Australia v South Africa 5th ODI: The Liebke Ratings

By Dan Liebke / Expert

Australia and South Africa headed to the SCG for the final game of the series. Despite the terrible film ‘Superman 4′ scheduled to follow the cricket on Nine, neither team could be convinced to switch to a 70 over a side match.

Here, then, are the ratings for an official One Day International.

Dead Rubber Batting
Grade: D

A lot of people look down their nose at dead rubber runs, seeing them as less valuable than those scored when the series is still alive.

Not me. I remember the Mark Taylor era of Australian cricket, in which Australia invariably lost matches after wrapping up a series. It was a habit that proved awfully hard to break with Steve Waugh eventually having to gather together arguably the best Test team of all time to put an end to it. That was a lot of work, and it’d be a shame to throw it all away, so I’m a big fan of players who now step up when there is nothing on the line.

Of course, nobody steps up when there is nothing on the line better than Shane Watson, and he did so once again here, bludgeoning 82 off 93 balls before being caught with the score on 218.

Watson’s dismissal saw Glenn Maxwell promoted to see if he could also flourish in the dead rubber environment. Maxwell arrived at the crease with a Batting Strike Rate of 120 runs per 100 balls. This is, of course, statistics gone mad. One hundred balls? For Maxwell? Preposterous. Besides, we all know that if Glenn somehow ever did face 100 balls, he’d be 832 not out.

As it is, he faced only 10 here before skying one to Farhaan Behardien for 7.

The shot did highlight his leadership potential, however, as it inspired almost all of his teammates to follow suit, with everybody going Full Maxwell as Australia crashed from 4/264 in the 44th over to 8/267 in the 46th.

Only team rebel James Faulkner somehow resisted the urge to join in the mad collapse of crazed slogging. He hit the winning runs off the first ball of the final over, ensuring Australia stumbled drunkenly home. In the process, they also regained the Number One ODI spot in world cricket. It was a performance fully befitting such a prestigious ranking.

Never in doubt.

South African Selectors
Grade: B

The South African selectors responded harshly to the series loss, dropping both Dale Steyn and AB de Villiers from their team. Oh, sure, they smokescreened it with talk of ‘resting’ and ‘incredibly painful rib injuring’. But nobody was fooled.

The absence of de Villiers allowed the other South African batsmen to thrive and they responded well, amassing an impressive 6/280. It therefore appears as if de Villiers will now have to return to the South African first class system and see if he can amass enough runs there to give himself another shot at international cricket.

Best of luck, AB! Just try your hardest and see what happens.

Rain Delays
Grade: C-

In the 33rd over of the South African innings, with the score at 2/164, a shower swept over the ground, forcing the players from the field. The assumption, based on history, was that this brief SCG rain delay would see South Africa’s total adjusted to something like 8/71.

Instead, it had no impact whatsoever on the South African innings. It wasn’t until a similar rain delay in the Australian innings that Messrs Lewis and Duckworth forced their way into proceedings. After consultation with the umpires, two overs were lost, the original 281 target was adjusted to 275 and everybody was given permission to immediately start complaining about the complexities of the Duckworth Lewis system.

It’s a fair point. I mean, why isn’t there a blindingly trivial formula that everybody can understand regardless of their level of education, which also accurately allows for the multiple complex-factors that can be introduced by a rain delay?

Lift your game, mathematics.

Pat Cummins
Grade: B

The rain that disrupted the South African innings came in the middle of an over by the cool-headed finisher from the previous match, Pat Cummins.

Cummins was the pick of the Australian bowlers, taking 3/54 off his 9 overs, including two wickets either side of the rain break. In the process, his bowling action drew comparisons from some of the commentators to that of former Australian all-rounder Keith Miller.

This comparison didn’t hold up all that well when checked via split screen technology, with revelations that Cummins had not once bowled in black and white footage.

Still, Miller famously once said that “pressure is a Messerschmitt up your arse, playing cricket is not.” Which raises the question of when Cricket Australia will get professional enough to test youngsters like Cummins in this fashion? Surely it’s the only way we’ll really know if they’re worthy of a World Cup spot.

Streakers
Grade: B+

During the Australian innings, a streaker made his way onto the field. Since Andrew Symonds wasn’t playing, it was left to security guards to bring him down and issue the mandatory fine of $5,500.

This seems remarkably inefficient. Why not instead charge $5,500 for everybody who comes to the game and then, at the end of the match, refund the money to those who didn’t streak? Simple.

Sure, you could argue this policy might impact the number of people willing to attend a game of cricket. But, judging by the crowd sizes this series, it might not too.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-24T08:00:59+00:00

Matth

Guest


Maxwell and Afridi should holiday together

2014-11-24T07:39:09+00:00

Mark

Guest


He's not up to test standard with by or ball. Simple as that.

2014-11-24T06:13:03+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I see that Smith is out of the Shield game because of a quad injury.

2014-11-24T04:15:18+00:00

MAF1970

Guest


Thanks for that summary Dan - pure gold. Now you just need to get yourself onto the Channel 9 Commentary Team...........actually no don't, you seem far too intellegent, quick witted and interesting to join that bunch. Seriously who do they think they are - if I heard mark Taylor suggest that De Kock struggled with the short ball on our bouncier pitches early in the tour once more yesterday I would have bowled a short ball through my TV. Obviously someone suggested that to Mr Taylor and because of an inability to come up with an idea of his own he repeated it to anyone who wanted to listen. If yesterdays commentary effort is an indication of what to expect throughout this summer I won't bother watching but will log on to the Roar for your insights at the end of each Test and be much better informed!

2014-11-24T03:05:34+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Would've been interesting to see if Aus could've lasted the extra 2 overs and 6 runs.

2014-11-24T02:39:52+00:00

Pottsy

Guest


Haha, love the final punchline! Think the Maxwell criticism was well deserved. It was a very low-percentage shot that simply was not necessary and let South Africa back in the match.

2014-11-24T02:30:51+00:00

Matt

Guest


Faulkner? What more does the guy have to do. We finally have ONE guy in the team that doesn't constantly crumple under pressure and he's not selected! Back to relying on the bowlers to add a few hundred and save the game I guess.

2014-11-24T01:09:41+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


Not bad that.

2014-11-23T23:37:01+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


I can see why they would want to keep together roughly the same team as the one that got to no. one (however briefly), but I can't agree with Clarke being rushed back. He should have rested at least two of these tests I reckon. And agree on Siddle. I love the bloke but there are too many fast bowlers in Australia now to justify him (he'll probably get 12 wickets for the match now, he often performs just when you want to drop him).

2014-11-23T23:34:38+00:00

Macca

Guest


I really wonder if Maxwell is the dumbest cricketer in the world right now - no point having an amazing eye if you don't have a brain.

2014-11-23T22:58:02+00:00

Bob Sims

Guest


So what came out of last night's match? Smith, Warner, Finch all looked good and must be certs for the WC squad. Similarly, Faulkner proved yet again that he can keep a cool head when all around him are losing theirs. What a finisher - he's a must. Watson produced yet again, as you so rightly point out, when there's nothing on the line. Think his WC spot is far from guaranteed. Bailey? Gee, some runs would be nice. Wade? Who knows? Keeper's spot wide open. Cummins was the best of the bowling mediocrity last night. Starc looked ineffective and Hazlewood had a quiet night. That brings us inevitably to Maxwell, who seems to me to be just about maxxed out. He has had a poor series and must be on very thin ice. I think there are still spots open, especially bowling, if someone strings together a few good performances and screams out "pick me, pick me". Looking forward to WC it seems like this - Warner, Finch, #3 (anyone's guess, but please not Watson), Smith, #5 (again, anyone's guess - Bailey horribly out of form and Clarke will likely be in a wheelchair), Marsh, WK (raffle), Faulkner, Johnson, Cummins, Harris (if fit). Additionals spinner (who???), Hazlewood, reserve bat. It's not looking all roses for a team that's just taken the #1 spot!

2014-11-23T22:49:36+00:00


"This seems remarkably inefficient. Why not instead charge $5,500 for everybody who comes to the game and then, at the end of the match, refund the money to those who didn’t streak? Simple." Just like a streak deposit, eh :lol: If you don't drop your junk, you get your money back.

2014-11-23T22:37:11+00:00

Bob Sims

Guest


Not good is being kind! Train wreck more like it! Why the obscene rush to get Clarke back in the side? There is simply no way he could be fit. Fitness concerns also over Watson (of course), Haddin and Harris. Sidds may bowl well on Aussie decks (he is a lionheart, after all) and then pushed onwards to the Ashes, where he won't produce - is that good? Worst case scenario is team implosion. I can see spots up for grabs for the second Test. Don't be surprised if India take an early lead in the series!

2014-11-23T22:27:29+00:00

Andy Thompson

Roar Pro


It was a shame a few players went Full Maxwell. Everyone knows you don't go Full Maxwell.

2014-11-23T21:59:57+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Not good there Jonny. Clarke, Haddin, Harris, Hazelwood, Johnson, Lyon, Marsh, Rogers, Siddle, Smith, Warner & Watson

2014-11-23T21:50:36+00:00

Matt

Guest


"The shot did highlight his leadership potential, however, as it inspired almost all of his teammates to follow suit, with everybody going Full Maxwell as Australia crashed from 4/264 in the 44th over to 8/267 in the 46th." So true. 11 runs to go and Australia lose 4 wickets. Clearly hitting a six every ball is the better tactic!

2014-11-23T21:44:45+00:00

michael steel

Guest


Dead Rubber is a tennis term. When you have eleven players in a team and usually six of those eleven are playing for their future I can never see how anyone can think players aren't trying. Everything to these blokes hinges on a batting or bowling average.

2014-11-23T21:40:52+00:00

Johnny Spina

Guest


What time is the test squad annoucned today?? 1pm? 3pm? Dying to find out if Burns made the squad and if Watson has been dropped like a hot meat and cheese pie

2014-11-23T21:03:29+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Fully Maxwell....That will be a diagnosed medical condition soon

2014-11-23T20:49:42+00:00

Adam

Guest


Brilliant, as usual.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar