No place for Michael Clarke in my World Cup XI

By Jacob York / Roar Rookie

Many have written about who should be in Australia’s starting XI for the World Cup, I’m choosing my XI from the World Cup squad named last week.

David Warner and Aaron Finch
Both are automatic inclusions. Warner may have only averaged 33.13 in his 54 ODIs with just four centuries, but he will only up this average as the World Cup progresses if these past few years in Tests are anything to go by.

Couple him with Aaron Finch and it creates one of the most destructive opening partnerships in the world.

Both of them average a strike rate of around 85, so it’ll only take one of them to fire for the Aussies to have a good chance of winning.

Shane Watson
It was a tough decision. The potential of Mitch Marsh or the talent of Watson? I went with Watto.

The right-handed batsmen is a big boundary hitter, with 546 fours and 124 sixes for the fifty-over format. Round that off with a strike rate of almost 90 and you have a brilliant and capable batsman at first drop.

His 180 games of experience will be invaluable for the Aussies, as will his ability to bowl tightly at one end, allowing his teammates to get wickets at the other. His only drawback is his struggles convert his starts into triple figures, with 31 half centuries yet only 9 three-figure scores. But when you realise that Marsh is yet to prove himself at the highest level, the decision became easier.

Steve Smith (VC)
No need to question this man’s place in the team. After being surprisingly omitted from the first ODI against South Africa after being man of the series in Pakistan, he responded with scores of 71*, 104, 67, 37 and 47 with a fantastic batting average of 65.2.

With his ability to build both long and steady partnerships, or take advantage of a quick start, his value cannot be overstated.

George Bailey (C)
I only have room for one of George Bailey and Michael Clarke and I chose Bailey, even though he’s only averaged just over 20 with the bat in his last seven games, with a high score of 70.

One reason was Clarke’s low strike-rate of just 78.59 compared to Bailey’s ability to hit more than the occasional boundary for a strike rate of almost 90. And with Clarke’s injuries he’s too big of a risk. Hopefully Bailey can re-find form as that middle order batsman with power and precision.

Brad Haddin
Not a lot to say about this one, hopefully he’ll be able to put a few more runs on the board for the Aussies though. Good to see him there at the end for a couple of games too, like he was against India.

Glenn Maxwell
For some Maxwell’s x-factor with the bat and wicket-taking right-arm off breaks make him an automatic selection. For some, he’s borderline, for others still he’s not in the XI, due to current poor form and inconsistency.

I believe he has the potential to be a very good batsman, but he’s not there yet. Hopefully he can score some big runs next game.

James Faulkner
The fourth man picked – behind Smith, Warner and Finch. This man’s ability to bowl at the death is well known and those slower bowls out of the back of his hands are fantastic to watch. And he has the ability to smash the ball to all parts of the ground to win in thrilling run chases.

Mitchell Johnson
Johnson’s ferocity, wicket-taking ability and experience makes him the pick of the bowlers. At 33 years of age, and with 144 games under his belt, he has the knowledge and the cool head to lead the Aussies to victory.

Though he hasn’t had bad figures of late (averaging 2.25 wickets a game) it has not been up to Mitchell’s moustache standard. Hopefully he can take the form he was in from the Test series against India (and his ‘mo’) into the World Cup.

Mitchell Starc
If I had have written this article a week ago he would’ve been on the bench. But after two man of the match performances, yielding results of 4/42 and 6/43, it’s impossible to consider him not playing. With his deadly yorkers at 150 clicks, as well as the ability to strike early in a match – he’s now struck in his first over three games in a row – it’s just too tempting for him and Johnson to partner in a deadly pace attack.

Josh Hazlewood
What’s not to love? From just six games he’s already got 10 wickets, and with the comparisons to Glenn McGrath coming constantly, his potential and talent are worthy of the 2015 World Cup.

Pat Cummins (12th man)
Unfortunate to miss out. Has looked good at times in the tri-series so far, bowling in quick bursts, but lacked the consistency and wicket-taking ability shown in the early part of his career.

Being able to bowl at 150 plus kilometres an hour is definitely an advantage he has over Hazlewood, and will probably play a couple of games if Josh doesn’t fire early.

The unlucky three
Xavier Doherty, Michael Clarke and Mitch Marsh were the unlucky three this time round. Maxwell, Smith, Warner and Smith combined can easily account for 10 to 15 overs, meaning it’s unnecessary to have Doherty in the team as a specialist spinner. Won’t say much more on Michael Clarke. Mitchell Marsh was unfortunate too, but Watson’s experience at the top level cancels him out. Might come in if Watson doesn’t keep scoring runs and taking wickets.

Well there you have it, my Aussie XI. Any suggestions Roarers – including good websites for looking up stats?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-01-20T22:56:55+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


He hasn't played International Cricket for Australia since the first test against India in Adelaide - where he broke down injured and is still recovering. He hasnt played ODI cricket since the first ODI against South Africa, where he broke down injured and made 11. The last time he played for Australia in the ODI's without breaking down was August 31 where he made 68 not out. So Clarke may have averaged 40 in his past 20 matches, but you cant use that stat to say he should play considering that those last 20 matches were ages ago so their results can be used to see whether or not Clarke should be picked for the World Cup. Me personally I dont think past stats from World Cups should come into consideration at all when choosing the team. Sure, there's the experience side of things, playing under pressure and big games - but The last World Cup was 4 years ago. How can you pick a player due to stats from four years ago? I disagree with you there, in Bailey's last 13 games as ODI captain he's had 10 wins and just 3 losses. Nothing wrong with the Aussie while either Bailey or Clarke are captaining

AUTHOR

2015-01-20T20:28:30+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


The question is though, doesnt Michael Clarke want to prolong his career? I read an article recently, of him saying he wants to play in the 2019 World Cup. While I think that's slightly unrealistic, if he does want to prolong his career then i think he should skip the World Cup completely - Unless he's recovery is going superbly... Or he's silly enough to play when he's unfit

AUTHOR

2015-01-20T20:25:38+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


So true! Australia have a lot of depth - mind you a lot of them dont have a lot of experience (ie. cummins, m marsh, only have 21 games between them) ]... Clarke is too risky mind you at this stage if he wants to prolong his career.. That's right - if you dont pick Maxwell you need to have the specialist spinner in

AUTHOR

2015-01-20T20:21:16+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


At least Doherty.. for Cameron Boyce or Zampa?

AUTHOR

2015-01-20T20:20:37+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


Not if Maxi gets going - which he doesnt have to do EVERY game

2015-01-20T12:29:09+00:00

ajay

Guest


don't think so craig bailey is a avz player he smash those runs in dirt roads in india + in postal stamp? i think pup is great choice along with cam white(if he scores runs in next few odis)

2015-01-20T11:02:42+00:00

Gav

Guest


If Clarke can't get matches and form under his belt by the time the business end of the tournament comes around, he misses out for mine.

2015-01-20T05:28:13+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Bailey's last 20 ODI matches he's averaged 22. Clarke's last 20 matches he's averaged 40. Bailey is an ok captain. Clarke is a wizardly captain. Clarke has 700 runs at an average 84 in World Cups. Bailey has 0 runs at 0 in World Cups. If Clarke's fit, there isn't even a choice.

2015-01-20T05:19:07+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Lets us hope that Maxwell and Doherty get injured...not badly. Then bring in a leg spinning wristie or at the very least a reliable batsman who bowls decent finger spin.

2015-01-20T05:11:01+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Heard Cameron White could be a chance. Like Lynn and SOS. Joe Burns?

2015-01-20T05:00:54+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Spot on Ajay. Except for George Bailey. "Muppet"? Room has to be made for him. Check out his record. Not too long ago he was averaging around 50 in ODI. Is a big match player. He will come good for the world cup. One of the three hit and miss merchants at the top of the order has to make way for Bailey. After his mature innings in the second tri-series match I would be holding onto Aaron Finch. So it is out of Watto and Warner. Wishful thinking. Both are selector's pets.

2015-01-20T04:04:39+00:00

ajay

Guest


agreed but mitch marsh is way better then no show and can hit longer the marsh + consistency and i think he is in our best x1

2015-01-20T02:01:06+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


One thing people fail to remember when looking at Clarke's record is that he's been going for a lot longer and before they started roping in boundaries a lot more, added more powerplays and reduced the number of fieldsmen outside the circle from 5 to 4, all of which have seen scores and strike rates spike in recent years. And as someone else pointed out, Clarke's record in World Cups is phenomenal. He's a player who scores the runs when it counts, and his average, strike rate and aggregate at World Cups is up there among the best all-time. Effectively, Clarke is an automatic inclusion if fit, and Smith's recent batting has made him so too, meaning if both of them are in the team there is no place for both Bailey and Maxwell. Considering they tend to want Maxwell there for the addition of his offspin, Bailey is likely the one to get dropped.

2015-01-20T01:54:51+00:00

jammel

Guest


Agree that Bailey's under some pressure right now. Who'll come in for him now that he's suspended? Looks like Sean Marsh would be first in line, but Lynn's got to be close. Lynn would be an exciting selection. For the England WC opening game, I'd go: Warner Finch Watson Clarke Smith Haddin Faulkner Johnson Starc Cummins Doherty

2015-01-20T00:04:19+00:00

Damo

Guest


I think the recent form of Maxwell and Bailey make Clarke an automatic starter when fit. Clarke could go in a 4 and play the long steady innings, dropping Smith to 5 who has the ability to turn it on late when required. Also shows what happens when you pick out of form players.

2015-01-19T23:39:32+00:00

Brian

Guest


Bailey's just about used up all the credits he gained batting on roads and disgracefully small grounds in India. I would have Clarke in the side over him any day of the week. My side would be: Warner, Finch, Watson, Clarke, Smith, Haddin/Maxwell (depending on the position of the match), Faulkner, Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood.

2015-01-19T23:31:18+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Seriously - we're looking pretty good if we can afford to leave out Clarke, Mitch Marsh and Cummins. All three would make most other teams. And I think all are line ball to make the team. I think we either pick Maxwell + Cummins/Hazey, or we pick Marsh + Doherty. Those no.6 and 11 spots are the only ones in dispute. Going with Maxwell gives you three legitimate quicks. Going with Marsh gives you three medium pacers (Watto, Marsh and Faulk) backing up the two quicks.

AUTHOR

2015-01-19T22:12:42+00:00

Jacob York

Roar Rookie


That was my other selection of players but I actually decided that one of Mitchell Marsh or Watto could make the team. I originally chose Marsh but then after looking at some stats and Watson's experience went with him. Maxwell hasnt done a lot to secure his play in the team but I have him in there as the one who can either win games for Australia with his explosive batting, maybe get a handy 20 or be yes, a no show... Also, Maxwell has to be their to lead the Spin section with Doherty out of the team. I almost, completely agree with you on Clarke.. He has definitely proven that he is capable of some good batting for the Aussies. However, if you think about the only reason he's in the team is because he's captain. If Clarke wasn't captain would they want him in the squad? With the depth of batting that Australia have they don't need him and if he wants to prolong his career, the best way to do it would be by missing the World Cup and preparing for the West Indies Tour.

2015-01-19T15:33:03+00:00

ajay

Guest


couldn't agree with you clarke st/rate 78 but clarke avz in wc somewhere 80+ with93 st/rate(by memory) and we don't need clarke to score at 150+ i smith and both are just able to rotate strike then we have marsh ,faulkner,hadds all are able to hit at 200 st/rate m.marsh is incredible hitter and he will finish game for us along with james faulkner both are needed warner finch watson clarke smith m.marsh hadds faulkner strac hazlewood johnson no room for bailey and no show both are muppet

Read more at The Roar