Only Round 5 but for Richmond it's time to panic

By Leigh Eustace / Roar Guru

Five rounds in, with a two and three record, all doesn’t seem lost for the Richmond Football Club. But dig a little deeper and you can understand why a good couple tonnes of manure might end up at the front door at Punt Road yet again.

Expected wins over Brisbane and Carlton are nothing to be judged by. Brisbane would struggle to defeat their own NEAFL side at the moment, and Mick Malthouse’s milestone week aside the world has come crashing down on the pitiful Blues.

It’s the losses that really concern.

Sure, Geelong has not lost to Richmond since 2006, and are still a quality side. However the Cats were ripe for the picking, a lot of their veteran stars are either out of the side or out of form, and if there was ever a chance for Richmond to take the step up and overtake a Geelong on the slide, it was a sunny Saturday afternoon at the MCG.

On current form, a loss to the Western Bulldogs isn’t as bad as first thought; the Dogs are on the rise and playing ripping footy. But therein lies the problem, the 4-1 Bullies have seemingly overtaken the Tigers without any notice whatsoever.

If the Dogs have gone past Richmond, and the likes of Adelaide, Collingwood and the Greater Western Sydney Giants are all improvers too, not to mention the consistent threat of the other seven finalists from last year, where does that leave the Tigers?

Finally we had the loss to Melbourne. The eloquent Damien Hardwick described the performance as “insipid” and “not tough enough”.

Against Melbourne? Yes, the messiah Paul Roos appears to have finally got the Dees’ compass to point north, but for far too long if you were to actually lose to Melbourne it was the equivalent of losing a swimming race to Eric Moussambani.

However, the most optimistic Tigers barracker will offer that a win this weekend and the ledger would be squared, the season is far from lost. Sorry champ, you are as confused as a Sydneysider in Melbourne, having to make a hook turn.

This week we see Richmond heading to Hobart for an away fixture with North Melbourne. It will be very cold and very chilly, much like the Tigers’ chance of winning.

They then have four more games up until a bye: the resurgent Collingwood, Port Adelaide in Adelaide, Essendon for the Dreamtime fixture, and Fremantle in Perth.

The way both teams are playing the Maggies would be warm favourites at least; the game against the Power will bring back haunting memories of the equivalent match-up in September last year; the Dons, while showing inconsistency, look a top-eight side again this year; Freo at Subiaco, dare we need say anymore?

Two wins to the bye is nowhere near the mark of a finals-worthy side. That would be one less win to the equivalent stage last year and it took a Houdini-like effort to pull a finals appearance out by season’s end. Richmond is nowhere near good enough to play that trick again this year.

So where does that leave those oh so strong, and oh so bold? Not flash, not flash at all.

On pure talent alone, taking age profile into consideration, one could argue that there are at least a dozen better lists in the AFL. Every single team above Richmond on the ladder currently certainly has a better playing roster; North Melbourne, Melbourne and Gold Coast while below them at the moment have an edge on the Tigers for overall talent as well.

So surely we’re not at the stage where yet ‘another’ five year plan needs to begin? Off-field they are motoring nicely, they will be the third club to crack 70,000 members behind the juggernaut in Collingwood and the high-flying Hawthorn, sponsors in surplus and facilities top notch.

But despite their greatest efforts and with all the time in the world, they still persist in not getting the on-field anywhere near right.

The midfield consistently revolves around three blokes and three only: their captain, the troublesome one with the tattooed neck, and the 2004 number one draft pick.

Their full forward has dropped so much weight he now comes in barely at a flanker’s weight dripping wet, they haven’t had a decent small forward since Captain Cook was a boy, and their best player – arguably the best defender in the game – may retire at season’s end to take up full time religious service.

Club chief executive Brendon Gale aids to the woes with, “when we experience injuries we struggle more than most because of our lack of depth.

“That’s an explanation, not an excuse, that’s the way it is.”

So their fixture looks paralysing, the side gives performances described by the coach as insipid, they have depth described by the CEO as lacking, and their list appears to have more worries than a Joe Hockey budget.

There’s very little chance of another four points being secured by the bye. Oh dear. The aroma of another wasted year in yellow and black is really starting to stench.

The Crowd Says:

2015-05-05T10:42:28+00:00

Daws

Guest


I guess rebuilding comes in two waves then Slano, getting to from bottom to middle and then middle to top. It's all pretty interesting reading though.

2015-05-05T01:43:45+00:00

Milo

Roar Rookie


The article's not far from the truth, but there is some obvious problems between reality and theory that the RFC match committee seems to struggle with each week. A few years back it went out and topped up the playing list with Maric, Houli, Grigg, Petterd, Knights, Thomas. The draft was compromised by the Suns & Giants so for a short term that made sense. Of those only Maric has consistently provided lasting value. Ivan is a warrior but the rest add little and now they are keeping out younger players from the team that should otherwise be given a consistent run. Some will argue Houli adds run and kicking execution but watch him cough it up under minimal pressure. Likewise Chaplin is absent when the heat is on. Sadly although I love him for his courage and determination, Morris isnt cutting it anymore either. Now is a real opportunity to persist with players like Lennon, McDonough, Arnott, C Ellis, Dea, bring in McBean (at the expense of Vickery or if Griffiths is injured), Menadue, McKenzie and welcome back Conca. For the rest of the year play these guys and see how they shape up. Stop bringing them in for one game and then dropping them. If they dont look like theyre cutting it, then thats a decision at years end. But we cant make those decisions so long as their road to the senior team is blocked by the recycled guys. Hardwick reckons he espouses the idea of earning the jumper. Well thats fine, but the guys in the ones arent doing it today ffs!.

2015-05-05T01:40:31+00:00

slane

Guest


You need to go back even further, Daws. Freo has the oldest list in the AFL and while they undoubtedly struck it rich in the 2008 Draft their senior players were a vital cog in making those 2008 draftees info champions. Pav, Johnson, McPharlin and Sandilands are the core of that list. Once they retire it will be the 2008 draftees job to show the 2017 draftees how to play the Freo way.

2015-05-05T01:20:22+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


Daws that doesn't really represent the Dockers story that well. Their rebuild started really at the sacking of Connelly towards the end of 2008 season. They actually spent most of 2010 in the top 4, a few injuries slowing their momentum. 2011 was lost to a huge injury toll and 2012 was a restart with the dumping of Harvey for Lyon.

2015-05-05T00:50:58+00:00

slane

Guest


I'm so glad you brought up Bucks/Malthouse because I was very close to mentioning them in my last post. Even now Bucks is building his list, not rebuilding. He is putting his own touch on a mature list. Unless a team has enough time to build that mature list they will always find themselves floundering in the middle of the ladder.

2015-05-05T00:47:00+00:00

Daws

Guest


True Slane. More like 7 years. Current #1 Freo: 2008 14th 2009 14th 2010 6th 2011 11th 2012 7th 2013 3rd 2014 4th 2015* 1st ;) Drafted heavily in 2008 - 11. Had the two steps forward (6th) one step back (11th). Bring in top 8 proven coach (2012). Two steps forward (7th, 3rd), one step back (4th and out in straight sets). Currently a legitimate contender. Similarities to the Doggies, anyone? This almost deserves an article itself...

2015-05-05T00:30:24+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


I can agree with that. Was a transition that was actually quite smooth. Unlike Malthouse-Buckley which is only now reaping dividends.

2015-05-05T00:22:09+00:00

slane

Guest


Good point, Jack. I'd still like to leave him there though, as I see the Longmire era as a natural progression of the Roos era. Longmire was part of the list that Roos built(albeit in a coaching capacity). That is a decade long build of the list followed by a 'smooth' hand-over to the heir at the appointed time.

2015-05-05T00:03:46+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Longmire is the exception in your list. Had a building team from Roos but did implement his own game style and plans into it within two years.

2015-05-04T23:37:05+00:00

slane

Guest


I think we should be blaming whichever clown started the narrative that a rebuild should only take 5 years. Also, throw anybody in the media who spouts the same tripe into that pile. How long was Bomber at Geelong before their list had success? How about Clarkson? Mick Malthouse? Longmire? The fact is that it takes a lot longer than 5 years to build a list when you start with nothing. Even longer if you don't have any senior players to guide the kids.

Read more at The Roar