Heyneke Meyer should yank his head out of the sand

By Andrew Jardine / Roar Guru

Heyneke Meyer has dug himself into a hole I can’t see him easily escaping from, and I won’t be surprised if the Springbok coach buries his head in the sand after the debacle against Ireland at the Aviva stadium.

He appears to have done that by blaming our players’ lack of character, the wet ball on a “tricky” surface, talking up being outplayed by a “great” Ireland side, which had beaten the All Blacks, and taking an implicit dig at the referee.

For starters, this was not a great Ireland team. It was one racked by injuries and featured a below-par front row that the Springboks pushed around with ease. Instead of criticising the players, Meyer should remember that when you point a finger, three point back at you. He’s the boss and the man who decides how the team practises and plays.

He should yank his head out of the sand and confront our problems, one of which has been his penchant for digging up bodies from South Africa’s World Cup-winning squad of 2007. Players such as captain Jean de Villiers, Gurthro Steenkamp, Ruan Pienaar, Morne Steyn, Jannie du Plessis, Bakkies Botha, Schalk Burger and even 37-year-old Victor Matfield are not the players they used to be and should have been given a well-earned rest in Boot Hill.

Rather than talking up Ireland, he should be concerned about our lack of ball skills and dubious game-plan decisions in the 29-15 defeat. The wet ball and the referee were not the problems. He should wonder why Ireland gave us a hiding.

In his first squad, Meyer chose all of 11 players from the one when South Africa won the rugby showpiece. New Zealand have kept five players from that tournament and Australia only two.

In our squad back then, the average age was over 31 and it resembled a pensioner’s paradise. The average has now dropped to about 28, which is similar to other line-ups. However, we persist with Matfield and the like. I admit that the 37-year-old still soars like an eagle in the lineouts and has an octopus-like grip on the ball. But he has lost pace in general play and keeping him solely for his lineout skills is an open question.

Why the shortage of younger players? The truth is that we simply don’t have enough youngsters with sufficient experience because we haven’t been bringing them through. You only get experience by being given significant game time and that hasn’t happened. The Springboks have held on to the same team for far too long. We should have blooded the younger players during our Northern Hemisphere tour two years ago. We are now paying the price.

Pat Lambie is a case in point: just 24 years old, the skilful flyhalf has spent most of his time warming his backside on the bench. Here is a player blessed with talent who should have been developed. Lambie, however, has not fitted into Meyer’s big-is-better, brawn-not-brains mantra.

Meyer has persisted with Handre Pollard, another young talented player, at outside half. Only 20 years old, Pollard has great potential, but why, with only a handful of Test caps, has he been preferred to Lambie, who has more than 30? Because he is bigger, not necessarily better.

And why is Morne Steyn still in the squad? He was the star in 2011 and scored the most points by an individual. But the game has changed since then and Steyn, despite his unerring boot, is not the force he once was. Meyer appears to have a touch of Blue Bull fever with some of his selections.

We now have only a handful of Tests before next year’s World Cup battle, so it is far too late to start making major changes. Meyer must realise that for the Springboks to improve, he must change his view. If perfection is the aim, change is vital. The changes don’t have to be earth-shattering. There is time to hone the team’s overall skills by the time the World Cup arrives.

I am well aware that we recently beat the All Blacks courtesy of a TV-replay inspired penalty that Lambie booted over at the last minute and gave South Africa a two-point victory. All credit to Meyer and the Springboks for winning 27-25 and ending the New Zealanders’ unbeaten record.

Fans and critics were over the moon and howling with delight. Pollard was rated as the greatest flyhalf on the planet and eighth-man Duane Vermeulen the best back-rower. The world was at our feet and there was talk we could even knock the All Blacks off their world number one perch.

And then came Ireland on what Meyer described as a tricky surface. South African commentators at the match, however, said the surface had dried out and praised the ground’s drainage system. In any event, it was the same for both teams.

I feel that it was a mistake not to take points early with a shot at the posts. We opted for a lineout instead and an unsurprising driving maul. It did pay off once with a try but Ireland defended effectively against the maul on other occasions. We came short, too, when we did run the ball.

Francois Hougaard was awful and nervous at the base of the scrum, Pollard was ineffective and indecisive at pivot, De Villiers and centre partner Jan Serfontein ran at their usual predictable, metronomic pace while Bryan Habana, often a potent force, hardly saw the ball. Cornal Hendricks, on the other wing, was poor on defence. At fullback, Willie le Roux gave his usual show-and-go performance, but ran sideways too often and fumbled the ball.

Our backs appeared to believe that power is the name of the game. Run full-tilt at the opposition, drop in the tackle and recycle the ball. How about more canny off-loads, something that the All Blacks are masters at? You could probably write our game plan on the back of a cigarette box.

For those who complain about French referee Romaine Poite, former Springbok coach Nick Mallet says he was right in giving Adriaan Strauss a yellow card.

“People will complain about Adriaan Strauss getting sent off, but you know that you cannot take a guy in the air. He got the yellow card he deserved,” he said.

“The success of our performance against England is going to depend on good transformation from our scrum to our backline and that comes through the scrumhalf.

“Our wingers hardly got the ball, and Habana spent a lot of time trying to contest the ball on the ground. The try we scored at the end of the game showed what we can do if we put the ball through the hands.”

As the crunch against England at Twickenham looms, Meyer should heed what a sage once said: “We are products of the past, but we don’t have to be held prisoners by it”.

It is true that the Springboks have opted for a more balanced game plan. Kick and chase will always be part of our armoury, and we are not alone in relying on the boot. The trouble is that we have only recently expanded on the way we play and we don’t have near the skills of other teams who have been polishing them for years.

We did out-scrum a mediocre Ireland outfit, racked by injuries, and prop Du Plessis emerged with distinction. But do not think that our front row will have it that easy against England. They will be far tougher in the scrums and good in the set pieces. If we don’t dominate up front, we will have to take our chances and to do that we need better ball skills.

As usual, Meyer refrained from directly blaming the referee, but did so by implication in his inimitable style.

“The referee is always right, we’re not allowed to say otherwise,” he said.

“We have to adapt to different styles of game. You can’t play Championship (southern hemisphere championship) rugby in the ones we had today and we haven’t really played well in the wet ball conditions like that all year.”

Too true, but this is not the first time his squad has played in Europe. Meyer and his backroom boys can’t feign ignorance about overseas conditions.

Ireland coach Joe Schmidt, a New Zealander, however, had a good look at the way we play and came up with a game plan that left Meyer and his backroom boys clutching their heads in consternation.

Do the old-timers deserve the boot? I can’t see De Villiers being dropped so close to the World Cup. For the others, it’s time for them to go before it’s too late.

The thought reminds me of a line from a western movie, The Unforgiven. The sheriff, played by Gene Hackman, lying on his back on the floor, says, “I don’t deserve this”.

His avenger, played by Clint Eastwood, gun pointed at Hackman’s head, replies, “Deserve has nothing to do with it,” and pulls the trigger.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-13T09:13:50+00:00


eah, I cannot fathom that four 4 years long you focus it all on a six week window, rather focus on the 4 years between world cups, and as you say, you might have the team, you might have the luck and it all goes your way. That 6 week window is beginning to irritate me.

2014-11-13T09:12:07+00:00


It is not disbelief, it is huge disappointment.

2014-11-13T05:24:21+00:00

Gavin Fernie

Guest


Good article Andrew. Some Bok fans are so touchy it must mean something deeply psychological; like a complete inability to look at things objectively; to learn from our mistakes; not to rush into a mental laager. Interesting that BB says we need to rebuild now and stop fussing about the RWC2015. Any of the top teams can win the RWC. It is a lottery format, not a true test of the best team in the world over a (say) 2 year period. Such, however, is the fixation of the RWC that we are stuck with the pensioners parade until well after 2015.

2014-11-12T22:19:12+00:00


It happens, rarely.

2014-11-12T14:17:45+00:00

mactheblack

Guest


It's very disheartening to see the disbelief about the Boks' loss to Ireland. Ireland might not be top of the pops on the rankings, but a second rate rugby playing nation they are not. The Boks need to learn not to underestimate their opponents at times. They did so against Argentina in the Championship, but Argentina conspired against themselves to lost that game.

2014-11-11T22:01:47+00:00

Intotouch

Guest


Sorry if this is a stupid question but do South Africans truly never play rugby on wet grass? Surely some super rugby matches must involve being in a climate where wet stuff falls from the sky.

2014-11-11T03:30:43+00:00

Common Sense

Guest


All it takes for the anyone to win the cup is to have all of their other rivals trip up before the final. The world cup is not won by the best team in the world. It is won by the team that can outlast everyone else while not having to knock out the strongest teams, that could already be done by someone else.

2014-11-11T03:23:19+00:00

timbo

Guest


What is YOUR point

2014-11-10T18:34:09+00:00

etienne marais

Guest


Perhaps that's what he should have written then. That The Roar accepts shoddy writing like that is the real issue here.

2014-11-10T13:39:31+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Yes, McCaw is the best rugby captain I've watched. Very quick to see what's what. Can shift tactics and mindset. Our captain was really foggy

2014-11-10T13:33:32+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Fair call , I was speaking from ignorance as I could not see game. Ireland under a great coach will be there or there abouts and the boks still have time to get rid of the errors and have a very strong base to work from

2014-11-10T13:11:34+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


If you watched the AB match v England Harry, Aaron Smith also was given a hard time, but our captain had a good one... *grins*

2014-11-10T12:41:06+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


The players who were selected had the skills and pace and power to win. The plan was fine. The issue was execution and game decisions. Very poor day for our captain and our scrumhalf.

2014-11-10T11:57:29+00:00


I don't do easy mate. I expect them to be the best and will never go easy on them. The day I go easy on them is the day you can bury me.

2014-11-10T11:56:32+00:00


Irish were very, very smart. I will from now on call them the tricksters. ;)

2014-11-10T11:43:11+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Lets face it Ireland are a real threat to nab bill. Go easy BB boks may not be the most consistent side but at least on their day can beat anyone

2014-11-10T11:33:34+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Ireland was also really good.

2014-11-10T11:31:21+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


Just a tad. :)

2014-11-10T10:07:44+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


I understand BB, firstly I was being a smart a.se. Your analysis is impeccable (as always) but watching the game, it as almost like it was being played in slow motion ... the mistakes (many unforced) were magnified, The form was a complete turn around... if they were race horses, the Boks would have swabbed. Hendricks who I though was an exciting player (if he could learn to catch the ball) I thought was a liability in defence, even Will la Roux, who I know you have a high opinion of seemed to me like Digby Iaone in his running before he left Aussie shores... he must of run big metres but sideways... The back row was a disappointment to me, Vermeulen played to a shadow of standards this year his first touch was a knock on.. and so it went on. Hougard I thought was very average but as you pointed out in another thread somewhere, he had no protection. In fact there were no stand outs for the Bok in my opinion, perhaps Coetzee was the pick of the bunch. The recording of the game was not a 'keeper' to watch another time but I have to say the Irish played well, very well.

2014-11-10T08:32:04+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


Very balanced article Andrew. One thing that surprises me though is that all of you agree that 'too many veterans' are in the group yet no one mentions Jacque Potgieter as a deplorable omission. He is in his prime, covers a couple of positions and has undoubtedly improved since he last wore the Boks jersey. Not sayin he is a certain starter but in a group of 30, yep I would have him.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar