Rugby World Cup 2015: The Springboks' best tightheads

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

The selection of the tighthead props for Heyneke Meyer is laced with danger.

It is a position that very few understand, I myself as a loosehead think about tighthead props in the manner of who I want to scrum against and in general that is against taller tightheads.

The reasoning is simply because I find it easier to get underneath taller tightheads.

As an explanation I will use my son as an example. He started his rugby as a loosehead, he has natural strength in his back and legs, and with a few tutorials about the technique and strategy about how to bind for the engage he was on his way.

It did not matter how tall they were, his technique allowed him to get underneath his tighthead and with the laws of physics half the battle was won already.

The next season his coach required a tighthead and summarily moved him to that position without consulting me. I was very unhappy about it as my son comes up against players much bigger than him. My major concern was that his neck could sustain injury if these big and tall looseheads managed to lift him off the ground.

So I had only one tactic for him as a tighthead – ‘jack knife your opponent’. To explain it a tad better, you pull the opposing loosehead down as you hit him, effectively jack knifing him at the moment your momentum hits him. With his head below his hips and struggling to take in oxygen you render him useless. When this tactic bore fruit he was highly excited and explained to me in detail the grunting and snorting noises emitting from his opposing props.

I have attempted to provide video clips for the players discussed but the art of tighthead scrumming and play is so secretive that even YouTube is unlicensed to carry footage.

The tighthead cupboard for South Africa is bare when you are looking for experienced players at Test level. No matter what, Meyer will be selecting Coenie Oosthuizen and Jannie du Plessis.

Standing 1.88-metres tall and weighing in at 120 kilograms, Du Plessis is not small. Technically he isn’t bad, but the farmer and doctor from the freestate has been largely overplayed since 2012 and fatigue and overuse puts his selection in the dangerous category.

Jannie has never been the best defender, often takes the ball as first receiver and his general tendency as a nuisance cannot be undervalued. Due to the heavy work load Jannie has endured his performances of late have not been inspiring and I suspect management of his game time is going to be put at a high premium.

Due to neck injuries Oosthuizen may no longer be utilised as a loosehead prop, so for anyone wondering why Meyer has been insisting on continuing Coenie at tighthead, there is a medical reason for it.

Technically the Cheetahs scrum receives the most scrum penalties, and have been for some time, in fact Naka Drotske a few years ago made specific inquiries into the manner in which his Cheetah front row was penalised.

Oosthuizen is a big man, standing 181 metres tall and weighing in at a hefty 127 kilograms. He is built like a tighthead prop, a tad shorter than most props, being able to use his bulk well, but technically deficient in my opinion.

However Meyer’s reasoning is that there are very few scrums in the latter part of a Test match, and the benefit of Coenie being a hard-running ball carrier and being very aggressive at the breakdown outweighs any deficiencies he may have at scrum time.

Although that reasoning does have merit, the danger is what happens if Jannie du Plessis breaks down during the Rugby World Cup? Is Oosthuizen the answer come the knock-out matches?

When it comes to selecting the back-up prop it is really down to Frans Malherbe and Julian Redelinghuys. However neither are very experienced and an unfortunate injury to Malherbe excluded him from the recent tour to Europe and adding to his four international caps.

Redelinghuys was called up instead, but apart from experiencing the Springbok culture and spending time on the paddock during training sessions Meyer has not given him a chance to prove his mettle at international level.

At 1.90 metres and weighing 122 kilograms, Malherbe is a big unit, and most likely to be called up ahead of Redelinghuys, who at 1.76 metres and only 100 kilograms is significantly smaller, and one fact is certain, South African coaches will always select a big good ‘un over a smaller good ‘un.

However as the theme of Meyer’s front rows run in combinations, my choice would be to complete the Lions front row. As a unit they were top in the Currie Cup and Super Rugby last year. For a South African front row it is controversial to select a line-up with a combined weight of only 313 kilograms, however scrumming is an eight-man task, and the collective technique of the Lions front row, the combined effort and weight from the rest of the Springbok pack will benefit at scrum time as well as general play.

So to summarise, here are my three front rows for the Springboks during the 2015 Rugby World Cup.

Tendai Mtwarira, Bismarck du Plessis and Jannie du Plessis
Trevor Nyakane, Adriaan Strauss and Coenie Oosthuizen.
Schalk van der Merwe, Robbie Coetzee and Julian Redelinghuys.

The Crowd Says:

2015-01-20T12:07:55+00:00


Thanks Leeu, must have slipped my mind :lol:

2015-01-20T12:07:12+00:00


Thanks Digger, I must warn you though I know very little about Tacos ;)

2015-01-20T08:17:39+00:00

Laeveld Leeu

Roar Rookie


Good stuff BB! Just a quick note on" Redelinghuys was called up instead, but apart from experiencing the Springbok culture and spending time on the paddock during training sessions Meyer has not given him a chance to prove his mettle at international level" I believe our man Julian is a fully fledged bok having now played two (2) tests already (Italy and Wales although i might be wrong about wales). So we can let Heyneke off on that on. other than that, really wish Malherbe can stay injury free as he is a great defender as well. And spot on abut the scrumming being an 8 man job,in the cae of the Lions and 8 man trip to fun land which probably explains their success in it and their smiles afterwards.

2015-01-20T05:31:16+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


This is an excellent series BB, really enjoying it and appreciate the effort. Particularly looking forward to the Taco part ;)

2015-01-20T02:16:53+00:00

jameswm

Guest


In Aust props are like gold. We never have enough good, or even decent ones.

2015-01-20T01:52:31+00:00


True, I forgot about that.

2015-01-20T01:45:18+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


BB, Brett, RobC-- Coenie will scrum ag Nyakane this week--Trevor is a new Bull

2015-01-20T01:09:02+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


In much the same way it exposed Benn Robinson, Rob. Must agree...

2015-01-20T01:08:45+00:00


They need a new coach, Drotske has become stale.

2015-01-20T01:04:44+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


I think the new scrum rules, introduced after SR13 exposed the Cheetahs set piece Which is too bad, because they were starting to do well. Now its back to the drawing board.

2015-01-20T00:58:15+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Exactly! Also, remember the 5 m lineout early last year where it looked for all the world like a maul setup, but then a "pod" peeled off quickly and I think Vermeulen just had to carry ball and tackler over the line with a head of steam. Try.

2015-01-20T00:49:15+00:00


Yeah, I was surprised, I went through the footage of the French match in 2013 and my memory told me he did well then , but when I reviewed it he was literally at right angles to the scrum. How he manages to stay up is purely down to sheer strength.

2015-01-20T00:46:21+00:00


Most teams expect a maul from the front of the line out, so you could vary it by going to the back, or you fein two mauls, one at the back, one at the front and leave a gap for an offload to the hooker or halfback. We never use the short throw to the loose head prop. When was the last time we would take the ball at the back of the line out, run the ball lateral and pop the pass inside for the wing coming in on the angle? There are many variations for attack from the line out, we just don't use them and therefor become predictsble

2015-01-20T00:42:38+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Lions killed them in SR also

2015-01-20T00:42:00+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Coenie was abso shocking in Cheetah's scrum. Expected a shellacking in EOYT Surprisingly held up ok. Well, better than expected

2015-01-20T00:41:03+00:00


The Cheetahs has been having penalty problems at scrum time for about three years now, that's why they called in Os du Randt as scrumming coach. It is still not paying off, the Lions scrum (lightweight) demolished them in the Currie Cup this year. If you look at my article about Springbok looseheads and watch the first part of Schalk v d Merwe's youtube clip you will see utter annihilation of them by the Lions. I personally think the neck injury Coenie has sustained has effected him to the point that he looks awkward and uncomfortable when he scrums.

2015-01-20T00:40:11+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Yeah, that was a helluva kick, too. I was looking at ways to VARY our maul attack. A well- set maul is devastating, but often we are too predictable in the setup. A maul feint is cool, too

2015-01-20T00:36:19+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I seem to recall him having penalty trouble in the first half of last season, but I have to admit to not watching too much of the Cheetahs after they started their freefall down the table..

2015-01-20T00:34:20+00:00


It is thwarted with danger. Firstly you have to be careful of obstruction, then if you have more than one hammer driving you then you stand a chance of not being able to reload (get on you feet as the hammer) because you have bodies falling ontop of you and getting penalised. Remember our loss to Australia in 2010 because we didn't reload fast enough and Beale kicked a 50 meter penalty to win in the final minute?

2015-01-20T00:29:33+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Parisse, Faletau, and Vermeulen are the only guys who I see being consistently able to get over the gain line from a standing start from the base of the ruck. Can you set an effective "small" maul from a ruck?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar