SPIRO: Good Will (Skelton) hunting for new Wallaby star

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Will Skelton, 203cm and 140kgs (or thereabout), is the biggest Wallaby ever, and on Saturday he made the most startling and impressive debut for a Wallaby since Israel Folau.

Within a few minutes of the Test starting, Skelton had won a lineout (admittedly from a short, sharp throw that required no jumping), scored a try by running through a couple of defenders and smashing the ball down over the line like a giant driving in a pile, and made several bursts through the French defensive wall.

Then at the beginning of the second half, when the outcome of the Test was still in the balance, Skelton took the ball to the defensive line, attracted two defenders and slipped a soft, sympathetic offload to a racing Folau, who galloped away for a sensational try.

Sonny Bill Williams at his best could not have unloaded the pass Skelton delivered more skilfully or with better timing.

The issue for Ewen McKenzie is to decide whether Skelton’s attacking impact is best left towards the end of a Test to seal or even create a victory, or for the start to set up the win.

Here I would offer the advice given to me a long time ago by Earle Kirton, an attacking All Blacks number 10, a successful coach and an All Blacks selector, “Always start your impact player at the beginning of a game, when he can have the greatest impact on its outcome.”

Ewen McKenzie is revealing himself as a smart selector, the key to success as a coach in my view, and I have no doubt that barring injuries Skelton will start for the Wallabies in the first Test of The Rugby Championship at Sydney against the rampant All Blacks.

As Skelton’s game develops he will give the Wallabies pack a scrumming second-rower who dominates collisions in the mid-field with his runs and mauling. This is what the All Blacks coaching staff developed with Brad Thorn, and in the last two seasons with Brodie Retallick.

The Wallabies have Rob Simmons and Scott Fardy as their main lineout jumpers, with Wycliff Palu and even Michael Hooper as the occasional alternate. And, as they showed with the flat hard throw to Skelton, they can win the occasional ball with a well-directed and flat throw to him.

I liked the way McKenzie solved the difficulty faced by the Wallabies at Melbourne of trying to break the French defensive wall. There was no Skelton at Melbourne and Tevita Kuridrani hardly got the ball at all. At Sydney these two players made a huge difference.

I would differ with my colleague David Lord on Kuridrani. David has seen more top rugby than most of us combined, and he has an excellent judgment on the worth of a player. But a big back like Kuridrani running at the defensive line has more chance of breaking or denting it than the smaller backs the Wallabies tend to use.

Let me explain the theory of the running game. It works if the defensive wall is bent, gone around or succesfully kicked and recaptured over. It does not work if none of these things happen.

This has been the problem for the Crusaders for several years. They have gone from one side of the field to the other, but they haven’t been able to break the defensive line. Ultimately a team in this situation makes a mistake or gives away a penalty.

What the French did at Melbourne was play everyone except the fullback in the defensive line. This meant the Wallabies faced a sort of magic pudding defensive line that always had numbers, no matter how many phases the Wallabies set up. In frustration, which came very early in the Test, the Wallabies tried unsuccessfully to kick bombs over the French trenches.

This is where Skelton and Kuridrani came into the play at Sydney. They are both big, powerful players and when they make their charges their impact is felt. They were used early in the phases to make dents in the French defensive line. Sekope Kepu and Palu also were used a lot, too.

The result was that the Wallabies backs were getting the ball on the front foot. They were able to bring Folau in on the burst, rather than using him as they did in Melbourne as a crash ball player.

The 39-13 scoreline was a result of the Wallabies monstering a French side that intended to take no prisoners at the start of the Test.

There were only a couple of complaints I would make about the Wallabies performance.

Nic White did the occasional aimless box kick which had the effect of merely giving the ball back to the French. Stupid play. Once again, the Wallabies should look to what the All Blacks do with box kicks. The coaching staff have worked out that if Aaron Smith kicks high and only 40m with 4.4 seconds hang time, the All Blacks can compete every time for the kick and generally win the ball back. All teams in world rugby should remember this ratio: 40m and 4.4 seconds hang time.

Occasionally, too, the Wallabies scrum was a big shaky, but then so are the scrums of England, South Africa, New Zealand, France, Argentina and Ireland.

The starting Wallabies side on Saturday afternoon, barring injuries, is the starting side McKenzie should go with against the All Blacks. Is it a good enough side to defeat the All Blacks? Who knows. As I once replied rather tartly to an ABC interviewer on the morning of a Test when he badgered me to make a prediction about whether the Wallabies would beat another rampant All Blacks side, “Peter, that’s why we’ve having the Test to find out!”

One of the main differences from this 2014 Wallabies side and other Wallaby sides, especially now that Skelton seems to have entrenched his position, is that the Wallabies are as big as the All Blacks and probably the Springboks. This hasn’t been the case for a long time.

In The Sydney Morning Herald on Saturday I made the point that professional rugby is taking the rah rah out of the game and making its playing population more inclusive of the current Australian society. This has meant a great increase in the number of players with a Pasifika background playing rugby and graduating to Wallaby status.

One of the greatest Wallabies of all time, George Smith started for the Brumbies and Wallabies in 2000, four years after rugby went professional. Smith, born and bred in Manly, has Tongan background, and actually spent a year at school in Tonga. Digby Ioane, who first played for the Wallabies in 2007, was the first Australian rugby representative with a Samoan background.

Both these players would have played league rather than rugby if the game had not gone professional in 1996. Now the flow of players, some of them stars like Israel Folau (league, AFL, and then rugby), came from league to rugby. This is to the great benefit of Australian Super Rugby teams, and the Wallabies.

The impact of this flow is represented by the Wallabies on Saturday, with eight players with Pasifika backgrounds in the 23-man squad: Israel Folau, Tevita Kuridrani, Sekope Kepu, Tatafu Polota-Nau, Wycliff Palu, Will Skelton, Laurie Weeks and Scott Sio.

We have to be careful about these matters of ethnicity and the cliches that are often tossed about. But the evidence is there that these players with the Pasifika background tend to be big, powerful, aggressive players. They have no fear about making an impact with collisions. They seem to be born to play the modern rugby game.

And in the case of Folau, there is a Rolls-Royce speed and swerve to his attack that makes him a potential Wallaby great, if he decides this is what he wants out of his career.

The Wallabies have emerged from their three-Test series against France with three wins. They have won seven Tests in a row, a sequence last achieved in the Rod Macqueen era of the Golden Wallabies. Is there a resonance here of a new golden era under Ewen McKenzie?

The Wallabies are a bigger and better side than last year. In the first and third Tests they played an attractive, winning, try-scoring style which brought the biggest rugby crowd ever to Allianz Stadium to see them – and especially Good Hunting Will – strut their stuff.

How much better the 2014 Wallabies are from last year, though, we will discover during The Rugby Championship. Game on!

The Crowd Says:

2014-06-24T06:52:03+00:00

Phil

Guest


Or maybe your favourite nephew is not getting a run.What's with the vendetta against Foley ffs?Sure, he is not the complete no.10 at this stage, but if you can't see the potential in him to be that,then you should be watching some other game. Even Cruden has some shockers but do you see AB supporters knock him to this degree? Give it a break.

2014-06-23T21:32:43+00:00

soapit

Guest


youre right, but nobody mentioned mccaw thank goodness

2014-06-23T14:18:26+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


I also thought Kuridrani contributed well in that game. eg his and Foley's runs were the reason France defence line was moving back for the Skelton offload, Folau try. The main difference between game 2 and 3 was intent. ie If the same intent was applied to game 2, I believe the WBs would have delivered a similar result. I think the WB scrum was better in game 2. Having said that: good job Skelton, Palu and the usual suspects.

2014-06-23T13:06:24+00:00

Fair go

Guest


Amazing to me that people commenting on a team game of some intensity can so predictably come up with such definite individual calls. The point of Saturdays game was the consistency of defence and attack. It is utterly redundant to focus on the supposed brilliance if one or other. Because they would be nullified if they had weak team colleagues. Skelton looked great. But a very big part of that was the efforts of others maintaining pressure.

2014-06-23T12:44:25+00:00

The scales of justice

Guest


there are many hyper-defensive fangirls around here who get their knickers in a twist whenever they think someone is slighting either the messiah or the team chock-a-block with worlds best in position. The anger inhibits their reading comprehension.

2014-06-23T12:14:45+00:00

The scales of justice

Guest


The wallabies are so awesome under EM that surely NZ and SA will acknowledge the have no chance and can just hand the RC silverware over to Oz without a game needing to be played. Who could not bow down in the face of the majesty of SEVEN in a row?

2014-06-23T11:19:28+00:00

Rob na Champassak

Roar Guru


How many times did White kick away possession needlessly? You're not counting that kick right at the start where he gained 50m off the kickoff as wasted possession, are you?

2014-06-23T11:13:38+00:00

Rob na Champassak

Roar Guru


Well they weren't terrible mistakes. The pass behind Foley, for instance, was not so far behind him that he could not catch it and continue the play. Neither of the passes that landed short of the player ended up being a turnover, in fact both of those bounced onwards to the player that they were intended for in the first place. They're errors all the same, yes, but if we talk about White's overall impact (which generally saw quick and accurate service), I would say that at worst, it was a little below par. If he'd thrown an intercept, or if the pass to Foley had been so far behind him that it couldn't be regathered, then sure, we'd call that a bad performance. I'm guess I can't understand the kind of standards you want to measure him by. Are they the same standards you apply to the rest of the players? If so, how about we talk about Fardy or Foley or Folau? Each of those fellas made uncharacteristic mistakes in the match, but nobody has described their performances as awful (not that I have seen, anyway).

2014-06-23T11:00:42+00:00

jason8

Guest


Generally the player is already moving at pace before the ball is kicked AND although competing in the air is key it is almost as effective to smash the player back as he comes back down to terra firma allowing your forwards to pile in behind and over the ball. The time it takes for the ball to be collected and returned to the deck is significant.

2014-06-23T10:31:51+00:00

Shungmao

Guest


Not comparing AAC to Cummins

2014-06-23T10:15:58+00:00

stillmatic1

Guest


if the wallabies never played this style under deans, then why was the wallaby backline touted as worlds best for a few of his years in charge? the very people that accused others of supporting deans ad infinitum, seem to now supporting McKenzie as some kind of messiah. good on the wbs for winning a few games in a row, but it would be like manly or Melbourne playing Cronulla every week. pretty easy to rack up a few wins. lets wait and see if the new god of wallaby rugby, with his supreme tactical ablility (?), can actually get his team to beat more than argentina this year. a potential problem for McKenzie is that he believes his own hype. the grandstanding on the sidelines is cute, but pretty unnecessary tbh. there is a reason coaches sit up in the box. they can actually see what is happening on the field with a birds eye view. if telling the waterboy to tell the players to kick from their own half is mastery of coaching, then all is lost im afraid. and to assert that the poor performance in Melbourne was a directive, as such, is pretty hard to stomach. deans wasn't the messiah made out to be, a nor is the grandstanding McKenzie. all that said, as many other wb fans have said, winning is a habit, and the players seem to be much tougher collectively too. but as me old mate clint says "tough, aint enough".

2014-06-23T10:11:15+00:00

DMac

Guest


Ok so we have agreement on 5 mistakes in the first half. On what planet does that get a pass mark? The poor options were clear at the ground, they may not have been so obvious on tv. Once or twice he passed short side to an isolated man, a couple of times he had numbers one side and went the other way. I'll watch the replay and see if they show up.

2014-06-23T09:29:07+00:00

bennalong

Guest


Touche Uncle, But recent Quade has not been up to speed. Which one is yours, and which backline was he in?

2014-06-23T09:06:03+00:00

Utah

Guest


Sorry Mike, the last bit about Barnes and McCabe was an attempt at satire. Will do my best to keep things vanilla for you going forward.

2014-06-23T08:41:15+00:00

Rob

Guest


Spiro, I watched the annual CHS v GPS clash last Friday. In the firsts GPS won 22-20 and in the seconds won 24-7. In both games GPS were so much better at the breakdown, appeared to me to be way technically superior and especially in the backs were bigger and stronger in their upper body. I think GPS deservedly got more players in the all schools squads than CHS. I was talking to a mate whose son is doing some coaching in Sydney. He said his son did some research on boys who play CHS Rugby and whether they take up senior rugby. I don't know the actual figures but he said they were very poor. My argument is that the selectors at these events, and don't forget that in some cases these may be the starting points for advanced careers, can only pick players for sides on what they see at the time. At the end of their schoolboy careers the quality GPS players are progressing because they have great skills and have had great coaching.The CHS player who hasn't had the intensive coaching over the last 6 years of high school won't get picked and may be lost to Rugby Many of these boys lost to Rugby are from South Pacific backgrounds. Unfortunately Rugby doesn't have the funds to keep them interested whereas League is actively recruiting even at these carnivals. If the Brumbies hadn't existed George would have played league.

2014-06-23T08:28:27+00:00

strupper2003

Guest


there is plenty to like about the wlbs since the appointment of link. what i like most is the transformation in psychological and attitude of the players.

2014-06-23T08:23:05+00:00

SandBox

Roar Guru


yeah, as I said last time he likened him to a Roller, a Bentley turbo, or many other luxury sedans would eat it in a race. Folau is more like watching a GT4 race, than the Queen trundling along doing the royal wave. The Rolls does epitomise luxury, so I get what he means....sort of

2014-06-23T07:56:49+00:00

Hopperdoggy

Guest


Yeah I'd like to know which rugby player can run 40 meters in 4.4 seconds as well. Smells like BS. 28 meters sounds much more probable!

2014-06-23T07:37:30+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Foley is playing ok , give the guy a break, QC still makes umpteen mistakes and has been in the wallabies for 6 or 7 years. foley is the answer me friends.

2014-06-23T07:07:09+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Ewen McKenzie has assured us there will be no talk like that out of the Wallabies this year. That's quite the vow of abstinence from an Australian coach.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar