You can't legislate against one-off twists of fate

By Debbie Spillane / Expert

And so there we all were, fussing and fretting about the likelihood of rugby league players in their fifties and sixties suffering long-term damage from head knocks when a 22-year-old’s head hit the turf.

Suddenly long-term damage seemed, well, a long way off.

As I write, the prognosis on Newcastle forward Alex McKinnon is still very uncertain. Like everyone in the rugby league fraternity, I can only wish him and his family strength and positive thoughts.

We should also be grateful he is in a position to be afforded the best possible care and support.

But I also feel sympathy for the alleged villain of the piece, Jordan McLean.

If, like me, you’ve watched rugby league for any reasonable length of time, you would’ve been through dozens, if not hundreds, of those moments where you see a player lifted, tipped and driven ferociously head-first into the ground.

You curse the recklessness, aggression or unnecessarily physical approach of the defenders, and you hold your breath. Then you marvel at the fact the tackled player bounces to his feet and carries on unscathed.

Alex McKinnon did not bounce miraculously to his feet on Monday night. But neither had I experienced any of those heart-in-mouth reactions when I saw him tackled.

Sure, I was concerned about the way he tucked his chin into his chest before he hit the ground and disturbed by the awkward way his neck was bent as he made contact with the playing surface.

But not for a moment did I think the tacklers overly-violent, or even reckless, in the way they’d dealt with him.

On a scale of one to 10 in dangerous tackle ratings I would’ve had it at about a two or three.

Yes, McLean came in as third man, grabbed one leg at thigh level, lifted and seemingly tipped McKinnon over the vertical. That probably puts him in breach of the rules and it perhaps means he contributed to the horrible outcome. While there is no doubt he should be held accountable for his actions, that does not equal being responsible for the result.

For starters, we still don’t know what the ultimate result will be. Neither do medical authorities.

Kudos to the NRL for the decision to let McKinnon and those close to him deal with the immediate challenge of the injury before trawling through the details of exactly what happened, and why.

Already we’re seeing calls for the gang tackle to be banned. Maybe that’s a solution but, to my way of thinking, less players in any given tackle means more players set in the defensive line, forcing ball runners to increasingly play the role of battering ram.

Roy Masters in Fairfax media has suggested it was the effort to prevent knee and lower leg injuries from cannonball tackles that influenced McLean to go thigh-high as the third man in.

The NRL had deemed it too dangerous to allow a man being held up by two defenders to be hit below the knee by a third defender and so tweaked the rule this season.

Maybe that’s the case. Roy’s a former top-level coach and I’m not, so it’s worthless me declaring him wrong or right. Nevertheless, the point he makes that seems most credible to me is that the object of the exercise was to slow down the play-the-ball, not to physically punish McKinnon.

And that would explain the lack of aggression or vigor in the incident that seemed so obvious at the time.

Masters argues the Storm defence were trying to put the ball-carrier on his back, not on his head. They wanted to prevent him from playing the ball quickly. The Storm have been masters of making the play-the-ball a three-act play and they’re also savvy enough to have recalibrated their approach given the change to the rules regarding the third man in.

So we have to address the harsh reality that trying to eliminate one undesirable outcome can open the door to the possibility of a different, yet equally undesirable, outcome. Or maybe an even more undesirable outcome.

At which point I can imagine some of the pro-shoulder charge lobby are getting ready to argue that the elimination their pet spectacular defensive play falls into the same category.

Not so.

The shoulder charge is by general definition a low percentage defensive tactic. It’s intended as a physically intimidating play. Furthermore, the effect of one shoulder charge, even one that goes astray and hits the head of the ball carrier, isn’t the major issue. It’s the cumulative effect across a career span of brain-jarring hits that’s cause for concern.

In the sad case of Alex McKinnon, one tackle gone wrong has caused what his club describes as a “devastating spinal injury”. It’s heartbreaking. But freak accidents happen and no amount of amending the rules will avert them.

You can’t legislate against one-off twists of fate. Sport – and life – are full of them.

When I was a young girl, Balmain centre Dennis Bendall suffered a serious head injury while on a school camp. He swung off a rope and into a pool in the Blue Mountains, hitting his head on a rock.

He diced with serious injury every week of the first grade football season in the brutal late-70s version of our game, but came to grief in what seemed like an innocuous recreational activity.

Michael Schumacher survived a career of Formula One racing, starting with a championship win the same year Ayrton Senna died in a race accident. Over the ensuing 20 years, rules were reviewed, tightened, amended and Schumacher himself taken to task for being too ruthless on the track.

Who could predict that having survived all of that he would end up on death’s doorstep (where he remains) as a result of a holiday skiing accident?

If there are no risks at all in sport, there’s precious little courage required. And courage is one of the purest and most admirable traits of sporting champions.

But if a specific demonstrated risk, especially one that builds up over a course of time, can be minimised and sports administrators choose not to minimise it – well that’s a different kettle of fish altogether.

Debbie Spillane joins The Roar today as a regular columnist. She is a trailblazer in Australian sports journalism: the first full-time female broadcaster hired by ABC Sport, and the first woman to call cricket on ABC radio, among other achievements. She hosts Grandstand’s NRL show The Hit Up, all-female sports talk program Hens FC, and calls Wanderers games in the A-League.

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-31T22:00:45+00:00

Jacques

Guest


Yes,but there are still a lot of much safer and less violent sport to play. Everyone who play knows the risk

2014-03-28T14:59:32+00:00

Glenn Innes

Guest


Nathan - True hardcases make bad law but it is also true that the law deals with outcomes as the example I give above shows.The big question in this case is did an offence actually d take place or was it just an accident, If an offence is found to take place... well remember Les Boyd got twelve months for a flying elbow that broke Darryl Brohmans jaw back when the game was supposed to be more tolerant on foul play than it is today.. so there is some Rugby Lague sentencing precedenrt for those suggesting he sgould get four weeks,

2014-03-28T13:32:38+00:00

Barbauld

Guest


Just for me I've a question about the role of the Bromwich brothers. I've seen tackles where the front man will pick up a player so his head doesn't land badly or spear into the ground. It's just awful that this happened when 1000s of worse looking tackles end up with no injury.

2014-03-28T09:33:24+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


The rules of the game have changed so much over the years, mainly at the behest of coaches to the detriment of the game but to the benefit of their coaching styles. Non competitive scrums, allowing the attacking team to stand inside the five metres then complaining there isn't enough room so the defence is now back 10+ metres, no raking the ball back in the play the ball, no playing the ball forward. Ball security is a thing of the past as a lost ball is a fifty fifty penalty.

2014-03-28T09:20:03+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


The three were involved in the tackle and all should have been cited.

2014-03-28T09:19:13+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


Sorry, but we see these tackles week in and week out from ALL the teams.

2014-03-28T09:17:39+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


Rick, I agree. We see these tackles week in and week out. The problem is they are let go unless someone is hurt. It comes down to the ref (the two of them) to penalise this, which they don't.

2014-03-28T09:13:35+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


Chop, remember it was the five metre rule where BOTH sides had to be back five metres from the play the ball? The coaches put an end to that. Sadly, most of the game's ill stem from the rule changes that coaches have put forward. These coaches have their own newspaper articles to push their line.

2014-03-28T09:00:21+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


Those were the days when intent was penalised. A headhigh that misses, a punch that doesn't connect. penalty. Now, even if you connect chances are nothing will happen

2014-03-28T08:48:55+00:00

Cadfael

Guest


The whole point of these tackles is to slow the game down so as the defence can reform. No one believes the player went out to deliberately injure another player. It was a tackle gone wrong, badly. There were three players involved in the tackle, had there been only two nothing would probably have happened so here it is unfair, the three players involved should all have been cited.

2014-03-28T08:36:31+00:00

Alex

Guest


The High Shot nailed the problem in a comment in Guru's article! The tackle has become about stopping the ball not the man. When I learned to play it and was taught how to tackle it was too stop the man – by going low or drive in around the waist and drive and put him on his back. Now nearly every tackle they go high and wrestle him to the ground when years ago they just tackled the man. I agree with Steve Mortimer bring back the 5m and ban wrestling – if they want to wrestle go and wrestle. The game was just as if not more exciting back in the day anyway. to me the game has changed so much that I have lost interest in it as well.

2014-03-28T06:57:27+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I coach my team in general and my front rowers specifically not to tip their head forward - particularly in a scrum collapse situation. The head bending forward or twisting to the side is where the neck is exposed to greatest risk. I have my players shrug their shoulders and while keeping their head in a nuetral position push their neck back into their raised trapeziums. The saying coached to me and that I pass on is that players should be prepared to eat the turf - your ability to recover from a broken jaw is much greater than your ability to recover from a broken neck. Completely agree that in general collisions and particularly those that occur at the ruck carry a lot of risk as well and that is harder to coach for than a collapsed scrum but the same principles apply.

2014-03-28T06:23:17+00:00

Sir Walter

Guest


+1

2014-03-28T06:18:07+00:00

Sir Walter

Guest


It was a three on one tackle, the attacking player held the bal,; he was lifted. 330 plug kgs at force buried the player in the turf on his beck. As you say there were other similar tackles, thats the coached technique. More "accidents" will happen if there is no change. Three on one and lifting is the problem

2014-03-28T02:58:36+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


I have seen that video, and I am sure you could make one similar about any player in the game. I don't have an issue with the tackling style, and if people think he leads with his head in tackles to hurt other people, then both Myles and those conspiracy theorists are mad... I have said it before... If Gallen had an issue with Myles, why didn't he arc up when Myles was supposedly doing something grubby? IF that was the case, then I could understand the punch. Not condone it still, but understand it better... Why did it take Gallen until Myles was running with the ball to tackle him with a swinging arm of his own, then when Myles pushed him back to play the ball, hit him? There was nothing grubby that Myles did immediately preceeding the punch. So the punch was hardly in the heat of the moment.

2014-03-28T00:28:55+00:00

Nathan of Perth

Guest


It is a very important legal principle that emotional cases make for bad case law. Hopefully no one at the ARLC starts changing interpretations until they have a chance to see it in the cold light of day.

2014-03-27T23:47:58+00:00

Bigjohn

Guest


I was commenting on the last sentence of your previous comment Scott, perhaps I took it out of context, however it appeared to me that you were saying that a harsh penalty for McLean would be a tragedy.

2014-03-27T23:44:54+00:00

Bigjohn

Guest


No argument there Bearfax, tv for vision, ABC radio for commentary.

2014-03-27T23:43:28+00:00

Bigjohn

Guest


Pretty sure that Debbie Spillane has never played in the NRL either, perhaps you would like to call her names.

2014-03-27T22:10:27+00:00

Vivalasvegan

Guest


You are spot on. This was not the worst tackle of the season, the round or even the game. Chilling result that has left us all sickened.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar