 sets of selectors have decided he,s not worth a go.. I've hardly seen him bowl to be honest but what I have seen he seems to have a fairly low trajectory and bowls reasonably flat. Maybe his last chance may come in the Pakistan tour where we will at least take 2 spinners perhaps 3. But you get the feeling if a Ahmed or Agar have a good final 3 games in the shield he will get left behind again

2014-02-18T12:34:03+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


He's a damned good bowler Nudge. I'm not disputing that. But I wonder if O'keefe was playing tests and maintaining something close to his FC average, what your thoughts would be then. You favour Lyon because you've been watching him develop. O'keefe has never had that opportunity to impress you.

2014-02-18T12:18:14+00:00

Nudge

Guest


I agree with most of that Bearfax but I'd take Lyon any day over SOK

2014-02-18T12:12:31+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Only one spin bowler in the country I would have other than Lyon and that's O'Keefe, who has far better FC averages.both batting and bowling. Okeefe's FC batting average 27.64, bowling average 25.49. Lyon's FC batting average 12.88 (17.11 tests) and bowling average 37.08 (32.58 tests). But for some reason O'Keefe is not at all on the selectors radar (yet another bungle by them). Only 3 years difference in age However Lyon is No 2 in my mind and is improving every test and is performing admirably. But for the O'keefe travesty, I think Lyon is the next best spin bowler we have at present and is showing increased maturity every match. He's certainly cementing his position as a valued member of the team.

2014-02-18T11:53:36+00:00

jameswm

Guest


They've got Ahmed, Maxwell and Holland.

2014-02-18T11:47:52+00:00

Nudge

Guest


As I'm sure you know Ronan I've backed him from day 1 myself

2014-02-18T11:44:43+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Indeed. Think he is the old guy everyone cringes at when he tries to speak however he is blind to their resentment towards him...

2014-02-18T11:42:36+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Lyon = great bowler. Lyon = very good fielder, oft in odd spots (Clarke's great attacking captaincy) Lyon = best spinner we've had since Warne. Warne still tweaks circles around the entire bowling retinue in the world...

2014-02-18T11:37:57+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Warne was one of those exact rarities. He did get smashed early on. Don Bradman has not easy start to his batting career either, 18 and 1 in his first test in the baggy green.

2014-02-18T11:35:59+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Leg spin is physically hard to get your head around. The ability to actually bowl it as Warne did is truly amazing. Offspin (finger spin) makes sense to the mind but trying to actually use the art of leg spin (wrist spin), while bowling it in the right place combining drift, release and rotations it truly is the hardest bowling method in cricket.

2014-02-18T10:47:06+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


You know I think you've got an excellent analytical mind and dispassionate perspective, Ronan....except when you're wrong. (which is not often I must admit but I enjoyed the jab)

2014-02-18T10:27:42+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


The fact that overseas batsmen are more likely to struggle against him then Aus domestic players should also be considered. Colin Miller was a military medium level bowler at Shield level as a youngster but at test level he was very useful. Was a much more effective Shield bowler in his mature years.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar