Australia's first Test cricketers - who were they?

By sheek / Roar Guru

The extraordinary depth of grief and outpouring of heartfelt emotion and sincerity at Phil Hughes passing is an experience quite unprecedented in my lifetime.

On one level it says a great deal about Hughes and both his immediate and extended family, outstanding members of the community, all of them. On another level, it says something about the enormous hold cricket has on the Australian psyche.

It’s an affinity and an affection that stretches back to the very first Test match played by Australia in 1877, against England. Heroes from that year and every year since continue to resonate on the national psyche.

It is often said that being the Test cricket captain is the second most important job in Australia to the prime minister.

Some might argue the Test captain is way ahead! Great players are put on a pedestal in the same way that sporting heroes are revered in other sports in other countries.

Cricket is to Australians what rugby union is to New Zealand; football is to Brazil; baseball is to the USA, or ice hockey is to Canada.

It’s difficult to imagine the passing of any other national sportsman of Hughes’ calibre and level, could have the same effect on Australians across the country, as has Philip Hughes.

Over a decade ago, when I was arguing the necessity of a national comp in rugby union (long before the unfortunate ARC or regrettable NRC), I used the example of cricket.

You can travel all over Australia and walk into any pub and ask, “what do you think of the cricket”, and everyone is immediately on the same page. Not so football.

You can travel all over Australia and walk into any pub and ask, “what do you think of the footy”, and if you’re a stranger the pub crowd might first inquire, “which footy are you referring to?”

Because in Australia we have four football codes – Australian (AFL), association (soccer), rugby league and rugby union. Many Australians might follow two footy codes, but very few follow all four. Although that is slowly changing.

There were folk who came out with the First Fleet in 1788, who were versed in the skills of cricket. The first interstate game was between Tasmania and Victoria, way back in 1851. This was about eight years before Melburnians decided on their own form of footy.

Meanwhile, back in Britain, other aficionados were many years from deciding whether football ought to be feet only (soccer) or a combination of hands and feet (rugby).

The Sheffield Shield for interstate cricket commenced officially in 1892, a whole nine years before Federation in 1901. Cricket’s roots run very deep in this country.

Not every country town across Australia has a footy oval or rugby league field but almost every country town has a cricket ground.

Whether you live in Narrogin WA, or Quorn SA, or Deloraine Tasmania, or Horsham Victoria, or Galaganbone NSW, or Longreach Queensland, there is almost certainly a cricket ground.

So who were our first Test cricketers way back in 1877? There is a saying, “Cometh the hour, cometh the man.”

Australian cricket mined a rich vein of talent, right from the get-go.

Incredibly, four (Bannerman, Blackham, Murdoch and Spofforth) of the 14 players used in those first two Tests produced displays over their careers that resonate today of the highest order, while our first great cricketing family (Gregory) also made itself known to us.

First Test at Melbourne, Mach 1877.

Charles Bannerman (b. 1851), NSW, right bat. Three Tests. Bannerman was our first great batting star and his career is a case of “what might have been.” He achieved two records in his first innings which still stand today, 137 years later.

His 165 (retired hurt) remains the highest score on debut by an Australian. Even more incredibly, his contribution of runs (165 out of 245, or 67.35%) to innings total runs has never been surpassed to this day.

He also topped the batting averages and aggregates on the first tour of England in 1878.

He was later a Test umpire. Bannerman’s younger brother Alick enjoyed a long career as Test opener in 28 Tests, but without his older brother’s flair.

Nat Thompson (b. 1838), NSW, right bat. Two Tests. The first batsman to be dismissed in Test cricket, Thommo was sadly past his best when he played in these first-ever Test matches.

Tom Horan (b. 1854), Vic, right bat, right medium. 15 Tests. An aggressive batsman, he was considered one of our better players of the late 19th century.

After retirement, he continued to write on the game, under the pseudonym of ‘Felix’, for the Australasian newspaper.

Dave Gregory (b. 1845), NSW, right bat. Three Tests. Our first Test captain, and by all accounts, the right man for the job.

Like Blackham with his keeping, Gregory set the template for future captains with his skillful and thoughtful leadership. With his full, flowing beard, he could have been a dead ringer for Ned Kelly! A member of the distinguished Gregory clan.

Bransby Cooper (b. 1844), Vic, right bat. Only Test. Cooper was a bit of a world traveler who settled in Melbourne in the years before the first Test.

With his extensive cricketing and travelling experience, he played a leading part in Australian cricket’s formative years.

Bill Midwinter (b. 1845), Vic, right bat, right medium. 12 Tests. Represented both Australia (9 Tests) and England (3 Tests) as a useful all-rounder.

Could probably lay claim to being Australian cricket’s first full time professional, travelling between Australia and England almost annually to play cricket.

Ted Gregory (b. 1839), NSW, right bat. Only Test. The elder statesman of the Gregory clan, he was clearly past his best when he played this Test, scoring the first ‘duck’ in Test cricket.

Gregory was nevertheless, an outstanding fielder in his day and is also credited with designing the first SCG scoreboard during the 1890s, where he was ground curator.

His son Syd played 58 Tests during the ‘golden age’ from mid-1890s to beginning of WW1.

Jack Blackham (b. 1854), Vic, right bat, wicket keeper. 35 Tests. What a beauty! Known as ‘the Prince of wicket keepers.’ Set the template for all Aussie keepers to follow. Revolutionised keeping, dispensing with the long-stop.

Also moved up to the stumps except to the fastest of bowlers. 32 players have kept wicket for Australia over 137 years, but only 11 have done so in more than 20 Tests. That’s some consistency of performance.

‘Demon’ Spofforth refused to play the first Test because he reckoned his mate Murdoch should have been keeper. He quickly changed his mind when he saw how good Blackham was behind the stumps.

Tom Garrett (b. 1858), NSW, right bat, right fast medium. 19 Tests. Baby of the team at only 18. He was a quasi all-rounder, providing useful batting at 7 or 8 and backing up the opening bowlers with pace and swing.

Tom Kendall (b. 1851), Vic, left bat, slow left arm. Two Tests. A wily spinner, after retirement Kendall became an outstanding coach of players in Tasmania.

John Hodges (b. 1856), Vic), left bat, left fast medium. Two Tests. Apparently a mysterious and shadowy figure from the early days. Interestingly, his Test debut was also his first-class debut.

For the second Test, Kelly, Murdoch and Spofforth replaced Horan, Cooper and Ted Gregory.

Second Test at Sydney, March 1877.

Tom Kelly (b. 1851), Vic, right bat. Two Tests. His great claim to cricketing fame was as a good fine-point fieldsman. Learnt his cricket in Grace (family) country, otherwise known as Gloucestershire.

Bill Murdoch (b. 1854), NSW, right bat, backup keeper. 19 Tests. Took over from Bannerman to become the greatest Aussie batsman of the late 19th century. Was also our first great long-term captain.

A player of immense concentration, quick footwork and attractive strokeplay, he scored the first double century (211) in Test cricket in 1884. Born in Victoria, he also died there from a heart attack while watching a Test at the MCG in 1911.

Fred Spofforth (b. 1853), NSW, right bat, right fast medium. 18 Tests. Nicknamed the ‘Demon’, Spofforth was our first great fast bowler. He was still a regular all-time first XI selection right up to the beginning of the 1980s.

Possessed a classical high action, cleverly disguised variations of pace, plenty of bowling variety and wizardry and a finely tuned tactical mind. Plus a Dennis Lillee like air of malevolence.

So there you have it, our first Test cricketers from 1877.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-12-07T02:50:04+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Thanks Jarijari, For your additional contributions. I've actually had better feedback than anticipated, which is encouraging. I might drop these historical retros in from time to time. I read this quote about history the other day, & I like its meaning very much. "In its Greek origins, historia meant inquiry, and from Thucydides onwards, the past has been studied to understand its connection with the present." This explains it as well as anything else I've ever read about the meaning of history.

2014-12-07T00:26:41+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


Yeh, that was because it was the early days of numbering and Slats assumed that because he batted before BJ, he got the first number. He had a tattoo of 356 (which he sits on) and personalised number plates with it before the (then) ACB told him he had the wrong number, but they agreed to switch it.

2014-12-07T00:20:08+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


Excellent place to start if you're in historical mode, Sheek, unfortunately most of the younger blokes don't care much about sports history. "If I didn't see it, it doesn't mean anything to me,'' was how one put it. Good point about the pub chat and some treasures there from 70s Mo. Johnny Mullagh (Unaarrimin) as Chappelli's 12th man is an interesting choice and himself a good subject for a story. Nothing seems to be recorded about his fielding ability, though he was a pretty good bat by all accounts. There's an annual match between a Johnny Mullagh XI and a local Glenelg XI for the Johnny Mullagh Shield in the village of Harrow in western Victoria, the region where the 1868 tourists learned to play the game, and a statue of the player in Harrow's little cricket museum. As for the Phil Hughes's funeral, the only one comparable would be Victor Trumper's in 1915 and they were certainly cast in the same mould as batsmen.

2014-12-06T23:39:50+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


OF course Slater and Julian are the famous anomaly to the ordering system.

2014-12-06T22:49:02+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


They're the baggy green order of appearance numbers Craig http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Australia_Test_cricketers and they go in alphabetical order when they started in the same Test , so Bannerman gets No 1, Jack Blackham 2 and so on. We're all now aware Phil Hughes was 408 in the first Test against South Africa in Johannesburg in 2009, his fellow debutants were Ben Hilfenhaus (407) and Marcus North (409).

2014-12-06T13:19:00+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Sheek. These are national rankings? So Keith Miller...probably our greatest ever all rounder was ranked 168 th nationally when he was first chosen to represent Australia?

2014-12-06T12:05:38+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Nice piece Sheek, Cricket is our National game so very poignant article, well done.

2014-12-06T09:00:24+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Sheek Neil Harvey had a brother never knew that there you go. In generations to come some will never know the Waugh twins had 2 talented other brothers, Dean I think played a few games for NSW. Maybe Merv harvey, was the Trevor Chappell of the family household. Better than 99.9% of people at cricket,but not in there own family household.

2014-12-06T05:52:25+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


The love historical aspects of my favourite sports, rugby, league and especially cricket. My heroes growing up were Kenny Irvine in league, Greg Davis in rugby and the players we all talked about at school Norm O'Neill, Benaud, Walters, Dexter.

2014-12-06T05:45:01+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Worse than that Sheek - the WSC games don't even have First Class status, something Cricket Australia could change tomorrow with the stroke of a pen.

AUTHOR

2014-12-06T04:21:16+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Here's some interesting numbers for you, debutant rankings. 1 - Charles Bannerman, 1877. 11 - Nat Thomson, 1877. 14 - Fred Spofforth, 1877 25 - William Cooper, 1882. 50 - Walter Giffen (brother of George), 1887. 75 - Jim Kelly, 1896. 79 - Victor Trumper, 1899. 100 - John McLaren, 1912. 117 - Bill Ponsford, 1924. 121 - Clarrie Grimmett, 1925. 124 - Don Bradman, 1928. 125 - Bert Ironmonger, 1928. 140 - Bill O'Reilly, 1931. 150 - Bill Brown, 1934. 165 - Ray Lindwall, 1946 168 - Keith Miller, 1946. 175 - Merv Harvey (brother of Neil), 1947. 178 - Neil Harvey, 1948. 190 - Richie Benaud, 1952. 195 - Alan Davidson, 1953. 200 - Peter Burge, 1955. 225 - Alan Connolly, 1963. 231 - Ian Chappell, 1964. 250 - Alan Froggy Thomson, 1970. 254 - Dennis Lillee, 1970. 262 - Jeff Thomson, 1972. 275 - Graham Yallop, 1975. 299 - Allan Border, 1978. 300 - Phil Carlson, 1978. 325 - David Boon, 1984. 335 - Steve Waugh, 1985. 350 - Shane Warne, 1991. 358 - Glenn McGrath, 1993. 359 - Matt Hayden, 1994. 366 - Ricky Ponting, 1995. 375 - Gavin Robertson, 1998. 381 - Adam Gilchrist, 1999. 389 - Michael Clarke, 2004. 400 - Brad Haddin, 2008. 408 - Phil Hughes, 2009.

2014-12-06T04:17:04+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Sheek a nice trio down memory lane. I reckon you in the next life should come back as a professional sports historian very useful, good stuff. This article makes me hope Test cricket lives on in 20-50 years. I'm pessemitic about the games appeal to the younger generation people born 1990-onwards, but there's some hope.

2014-12-06T03:55:33+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Ah yes, 70s Mo has got it, it was the awarding of official numbers I'm thinking of Sheek, apologies..

2014-12-06T03:33:09+00:00

Paul Nicholls

Roar Guru


I am not sure about the test status but I am sure the players were retrospectively awarded official numbers - does anyone know anymore about this?

2014-12-06T03:14:31+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Good read Sheek. Like the historical stuff. Cricket does not often get chronicled on the big screen or the little. One of the few and in my view, the best tv mini series on the subject was Bodyline with Gary Sweet as Bradman and Hugo Weaving as the hated English captain Douglas Jardine. I first saw this series back in the mid eighties and was lucky enough to watch it online again recently. Loved it just as much as the first time. Was a tumultuous time in cricketing history when during the 1932/33 Ashes sportsmanship was thrown out the window in order to stop one man...Donald George Bradman from humiliating England a second time. The incident very nearly created a diplomatic sensation and brought the Australia and England relationship to possibly the lowest ebb in our history. Another good watch was the series "Howzat" about the advent of World Series Cricket by Kerry Packer. I too would like to see Crowe invest in a cricketing project about some period of our great cricketing history.

AUTHOR

2014-12-06T03:11:20+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Mo, Looking at your article from July, JGK nailed it. Those signatures would have been procured most likely form the 5th test of the 1928/29 series.

AUTHOR

2014-12-06T03:07:57+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Brett, That's a great line from Chivas. I remember at school the best teachers never had any disciplinary problems because we were spellbound with what they were telling us.

AUTHOR

2014-12-06T03:05:53+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Brett, If you mean any Aboriginal matches - No. Mind you, that's a bugbear of mine. We've had one Australia-World XI match granted test status, as tests played by England in different parts of the world in 1929/30 - against West Indies & new Zealand. Neither England team could have been at full strength, even against countries in their cricketing infancy, second series for Windies & first-ever series for Kiwis. Then there's the tests between England & World XI in 1970 & Australia versus World XI in 1971/72. Last but not least, anyone who witnessed the WSC supertests of 1977-79 would agree the standard was the equal of any test matches ever held. Yet the ICC clings to its double standards, of being selective.

2014-12-06T02:46:44+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Funny you should say that. Menai in the inner west of Sydney also boasts street names of famous Aussie cricketers...but more of a modern era than Bannerman and his team.

2014-12-06T02:15:54+00:00

up in the north

Guest


I'm pleased my grey matter is standing the test of time. I actually met a guy who had recently gone on that '88 tour, and I was totally chuffed to meet someone that had represented not only Australia but Indiginous Australia at that. And I'm white, well whitish. As to a movie, as long as Warnie got a gig I'd watch it. I can just see him playing for the poms. What a laugh that would be.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar