SPIRO: Wallabies beaten in Paris by splendid French 'esprit'

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

There is a French rugby idiom that comes into play when the national side plays at home: ‘l’esprit de clocher‘.

The passion behind the idiom provided the heart of a splendid 29-26 victory at Paris for an embattled French side against Michael Cheika’s Wallabies.

Translated literally ‘l’esprit de clocher’ means ‘the spirit of the church bells’. In the rugby milieu this spirit translates into the fury and effectiveness of French rugby teams playing at home and expecting to win, compared with playing away from home, away from the sounds of their local church bells, and expecting to lose.

France at Paris on a slick field and in front of a passionate crowd were a different side from the bewildered and hesitant team that conceded the series in Australia against the Wallabies three Tests to nil.

Ironically, given the way the Test unfolded for the first hour or so, the Wallabies had a terrific chance to score virtually from the kick off. A French clearing kick under pressure was belted straight into the hands of Rob Simmons. If he had caught the ball it was try-time for the Wallabies.

France responded with a storming attack that saw their impressive halfback Sebastien Tillous-Borde scuttle across for a try.

I enjoyed the commentary of Rod Kafer and George Gregan, who gave some insights into the problems the Wallabies were facing in trying to make their ball-in-hand game work.

First, France put 14 defenders in their front-line defensive wall. This meant that it was virtually impossible for the Wallabies to outflank the defence.

Second, France applied enormous pressure at every ruck and maul and succeeded in slowing down the delivery of the Wallabies’ ball, which in turn allowed the French defensive line to re-set to quell each ensuing attack.

At one stage in the Test Nick Phipps could be heard complaining to Welsh referee Nigel Owens about how difficult it was to clear the ball as French arms and legs seemed everywhere, smothering the ball and making it difficult for him to get his hands on it.

Owens seemed oblivious to Phipps’ point.

And here I must make an intrusion into the discussion of the Wallabies’ problems to make the observation that Owens and the Frenchman Romain Poite during the Scotland versus New Zealand Test both seemingly allowed the northern hemisphere sides to flop over the ball and stop their opponents from quick recycling of the ball.

Both the Wallabies and the All Blacks rely on quick ruck-ball to make their ball-in-hand game an effective attacking force. The slow ruck ball negates this.

Owens and Poite should look at Steve Walsh and Craig Joubert for a system that allows enterprising rugby to flourish. Both these referees penalise tacklers who deliberately or even inadvertently place their bodies between the ball and the opposition halfback.

During the England versus South Africa Test for instance, Walsh could he heard yelling out “Move!” when a tackler was looking to block the recycling of the ball. Joubert, too, is insistent on tacklers moving away after the tackle. But I can’t recall Owens using this call against France, even though they were flopping over the ball throughout the Test.

Third, the Wallabies allowed the French tacklers to gang up on Israel Folau. The star fullback was well-contained and it was only at the end of the Test that he managed to make a telling break.

Fourth, the Wallabies kept on recycling the ball even though with 14 men in the defensive line France had exposed huge amounts of territory that was there to be exploited with clever kicking and some slick passing.

The slick passing came at the end of the Test when Quade Cooper came on and played a lovely cameo role along the lines of what Kurtley Beale did for the Waratahs.

Beale’s unexpected recall to the Wallabies could reflect Cheika’s thinking that Bernard Foley’s flat attacking style is best complemented by a slick-passing inside centre. Cooper did well in this role against France in the little time he had on the field.

My guess is that Beale will be brought in as a reserve to play the same sort of role for the Wallabies in the final match of the tour against England. Next week, though, it wouldn’t surprise me if Matt Toomua started at inside centre and Cooper came on earlier than he did against France to provide the variety of passes he has in his bag of tricks to open up gaps for his runners.

I would expect, too, that whoever plays at flyhalf or inside centre would have the little kick over-the-top with enough elevation to be re-gathered on the full by a second runner in their box of tricks.

The Springboks exposed the tight England defensive line with a terrific play from Patrick Lambie who kicked over the top for Willie le Roux to gather on the full. Le Roux raced away and put the flying Cobus Reinach into the clear and it was try time, and game, set and match for the Springboks at Twickenham.

Just a little diversion here too, to make the point that Reinach provided real speed in his delivery and running for the Springboks. This energy gave an impetus to the traditional Springboks attritional game and the victory over England showed just how hard the Springboks are to beat when their speedsters – and they have several in the back line – get a chance to make break-outs.

There are a couple of aspects about the French approach to international rugby that deserve a cautionary comment.

The French TV producers were quick to show replays of a Sean McMahon tackle that was made after a French infringement and deemed by Owens to be dangerous. The penalty kicked following this incident gave France the three points that was the margin of their victory.

Would this decision have been made if the French producers had refrained from re-showing the incident? I doubt it.

But Kafer had pointed to some French deviousness early on in the Test when a discussion between the TMO and Owens was not broadcast for viewers to hear, as it was supposed to. Then we had the McMahon intervention.

But later, when there was a French indiscretion that warranted possibly a sending off, surprise, surprise! There was only one sequence of the incident somehow available for Owens and the TMO to scrutinise.

This is not good enough. The television producers at Paris and at Twickenham last week in the England versus New Zealand match played a role of being a 16th player for the home side. The IRB must start imposing big fines on producers who do this and bans on individual offenders.

We can’t have the partisan use of TV replays affecting the outcomes of matches. This is really cheating on the part of the production teams, and unacceptable behaviour.

The Wallabies have now reached the really hard part of their tour. The first three matches – the Barbarians, Wales and France – were expected to end in Wallaby victories. Two of these match did. But talk of an ‘unbeaten European tour’ was always a nonsense given the fact that only Greg Smith’s Wallabies have achieved this in the professional era.

The defeat to France means that the Wallabies must defeat either Ireland or England in the next couple of weeks to come out of the tour with any credit.

Two wins would be a great result. Two defeats, though, and the criticisms will start to mount.

There is a lot of credibility for Cheika and his ‘hybrid’ Wallabies style – a combination of the Waratahs’ game plan with the best of the other Australian Super Rugby sides – riding on the outcome of the Ireland and England Tests.

The referee for the Ireland versus Australia Test in Dublin is New Zealander Glen Jackson. Hopefully he will be vigilant about ensuring both sides get quick ball out of the tackle area as Craig Joubert was in the Wales versus Australia Test.

Teams that deliberately kill the opposition’s ruck ball, as Wales did, deserve to be penalised out of the game.

Wales scored more tries than the Wallabies but their infringements at the rucks gave Foley the opportunity to kick the Wallabies to a well-deserved victory.

If Ireland are allowed to do to the Wallabies in the tackled-ball area what they did to the Springboks under the passive refereeing of Romain Poite, then a win at Dublin, hard enough right now with an impressive Ireland side, will be extremely difficult.

Next week then is going to tell us a lot about the resilience of the Wallabies under Cheika and whether Ireland, the reigning Six Nations champions, are as good as most of us believe they are.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-18T21:26:28+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Maybe

2014-11-18T07:11:09+00:00

Gavus

Guest


Godwin has been the complete package for the force. Very good on attack and excellent on defence. He has the potential to be a great test IC. I’ll be very disappointed if he doesn’t get a crack this tour.

2014-11-18T05:47:19+00:00

Birdy

Guest


This is why the Boks try was so good. Care is normally the sweeper behind the defensive line. The one time he was caught up in the defensive line the Boks spotted it and put in the chip. I doubt this had been picked up before the game by the coaches because England almost always have a sweeper in place - it was just good heads-up rugby spotting the opportunity.

2014-11-18T04:27:21+00:00

formeropenside

Guest


Actually, he is a former Tah coach who became Wallaby coach in 1995 following Dwyer. His term is not generally considered a success.

2014-11-18T03:25:42+00:00

Loosey

Guest


It seems the ABs kick when the opportunity is there, The wallabies kick when they don't know what else to do. That's the difference between a team well drilled on their system and a team that isn't. I reckon anyway.

2014-11-18T02:32:50+00:00

Yogi

Guest


NickF there is a good reason why Scott Allen's articles are deeply appreciated by roarers, as well as those by Brett Mackay and contributors such as BB, Rob C, Diggercane etc. They contain quality analysis and they don't have an agenda. Spiro is a professional journalist with many years of experience and he knows the score - if you write material to justify an agenda or bias you will get a reaction. Lord is even worse and in his dealing with the McKenzie/Beale saga he was pretty nasty in his treatment of link. I very much doubt these two are bothered by the reaction they get on the roar but if they are then an improvement in journalistic standards would go a long way towards fixing the problem. By the way if a writer on the roar is critisised unfairly there is always plenty of people willing to jump to their defence. But with spiro and Lord there are usually very few defenders.

2014-11-18T02:23:47+00:00

NickF

Guest


I agree on point 1. But there is a history there with his counter parts in the NH, and while he does go on about it, I am sympathetic to a point. Point 2. I think you are being a bit harsh. I get the feeling his desire is a style of rugby, not SA, and I think he sees the talent there and wishes it was coached differently. Point 3. Fair enough, but he is mainly writing for that market, preaching to the converted.

2014-11-18T02:14:22+00:00

NickF

Guest


Harry, I don't think Spiro was really calling for his axing, as we all know it wasn't going to happen. I think it was more about making the point of a top tier coach should have been aware of.

2014-11-18T02:11:10+00:00

NickF

Guest


Biltongbek, Your point are all fine, but I don't think you are seeing it. I read the Roar because the articles are of a reasonable level and the replies are also reasonably articulate, civil, sometimes provocative and informing. This is not too common on other sites where comments turn into slanging matches. ( It happens here but mostly not). The rugby community has been improved by this site. My point is that Spiro seems to attract more attention than others. There also seems to be a few posters that have a competition to see who can be first to criticise Spiro, not his article, but a few cheap shot here and there. There is also a sort of gang mentality where a lynch mob will form (or should that be lunch mob) to egg each other on, now this can be fun sometimes, but not always, and heaven forbid you get in the middle of it if you disagree. There is the inverse, of course, where I have noticed there is a serious man crush on Scott Allen. Don't get me wrong I think his article are just fine, and I am surprised his knowledge is not being utilised but Australian rugby. But back to Spiro. I used to read his articles in the SMH before the internet took over and have been reading th Roar ever since it started. I respect his writing, I don't always agree, but he has a deep knowledge and a passion for the game This complaint of mine is not based on the comments made in this post , but the culmination of many post on EVERY Spiro Zarvos article. A healthy disrespect is one thing but this has become a routine now. A few poster start with a negative opinion of him before they start to read ( i even wonder if some don't even read before replying). Spiro is big enough and ugly enough to defend him self, but The Roar is just as much my rugby site as it is yours, I just choose to post less. I also write this in my hope that this rugby site retains it's intelligence and respect of all viewpoints. I look forward to more of your replies and articles.

2014-11-17T23:52:13+00:00

Mad Mick

Guest


Spiro, I think the Australian team is playing with a lot of niggle. They need to stop trying to influence the referee get on with playing and stop the niggle.

2014-11-17T23:34:25+00:00

RodMac

Roar Rookie


Agree - I think someone slightly to the Beale side of the middle in the Foley/Beale Spectrum would be optimal. MT and CLL are probably more akin to Foley. A pared back QC could do the trick.

2014-11-17T23:28:11+00:00

RodMac

Roar Rookie


That probably makes sense. I do recall Owens saying the tackle "went to the horizontal" and that McMahon was "lucky he'd come down safely"... I wonder if it would have been notice had it just been a leg tackle with no lift?

2014-11-17T23:19:13+00:00

Marlins Tragic

Guest


Agreed, Phipps looks buggered after a long season, Genia looks fresh. Keep Foley @ FH, take a gamble on Cooper @ IC. In the second half with 20 to go bench Foley bring on Tamoua @ IC & move Cooper to FH.

2014-11-17T22:46:04+00:00

Yogi

Guest


to be fair to cheika the only tah in the squad who really doesn't deserve to be there is probably Fat Cat. The test of cheik's impartiality will come when/if Genia, Cooper, Pocock, Sio recover and return to form. But it is a positive sign that he has given Simmons and Horwill a fair go.

2014-11-17T22:41:35+00:00

Yogi

Guest


Soapit your insightful comment about qld got censored!

2014-11-17T22:39:09+00:00

Yogi

Guest


if there are 14 men in the line there must be gaps to kick into. I think teams are varying their defence. The gaps are there some phases and not others. Which means the flyhalf has to be opportunistic and avoid following a formula.

2014-11-17T22:34:01+00:00

Yogi

Guest


Genia was rightly regarded as the best half back in the world in 2010-13.

2014-11-17T22:16:59+00:00

cs

Guest


Very funny.

2014-11-17T22:11:26+00:00

Yogi

Guest


Birdy and the bok brigade - don't feel like Spiro is singling out SA and UK for special treatment . His commentary on domestic Aust. rugby issues is even more one eyed, hence the pro-Cheika anti-McKenzie agenda that has been a theme in everything he has written in the last few months. I am appreciative of all roar contributors including spiro, but I don't expect balanced opinions from him.

2014-11-17T16:15:00+00:00

Westie

Guest


Ball of muscle? Ha. Maybe compared to a teenager, maybe not. If you want strong over the ball forget Wilson, there is only one. Bam bam.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar