Michigan’s next football coach must be a winner first and a ‘Michigan Man’ second

By Andrew Kitchener / Roar Guru

There’s been a lot said about Michigan wanting a so-called ‘Michigan Man’ as a coach.

For the uninitiated, that’s someone who has some sort of tie to the grand old days of Wolverine football, when the maize and blue were legitimate national powers, and when the Big Ten conference was the epicentre of the college football world.

It’s a romantic notion, no doubt, but this is 2014, and the Big Ten has been one of the biggest disappointments not just this year but the last five or six years.

The Wolverines have been a shadow of their former selves through the disastrous Rich Rodriguez era, and through an arguably just as disastrous under Brady Hoke.

Hoke, who was relieved of his coaching duties earlier this week, teased the massive Wolverine fan-base by leading his first Michigan team to an 11-2 record, including a victory over arch-rival Ohio State and a Sugar Bowl title. However, he then proceeded to oversee a degradation of the program.

He was a Michigan Man, and the school looked at that before they looked at his mediocre coaching record at San Diego State and Ball State, where he amassed a 47-50 overall record.

That sub-par record didn’t seem to matter to Michigan. They were fixated on Hoke’s apparent affinity with the old days, and hired him pretty much out of left field.

As a general rule, if you can’t win consistently at a mid-major school, you’re not likely to be able to win on the big stage, and Brady Hoke has pretty much proven that fact.

Under Hoke’s watch, the Wolverines went 31-20 (18-14 in Big Ten play), and after that stellar 2011 season, fell to 8-5 in 2012, 7-6 in 2013 and this season struggled to a 5-7 record.

That means Michigan will miss out on a Bowl game for the first time since 2009. It’s uncharted territory in Ann Arbor, where football excellence is as much a part of life there as is freezing temperatures during the winter.

The fact that Hoke has been fired can be boiled down to five major reasons:

1. He didn’t bring enough star recruits through the door
2. He didn’t beat Michigan State often enough
3. He didn’t beat Ohio State often enough
4. Michigan didn’t win any Big Ten or National championships on his watch
5. Aside from the 2011 Sugar Bowl, Michigan didn’t bring home any major Bowl wins

For all of Hoke’s bluster, his knowledge of Michigan football, his ties to the glory days of the program and referring to Ohio State as, simply, “Ohio”, the fact remains that he wasn’t a particularly good football coach – at least, not good enough to lead a team and a school like Michigan.

It’s one thing to know the words to The Victors but that hardly matters if you don’t get to sing it very often during your coaching tenure because you’re always losing, and often doing so in an embarrassing manner.

For mine, ‘out of his depth’, is a fair assessment of Hoke’s time at Michigan. Upon accepting the job, Hoke argued at his introductory press conference that Michigan was still an elite job.

Four years later, it’s far from that. The Wolverines are at or near the bottom of the Big Ten, and attracting a really good head coach won’t be easy unless it’s a coach who loves a long rebuilding process.

There is so much work to be done at Ann Arbor, such as retooling the offense and stopping the raft of turnovers that plagued and doomed their 2014 campaign.

For their next hire – their third in less than a decade, and, therefore, an incredibly crucial one if the school has any real hope of returning to the top tier of college football – Michigan absolutely must look outside their family in order to have success.

Like Alabama did in hiring Nick Saban, like Oklahoma did when hiring Bob Stoops, like USC did when Pete Carroll came on board. Those programs have had success with coaches who had no ties to the program. A fresh approach is often the best. It worked wonders for the Crimson Tide, Sooners and Trojans.

So take a look at someone like Dan Mullen at Mississippi State, Jim McElwain from Colorado State – hurry, before Florida snap him up, as the Gators are rumoured to be doing as I type – for starters, two candidates with SEC experience (which counts for a lot) and resist the urge to hire a less-successful coach with strong ties to Michigan football.

I mean, if LSU’s Les Miles or Jim Harbaugh, currently leading the San Francisco 49ers in the NFL, come knocking on your door wanting to coach, by all means bring them in, but the key reason for hiring either of those two men would be that they are, before anything else, proven winners at the sport’s highest level.

So who cares if the next head coach of Michigan can’t recite Bo Schembechler’s career record, the complete history of the Wolverines’ series with Minnesota and doesn’t mind calling Ohio State by their full name? None of that matters. Just as long as they put the Wolverines back in the winner’s column and make them nationally relevant again.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-12-04T01:03:27+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


"If you are genuinely in the position of having to rebuild it can be bloody tough" And Michigan are.

2014-12-04T00:32:57+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


*tough* not though. I type with the accuracy of an epileptic chimpanzee

2014-12-04T00:31:49+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


NFL is probably easier to genuinely rebuild because the cap, draft and scheduling all try to tilt the balance in the favour of the rebuilding team, whereas in college winning, prestige and TV time improve the ability to recruit. If you are genuinely in the position of having to rebuild it can be bloody tough

AUTHOR

2014-12-04T00:31:27+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Exactly. A lot of the recruits that used to knock down the doors of the Big House are now headed to East Lansing and other places.

2014-12-04T00:29:15+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Rebuilding can be though once you loose the mystique of being a powerhouse as players don't want to spend your short career getting pounded in obscurity.

AUTHOR

2014-12-03T20:57:30+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


There's not much in the maize and blue cupboard at the moment, but turnovers and bad defense. Barring some sort of miraculous run - kinda like what Hoke conjured up in his first season - it'll be 3-4 years before Michigan gets close to Sparty and the Bucks.

2014-12-03T20:49:35+00:00

pat malone

Guest


players come and go quickly in college, it doesn't take long to rebuild or go bad

AUTHOR

2014-12-03T19:27:03+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Regardless, they were there. And have imploded since. With the gap OSU and MSU have put on UofM, it will take some time to get them back and competitive.

2014-12-03T14:54:39+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


how long will it take to turn around a college program? nowhere near as long as an NFL one i would suggest. With regards to the sugar bowl they shouldnt have been in that game anyway. they were ranked 14th from memory and only got selected because of the size of Michigan as a supporter base

Read more at The Roar