McCullum's legacy isn't reliant on a Kiwi World Cup victory

By John Deaker / Roar Pro

Whatever happens in the Cricket World Cup, Brendon McCullum has already left a significant legacy on New Zealand cricket that he can be extremely proud of when he finally hangs up his Black Cap.

In the selfish world of professional sport many sportspeople leave the game that has dominated their lives since they were a kid with some great mates, a few memorable achievements to remember and often a large amount of cash in the bank.

A very small percentage of them are able to leave a prominent legacy on their sport like the one McCullum is already certain to leave.

McCullum is a positive, charismatic role model for young cricketers throughout New Zealand while also inspiring many non-cricketers to take up the sport for the first time. His appeal reaches much wider than that though, with his appearance and approach to the game endearing him to men and women who may have had little or no interest in cricket in the past.

Interestingly, he wasn’t always so universally liked by men and women of all ages. Prior to taking over the New Zealand captaincy, much of his career was plagued by unwarranted criticism from sections of society who didn’t seem to understand or accept him.

Not long after taking over the captaincy McCullum discussed the issue of the criticism he has received.

“I think the rocks or diamonds nature of my style of play probably opens the door more to that kind of criticism,” he said.

“I’ve learnt to deal with criticism over the last decade or so … sometimes it hurts my family more than it hurts me.”

Ironically, many of the character traits that prevented people from accepting him are the same ones that have seen him embraced as a really special New Zealander. They are also some of the traits that saw an article printed out of Australia this week with the headline: “Why we wish Black Caps captain Brendon McCullum was an Aussie”.

One strength of McCullum clearly on show in the weekend’s victory over Australia was his courage. Kiwis love their heroes to be battlers just as much as the Aussies do, and his brave performance after copping a vicious blow to the forearm from Mitchell Johnson elevated the man who’s already a national hero into almost superhero status.

The television coverage that showed McCullum’s forearm swell up within seconds of him getting hit was a very graphic reminder to viewers that what McCullum makes look easy is extremely dangerous too.

When you hail from Dunedin, where they pride themselves more than anywhere else on being ‘real men’ and you have an older brother (Nathan) almost as competitive and talented as yourself, you almost have no option but to ‘man up’.

Not that McCullum has ever been one to take a backward step since his emergence on the international scene against Australia in 2002. He might have been only 18 at the time but that didn’t stop him displaying the same sort of confident and combative demeanour back then as we saw from him at the weekend.

Like we’ve seen with Kane Williamson more recently, McCullum stood out through age-grade cricket so much from his peers that for those following him closely through his teens the debate often wasn’t so much about whether he’d play for New Zealand as it was about whether he could adjust his technique and keep enough of a level head to go down as one of the greats of his generation.

On pure playing ability it’s as a wicket-keeping batsman that most cricket purists will remember McCullum as one of New Zealand’s greatest players. Unfortunately many of the less fanatical followers of cricket will never value what he achieved through that period as much as they do his performance these days in the captaincy and specialist batsman role for New Zealand.

McCullum’s already made huge progress in his captaincy and batting since his role within the team changed. If he’s able to continue making progress in both areas his place as one of our greatest cricketers of all time will be hard for even his harshest critics to argue with.

Becoming the first cricketer to win New Zealand’s sportsman of the year award since Martin Crowe was further recognition last month that his efforts are more appreciated these days. The triple century that highlighted his landmark year also appeared to fully put to bed any doubt that McCullum might have had about his ability to become a world-class Test batsman.

Since getting those runs behind him, McCullum seems to have taken his role of captaincy and promotion of the game within the New Zealand media to an even greater level.

It’s an indication of McCullum and his Black Caps teams impact that they’ve got a nation that often prides itself on claiming the underdog status actually openly saying ‘I think we can win this’.

Regardless of the result, the fact that he’s already got the nation encapsulated by cricket means McCullum’s impact on the game in New Zealand is assured.

The Crowd Says:

2015-03-09T20:23:10+00:00

MACDUB

Guest


People criticised McCullum for his aggressive and daring captaincy. Many will say it was unwarranted. But at the time, we simply didn't have the skill, talent nor ability. Our batting was terrible and our 3rd/4th etc choice bowlers weren't too flash. So at the time, that aggressive and daring captaincy was frowned upon because we didn't have the skill to play like that. I believe that McCullum's aggressive and daring captaincy is working very well now, because we have the skill and talent to match that line of thinking i.e. we have genuine world class batters who can chase runs that our "aggressive" mindset will leak..we have one of the best, if not the best, bowling lineups meaning McCullum's aggressive field placings now yields wickets.

2015-03-09T13:27:19+00:00

Dragon-Fly

Guest


Thanks for those interesting words, John. I tend to agree with you. MCullum's legacy won't be, and shouldn't be, judged on a World cup victory. He should be judged on being the Captain that finally instilled the mentality and belief that transformed NZ Cricket. The many coaches of high calibre only seemed to stumble with what seemed to be the revolving administration "Panel of Mediocrity" of past players - Most of who formed some of our darker times on the international stage - as well as a group of players not willing to show any fight in fear of criticism. We were a team of status quo. Talent, yes. Fight, no. Moments of brilliance, yes. Consistency, no. McCullum was the Captain that bucked the trend. He is not afraid of criticism, putting his leadership on the line, and taking a risk in order to succeed. One would argue these are similar traits to other great kiwis - Upham, Hillary to name a couple. His players have bought in to his ethos and we now have 11 players who are willing to fight and put their hand in the hat in order to pull out victory. Theodore Roosevelt once quoted - It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. McCullum is a winner. He dares great, and knows its not the critic who counts. His legacy will not be with those cold and timid souls of NZ Crickets past.

2015-03-09T03:59:06+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


I tend to disagree. I think McCullum does need to lead New Zealand to a World Cup win to consolidate even elevate his career. As things stands his overall record in all forms, while solid is certainly not one of the "Greats" that I've continued to hear him compared to during this World Cup. ODI batting average of 30.80 & Test Batting average of 38.87 certainly doesn't hold him up in revered names like Kallis, Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting, Sangakkara that I've heard him be compared to in the last month. As for legacy in NZ itself. I still think he's behind the New Zealand greats Fleming, Crowe & Hadlee. But he does still have time to bring himself into that discussion.

2015-03-08T07:15:56+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Oh and if NZ do win the WC McCullum will go down as a dead set legend in NZ

2015-03-08T07:13:22+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


To be fair he did waste a lot of opportunities in the past. I have always backed him but as he said he is a rocks and diamonds type player and when it's rocks it can be frustrating

2015-03-08T04:15:55+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


"much of his career was plagued by unwarranted criticism from sections of society who didn’t seem to understand or accept him". Not all of it unwarranted. He has at times wasted a lot of his talent with undisciplined batting. These past few years make you wonder what might have been had he applied himself like this 10 years ago, There was the whole issue with the England tour clashing with the IPL a few years ago. McCullum said he considered not signing his NZ Cricket contract and becoming a free agent, which didn't endear him to the fans.

2015-03-07T16:55:31+00:00

ak

Roar Guru


Yes and this also holds true for Dennis Lillee, Greg Chappell, Ian Botham, Richard Hadlee, Brian Lara, Jacques Kallis, Allan Donald, Shaun Pollock, Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh.

Read more at The Roar