Only god knows how to defend New Zealand

By Harry Jones / Expert

Before the All Blacks play a Test, and before the haka, they ask god to hear their voices, and ask the Almighty defend their “free land” from “the shafts of strife and war.”

Maybe god has in fact defended New Zealand. Very few rugby teams have been able to defend against the All Black attack.

During this decade, New Zealand has not lost in New Zealand. They have lost to England at Twickenham, and Australia in Brisbane and Hong Kong, and to South Africa at Port Elizabeth, and drawn a couple of Tests away from their home.

But here is one constant – when New Zealand has scored 25 or more points in a Test match this decade, they have not lost. New Zealand is a perfect 43 out of 43 in Tests in his decade when their opponent cannot hold them under 25 points.

If you let the All Blacks score 25 points, you will lose, because New Zealand’s tryline defence is underrated, and you have doomed yourself to a tricky triad of tasks.

You must cross their tryline several times, have twelve or thirteen forwards as fit as the All Black pack, and all your forwards must be ball-handlers. Or, I suppose get lucky, or pray to a different deity.

If you hold them under 25, you have a chance. You usually still lose. But the odds improve.

Those teams who beat New Zealand, defend New Zealand.

In the seventeen Tests in this decade, in which the All Blacks scored 20-24 points, they lost three. For their opponents, a 17 per cent win rate sounds poor, but it is infinitely better than zero!

Now, examine Tests in which New Zealand was held to less than 20 points, and we see that they won 11 out of 14 – meaning their opponents’ win rate was above 20 per cent.

If we mention many of these Tests, we immediately remember them. The 8-7 brawl at Eden Park over France. The 12-12 sister-kisser in Sydney this year. The 24-22 nailbiter in Dublin.

A dour pre-World Cup asterisk win by Morne Steyn in Port Elizabeth, in which New Zealand’s B team only scored five points. The recent escape in Wellington, with only one try by the men in black in their own divinely defended capital.

The twentieth point scored by Conrad Smith to defeat England.

Twenty points weren’t enough to beat Australia at Brisbane in 2011. In their two draws of this decade, the All Blacks failed to score twenty points.

And in all eleven Tests in this decade in which a late unconverted try would have beaten New Zealand, but the All Blacks survived with a win or draw, we can see that New Zealand was defended – below 25 points in all but one (the oddly “not close” 28-27 win over England in Dunedin).

In most of these tight struggles – seven of eleven – the Kiwi juggernaut was held to 20 or fewer points.

The way to win against New Zealand is to keep their attack contained.

How do you do that?

It’s not a matter of doing what Australia just tried to do in Cape Town – make 90 per cent of almost 300 tackles and hang on for dear life for the last ten minutes. That doesn’t work against New Zealand, and didn’t against the ‘Boks.

You defend the All Blacks by starving them. You simply cannot feed them with aimless kicks, or uncontested up-and-under punts.

You rob them of turnovers with ruck retention and ball security; the vital three seconds after a tackle.

And here’s a tricky part. You starve them of offloads, or smother the aftermath of flat passes.

Then, you compete at the breakdown, gain ascendancy at set piece and use the clock well.

You must be prepared for the raking kick, the grubber, the chip, and the diagonal probe, but also clatter into every collision determined to take every bit of happiness from every All Black.

You will see Ben Smith dance but you must end that dance.

Don’t panic when you get into their 22 and expect clever coordinated mayhem; make sure the referee has to make the call.

Take your points on offer, using all the time the ref gives you.

And finish. Finish them. Finish your chances. Finish stronger than them. Finish every move. Finish your tackles. Finish.

The Crowd Says:

2014-10-03T09:09:32+00:00

Garth

Guest


Doctor Shag. No, Professor Shag.

2014-10-03T07:43:34+00:00

scrumma

Guest


talk the talk you got to walk the talk.

2014-10-03T02:59:07+00:00

Sprigs

Guest


How to beat NZ? Take one pot of coffee.....

2014-10-03T02:57:30+00:00

Sprigs

Guest


Ancient NZ wisdom. Take the points.

2014-10-02T21:26:57+00:00

Buk

Guest


Interesting article Harry, and a thorough analysis. One thing I picked up from the last game in line with your pitch - the Springboks relentless defence really knocked the stuffing out of the AB's mentally in the first half - they eventually resorted to kicking because they were finding no way through, and getting hit hard If they play in a similar manner this week and replicate that defensive effort, then I would say a win is quite on the cards; that first half is already in the minds of the All Blacks, and its (obviously) a very recent memory; plus Barrett and Fekitoa are very inexperienced in regards to test starts regarding tests vs SA in SA

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T17:39:56+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Meyer has built a good squad; deeper and fitter and younger.

2014-10-02T16:48:22+00:00

etienne marais

Guest


You are absolutely right BB. Over the past two months we have seen the Springboks put together games where they truly showcased all aspects of the game (except field kicking). It is only a matter of time before they put together a performance where everything comes together, and they manage to showcase all of those aspects in one singular game. It's the game we've been waiting for. The thing that impressed me most this past weekend, was their discipline under pressure. This is the hallmark of a team that is confident in their abilities. And in this sense, I mean TEAM; the players trust one another's judgment and abilities. I remember noticing this rare quality in the 2011 All Black team, already early in that season. And see where it took them.

2014-10-02T16:22:44+00:00


I am sorry, but I am not going to agree with you on this We all know the All Blacks are a very well balanced team and executes most phases of rugby very well. But you are selling the Springboks short on ball carrying ability. Yes, we are not flashy, but you don't score 46 tries in 12 tests if you can't carry the ball. Last weekend was the first weekend where the Boks actually played ball in hand rugby, the level of patience they showed in getting so many phases was impressive, the fact that they made the wrong decisions at times and had to get back into clicking as an attacking unit is neither here nor there. They can attack, run the ball, they just need to d t more often.

2014-10-02T15:49:40+00:00

firstxv

Guest


True...but the boks are better kickers than ball carriers. Taking NZ on in the possession game is just as risky in terms of counter attack. Carrying the ball up inside its own half could cause the boks problems in the same way. Last week argie got turned over endlessly. Mind you...Retallick out doesn't help...a key waepon in the carry stakes.

2014-10-02T14:55:13+00:00

Brendan Hope

Roar Guru


BB. It's the All Blacks mate. You should be worried!

2014-10-02T14:54:42+00:00

Brendan Hope

Roar Guru


It's going to be an all day struggle at the breakdown for them. They'll have to keep it tight. Fitness is key.

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T13:33:11+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


If everyone is healthy and playing at their best, I'd pick this front row: Beast (Trevor) Bismarck (Strauss) Malherbe (Marcel)

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T13:31:01+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Haha! Reminds me of one of my more taciturn coaches: “Boys? Play hard!” Looking forward to this scrap, Andrew?

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T13:21:09+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Retallick is out. Thrush is in.

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T13:07:24+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I am happy I was finally able to entertain you, StuB. We won't offload as many times as NZ, but well-timed passes after one or two tacklers are drawn.....stlll work. Most important improvement in Boks: fitness.

AUTHOR

2014-10-02T12:57:31+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


True But you will either lose possession via kick (which puts NZ in acres of space) or in a tighter space (dropped ball, ruck, etc) The more I've studied NZ video, the more I see how structured they are on the counter

2014-10-02T12:15:32+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


Merci NOS I try to find clues re How To Beat NZ Consistently The big rugby mystery Yes, the counter switch is what they execute best

2014-10-02T12:13:18+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Start scribbling your notes. It may happen

2014-10-02T12:12:45+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


AUTHOR

2014-10-02T11:55:48+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Haha! Reminds me of one of my more taciturn coaches: "Boys? Play hard!" Looking forward to this scrap, Andrew?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar