Australian rugby pretensions have been exposed

By Roy Isbister / Roar Rookie

With seven wins and a draw from their previous eight games, Australia to be sure was enjoying a good run, but the carnage at Eden Park exposed their flattery as so much deception.

And while only so much blame can be laid at Ewen McKenzie’s door, he has seldom looked more a prop than when selecting the Wallaby backline for this year’s Rugby Championship. Or it could be that he felt threatened by Michael Cheika’s success with the Waratahs, and so deemed it necessary to put his own stamp on the Wallabies by diluting the Waratahs’ imprint.

The irony being that he while he was probably right to do so, he did it arse-backwards. He proved he is his own man by ignoring the best halfback combination in the land in 2014 and instead pairing a pedestrian journeyman at No. 9 with a brilliant but headless and out-of-position chook at No. 10.

To be fair to MacKenzie, piecing together a complete Aussie backline at the moment is no easy task; either because some of the pieces don’t quite fit, or because they don’t exist at all.

But at least he could have got the easy ducks in a row – i.e. Israel Folau, Bernard Foley and Nic Phipps (though note that while Phipps might be the best No. 9 available at the moment, it is hard to see him as the final answer) – and thus freed up his time to concentrate on the difficult stuff.

Difficult stuff such as what, really, should be done with Kurtley Beale?

As much as Beale in his pomp is a delight to watch and a danger to any opposition, he is too much of a risk to include in the starting XV.

Once upon a time in Tests, and still at Super Rugby level, a weak defender could/can be protected, but in the current international game if you can’t be trusted to tackle you can’t be trusted to start. As so many others have said, Beale’s creativity can be the difference once the game starts to break up, but if you have to move players around between defence and attack because you can’t rely on a player to stand his ground then that ground is already sliding under your feet.

With Beale out of the picture, Matt Toomua starts at inside centre, pretty much by default. Not one to set the world on fire or send shivers down opposition backs, but reliable enough to not let the side down until someone else comes along (or he grows into the role).

Adam Ashley-Cooper’s form for the Waratahs in Super Rugby would seem to give him the inside running for outside centre, however the gap between Super Rugby and Test rugby would seem to also be the gap between him having and not having a passing game.

So Tevita Kuridrani comes into centre and Ashley-Cooper goes to the wing. Which is handy, because Australia doesn’t have any wings, and fewer by the week. Rob Horne, as last-man-standing, keeps his place until Henry Speight is available or some fresh blood is sprung from another code.

As for the forwards, where McKenzie is more in his comfort zone, the problem at Eden Park appeared more fortitudinal than selectorial, though Wycliff Palu was once again exposed as a flat-track bully.

The All Blacks combination of aggression and pace proved too much for him and he went remarkably AWOL, to the point where it is hard to imagine him being chosen to run out against the South African loosies this Saturday.

Scott Fardy was a bit better but he too needs to up his game; Michael Hooper was left with far too much to do on his own, including providing leadership, for a man of his size (and experience). Looking at the forwards as a whole across both All Black games, the whiff of déjà vu was strong, as for years now, the fatties might make a proper fight of it one week but are then left without enough in the tank to produce a repeat performance the next.

Ultimately, there is a clear sense that while Australia was well served this year in the Super Rugby, it is still struggling with the step up to Test rugby, in terms of both depth and delivering consistent intensity.

The cracks can be papered over on an occasional basis (as against the All Blacks in Sydney), but fronting up on a week-in, week-out basis against the toughest opposition remains a problem. And while the direction of travel since this time last year is positive, and there is no team that the Wallabies can’t beat on a one-off basis, it is hard to imagine them emerging triumphant from next years’ World Cup.

The Group of Death is eminently negotiable, but to follow that up with three knock-out victories back-to back looks at least one bridge too far, no matter how good a selector MacKenzie has by then become.

The Crowd Says:

2014-09-04T13:39:43+00:00

2211

Guest


RT, I did have to laugh at the ticker scrolling by at the bottom of the Fox Sports coverage before the Eden Park match that read "Wallabies unbeaten in their last eight games" followed by "All Blacks winning streak broken in Sydney last week". Different ways of looking at things perhaps tailored to the intended audience...

2014-09-04T01:45:09+00:00

Kent Millar

Guest


Go get them T bone and bring it on. Chances are, they'll see about as much ball as Cinderalla's ugly step sisters. You need forwards. Not paper machee cutouts who can't see a ref baby sitting them even when watching a replay. That's what happened at Eden Park. Your forwards were baby sat by Peyper and exposed by Romaine. Super rugby can't be compared to test rugby. Super rugby is a comp that the players play for the highest bidder. It goes for a long period and players pace themselves. Test match rugby is about playing for your country. The passion and intensity go up 10 fold. The All Black forwards put in 100% for 80 minutes. During super rugby, that can be 70-80% for 60 minutes. So weak forwards are not exposed so much. Not sure what you have to do, but you need to do it if you want to foot it in the world cup.

2014-09-03T10:56:35+00:00

T bone

Guest


I can hear people calling for Cheka to be WBs coach already... Seriously? It won't change a thing! Unless you eastern suburbs boys provide private equity for 3 more league players, the trophy cabinet will remain empty. Imaging Falou linking up with Hayne, Inglis and Slater - on the back of charges from any origin back rower - unstoppable.

2014-09-03T09:24:24+00:00

Zack

Roar Rookie


The results would have been: ANZACS: 2 SAARGs: 0

2014-09-03T07:19:11+00:00

Zack

Roar Rookie


Eden Park was an aberration - didn't you get the memo? hehehe

2014-09-03T06:24:32+00:00

Common Sense

Guest


I would've liked the All Blacks to play the Springbok team that turned up in Salta last week.

2014-09-03T05:01:18+00:00

Mike

Guest


Why would Palu and Kepu cop any more criticism than the other forwards? And in Beale's case, was he wrongly selected at 10 or not? If he was, then that must ameliorate some of the blame on him for his performance. "Can’t wait till Cooper and Genia return for Oz." Yes it will be great to have two more experienced players available. But they will have to prove their case for selection like anybody else.

2014-09-03T03:10:27+00:00

Rollaway7

Guest


Yes to sugar coat them :)

2014-09-03T03:08:36+00:00

Realist

Guest


Wow, yet another pro Waratahs article on Roar. You can tell by the anit-White comment and the fact that blokes like Palu, Beale, and Kepu who all performed poorly seemed to get forgotten when the criticism is dished out. Can't wait till Cooper and Genia return for Oz.

2014-09-03T03:00:48+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


Why do so many refer to games won (as in this article) "as seven wins and a draw from their previous 8 games" .. why not refer it to ..... "so far in 2014, 5 games for 3 wins, one loss and a draw" ... or "in 2013 15 games for 7 wins and 8 losses" ..... just curious as to why results are expressed in this way, is there a reason?

2014-09-03T01:33:38+00:00

44bottles

Roar Guru


I think people are overdoing the anti-White stuff. He did have a pretty good year in Super and was arguably better than Phipps. (better in stats like try-assists and line-break assists) It makes sense for him to be selected as he was also the incumbent and Phipps hadn't played well against France. I personally didn't agree with others selections but understand why he did them. (eg. Beale over Foley because he wanted someone similar to Cooper who looks to be the first choice 10) I also understand the mantra of giving the players a second chance, as it could've just been a bad game. They've had two chances though, and the changes have now come, as expected. I just think people are heaping a lot more criticism on McKenzie than he is due.

2014-09-03T01:23:15+00:00

Mike

Guest


"The Group of Death is eminently negotiable, but to follow that up with three knock-out victories back-to back looks at least one bridge too far, no matter how good a selector MacKenzie has by then become." That's right - coaching is all about selections. You are in good company - most Australian rugby fans seem to think the same. You will pardon those of us who think selections are only one part of coaching (and not even the major part) if we switch off at this point.

2014-09-02T21:29:51+00:00

Fred

Guest


Blah blah blah

2014-09-02T20:43:56+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I would have liked NZ to play ARG in Salta last week; and SA play the version of Australia that showed up to Eden Park.

2014-09-02T18:44:40+00:00

Bazza Allblack Supporter

Roar Rookie


I sorta agree with this article but I would like to wait until the the next 2 weeks are over so we can see oz play SAFFA and Argies. By then NZ will have done the same so we can get an idea if Eden park was a one off or not.

Read more at The Roar