Marsh and Watson both in Australia's best Test XI

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Mitch Marsh yesterday might have provided answers to Australia’s problems at numbers three and six in their Test batting line-up.

The 23-year-old’s more experienced teammates should have been taking note of the manner in which he compiled an assertive yet composed innings of 87 amid another woeful batting effort.

Australia face the prospect of having to bat for up to five sessions to avoid defeat after again being dominated by Pakistan on Day 3 of the second Test at Abu Dhabi.

On the flattest of decks, Australia were once more exposed by Pakistan’s extremely inexperienced yet feisty attack.

The Australians had begun the day with hope of at least drawing the match. Indeed, if ever there was a pitch designed to produce a draw it was this Abu Dhabi surface. When premier batsman David Warner toe-ended to gully a rank, wide long hop in the opening overs of the day those hopes dimmed.

Glenn Maxwell, demoted to number three after opening in his previous Test innings, didn’t necessarily instil confidence Australia would avoid defeat.

But he was wonderfully entertaining during his sparkling yet all-too-brief innings of 37 from 28 balls. Maxwell looked in commanding touch against Pakistan’s quicks and was even more impressive against their rampant spinners.

The nimble Victorian continually got to the pitch of their deliveries and struck them through or over the infield. Having stolen Pakistan’s momentum and forced them to scatter the field somewhat he undid this progress with a poor selection of stroke.

After successfully hitting left arm tweaker Zulfiqar Babar with the spin through the offside, he made the mistake of trying to whip him across the line and was bowled. Skipper Michael Clarke then played with an encouraging level of fluency after appearing flummoxed by Pakistan’s slow bowlers at Dubai.

Clarke struck a free-flowing 47 and put together a partnership of 64 with Marsh. The young West Australian was abandoned in quick succession by veterans Clarke, Brad Haddin (10) and Mitchell Johnson (0).

Aided by paceman Peter Siddle, Marsh came within sight of his maiden ton before misjudging an Imran Khan full toss which he scooped to mid on.

In his second Test, the all-rounder played an innings of heartening maturity and skill. Against Pakistan’s paceman he unfurled a series of exquisite off drives, played with a high elbow and impeccable timing.

Opposed to their spinners he showed enough positive intent to disallow them from getting into a rhythm without ever straying into the zone of over-aggression that led to Maxwell’s downfall.

Such a knock, produced amid a crumbling batting line-up, should have earned him a spot in Australia’s XI for their next Test against India in Brisbane in just over one month. Australia have been searching for a number six and Marsh now deserves a chance to prove he can be that man.

By confirming himself yesterday as a number six of great promise he may also have helped Australia to solve their even larger problem at first drop.

Maxwell yesterday became the ninth Australian batsman to be trialled at number three in the past two years. Maxwell, Shane Watson, Clarke, David Warner, Alex Doolan, Phil Hughes, Usman Khawaja, Ed Cowan and Rob Quiney have all had a crack in that position.

Regardless of what many Aussie fans think of Watson – has there been a more maligned player of the modern era? – the reality remains he has been comfortably Australia’s most successful number three since Ricky Ponting vacated that position.

During that period, Watson has made two tons at first drop, while the other eight have made… none.

Watson has played his best cricket while stationed in the top order. In 10 Tests batting at first drop he has made 749 runs at 42, including two of his four career centuries. The burly all-rounder is also coming off the most productive stint of his Test career having stroked 612 runs at 47 from his last seven matches, including two tons.

Australia’s Test selections this summer will be made with one eye on the upcoming Ashes tour of England. This should work in Watson’s favour as he has vast experience playing against the Old Enemy and also a good Ashes record.

More than a third of his career matches have been played against England and in those 18 Tests he has compiled 1438 runs at 44.

After making his return from injury in the recent domestic one-day competition, Watson has sat out of the first round of Sheffield Shield fixtures.

He has four weeks to prove his fitness for the first Test against India. If he does then both he and Marsh should line up for Australia.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-05T10:17:44+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


Yes we are but the point is that a good debut/couple of tests doesn't make a player and in regards to Watson, I'm not disputing that Marsh didn't made runs but please refer to the first point of this post.

2014-11-04T10:26:56+00:00

jammel

Guest


Don - is this what you intended to write? "don't think of them both as all rounders competing for that position. Think of them as batsmen only. Watson is Australia’s 3rd best batsman behind Clarke and Shaun Marsh…" Shaun Marsh and Watson are both better batsmen than Warner and Smith, do you think? I have Clarke, Warner and Smith (and others) ahead of the likes of Watson and Shaun Marsh.

2014-11-04T06:15:28+00:00

Ross Fleming

Roar Rookie


Bring Khawaja in at 3 and leave him there for a full series and we will have a future 3

2014-11-04T06:14:50+00:00

Ross Fleming

Roar Rookie


I think he is only out for few more weeks Ronan so he will be back soon getting big runs

2014-11-04T05:56:02+00:00

dan ced

Guest


Mediocrity Boulevard.

2014-11-04T05:55:40+00:00

dan ced

Guest


Not bad, Klinger in for Burns right now.. and unsure about O'Keefe but will give him the benefit of the doubt. Rest reads well.

2014-11-04T01:03:49+00:00

BOB

Guest


Where's Shaun marsh at?

2014-11-03T13:26:01+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Which bit? That Ussie should be at 3 or that we have good kids now? You're not really reading stuff, are you?

2014-11-03T13:24:12+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Bear...you almost have it. Most of my comments are genuine cricket comments but when people get angry or sad (think Viv) or just too uptight, I like to make them my entertainment...my playthings. The thing is, they can just scroll past it. It doesn't have to be read.

2014-11-03T13:21:46+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Hey Viv...in the words of the classics, "No I'm not!" You are probably the only one in the world who thinks that of me...I am loved.

2014-11-03T12:31:51+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Roar Rookie


WA is looking very good for the Shield, I would say... Batting can still be a little fragile, but the bowling attack is second to none. Especially with Paris in the wings, hope he gets over his injury soon. It would not surprise me to see both Paris & Behrendorff in Aussie colours in the nex few years, maybe even Rimmington as well? Bugger it, throw in Agar, we desperately need another allrounder...

2014-11-03T10:22:28+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Keep up the good work Don. Hope you enjoyed the win today.

2014-11-03T09:35:05+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Not a bad looking side there Bucks. Not sure about Burns opening. Maybe Hughes at 2, Smith at 3 and Burns at 5.

2014-11-03T09:32:00+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


test is finished. We got done. Next page. By the way Ronan, even though I do give you a hard time, I enjoy your articles and you have a knack for picking the relevant topics. But now we have a breather. How about something on the first round of the Sheffield Shield. Some very interesting performances across the continent including some big scoring from a couple of 20 year olds just starting out, good figures for Zampa and Sayers, Cowan continues to impress and Neville Somebody makes another hundred. Worth a discussion

2014-11-03T09:23:20+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Viv I suspect a lot Don goes on with is a Gee up. I think he likes to stir and every now and then he laughs at himself and admits to his preoccupation with WA. I suspect Don is here for the entertainment.

2014-11-03T09:11:42+00:00

VivGilchrist

Guest


That's negative.

2014-11-03T09:10:19+00:00

VivGilchrist

Guest


Now, now, don't go throwing your skirt over your head. I'm sorry but everything you utter is negative if it doesn't originate in WA. Mate, I have more positivity in my little finger then you have in your entire body. Your the most hate filled person on this post.

2014-11-03T09:06:59+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Ronan I am just expressing what I think is likely to happen. They will pick him for the next series because he's a favourite son and he did well in this test. I just think they've pushed the kid too fast before he's dominated in the Shield. There are several young batsmen his age in the Shield who have better batting averages, but would you slot them in a test side?

2014-11-03T08:42:52+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Christian has already been in the test squad last time Aussies played India. Creepy but true.

2014-11-03T08:41:16+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


164 and he's faced more deliveries than anyone else apart from Smith. He certainly exceeded my expectations with the bat.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar