Crowd-sourced sports commentary: the choice is yours

By Ronan Mason / Roar Rookie

For too long, sports fans have been given no choice at all when it comes to live commentary. We are accustomed to having unlimited choice in entertainment, however traditional sports commentary has become monotonous and boring.

In an age where I can listen to any song at any time, why should live sports commentary be so restrictive?

Fans demand choice, and as technology in sports proliferates, fans are being offered more and more control of their sporting experience. We can control camera angles. We can watch replays on demand. We can pause. We can watch sports on the go.

Add to this the technology being used to analyse the game – Hawkeye, snicko, super slow motion – and you quickly realise how enhanced our viewing experience has become. If you stop to think about how far we have come in such a short time, it’s mind-blowing.

But one fact still remains – you rarely have a choice when it comes to commentators. And I say rarely because we are all familiar with Roy and HG.

They are an alternative to the norm and, for a change, come with a heavy dose of humour. It’s no surprise how well they’re received given Australia’s love of Billy Birmingham’s 12th Man series – Aussies love a laugh and a good piss take. So why not take this humour and apply it to live sports?

And Roy and HG are certainly not an isolated case of alternative commentary. The BBC offered fans the opportunity to watch two of the 2010 FIFA World Cup games with an alternative commentary via the Red Button by BBC Radio 1 presenters Chris Moyles and Comedy Dave. It was comical, factually inaccurate, ridiculous, and overall, damn entertaining.

And it doesn’t just have to be a comedic approach. The guys over at Test Match Sofa offer an alternative audio cricket commentary service, covering every ball of the England international calendar. Mute your TV and enjoy something a bit different, but with just as much analysis, insight, and entertainment as you have come to expect via traditional broadcasts.

But these examples offer fans only one alternative – your choice is still highly limited. What if you yourself wanted to commentate? Or what if you wanted a multitude of different options – different languages, different tones and approaches to commentary?

What if there was a platform that enabled anyone to commentate and broadcast live to the world? For sports fans, an opportunity to experience a whole host of different options. And for some of us, the opportunity to express our views, and try our luck as a commentator?

YouCommentate offered such a service briefly, but sadly it was short lived and the site now appears down.

Was this because it was a bad idea, or because it was poorly executed? I’m not sure, but like any new idea, it’s not always the first player to market that wins – Facebook wasn’t the first social network, nor Google the first search engine.

And so I decided to launch an alternative called Combox Live via a Kickstarter campaign.

The site’s ultimate goal is to bring more choice to sports fans by revolutionising the live commentary experience. It’s actually an idea I have had for many years, but only recently has it become technically feasible within a web browser.

I remember while living in the UK watching an All Blacks versus Ireland rugby game, and the Irish commentators were so one-sided it was infuriating. So we muted the TV, and streamed Talk Sport New Zealand via a laptop and enjoyed their commentary as an alternative.

That got me thinking, what if there was a platform that aggregated all types of different commentary and allowed anyone to get involved?

Perhaps we are in need of something different, or perhaps this is a niche that will always bubble under the surface but never break into the mainstream. Either way, a small part of every sports fan fancies ourselves behind the mic – even if it were just for the afternoon and the enjoyment of our closest friends.

The Crowd Says:

2015-09-06T02:36:21+00:00

Omar

Guest


This sounds a lot like YouCommentate?

2014-04-02T10:44:14+00:00

Hubbers

Guest


The ECB are doing their damnedest to kill Test Match Sofa. Any journalist who talks to them loses press access. User generated commentary is the future. It's what fans want. While I am ranting I'd like to buy my sport one match at a time and not bundled with 50 other channels that I have no interest in. Rant over.

2014-03-31T02:53:07+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


Great concept Ronan, hope it takes off. You can never have too much choice. Sometimes the delay via smartphone of ABC commentary on A-League, tweets etc. at the game just makes it too hard to bother - like lip synching audio issues in video - and not everyone wants to lug around a pocket radio. This is also a great concept that could support all those lower tier division clubs in sport - football, league, etc. where the clubs could broadcast the weekend games in audio where otherwise there are no other viable or easier options. Adding the ability to incorporate video could be handy as well, even if it is just on-the-fly interviews at the game... ...will be keeping and eye on how this progresses.

AUTHOR

2014-03-30T03:07:40+00:00

Ronan Mason

Roar Rookie


Ian - that's not much of a choice really is it? One other option. The idea of Combox Live is to offer hundreds of different options so that you can find something you really like. Maybe its comical, or perhaps its in a different language. I liked Test Match Sofa but again thats personal and they don't offer you any choice, they are simply one alternative. I really feel there is place in the market to offer an aggregated crowd sourced model. Glen - thanks for the the kind words. It definitely feels like there could be a shift coming. Also with stadiums now moving towards a 'connected' offering, what could be better than offering Combox Live to everyone at the stadium to enjoy alongside the live experience?

2014-03-29T02:24:47+00:00

Joanna

Guest


I think Ronan is working towards making this a more technologically sound choice, so that there is no delay in live action 'vs' different commentary. I prefer the ABC coverage of the cricket as well, however, you often have a televised delay on the commentary, and it can be frustrating during crucial, tense moments of the match. Bringing this choice into the modern era using the technological advances at our disposal is a brilliant idea. I'm well on board, good luck!

2014-03-27T08:41:25+00:00

Ian

Guest


>> For too long, sports fans have been given no choice at all when it comes to live commentary. What are you talking about? Of course we have choice. Always have. Cricket? TV sound down, ABC radio on. Real Footy? TV sound down (almost always) and ABC radio on. I listened to Test Match Sofa, and (in my opinion only) it was rubbish.

2014-03-27T07:56:52+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Hi Ronan, it's an interesting concept that you have come up with. As media broadcast rights continue to escalate and wireless computer technology continues to surge forward as it is I believe we will see more of this type of 'remote broadcasting'. I was involved with The Roar's coverage of the last Australian Test tour of India when the ABC chose not to cover it ball-by-ball. It provided a live coverage of an event that many cricket fans would have otherwise listened to on radio had it been available. The national broadcaster chose not to do it because the rights being asked by the BCCI were to exhorbitant. Test Match Sofa has already garnered a significant niche market. Well done on your concept and I wish all the best with it.

2014-03-27T03:47:18+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


Text allows you to catch up with developments without having to listen "live". Great for events that happen while you are at work which only allows for periodic checking.

AUTHOR

2014-03-27T03:37:50+00:00

Ronan Mason

Roar Rookie


Yes but why not audio instead of text? Audio is always going to be more engaging although admittedly not practical for work for everyone. I think the beauty of crowd sourced commentary is that no matter what, you will find someone who is entertaining in their own way for every sport. And it would also open sports up to non traditional audiences...

2014-03-27T03:32:53+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


If it works he can send some hard, mature cheese my way! It would be a great idea for cycling though as many of the top races are not available on the box, yet the cycling community is quite large. All it takes is two or three interested people writing the commentary on a rotation basis. Each event could even find volunteers to do this with one site being used for all international events. The races are of sufficient duration with enough subtleties for this text approach to work; especially given the dearth of alternative media for everything outside of the Tour de France.

AUTHOR

2014-03-27T03:22:51+00:00

Ronan Mason

Roar Rookie


Yeah I love the Cricinfo text commentary too, and I think this concept would be perfect for Cricket - where commentary is about conversation. It's funny you should mention cycling because I have a friend who is big in the cheese world and also loves Cycling. He saw this idea and instantly thought about how he could commentate on the Tour de France and link that in with areas famous for different cheeses! It's approaches like that which could really broaden audiences and provide something different.

2014-03-27T02:47:19+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


I've always enjoyed the text, ball by ball approach that Cricinfo adopts. Some witty comments are thrown in with the odd droll tweet from contributors thrown into the mix. It would be great if cycling could adopt something similar.

2014-03-27T00:24:08+00:00

Another Pom in Oz

Guest


Hi Ronan. Sounds interesting. There was a lot of debate amongst Roarers around the (generally agreed as) awful commentary by the Ch9 team during the Ashes.

Read more at The Roar