Cook's form is ominous for the Ashes

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

An in-form Alastair Cook makes England a vastly better and more balanced side. His return to touch has significantly changed the complexion of the upcoming Ashes series.

The England skipper has emerged from a long, deep slump. Starting from the Ashes series in England in 2013, Cook averaged just 23 over the space of 14 Tests.

Combined with his wooden tactics, those woeful returns left him in danger of losing not just the captaincy but also his place in the English team.

While England were able to scrap a series victory in the 2013 Ashes without major input from Cook, his struggles began to weigh heavily on the team. A revolving door of opening partners watched from the other end as he was undone, time and again, by full, straight bowling.

Meanwhile, the team was humiliated 5-0 in Australia and then lost at home to Sri Lanka. As he’s rediscovered some touch, England’s results have improved dramatically. In Cook’s past seven Tests he has made 707 runs at 71, including seven scores of 50-plus from 12 innings. Over those Tests, England’s win-loss record has been 5-1.

While Cook was labouring and his opening partners were changing with regularity, opposition attacks licked their collective lips.

Early breakthroughs are golden in all forms of cricket but are particularly crucial in Tests, where increasingly flat pitches have made batting often easy between overs 20 and 80 of each innings. During Cook’s slump, England so often found themselves two down for not many.

The knock-on effect was that this placed enormous pressure on the biggest strength in the English side – their batting from three to seven. In Joe Root, Gary Ballance, Ian Bell, Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler, England have a nice blend of class, circumspection and flair.

A sturdy Cook offers that group more regular opportunities to come to the crease in inviting circumstances. When England were 2-25 in the second innings of the first Test against New Zealand, victory looked a distant dream.

Still trailing the Kiwis by 109 runs, they were in risk of being thrashed in the opening match of a massive summer.

But Cook displayed the unwavering concentration which is the cornerstone of his batting at its zenith. He absorbed surging waves of pressure before then helping to turn the screws on New Zealand.

By the time he was finally dismissed after nine hours, England’s lead was 321 and the home side had almost eliminated the chance of defeat while opening a potential avenue to victory.

Cook’s 162 was his finest innings in more than two-and-a-half years.

It wasn’t a pretty dig. There were few shots which swelled the heart and several periods where he struggled for even a modicum of fluency. But it was massively valuable.

Cook’s tediously slow scoring has hindered his team many times in the past few years. Now, however, England have the players around Cook who can make up for his dawdling. Stokes, Buttler and the increasingly attacking Root ensure that England less often crawl along at 2.5 to 3 runs per over as they did regularly to their detriment in the past.

Their swift scoring in this Test earned them sufficient time to run through New Zealand and secure a rousing win. England scored at 3.77 runs per over for the match. Without having the exact statistics at hand, I would wager it is many, many Tests ago since England scored at such a fast rate against genuinely good opposition.

The same way that Cook’s stableness benefits his more cavalier batting colleagues, their aggression and unpredictability makes his job easier. In the knowledge that others will push the run rate along, Cook is less burdened by the need to up the ante himself.

Of course, his resurgence is not yet complete. New Zealand’s talented pace attack will come hard at him in the second Test starting on Friday. Then he faces the momentous challenge of overcoming the Australians, who have dominated him repeatedly across his career.

Aside from Cook’s phenomenal 2010-11 Ashes, he has floundered against Australia, averaging in the 20s in his other four series. By the time the last Ashes ended he looked a broken man, incapable of even brief spells of fluent batting.

Ryan Harris tormented him across the back-to-back series, exposing his frailty to full, straight deliveries. The Australian veteran will be targeting him once again. If he cows Cook like he did previously, England will find it remarkably tough to reclaim the Ashes.

But if Cook continues his recent surge of methodical accumulation, suddenly Australia’s job will be daunting.

The Crowd Says:

2015-06-06T04:45:09+00:00

13th Man

Guest


Moeen is rubbish. Lyon is ten times better

2015-06-01T05:54:59+00:00

Clark

Guest


Your spinner is definitely not better.

2015-05-31T02:48:53+00:00

Fitzy84

Guest


Where have u got your info about fringe talent in nz from I have heard there are 3 young bats who look really good averaging over 40 in fc cricket

2015-05-30T10:27:34+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Ah Don Freo., A burning light from the dark side.

2015-05-30T07:21:25+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Yw bf, your old mate Don Freo probably would of came up with that info for you if he was available but I've had to step up in his absence.

2015-05-30T01:13:40+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Saw that item Armchair. That's why I said what I said. But hey thank you for your interest ensuring I've got all the information. Appreciated. In some ways I'm more interested in that tour than the Ashes because of the personnel available. Some great young prospects there. Should be entertaining. Up to four or five of these 'kids' could be in the test side by mid 2016.

2015-05-29T21:45:21+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Bf, I just read the Kawalja article there under series and tournaments and it said there will be 2 four day games and 5 one day games but the dates are yet to be finalized.

2015-05-29T20:23:47+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Thanks Armchair. But it seems that though the tour is set down for July 20 to August 18, there are no set dates as yet for the specific matches Aus A vs Ind A or is there information I havent been able to access?

2015-05-29T17:27:28+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


cricket.com.au under series and tournaments bf.

2015-05-29T16:29:24+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


The other issue with the Warner king hit was the implication that it was originally swept under the carpet because he's a good mate of Clarke and it was only a month or 2 after 4 players were suspended for not doing their homework.

2015-05-29T12:41:35+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Ronan just diverging. Where the heck do you find information on the Australia A matches to be played in India this winter and when do they happen. Cant seem to find details anywhere.

2015-05-29T11:53:03+00:00

Birdy

Guest


I think it's more to do with the fact that the cupboard is fairly bear. If there was a 3rd quick who could bowl England would pick him if he held the bat at the fat end.

2015-05-29T11:13:00+00:00

Matt

Roar Rookie


The fact that he looks absolutely clueless at times and yet still has a 45 average on mostly green tops would make me want to persevere with his talent. The fringe talent around NZ is not particularly good - take Guptill for example, a potentially damaging white ball cricketer but not solid with the red.

2015-05-29T05:06:48+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


bell the cat, verb

2015-05-28T15:29:02+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Still averaging 45 which for an NZ player is top shelf, but he does look scratchy right now

AUTHOR

2015-05-28T12:31:16+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Wood impressed me. Not only did he hit 151kmh, which is rare, but his first spell was consistently 144-150kmh, which is intimidating for the batsmen. That's one thing Eng have missed for a long while, they've had no one who shakes up the opposition batsmen. He also could have returned much better figures than he did...bowled well and had no luck until he took his first wicket with about 75 runs conceded. I get the feeling that batting ability has played too big a part in Eng picking their 3rd quick the past 12 months or so and that has hurt them.

2015-05-28T11:47:58+00:00

Stephen Martin

Guest


Understandably overlooked in all the fuss over Stokes, Cook and Root, England will have been delighted by the debut of Mark Wood. They have been over-dependent on Anderson and Broad since the retirement of Swann, Finn's collapse in form, Bresnan's injury problems and the failure of young players like Woakes and Jordan to step up to the level required in tests. To have a good county player like Wood come in and bowl 90/145 off a short run with good variations in his debut is a very optimistic sign in the area where England are weakest. Stokes is a guaranteed starter thanks to his batting, but he hasn't yet developed control to go with his natural aggression. Moeen enjoyed (surprising?) success against India last summer, but hasn't looked test class since. Still, England will be much happier if they think they have three-quarters of a match-winning attack rather than just a half.

AUTHOR

2015-05-28T10:33:31+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Yep Birdy it was handled extremely poorly by the Australians and, the event itself was shocking on Warner's behalf. He is an extremely strong guy, had he hit Root clean who knows how serious it could have been. Watson has come out of the incident as a bit of a "dobber" but the reality is that the management needed to know what Warner had done and to punish him for it. Arthur's penalty was laughable whereas the harsh one later handed to Warner by CA was fair and, in fact, just what Warner needed, a real wakeup call.

2015-05-28T09:25:31+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Zim Zam, the 'brave Davey' bit was a response to Nudge, I never suggested that the Aussies themselves spun it this way. Ronan; however there was some unpleasant spin regarding the implication of 'racism'. When the story broke 'unattributable sources close to the management' let it be known that Warner was incensed at what he saw as racist behaviour by Root. This conveniently dominated coverage in the Aussie press for a day or two. When Warner and the Aussie management were directly questioned about this in England it all disappeared into the ether. I always thought the ECB should have taken this further. Not the incident itself, but the blatant attempt at media management based on trying to sully a young player's reputation. It's this, rather than a bit of push and shove in the pub, that made Warner public enemy number 1 in England.

AUTHOR

2015-05-28T08:20:51+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Young blokes having a few too many and one taking a swing and a miss you can move on from". My understanding is Root and Warner made up swiftly and the staff and players from both Eng and Aus who witnessed it did not report what happened to anyone higher up. It was Watson who days later sparked the investigation by CA after making a veiled comment to Mickey Arthur. Arthur asked around, found out what happened and put Davey on a last warning. CA chief Sutherland was livid that this penalty was too weak and put in motion events that saw both Warner banned and Arthur sacked.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar